I also want to say something good. I think the fact that the
fundraising team is using multivariate analysis instead of simple A/B
testing now is beyond good, it's just spectacular. A/B testing was
excruciatingly slow, and this is a huge advance. I hope it means that
all the banner text
If all the people in favour of filters had spent their time building them
rather than arguing about them, we would have had a wide array of different
solutions, without any politics or drama.
That said, if people want to filter Wikipedia, a client-side solution
rather than a filtered mirror
Why when we talk about editor engagement we think exclusively about new
editors? How about retaining people, who already made Wikipedia (= the
product) and keep maintaining it?
Retention of people who have made dozens of edits is about the same as
it's ever been. Retention of people who've
to active status, having made more than 50
edits each after having gone at least six months without editing.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
Apparently I am moderated on wikimedia-sf.
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:56 PM
Subject: Fwd: [altmetrics:21] SF hackathon
To: San Francisco Wikimedians wikimedia...@lists.wikimedia.org
-- Forwarded message
How do you see the fiduciary responsibilities of the board playing into
fundraising targets?
The employees of the board share their fiduciary responsibilities.
Are you suggesting the Board has a duty to raise as
much money as possible?
No. When actual fundraising far exceeded expectations,
Costs don't scale linearly with pageviews. Nor do donations,
especially when you consider that much of that growth in pageviews now
comes from the 'Global South' (where people generally have less
disposable income to donate) and from mobile devices (which we don't
really fundraise on,
SJ,
Thank you for your reply:
Fundraising targets have been set to match our projected needs for the
year, for the past few years.
Does the very recent abandonment of several aspects of the Strategic
Plan, after the July 2012-3 Annual Plan goal was set at $46.1 million,
which itself was
I forgot that you are not able to edit Meta.
Because I was accused of violating the research policy by a staff
member who admitted some months later that there was no research
policy.
I will migrate the relevant
parts of the discussion here to the wiki, since a wiki is a useful place to
to comment.
For that reason I will be recommending specific community initiatives
during next year's Board elections.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
... As Zack noted earlier this month, banners are down until the end-of-year
push. This has not changed. From December 26 to Dec 31 we'll begin
showing banners again to everyone for a final push to the year end goal.
Your posts are assuming a ridiculous degree of bad faith, where you
you start from your own confusion and extrapolate downwards
we've stopped fundraising this year -- December 21
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fundraising_2012diff=4885494oldid=4884949
we're hoping to
paying about four times as much interest. It is unclear
from the auditors' statements whether you accomplished this. Did you?
Sincerely,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
Another thing I want to point out, because I just noticed it. The
recent years' yields on bond funds has been slightly higher than
equity (stock) mutual funds, but with only a very small fraction of
the volatility:
http://news.morningstar.com/fundReturns/FundReturns.html?category=$FOCA$HY
I'm
On Thu Dec 27, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Samuel Klein meta.sj at gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:18 PM, James Salsman jsalsman at gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Zack Exley zexley at wikimedia.org wrote:
Maximizing for us means raising our budget
with as little negative
investments were
expected to perform below the rate of inflation when they were
purchased.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
How about for the April fundraiser, instead of setting a dollar value
goal, we agree to use multivariate analysis instead of A/B testing to
optimize the messaging from volunteer submissions in advance, then run
the whole thing for a fixed time frame, say three weeks, and then use
the actual amount
, and could be a disaster...
What are the possible failure modes?
On Dec 28, 2012 9:46 PM, James Salsman jsalsman at gmail.com wrote:
How about for the April fundraiser, instead of setting a dollar value
goal, we agree to use multivariate analysis instead of A/B testing to
optimize the messaging
about how to account for that other than to do a multivariate
test shortly before beginning fundraising in earnest.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Matthew Walker mwal...@wikimedia.org wrote:
James,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:11 PM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean as in the tests
than editors and the
public would not overwhelmingly support such an action in support of
income equality? I intend to find out.
... it would be irresponsible of us to try to keep up with the
average Tech company, as James Salsman had suggested.
Leslie, the most frequent cause of bankruptcy
Michael Snow wrote:
... You think that having people mortgage their future and simply
giving them more cash, which they don't ultimately enjoy other
than to pay loans at distressed interest rates, is a greater benefit
to them than providing the best insurance coverage we can offer?
No, I
Pine wrote:
...
