for it to be
blocked.
--
gwern
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe
mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
flat since the
number of editors isn't decreasing very much.)
Carcharoth
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We'll post a technical FAQ soon with some more info.
Erik
--
Erik Möller
VP of Engineering and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
Yes, I looked into it, and apparently being stupid* is popular.
*- defined as voting for things that are probably not in your own best
interests
On 17 January 2012 22:48, Javier Bassi javierba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am
On 4 November 2011 07:07, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
On 11/03/11 7:36 PM, Alan Liefting wrote:
On 3/11/2011 10:45 p.m., Ray Saintonge wrote:
On 11/02/11 3:38 PM, Ian Woollard wrote:
I'm thinking that the problem here is inline references. An inline
reference is one where
think that's a
lot of the battle when editing. I think it's the inline references that are
the main problem.
As in, you wouldn't force people to not use inline style to insert
references, but it would just get automatically adjusted to the
site-preferred format.
- d.
-Ian Woollard
Good.
Do it then.
On 2 November 2011 22:42, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 November 2011 22:38, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm thinking that the problem here is inline references. An inline
reference is one where you plonk the reference in the middle
such additions or alterations to
the structure of the Project require.
Marc
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian
get such a body established in the first place in the
Project?
Marc
on 10/28/11 3:01 PM, Ian Woollard at ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
The flaw isn't the oversight body, it's the almost complete lack of
policies
about 'crime and punishment'. It's not leadership; having a leader is
very
a tenth that size it would be put up on
the noticeboard and then get gratuitously chopped. And I'm not talking about
spam links here.
Carcharoth
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing
to gang up on the editors. Then we give them unlimited
power over editors and make sure that there's virtually no policies or
guidelines that relate to severity of punishment.
What could *possibly* go wrong???
Charles
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l
away from quantity towards quality.
Carcharoth
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
and rebalancing things.
So you're saying that sometimes people rewrite articles, and this
contradicts my point how?
Carcharoth
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
/Research:Wikimedia_Summer_of_Research_2011/Summary_of_Findings
Oh wait:
[verification failed]
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
it, move it to a different name and change the topic.
Bodnotbod
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
voted each score is a bit more interesting. If
it's bimodal, with two peaks, then that often tells you something.
But the tool doesn't currently give you that, it probably should.
Tom
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
term should
inherit another's link juice, but I couldn't see any obvious way to
nofollow internal links when I checked briefly.
--
geni
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
at the top of the google
listings, and we haven't done anything odd, then that's perfectly
fine.
Andreas
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
to sources.
But that doesn't seem to be what's happening here; I don't see signs
of breach of NPOV.
Andreas
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org
periods for
what appears to be a victimless 'crime'.
So I actually don't feel sorry for him at all, in fact he really seems
to have deserved it.
Fred
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing
of the size it ought to be, and if the article was allowed to
grow, that material would not have been removed, because it would have
been proportional.
There doesn't seem to be any protection against this in the policies at all.
I think that needs to be fixed, or at least, addressed.
A.
--
-Ian
.
It's a *good* idea to include things that are actually *wrong* like
Otto Middleton as it gives us a place to point this out.
A.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit
, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien
on it. ;-)
--
geni
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
in a very big ocean.
Basically, what matters here is readability and usefulness.
Charles
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
from the random feature.
There needs to be a cut-off and the word we're looking for is 'merge'.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org
, anyway.)
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing
.
Carcharoth
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
at the enWP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
.
Or is it because writing well is difficult, and writing accurately is
difficult, and writing well AND accurately is difficulty squared?
Nah, that would be ridiculous, it's just obsessive nerds who are broken; of
course.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l
although even that is looking perhaps very slightly pessimistic, but
it's too early to be absolutely sure.
But we can certainly I think, say with some justification, that the
extended growth model is significantly off the mark.
