Hoi,
I added Dutch labels. How can I refresh the data ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 19 May 2015 at 12:54, Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
Trying (on my user subpage!) Wikidata-based lists with {{#property}}
instead of fixed text:
Hoi,
From a Wiktionary point of view they are not the same. Wiktionary links
articles that have the same spelling in common. For every meaning in every
language they link to the articles that have a specific spelling and it is
potluck if that meaning actually exists.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 14
Hoi,
This is in other words what my question amounts to. The question that Denny
does not answer.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 15 May 2015 at 01:11, John Erling Blad jeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like this is doable, and it does describe a solution to how
Wiktionary can be linked form Wikidata. It
Hoi,
What is your definition of a language and, if it is not along the lines of
the ISO-639-3, how are they organised.
One of the first things to do is understand how these languages can be
incorporated in Wikidata and prepare for that. Do you have a list with all
the languages and hopefully
up of that analysis can
be found here:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Comparison_of_Projects_and_Proposals_for_Wiktionary
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:46 AM Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
Please do appreciate that OmegaWiki, originally WiktionaryZ, really
for statements on Lexemes and Forms, as the proposal
states explicitly.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:25 PM Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
Given the opposition to having statements on the level of the label, it
does not make sense to have Wiktionary included in Wikidata.
Thanks
Hoi,
Please do appreciate that OmegaWiki, originally WiktionaryZ, really wants
to be considered in all this. It is the grand daddy of Wikidata and it does
combine everything you would want as far as lexical data is concerned.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 8 May 2015 at 18:18, Denny Vrandečić
, John Mark Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Would it not make sense to FIRST finish a few things.. Like Commons and
Query ?
One of the primary things Wikidata was supposed to do is manage
,
GerardM
On 7 May 2015 at 12:03, Smolenski Nikola smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
Citiranje Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
The interwiki links to Wiktionary are from an interwiki point of view
EXTREMELY easy to do. The problem with those links is that they cannot be
uniquely linked
on Lexemes and Forms, as the proposal
states explicitly.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:25 PM Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
Given the opposition to having statements on the level of the label, it
does not make sense to have Wiktionary included in Wikidata.
Thanks
Hoi,
Given the opposition to having statements on the level of the label, it
does not make sense to have Wiktionary included in Wikidata.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 8 May 2015 at 06:19, Denny Vrandečić vrande...@gmail.com wrote:
I would disagree with requiring the Wiktionary communities to change
Hoi,
Would it not make sense to FIRST finish a few things.. Like Commons and
Query ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 May 2015 at 04:54, Denny Vrandečić vrande...@gmail.com wrote:
It is rather clear that everyone wants Wikidata to also support
Wiktionary, and there have been plenty of proposals in the
...@gmail.com:
I'll all with you, on this, unfortunately only a few people reads IPA
currently :(. I don't, for example.
2015-05-02 15:19 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
When the point is to express how an official name is to be pronounced,
IPA is in order
are
multilingual and should provide users in all languages an idea how the name
is said.
Best regards
Bene
Am 01.05.2015 um 07:14 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi,
It is still a bad idea. An official name exists only in one language.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 April 2015 at 18:50, Thomas Douillard
Hoi,
It strikes me as another example of a search for perfection where we do not
even cater for what is good. Our priorities should be with what is common
and present it well not with a game of trivia that upset showing what is
good and common.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 April 2015 at 18:33, Paul
in the original language together with
a transliteration in the user language. I don't understand how it could be
a bad idea.
2015-05-01 7:14 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
It is still a bad idea. An official name exists only in one language.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 April
language, the same reason we
translate the UI,, the help pages, the Wikipedia articles and so on.
2015-05-01 16:40 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
A name in a script that does not make sense to you is a standard to what?
Do not put yourself at the centre of the galaxy
Hoi,
You rest your case Fine. You do not address the point that an official name
is exactly that. It is the name as used by authorities. Typically it is
what is used in registers, in passports. You do not have those for your
convenience in any language. It does not matter what you can read or not.
myself understood ? I'm beginning to wonder ... :)
2015-05-01 19:47 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
You rest your case Fine. You do not address the point that an official
name is exactly that. It is the name as used by authorities. Typically it
is what is used
.
Joe
On 30 Apr 2015 06:13, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
We transliterate every name from one script to the other. Transliteration
the official name is exactly the one you should not transliterate.. What is
left after transliteration is not official.
Thanks
the transliteration in a
qualifier.
Joe
On 30 Apr 2015 06:13, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
We transliterate every name from one script to the other.