I think Erik addressed your question about pay in a way that is very
reasonable and I would ask you to re-read his comments
Thank you very much for asking me to do this. I overlooked the video
mentioned in Erik's comments and I see now that it may be the root of
the problems
Aaron explained how he originally measured Wikipedia contributions:
http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/whowriteswikipedia/swartz2006 -- which is
only linked through the bibliography he kept up on the topic
http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/whowriteswikipedia/ which is linked at the
end of the main essay. Less
MZMcBride wrote:
...
Given the mention of global citizen journalists in the blog post, I was a
little surprised to not see a mention of Wikinews. Some collaboration
between the Wikinewsies and the Global Voices folks might be good to
explore. (I'll admit that I'm still somewhat trying to wrap
Philippe Beaudette wrote, in response to:
...
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Reporter_Reimbursement_Program
...
I'm not sure that link makes the point you wish to make, James.
For instance, you note that it has NO supporting signups?
Per
At Stanford Monday afternoon; RSVP required:
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/law/forms/AaronSwartz.fb
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:43 PM
Subject: [opensource] The Legacy of Aaron Swartz - event at Law
School, January 28, 2013 12:45pm - 2:00pm
Event next
in the Ascent Advisor survey allowed. Since
it's only 25 minutes to office hours I better send this now and send
more information on how to do that later.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Andy Mabett wrote:
People could use AudioBoo, for example, if it had a Flickr-like way
for uploaders to open-license a recoding. I'ive reached out to them
suggesting that, with no luck yet.
The open source solution for voice recording with the largest
cross-browser and cross-platform support
Samuel Klein wrote:
... The person we find this time will also be through our community
and advisor networks
Will there be an opportunity for the community to pose questions to
finalists, the answers to which the Board might be able to evaluate in
making a final decision?
experience with editing or otherwise supporting
Foundation projects?
Sincerely,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
months… which is fair enough to some degree?)
(and to be fair: at this point, with all the experience I have within the
movement I would want to see most of these decisions researched before
committing to a point of view)
Jan-Bart
On Feb 18, 2013, at 9:19 AM, James Salsman jsals
This looks pretty substantial:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) hereby directs
each Federal agency with over $100 million in annual conduct of
research and development expenditures to
Where are the results of the current fundraiser testing?
And why has 2012 been deleted from
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Special:FundraiserStatistics ?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
I'd like to know more about the non-disparagement clause which
multiple people have stated that the Foundation's NDA includes. In
particular, does it forbid employees from discussing the fact that the
Foundation's policy of paying below market salary discriminates
against potential hires with
Jan-Bart de Vreede wrote:
... I do want to make sure you (and everyone else) realise that there is no
FACT like the one that you mention.
fact that the
Foundation's policy of paying below market salary discriminates
against potential hires with large expenses such as kids in college or
a
countries have to become before it would be
appropriate for the Foundation to advocate on the issue? Is it already
appropriate? Would it only be appropriate if the proportion of editors
leaving the project due to personal poverty was increasing? Would it never
be appropriate?
Sincerely,
James
geni wrote:
On 30 March 2013 20:57, James Salsman jsalsman at gmail.com wrote:
...
(A) Should the Foundation devote banner space on project home pages to
CISPA advocacy?[3][4]
(B) Should the Foundation devote banner space on project home pages to
CALEA advocacy?[5]
(C) Should
Hi Garfield,
Would you please find out how much the CFAA and CALEA amendements
would be expected to cost readers, editors, and the Foundation
compared to what SOPA or PIPA would have cost if they had passed, and
let the wikimedia-l and advocacy advisors lists know?
Best regards,
James Salsman
could
have cost, under what I believe is a very reasonable set of
assumptions.
If Sue or Garfield share your opinion that the question is
unanswerable, please let me know right away. Thanks again.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
On Apr 13, 2013, at 5:03 PM, James Salsman jsalsman at gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Marc Pelletier wrote:
On 04/13/2013 07:25 PM, James Salsman wrote:
In short, the CFAA amendments alone would likely cost readers, editors,
and the Foundation more than 500 times as much as SOPA or PIPA could
have cost, under what I believe is a very reasonable set of assumptions.
{{cn
people more and took my advice about statistics more often,
i.e., on using multivariate analysis instead of A/B testing.