Carcharoth
--
-Ian Woollard
On 15 February 2011 04:33, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 February 2011 04:00, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, so I stop there. Even 40 million appears completely
unsupportable. It looks like it's off again by about another order of
magnitude.
Oh really?
Yeah
On 15/02/2011, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 February 2011 16:19, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, really. That page claims we only have 3% of notable Poles. Are you
really, seriously, telling me we only have 3% of ALL notable
biographies???
Because that's what that page
, of
course, but perhaps not always.
Newyorkbrad
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 14/02/2011 03:35, Ian Woollard wrote:
I think you can't take the simple percentages of articles, a lot of
the most important and well visited
, and seems to be two
orders of magnitude too high.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
to a casual reader, but would not overall provide a complete
picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is
needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
On 14/02/2011, Newyorkbrad newyorkb...@gmail.com wrote:
{{sofixit}} :)
fixin' the Wikipedia - brb
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org
at Boulder
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
of the biography, and can
treat anything they say accordingly, if it was just a random web page
then we don't even have that.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
?
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
number of articles, that don't exist. Even if they're linked from a
template, they're still likely to be fairly important to be in a
widely used template.
And google would probably tend to consider these articles as important
if they existed.
Cheers,
Magnus
--
-Ian Woollard
creating a POV!
--
David Goodman
DGG at the enWP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit
leadership. Things that aren't traded, don't require
leadership, since consensus will very typically do the right thing for
things that aren't traded off.
Fred
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
it.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
are based on summarising information culled from
paid-for sources. These sources are not generally available to people
outside certain closed groups of people, at least, not without paying
money, and except for recent works, who ever does that?
Carcharoth
--
-Ian Woollard
from what can be an *enormous* pile of positive
ones, and no regard is even usually made about how things turned out.
For this reason, the more contributions have been made, it's actually
a bad thing.
The upshot is, most people can get banned eventually.
/realist hat off
;-)
--
-Ian Woollard
some statistical analysis.
The problem is that a good encyclopedia, such as the Wikipedia, tries
to reflect reality and truth.
But reality and truth... have a well known liberal bias.
--
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com
--
-Ian Woollard
suppose at the moment, the admins are acting as a plaza, whereas
specialist admins may be more and more desirable.
-MuZemike
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
to the available sources), then the person with
expertise will be labelled as a trouble maker.
--
-george william herbert
george.herb...@gmail.com
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit
On 12 October 2010 20:11, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
... and having a piece of people that says you ought to understand
something
...having a piece of paper that says you ought to understand something(!)...
(it previously read something like 'having people that ought
, at the moment, that he's being pessimistic.
Still, in theory, a really good automated educational computer based
learning system could change all that I suppose, but I've never heard
of one that good.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN
or a reference to the newspaper
with the bad date? I did have a look at the article history a couple
of days ago but couldn't confirm it.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
.
That sounds like a much better idea, leaving brickbats around the
place for bad guys to trip over isn't stupid at all.
Carcharoth
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
On 18/09/2010, Tony Sidaway tonysida...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, perhaps an automated filter of some kind could be used to tag
edits like this.
It should be possible to use existing bots for this using the arcane
arts of 'regular expression' matching.
--
-Ian Woollard
, inevitably it's sometimes going to be done by
someone who knows exactly what they're doing, and the original editor
may have genuinely missed something obvious.
Expecting them to jump through arbitrary hoops doesn't seem very wiki-friendly.
-SC
--
-Ian Woollard
is to do this *without* their wiki descending into absolute,
total chaos, because if that happens nobody will read it and it won't
be worth anything for advertising anyway.
In principle, Wikis are stable enough to handle this, if you enforce
NPOV and verifiability.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
, and then it would close and over
(say) a couple of days or so the jury would vote on it.
FW
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
-study for some academic.