Transliteration the official name is exactly the one you should not
transliterate.. What is left after transliteration
Hoi Romaine,
Great news :)
I would personally love it when the Dutch Wikipedians look after their
dead. It does not get my eye and I think it is important to know at least
about the recently dearly departed.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 April 2015 at 01:07, Romaine Wiki romaine.w...@gmail.com
sense really. If
you use ISO for Russian names in Cyrillic script, the label you get is
not in English. It's still in Russian but transliterated to Latin
script. ISO thus would only fit as an alias for the Russian interface
language, if at all.
2015-04-26 22:39 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen
Hoi,
There are two ways of doing that.. You can assume given average age and
date of birth in what century someone died. This is something you can
specify or you can state that the date of death as unknown. Now that IS a
valid way of doing this. However it does not mean that 17th centrury people
Hoi,
It would make sense to have a bot run and add dates of novalue for dob dod
where we know that people must be dead.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 April 2015 at 08:54, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
There are two ways of doing that.. You can assume given average age
Hoi,
Let us be clear that what whatever Wikipedia does is for that Wikipedia to
decide. It does not follow automatically that it must be the label for that
language..
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 April 2015 at 14:22, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2015-04-23 01:21, Stas Malyshev
Hoi,
grin ISO is a reliable source; it is THE standard /grin Wikipedia is
definitely not a standard by its own admission.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 April 2015 at 22:37, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
On 2015-04-26 22:33, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi
My point
Hoi,
I regularly query for for instance claim[31] ie any instance of whatever...
I would also query for the existence of a date of death in a similar way.
for me a claim with a whatever it is that says that there is no value
would be a positive result and I would not consider it for any
Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 26.04.2015 22:16, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I regularly query for for instance claim[31] ie any instance of
whatever... I would also query for the existence of a date of death in a
similar way. for me a claim with a whatever it is that says
wrote:
On 2015-04-26 22:26, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Let us be clear that what whatever Wikipedia does is for that
Wikipedia to decide. It does not follow automatically that it must be
the label for that language..
Thanks,
GerardM
This is fine with me, but using ISO is really
but is that not the point. ?
It is similar to a lot of referenced statements that when you check them
are NOT what is stated at all.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 April 2015 at 22:37, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 26.04.2015 22:28, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
It is a matter
recording ).
Joe
On 26 Apr 2015 21:40, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
grin ISO is a reliable source; it is THE standard /grin Wikipedia is
definitely not a standard by its own admission.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 26 April 2015 at 22:37, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru
Hoi,
When someone bothers to add a qualifier, it is most likely that it will be
done completely and well. It is NOT something that is automated. So a date
missing means exactly that. There is no known end date.
This notion that no value has value is fine except that it prevents tools
that rely on
Hoi,
Do I understand correctly that you cannot have results showing labels for a
given languages?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 April 2015 at 22:18, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
Hi all,
For many years, Denny and I have been giving talks about why we need to
improve the
Hoi,
Yes the link below is for Russian :)
On 23 April 2015 at 19:02, Nicola Vitucci nicola.vitu...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 23/04/2015 18:36, Gerard Meijssen ha scritto:
Hoi,
Do I understand correctly that you cannot have results showing labels
for a given languages?
Thanks,
GerardM
Hoi,
Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ? Having a
no value is imho understanding only a complication of saying nothing...
Why not say nothing in the first place ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 22 April 2015 at 21:52, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
that the series is other, we can state
no value follows Episode 2
Which means We're sure the series is other.
Otherwise this means Wikidata do not know, for some reason there could
be a following episode but noone updated Wikidata yet, for example.
2015-04-23 11:33 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen
the source B saying that X had no
child
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Lydia Pintscher
lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ?
Having
not apply.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 23 April 2015 at 11:37, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Sorry for being dense.. What is wrong with there being no value ? Having
a
no value
, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-04-09 8:29 GMT+02:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Because the battle of Stalingrad as a battle was not fought by modern day
Russia, it was fought by the USSR and Nazi Germany. Associating the
battle
of Stalingrad
of
Wolgograd.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 April 2015 at 23:27, Roland Cornelissen metamatter...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 05-04-15 16:10, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
It does not make sense to couple coordinates with countries... The battle
of Stalingrad for instance was firmly in the USSR
Hoi,
Reasonator is read only in the sense that the display does not update
itself when you make an edit from it through Widar. Even that is not
strictly true; the label of the article itself will update when you add a
label in your language and once it has been included in Wikidata.
I really
Hoi,
When you look at Wikidata itself, it is very much a jungle of unsorted
data. This has been recognised and a different layout of the information is
in the planning. I am glad with your complaint because it shows that we are
maturing.. We have so much of a mess that it is largely
Hoi,
I do not follow ... A quote is exactly that ... it is not a place where
things that do not fit neatly are to be dumped.
What you need to consider is what the value is of mono-lingual text.. A
motto as used on a shield makes sense.. a quote maybe, the original name of
something surely... but
Hoi,
For me this is a dream come true. I very much do NOT want another million
edits. That is not to say that I would lose interest; I do not want to do
this.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 March 2015 at 13:24, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
I spent last few weeks working on this
Hoi,
I like where you are going a lot... GND is given as an example and for any
source including the GND we know things can be wrong as well. They
regularly are and there is a process in place for indicating where GND and
WP-DE differ. This works well because in time the GND does look and remedy
Hoi,
I have waited for some time to reply. FIrst of all. Wikidata is not your
average data repository. It would not be as relevant as it is if it were
not for the fact that it links Wikipedia articles of any language to
statements on items.
This is the essence of Wikidata. After that we can all
Hoi,
One thought, the majority of statements are not made at Wikidata but are
done using Widar or a bot. How will this affect these processes ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 February 2015 at 12:44, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
I like where you are going a lot... GND
Hoi,
Obviously you forgot about OmegaWiki. It can still do things Wikidata is
incapable of.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 February 2015 at 17:21, Markus Kroetzsch
markus.kroetz...@tu-dresden.de wrote:
Dear Gerard:
...
This is the essence of Wikidata. After that we can all complain about
that difficult for me to do for Wikidata what I did for
Freebase but I am not doing it because you aren't going to pay for it.
[... GOES BACK TO WORK ON A SKUNK WORKS PROJECT THAT JUST MIGHT PAY OFF]
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
I have
Hoi,
This is VERY exciting
Thanks,
Gerard
On 12 February 2015 at 17:26, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
wrote:
Hey folks :)
Since one of our frontend developers is transitioning to doing more
design work we are looking for someone to join the Wikidata dev team
to work on
Hoi,
It is pointless to include automated descriptions when they are then saved
in a fixed form. The point of automated descriptions is exactly that they
change as new statements are made. This is one reason why they are superior
to manual descriptions. The other is that when one label is added in
Hoi,
I understand that item descriptions are going to be used in a mobile app.
In my opinion that is seriously disappointing because it is not realistic
to expect enough coverage in any language. Particularly in the small
languages it will not be really useful.
My question is: we have had
, but as an
opportunity to find a way to fill item descriptions more efficiently.
Basically, to find some cycles to resolve
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64695
בתאריך 8 בפבר 2015 10:33, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
כתב:
Hoi,
I understand that item descriptions are going
Hoi,
Great to hear about the collaboration between Wikipedias :)
I do not use those buttons imho it is not worth it It is quicker doing it
all from Wikidata for me.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 January 2015 at 12:49, Robin Owain robin.ow...@wikimedia.org.uk
wrote:
Exactly, Fabian. We constantly
Hoi,
English Wikipedia is not Wikipedia. It certainly is not any other project.
I certainly do not want the policies of English Wikipedia. It is bad enough
for en,wp itself
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 January 2015 at 19:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider pfpschnei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wikipedia has
Hoi,
Markus, is there no public domain picture for you... Please let it be a
flattering picture.. and please add it yourself...
grin I love the argument people make when they want to imply that you are
not that good looking /grin
Thanks,
Gerard
Hoi,
You say this based on what? As far as I am aware Andy is right.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 January 2015 at 08:40, Jasper Deng jas...@jasperswebsite.com wrote:
@Andy: no, the terms of use *are* the minimum because since a user must
legally accept them when editing a project, everyone is
Hoi,
I understand why you used the pie notion however, Wikidata is more like a
3D ball [1]. A ball that is dense in places and more open in others. If
there is one challenge that we have to face and where we will find no help
elsewhere it is very much in the representation of our data in other
Hoi,
Absolutely. However, creating functionality that is useful in any language
for any subject beats considering templates that are useful for only about
one project. Also automated text is something beyond what templates may
offer or what Reasonator offers.
Reasonator and its approach is
to generate the
stub article.
2015-01-01 18:38 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
You do not make sense to me. A query is something I understand. What you
are saying about templates and list articles is very much wishful
thinking. It bears no relation to anything I know.
I
://tools.wmflabs.org/autolist/autolist1.html?q=claim%5B106%3A1028181%5D%20and%20claim%5B19%3A12892%5D
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
For the list Flemish surrealist painters there is no intersection
between Flemish painter or with Surrealist painters
Hoi,
For the list Flemish surrealist painters there is no intersection between
Flemish painter or with Surrealist painters. That list is in and of
itself an article in a Wikipedia. In Wikidata you want the two properties
separate so that you can be surprised with who fits in a list. It is not
your point, nor a clear answer. And I don't want to guess.
2014-12-30 15:59 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
Until Wikidata provides query functionality, any arguments about it are
without much merit. Until that time WDQ provides functionality. That
functionality can
Hoi,
With all due respect. We have something that works already in Reasonator.
It covers most if not all requirements that we can possibly think of. We
have gained a lot of experience in that way.. Why not implement it and
improve on it conform any potential additional requirements ?
Thanks,
that is already available to us.
Reasonator works now and anything else will take a LONG time before it can
be used.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 10:16, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote
.. sharing in the sum of all knowledge. The knowledge in Wikidata
is available knowledge to us so we do not have a valid excuse.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 11:38, Michał Łazowik mlazo...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
Wiadomość napisana przez Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com w
dniu 30
Hoi,
You also forget that it HAS been in use on several Wikipedias in the past.
So when that was no problem why is it a problem that can not be overcome
now and for now?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 12:15, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
They are mostly
cool that this feature is
not implemented right now :) And reasonator can follow its own path.
2014-12-30 12:28 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
You also forget that it HAS been in use on several Wikipedias in the
past. So when that was no problem why is it a problem
difference between
those two and the other organizations like the OMG, W3C, IETF, and FIPS
that publish standards for free and manage to somehow pay the bills.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi.
The fact that ISO has its standards
Hoi,
The Wikipedia article on the subject has probably most if not all relevant
details..
Thanks,
GerardM
On 30 December 2014 at 16:39, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
The most important people, as far as Wikidata is concerned, are the
Wikidata developers. As long
How could we model events in Wikidata ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 December 2014 at 09:49, Dov Winer dov.wi...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
Hi Sam,
CIDOC/CRM is the ontology of choice for Structured History
as it is anchored on modelling events.
An excellent project based on it is the
Hoi,
It is an assumption that Wikidata will not expect data from Freebase. It
has not been discussed, it may be correct. However, there are many really
important reasons why we should seriously consider the offer of accepting
much data from Freebase for inclusion in Wikidata.
The most important
Hoi,
As you know Amir wrote software to compare data in Freebase and Wikidata.
Currently there are students working on a similar approach with other
sources. Yes, we want sources obviously HOWEVER, the lack of sources should
not hold us back from having valid and valuable data. When data can be
Hoi,
Maybe. At the same time other people are equally opposed to what you favour
so much. Your approach is one that is very much Wikipedia oriented. It is
not something that makes sense with a more Wikidata oriented approach.
The point is that quite often Wikidata is more informative than what
,
James.
On 10/12/2014 10:11, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Maybe. At the same time other people are equally opposed to what you
favour
so much. Your approach is one that is very much Wikipedia oriented. It is
not something that makes sense with a more Wikidata oriented approach
Hoi,
This is the kind of good news that deserves a wider audience :)
Thanks,
GerardM
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2014/11/wikidata-is-opendata-winner.html
On 4 November 2014 20:50, Cristian Consonni kikkocrist...@gmail.com wrote:
Saw this now on Twitter:
wikidata vince
Hoi,
A category or a list includes entries that fulfill certain criteria. For
instance,many awards are given to humans, so we can define on the list is
a list of humanwith a qualifier award received Award name. Over 1400
categories have such definitions [1]. When you choose any of them, there is
the whole standard and
implementation stack? What makes you think Wikidata can do better than
RDF?
Martynas
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Hell no. Wikidata is first and foremost a product that is actually used.
It
has that way from
will be 2) is not supported by any other tool or
project and never will be?
I would understand this kind of reasoning coming from a hobbyist
project, but not from one claiming to be a global free linked
database.
Martynas
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs
Hoi,
Hell no. Wikidata is first and foremost a product that is actually used. It
has that way from the start. Prioritising RDF over actual practical use
cases is imho wrong. If anything the continuous tinkering on the format of
dumps has mostly brought us grieve. Dumps that can no longer be read
Hoi,
Well deserved !!
Thanks,
GerardM
On 28 October 2014 00:55, John Lewis johnflewi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Some exciting news here. The Open Data Awards' finalists lists were
recently published on their website. Wikidata has been listed as a finalist
in two different
-comparable wiki article).
I look forward to your comments.
All best,
James.
On 22/10/2014 06:43, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
When a position is taken that is manifestly wrong, it is worse to desist.
Andy I like you too but calling someone a dick because he does not agree
with you
Gross) to Alice Gross (a redirect).
Q(Alice Gross) would then no longer be sitelinked to an article about an
event; but instead would be sitelinked to a redirect.
Wouldn't that be a better state of affairs ?
-- James.
On 22/10/2014 12:19, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I do not consider
Hoi,
If this Jackson Douglas is the best that you can do, you destroyed the
argument that it has merit. Have a look at what Jackson Douglas brings you
in Reasonato[1]r !! When you read the article, Mr Douglas is mentioned as
the spouse of Alex Borstein. That is all. Mr Douglas has articles in
Hoi,
Maybe let a thousand flowers bloom ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 21 October 2014 08:05, Ricordisamoa ricordisa...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Currently, we have different styles: c:Category:Wikidata task forces
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikidata_task_forces.
What could a
a problem with that?
If so, what is your problem?
-- James.
On 20/10/2014 11:45, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
We do not support redirects. We do not support paragraphs.Wikidata is not
designed to support either.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 October 2014 10:39, rupert THURNER rupert.thur
Hoi,
Is this dump going to be cleaned up? Will the next dump be good? Why did
this go wrong?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 21 October 2014 17:02, Lukas Benedix lukas.bene...@fu-berlin.de wrote:
Different keys can still be found in the actual xml dump
wikidatawiki-20141009-pages-articles.xml.bz2.
not be a dick yourself..
Thanks,
GerardM
On 21 October 2014 21:21, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 21 October 2014 07:13, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
If this Jackson Douglas is the best that you can do, you destroyed the
argument that it has merit
is there on enwp, and a paragraph and a redirect to it is there on
dewp?
Rupert
On Oct 18, 2014 1:21 PM, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hoi,
As you correctly quote, one of the requirements is an article. So what
is your point ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 18 October 2014 12:52, John
Hoi,
I am totally happy for Wikipedia to have redirects. I do not mind as long
as it stops there,.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 20 October 2014 22:24, James Heald j.he...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
I think we have to look at what people actually use: overwhelmingly, that
is redirects, not labelled section
misunderstood what I was talking about.
I hope it is clearer and makes more sense to you now.
All best,
James.
On 16/10/2014 06:15, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I seriously fail to see how an example how Wikidata can be abused is a
good
thing. Redirects are imho seriously stupid
, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Just for arguments sake I have included the information about Mr Havell to
Wikidata. The result is certainly informative when seen from the
Reasonator. [1]
Any and all people known in the Creator template on Commons can and
should have a Wikidata entry. When you
Hoi,
As you correctly quote, one of the requirements is an article. So what
is your point ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 18 October 2014 12:52, John Lewis johnflewi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
One of the requirements
,
GerardM
On 18 October 2014 13:12, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 18 October 2014 08:15, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think I requested P1472, I forgot all about it. It takes so long before
The proposal was mine:
https://www.wikidata.org
was talking
about.
I hope it is clearer and makes more sense to you now.
All best,
James.
On 16/10/2014 06:15, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I seriously fail to see how an example how Wikidata can be abused is
a
good
thing. Redirects are imho seriously stupid. They are utterly
items
which redirect to other items?
Joe
On 17 Oct 2014 06:27, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
If there is something like a hatmaker, it can have an item even when
there is no article in the English Wikipedia about it.
When Mr Daniel Havell has no article, it still
.
I hope it is clearer and makes more sense to you now.
All best,
James.
On 16/10/2014 06:15, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I seriously fail to see how an example how Wikidata can be abused is a
good
thing. Redirects are imho seriously stupid. They are utterly Wikipedia
centric
Hoi,
Thanks :)
Gerard
On 15 October 2014 08:54, Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
wrote:
Hey :)
Update/next steps:
* We've investigated the edit conflict issues and found the cause.
* We're working on a fix for the edit conflicts. In this sprint.
* We're going to work on a
Hoi,
I seriously fail to see how an example how Wikidata can be abused is a good
thing. Redirects are imho seriously stupid. They are utterly Wikipedia
centric and they introduce new things that do not exist.
- a redirect page to three pages is also called an disambiguation page..
We do
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