In any case, I hope you are well. Please visit the interstellar
sleeper ship prototypes in the Lagrange Point region in Second Life
when you get the time.
Best regards,
James
Kul Wadhwa wrote:
Microsoft with other partners has also been working on bringing broadband
to Kenya (and ultimately other African countries) via white spaces
However, every party has their own agenda so hopefully competition lowers
prices and gives people more choices. And having many
Mathias Damour wrote:
The only sad thing is that it won't be launched in other languages
There is a longstanding proposal to create simple language Wikipedias
in languages other than English and France, but it remains to be seen
whether it is compatible with the current narrowing focus
Where is the draft Annual Plan referred to at 1:02 of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoCEj5AOrFA ?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
If we transcoded the stoplist would we still trigger censorship in China?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions/Archive_20#Mentioning_Wikipedia_on_Chinese_Skype_triggers_surveillance
All centralized authorities engage in misguided attempts to impose
on an
interpretation of Dan Pink's work which he and the secondary literature
both firmly reject.
Perhaps the elections and ED replacement will provide leadership who care
more about the evidence than suffering through having to admit that they've
been misguided.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:28 PM, James
Federico Leva wrote:
...
WMF will log the same (partial) data, but for 100 % of visits rather than
1/1000.
How much more will that cause the Foundation to spend on processing
subpoenas from law enforcement agencies? Will those agencies be
charged for the time and organizational overhead of
Do others feel that the letter to US Congress text at
https://optin.stopwatching.us/ (for which there does not seem to be a
direct URL, sorry) is appropriately worded?
I am far more impressed by the text at http://bestbits.net/prism-nsa/
which Jan Engelmann suggested on the Advocacy Advisors
Gayle,
Page 26 of the 2013-4 Annual Plan says that you have optimized Wikimedia's
value proposition [with] reasonable compensation near the mid-point of the
tech sector.
How much of a change to previous compensation scales pegged to the
nonprofit sector does that represent in percentage terms?
Luis Villa wrote:
...
we'll continue to look out for opportunities that make sense
ourselves, and of course the community should always feel
able and empowered to start things as well
The Foundation uses Google Drive/Docs internally. And extensively so,
right? Why don't you publish a
Robert Rohde wrote:
...
early evidence that VE makes new users less likely to edit [2][3]
...
[2]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:VisualEditor%27s_effect_on_newly_registered_editors/Results
[3]
Nathan wrote:
...
Because they are measuring different things? The first refers
to newly registered editors, which the second (judging by
your summary) does not.
You are absolutely right. This gives us a silver lining insight that about
80% of anonymous IP editors have the editing experience
Oliver Keyes wrote:
active editors == editors with [5/10/depending on standard] edits a
month. It's pretty impossible, at our end, for us to identify one person
between multiple IPs or one person between multiple IPs.
Why can't you use behavioral and expertise characteristics to measure
the
Erik Möller wrote:
...
we need to collectively figure out what a discoverable,
intuitive user experience should look like We're not
going to solve these challenges if we lock away VisualEditor...
Erik, I don't understand. Could you please explain how making the
visual editor opt-in only
Why not make the visual editor the default with opt-out for 5% of
newly registered editors and anonymous IP page loads, and opt-in for
everyone else until there is evidence that it is not decreasing the
number of edits?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
As much as I complain about the fundraising team's continued neglect
of the as yet unmeasured potential of the majority of the
volunteer-submitted banner messaging ideas, I thought it would be nice
to show the results of their latest experiment:
http://i.imgur.com/gDBvNSt.png
Note that the
Dario,
Do you intend to measure the total number of edits per day prior to
and after the visual editor roll-out?
It appears that you have not analyzed or presented any data associated
with those statistics.
For example, why are you not providing a daily version of the hourly
graph at
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Dario Taraborelli
dtarabore...@wikimedia.org wrote:
...
We do have a graph of total hourly edits on enwiki across mainspaces here:
http://ee-dashboard.wmflabs.org/graphs/enwiki_edits_api - it's trivial to
bin
by day and filter to the main namespace only, I'll
Steven Walling wrote:
... We know, for instance, that as the summer progresses,
editing activity drops and climbs again in the fall
How do we know that? According to
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm database edits
increased from June to July and fell from July to
MZMcBride wrote:
... the number of non-deleted revisions per day for the
English Wikipedia. The results are here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Permalink/565971356
So, that looks terrible: http://i.imgur.com/Z9lYCWj.png
It looks terrible in the same way that every other graph of active
Denny Vrandečić wrote:
...
Is the graph http://i.imgur.com/TfaD99V.png based on actual data?
Yes, the precise sizes for the
dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiki/MMDD/enwiki-MMDD-pages-articles-multistream.xml.bz2
files are:
2012-07-02 9524994664
2012-08-02 9824345489
2012-09-02 9929910893
follow FiveThirtySix will first regret it, and then end up
following it afterwards to prevent further such regret.
Also, congratulations to Megan and Lisa!
Sincerely,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
Nathan wrote:
... It seems that most of the data they
collect is wiped within 3 days; that the data itself can only be
analyzed under a fairly specific set of minimization rules
Are you referring to the 2009 Holder minimization rules which per
With the NSA revelations over the past months, there has been some very
questionable information starting to circulate suggesting that trying to
implement perfect forward secrecy for https web traffic isn't worth the
effort. I am not sure of the provenance of these reports, and I would like
to see
Ryan Lane wrote:
...
Assuming traffic analysis can be used to determine your browsing
habits as they are occurring (which is likely not terribly hard for Wikipedia)
The Google Maps example you linked to works by building a huge
database of the exact byte sizes of satellite image tiles. Are you
George William Herbert wrote:
...
It would also not be much more effort or customer impact
to pad to the next larger 1k size for a random large fraction
of transmissions.
Padding each transmission with a random number of bytes, up to say 50
or 100, might provide a greater defense against
Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
...
A minor random increase of size in document wouldn't even slow
down [fingerprinting.]
That's absolutely false. The last time I measured the sizes of all
9,625 vital articles, there was only one at the median length of
30,356 bytes but four articles up to 50 bytes
... random padding without (at least) pipelining and
placards *is* worthless to protect against traffic analysis
No, that is not true, and
http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2012/papers/4681a332.pdf
explains why. Padding makes it difficult but not impossible to distinguish
between two HTTPS
Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
...
http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2012/papers/4681a332.pdf
...
have you actually /read/ that paper?
Of course I have. Have you read the conclusions at the bottom right of page
344? What kind of an adversary trying to infer our readers' article
selections is going to
please address
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_cipher_modes_of_operation#Padding
Sure. As soon as someone creates
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunset_Shimmerso I can use an appropriate
example.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Anthony, padding in this context means adding null or random bytes to the
end of encrypted TCP streams in order to obscure their true length. The
process of adding padding is entirely independent of the choice of
underlying cipher.
In this case, however, we have been discussing perfect forward
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/517781/math-advances-raise-the-prospect-of-an-internet-security-crisis/
is another example of a very highly placed secondary news source casting
fear, uncertainty, and doubt on the value of industry-standard encryption
practices which is not only based on the
While the trickling release of Edward Snowden's revelations from bad to
worse in weekly incremental steps has been enormously effective in swaying
public opinion, it has made formulating a meaningful response very
difficult.
A few weeks ago we learned that the FBI has been purchasing personal
So, there has never been a copyright or privacy dispute involving any
actual radiology image, nor has anyone been able to find any evidence
of a hint of any such dispute. The law is silent on the question
because there has never been such a dispute.
Yet some people want to delete hundreds of such
of user referral log entries to the TAFI blurb?
Sincerely,
James Salsman
Oliver Keyes wrote:
No idea; if people have proposals...well, see above :).
On 29 September 2013 20:10, James Salsman jsalsman at gmail.com wrote:
They are really interested in finding ways to feed back
Geoff,
The inherent complexity and controversy of carbon footprints suggests
that you should seek assistance at the Teahouse before proceeding with
further editing on the topic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse
Tim Starling wrote:
...
The inherent complexity and controversy of carbon footprints.
What do you mean by that?
Even those who fight for inclusion of the facts about climate change
on Wikipedia aren't very likely to follow the peer reviewed secondary
literature when it comes to reporting the extent of changes in
previous paid advocacy successes. If this
were to become an ongoing effort culminating in name and shame
releases (We caught these paid advocates puffing up these
corporations' articles and blocked them) it could easily drive the
worst abusers out of business.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
if it
falls off at the same rate as the July test, that still means you
could produce an endowment sufficient to do away with fundraising at
current spending levels in less than eight months.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
/Fundraising_2013#July_.26_August_Update
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:12 PM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
If October 4th and/or 22nd had large donations because of one-time events
instead of regular donation appeal changes, why are they both bracketed by
vastly abnormally successful previous
.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Hi Megan,
If someone wants to donate the harvestable platinum from an asteroid, would
you please make sure that an appropriately progressive excise tax is paid
to the ufohastings.com
concerns? Thanks muchly.
On Dec 11, 2013 8:03 PM, wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Send
If people chose to opt into censorship then its a bit outside our remit.
For values of empowerment equal to very sincere well wishes.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Can we please stop paying the Microsoft and NSA taxes and start buying
datacenter equipment which costs a lot less? Cubieboard/Cubietrucks for
instance?
Ref.:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/catalog-reveals-nsa-has-back-doors-for-numerous-devices-a-940994.html
Best regards,
James
When this came up last time, it turned out that there was some kind of
a deal in place, and certainly many if not most published pictures of
the Wikimedia data center feature rows of shiny Dell logos. But Dell
does support Microsoft and the NSA, obviously, and also supports some
very creative
... Wikimedia Labs uses x86 hardware virtualization (just one example)
How does that tie us to x86?
http://www.eweek.com/servers/arm-server-chips-get-xen-virtualization-support/
... a conservative $200/server estimate
I have been recommending hardware which costs closer to $70 per
server
Jasper, if you can't write an email or pick up the phone asking for a
hardware quote without supporting the status quo of the Foundation
datacenter being a monument to the poster boy of corporate tax abuses,
Microsoft OEM bundling abuses, and NSA collaboration, I really can't
help you.
If you're
Jasper has tried to give you honest, useful information based on his
actual experience and expertise in the matter
It sure seemed like he was trying to imply that ARM servers cost more than
twice what they actually do, and that there is some vague reason that we
are tied to x86 because porting
Neither of Calxeda's articles gives a figure for capital cost
I think they went under the moment their first competitor charging typical
markups (Mitac) started shipping. Get some GFX servers and some of these to
do your own tests: http://www.mitac.com/Business/7-Star.html
you can't just plug
Why would we promote patent- and secrecy-encumbered formats when Google has
spent so much on opening WebM?
Also, why does the Multimedia Team care about video when most Wiktionary
headwords don't have uploaded audio exemplars yet?
Where are our priorities?
contrary to the peer reviewed secondary
literature, many examples of which still exist in the English
Wikipedia.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
common view among Stanford's
Hoover Institution-sponsored staff, their relatives, and alumni. See also
the proportion of Americans who disbelieve evolution, vaccines, and
radioisotope dating.
Best regards,
James Salsman
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote
... try to clone Sue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recurring_Futurama_characters#Cubert_Farnsworth
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_(2009_film)
Could the WMF strategy extend to creating a Death Star
to preserve all of human knowledge?
If Sue and Leonie Haimson were mutual
My suggestion of Leonie Haimson as co-director was most certainly not
frivolous, and concern trolling on comments made in the spirit of fun
to try to sideline consideration of her is offensive.
Erik and others, what has Ting accomplished that would make him a
better Director or Co-director than a
Craig Franklin wrote:
...
it would be grossly unprofessional for Erik, Jan-Bart, or anyone else
to publicly discuss the relative merits of people who may or may not
be involved in a confidential hiring process
No, the Board resolved to consult the community as necessary to
assist with
... Most people who are already in a current job are not going
to be willing to have open debates about the job opportunities they are
seeking. Not only because their 'boss' will know but also because if they
are in a public company that could cause large issues in the market etc
Do we
... we should consider it a strength in an individual to
refuse to consider applying for a position where every aspect
of their career and personal life would be microscopically
examined by thousands of people
What if the tiny fraction of people who were open to examination of
their merits
Jan-Bart de Vreede wrote:
...
a large part will never be contacted as a potential candidate,
simply because they are not close to matching the profile
Is the profile documented or subjective?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
How could you say no to a face like this?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kitty_meowing.jpg
Is that the same angst-offsetting kitten as on j.mp/heygooglers
?
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
participant driving the process schedule
(to the extent that human is skilled at it) but there are some very
attractive opportunities for e.g. Wikidata and maintenance bot integration
down the road if it works out.
Best regards,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia
1 - 100 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