(this is evaluating your arguments, rather than an opinion on whether
what they argue for is good or not)
That's perfectly fair enough. It may even be that it's not a good
idea. The principle of unexpected consequences and all that.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
On 27/08/2010, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 August 2010 02:01, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
I would expect that that could be done, but I'd have to think about
it. But if the process allows people not to check their biases at the
door, then that's a problem
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
We don't absolutely need admins at all.
If we used randomly chosen juries to make decisions then we could use
bureaucrats or even bots to actually apply any decisions made.
That essentially avoids the 'who polices the police' issue.
--
-Ian Woollard
just need to show that the much larger
number of jury members would be available, you also need to identify a
benefit for this proposal, and that benefit would need to be more than
commensurate with the disbenefits that I've identified.
WereSpielChequers
On 20 August 2010 18:13, Ian Woollard
are actually dangerous?)
AFDs.
Having admins decide them gives inclusionists/deletionists too much
power to side with their friends in a nearly invisible way. Not only
can AFDs be vote stuffed, but admins can then decide to follow the
'majority'.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
ones. Solving those is an orthogonal problem. (Though the act of
deletion is easily reversible, so is a power it would be safe to grant
widely. Viewing deletia, OTOH, may not be; that said, oversighting is
pretty efficient.)
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
merits of an article.
The point is that the random choice of the jury allows for a straight
vote among the jury. Right now, there's odd stuff going on sometimes.
WereSpielChequers
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
the reader expects when they read
the article.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
on any article, which is why flagged revisions seems a reasonable
idea, rather than locking.
- d.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
you can do: fix the definition of reliable source.
Or, isn't this the point of IAR?
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
I'm pretty sure that the main solution to this is to make the wiki
experience better, not trying to specifically treat people that are
getting frustrated's experience better.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
/listinfo/wikien-l
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l
don't like forks. That isn't the problem. The problem is the people
that DO like forks.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit
/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
-Ville Heiskanen
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
honest, I don't think anyone knows, it will probably
depend on what policies are built around it.
-MuZemike
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
.
That's why it's supposed to be about who has identified the valid
policy for deletion or keeping it. You can't stuff the vote by
identifying valid policy.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
ended up getting
perma-banned.
-Phil
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
puppet abuse is covered by policy also, using a sock to
repeatedly remove references will certainly get you blocked, as this
individual involved found out.
I would argue the other way- sticking to English-only references is
unequivocally harmful for the project.
-Phil
--
-Ian Woollard
.
That's not quite true, you are allowed to add references to material written
in foreign languages, and I've seen it done a few times.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VER#Non-English_sources
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
--
-Ian Woollard
disappearing off
watchlists.
Right now there's no guarantee that the edits have been reviewed at
all, and flagged protection should at least give that level of
guarantee.
WereSpielChequers
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
On 13/05/2010, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com
wrote:
Under firefox, the new search box is quite buggy actually. I just
tried typing really quickly into it on a slow machine, and ended up
with only half
On 14/05/2010, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 May 2010 21:21, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it's a horrible, horrible bug in the search box.
To be honest, I think this bug should have gated the release; about
50% of the page hits go through this one box, and it's
said (nowhere useful). Only one out of
three times did I end up at the right page, and it clearly wasn't
simply my typo since I didn't touch the back key.
AGK
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
some of the sponsors of the Wikipedia, and Fox newspaper has
been deliberately seeking them out, and trying to persuade them not to
donate any more money:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/may/10/ipad-apple
AGK
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l
to be.
I think we're writing for everyone, although ironically the 'pedia'
bit of Wikipedia and encyclopedia refers to children (as in PEDIAtric
doctors- children's doctors)!
Encyclopedias were actually mostly intended to educate children.
-- Phoebe
--
-Ian Woollard
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
with new
knowledge; but IMO it will probably be mostly dealing with new
knowledge within the next year or so.
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org
On 28/03/2010, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com
I think a lot of people get involved to write new articles. It looks
like 2007 was 'peak oil' for new articles; after that it was getting
harder to find new
/programmes/p00542f2
Carcharoth
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
-Ian Woollard
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo