If only the first and only link in the thread you're following up on
contained pointers to dedicated journey and accomodation pages!
That would've made these questions so much easier to answer. Indeed,
it would've made asking them quite clearly rhetorical and intended to
passive-aggressively poke,
Personal opinion: as I recall, a big chunk of that scorn came from WMF
engineers. I appreciate it wasn't your intent, but the way you're phrasing
things here makes it look very much like you're saying 'hey, I bumped your
salary, throw some of your time my way' - which is not how it works. Ideas
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Srikanth Ramakrishnan
srik.r...@wikimedia.in wrote:
Where is anyone whining about this?
Nobody here is.
The point being made is about why other grants are not being accepted.
So, to summarise:
Please, let's stop complaining on the basis that this excludes
Indeed, although as I understand it he's going to be independent of the
actual Research Data team.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com
wrote:
Erik Moeller, 07/01/2015 20:36:
It’s my pleasure to announce that Tilman Bayer is joining the
Foundation’s
Well, yes. Was your clue the bit where it said English-language wikipedia?
Wikiproject-based things are incredibly difficult to generalize because
they're so dependent on project-specific nuances and setups. Wikidata will
change that, I hope, but it's not there yet.
On Tuesday, 13 January 2015,
A +1 to both Richard and Pete; Making editathons harder to put on is NOT a
valuable use of anyone's time.
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015, Richard Symonds
richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
I worry that running an auction and a raffle for each - or even some -
editathons would be a lot of
On the low or zero-cost element, the one bit I'd question is 'editathons
work well when attendees can buy their own food or attend a social where
they pay their own costs'.
This is certainly convenient for the chapter/volunteers/delete as
applicable, but I don't think we should have it as an
then you've, at best, completely missed the point I was trying to
make.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 14:33, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote:
...
expectations. So, yes, editathons work well when attendees pay their own
way - but they work /best
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:16 PM, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
when ticketed, this is usually to control numbers when
space is limited. This model works pretty well and makes them
popular events; indeed, they're one of our most visible public activities.
I don't see where the benefit
(Personal capacity)
Pine: I think you're reading far more into Phoebe's comment than it
actually contained. What she said was I trust our legal team to make
decisions about what legal actions to participate in. In other words,
to make evaluations about the probability of success, the necessity of
the positions of its elected officials. A mice toward more
openness about board discussions might ease some of my concerns.
Thanks,
Pine
On Mar 13, 2015 12:32 PM, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote:
(Personal capacity)
Pine: I think you're reading far more into Phoebe's comment than it
actually
This idea, I like it! And I think Yuri just volunteered to write the patches :P
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
On 2 March 2015 at 13:49, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote:
But if we're going to implement something, why not just..have timezone
Well, not all users have JavaScript. But, on the core of the proposal:
What threats? What users? How many, how serious? Have they been
reported to Legal and Community Advocacy? These are the questions we
tend to ask about this sort of issue. Do we need to insert technical
features to prevent it?
On Sunday, 22 February 2015, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
As some of you know, we are working on the project [1] with Matica
srpska [2]. Basically, that opens numerous possibilities and here is
one of them.
My professor, a Board member of Matica srpska and one of two
co-authors of
:02 AM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 14:55, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote:
We have a vested interest, as a community, in having as diverse a
group of people behind our content as possible, because we have a
diverse group of readers. People who can't afford a lunch out
I believe (correct me if I'm wrong, somebody) that it'd be Philippe (a Director)
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Robert Rohde raro...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik, thank you for everything you have contributed to Wikimedia over the
years. It has made an immeasurable impact, and whatever future
Have you considered that you might get a better response to your messages
if you - and this is just an idea drawn of idle whimsy, here - not spend
quite so much of them on an extended trip off the reservation in order to
attack and critique someone under their real name in public while hiding
any
Has there been work to determine the accuracy of our medical coverage
that's found it lacking? All the studies I've seen have said it's
pretty good, but that was a while ago, and I know anecdotally that
we've got a lot of work to do around, for example, womens' health
issues.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015
(volunteer hat on)
Glasgow to London in no way represents the scale of what any move,
even an in-US move, would be, unless the goal is for the WMF to end up
in LA or (maybe) Portland.
I would agree that a multi-location setup would work better as a good
expansion route here, although I'm not
I would like to clarify a fairly major premise of this conversation:
namely, the comment I made that Yuri quoted in the very first message.
When I say that the hierarchical organisation of the Foundation is
something that is preventing us from doing better, I was not thinking
of how we develop
in building a
fairer, more transparent and more representative governing structure.
All the best,
Oliver Keyes
Of these last 5 years, Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New
eep many of us sane
> with your wit through times strange and wonderful and awful alike.
>
> Take care of yourself and do good things!
>
> -- brion
> On Feb 23, 2016 3:36 PM, "Oliver Keyes" <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
e:
>
>> On 23 February 2016 at 15:35, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>> > I am leaving the Wikimedia Foundation to take up a job as a Senior
>> > Data Scientist at an information security company. My last da
+1. It's difficult without breaking fifteen NDAs to underscore exactly
how shellshocked and traumatised staff are right now, dealing with all
of this for 8 hours a day for 3-18 months, depending on the nature of
their concerns. As the people most impacted by negative or positive
changes to the
I'm agreed with Dan and Nathan (well, Nathan's implied point) both.
Right now we need stability. I'd much prefer an interim ED appointed
from inside the organisation or movement, ideally someone who has been
watching what's been going on. And then time for healing and
reflection in that space of
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:03 PM, David Emrany wrote:
> Hi Brion
>
> When you refer to patches with other movements / affiliates, are you
> proposing that WMF sponsors more Gibraltrapedias ?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibraltarpedia
>
> Have we forgotten so soon the
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Jimmy Wales <jimmywa...@wikia-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/29/16 7:00 AM, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>> > A few days ago, Oliver Keyes said[1] here on this l
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Jimmy Wales wrote:
> On 2/29/16 2:25 AM, Molly White wrote:
>> Thank you for your reply, and I apologize for how late this one is. When
>> I asked how you intend to speak with the Board of Trustees and with staff, I
>> did not mean what
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Chris Keating
<chriskeatingw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:58 PM, James Heilman <jmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Regarding to Oli
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 2:58 PM, James Heilman wrote:
> Regarding to Oliver's comment: "My concern is that when staff reached out
> the Board replied with a letter indicating they had full and unanimous
> confidence in our
> leadership."
>
> This statement is not really true. We
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Jimmy Wales wrote:
>
> I can't speak for Lila, nor should I try. But I know that for people
> new to our world, it's really quite confusing. You hear a lot of voices
> and if you've been around for long enough, you get to know which ones
>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Pine W wrote:
> I admit to being surprised by the depth of the division between the ED and
> staff that we are hearing about. Thanks to the Signpost and internal leaks
> we in the community knew about the low marks in the staff survey, but I
>
n the employees.
>
> It helps internal morale and external confidence in reforms.
>
>
> George William Herbert
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:30 PM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Pin
+1 to Keegan. I am glad you have spoken to staffers, Pete. I promise I
can identify at least 300 other people that fall into that category
too.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Keegan Peterzell
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Pete Forsyth
Anthony has hit the nail on the head here with "could be used to
punish or intimidate staff"; the reason I, at least, am uncomfortable
talking about the internal details here (beyond the obvious PR
elements for the Foundation) is that there's a lot of ongoing fear
about repercussions. A couple of
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:38 PM, phoebe ayers wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Anna Stillwell
> wrote:
>> +1 to what Oliver and Vibber said.
>>
>> The situation is still delicate, Jimmy.
>>
>> Staff are being extremely kind to one
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Theo10011 <de10...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am totally with Benjamin on this.
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "sorely under-represented perspective" or not, that kind of attitude
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I thought I was bringing a sorely under-represented perspective to the ED
>> > discussion on this list and wasn't aware I'd said or done anything
>> > inappropria
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:39 AM, GorillaWarfare
wrote:
> I would be curious to hear precisely what you hope to accomplish from your
> trip to San Francisco. How do you plan to communicate what you learn to the
> rest of the Board of Trustees, and to those who
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Yuri Astrakhan
wrote:
> Oliver, thanks!
>
>> In other words, the litmus test for me is: what happens when the socially
> and politically weakest person in the organisation has an idea?
>
> If we speak of a "product" idea, we have two
If I might provide at least my, minor, perspective: there is a big
difference between "perspective" and "dissent" and some of your
communiques.
People, particularly at the Foundation, are hurting a lot right now.
And the tone of your messages has been a lot of: justifying actual
people being in
If she'd lived, her book _wouldn't be so important to the entirety of
humankind_.
You have a feeling about what she'd do about it? You're putting words
in a Holocaust victim's mouth. For shame.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Tomasz Ganicz wrote:
> Well.. I don't think if
Just staff and former staff? Huh. You must be reading
wikimedia-that-doesn't-include-liam-fae-former-board-members-or-almost-anyone-else-l.
What's it like there?
To Risker's point; "don't beat up on people who have less information
than you" is a good principle. But so is "don't call people
I'm with Vibber too. I work in Engineering. This summary does not
represent my views, or the views of anyone I know.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Anna Stillwell
wrote:
> I'm with Vibber. He has seen things clearly.
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Gerard
I for one look forward to the open and inclusive educational
experience provided by people who collectively lose their shit when
presented with a highly improbable AI thought experiment[0]
[0] http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roko's_basilisk
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:03 PM, David Gerard
Aye, the user-assessment model is kind of interesting, but agreed.
When I think "who can explain complex things in relateable terms?", my
answer has never been (and will never be) Bayesians.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Craig Franklin
wrote:
> They have correctly
While I agree with people that it's an uncommon and exclusionary
phrase (and a confusing one!) it seems like Moushira fully
acknowledges this and is going to work harder on this sort of problem
in the future, for which I laud her.
If we want to have a general conversation about language choice at
Good luck, Katherine. Many of us are relying on you and have faith in you.
>
> Pine
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> \o/\o/\o/\o/
>>
>> So glad to see this wonderful choice!
>>
>> ...if we're gonna
\o/\o/\o/\o/
So glad to see this wonderful choice!
...if we're gonna have Katherine as the interim...do we really need to
find someone permanent? ;)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:05 PM, James Heilman wrote:
> A very positive move. Thank you Katherine for agreeing to step up and
I've been in the Wikimedia movement for over a decade now. I've seen
Wikimedia-l. I've seen internal-l. I've had death and sexual assault
threats show up in my inbox. And this, /this/, is genuinely the most
horrified I've ever been by any message I've seen yet.
This email is not a good faith
>
> David
>
> [1] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/13/wikimedia_coo_convicted_felon/
>
> On 3/10/16, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've been in the Wikimedia movement for over a decade now. I've seen
>> Wikimedia-l. I've seen internal-l. I've had death and sexua
Off the top of my head:
1. Because we have absolutely no idea, from the briefs given, about
the technological stack and how well it meshes with our existing
expertise as a movement, or the WMF's existing expertise as a
technical entity;
2. Because we have absolutely no idea, from the briefs
Featured Article, Good Article and point of view, in sequence. Hope that helps.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> Sorry but your alphabet soup makes it hard if not impossible to understand.
> I do not edit en.wp and that should not be a
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Employees have some righ
+1. There was an easy way to split the baby here; "the board has
confidence". Done. Simple. What the language actually used did, as
well as (now) betray trust and confidence, was induce the sense that
for all people said they were listening to staff, nobody was.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:39 PM,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Keegan Peterzell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Pine W wrote:
>
>> If the research results about qualities of effective managers have been
>> generally consistent for 30 years, then I wonder why so many
+1. I would also very much appreciate Patricio explaining whether the
"full confidence of the board" actually meant the full confidence:
IOW, that a vote was taken and everyone unanimously agreed that Lila's
continuation was the best thing.
I note that Patricio, despite being Chairman of the
nks,
> GerardM
>
> On 17 April 2016 at 22:13, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Gerard Meijssen
> > <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > Hoi,
> &
I'm honestly not sure what this thread is meant to achieve.
Might I suggest that if you object to the reporting you contact the author,
rather than drag their work in a largely-unknown internal mailing list?
It's likely to be more productive.
On Friday, 29 April 2016, Benjamin Lees
Chris,
Yeah, all I meant with my email was 'discussing whether Wikipedia is a
bureaucracy on *any* mailing list is likely to be further supporting
evidence to the average journalist' and have, since waking up and scanning
the new posts to the thread, reached pretty much the same state of...piqued
You're publishing on the main movement mailing list to complain about
another user and ask Jimmy a yes/no question?
This could've been handled with a neutral description of the background.
I'm not sure if you're in a position to be frightened by the comments of
long-term editors right now.
On
for the
participants involved.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Justin Senseney <jsens...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
&g
On Monday, 2 May 2016, Brion Vibber <bvib...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Oliver Keyes <ironho...@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > One element I can answer: no, it does not contain flash objects, flash is
> > not a tec
Honestly this is kind of a bewildering set of hypotheticals to me.
You worry wikimedia is gathering new data and maybe selling it to marketers
and maybe releasing it to the community, or not, or some of them, or all of
them, based on:
An edit titled 'fixed two errors in cookie names'
It seems like you can either deny James's knowledge of the technical/legal
overlap or ask him questions, but probably not both :p.
One element I can answer: no, it does not contain flash objects, flash is
not a technology included in the Wikimedia stack on account of it barely
being classifiable
+1 to that question, which is the biggest flag I have here.
"The highest standards of confidentiality" is nice but, as you note,
people presumably reached out to these individual Board members,
rather than the whole Board, because they felt the individuals could
be trusted a lot better than the
That didn't really identify any of the questions. You're suggesting
that counsel spend their time writing to agencies to ask about the
copyright status of programs with the intent of considering taking
them over, when we know almost nothing about them.
Since you've identified the people
It's not a reason to *dismiss* it, no, but it's definitely not a
reason to entirely reorganise our plans for organisational governance
in case it turns out to get traction at *some* point. And that's what
you're talking about here; making monumental changes to the timetable,
scope and demands of a
Yes, Jimmy is effective in his board role - unfortunately, well, have you
seen the threads about his behaviour in that role? If you instead mean he
is only valuable as an icon or media figure because of it you'll need a
better argument than a statement as if the claim is fact.
Also, no, the
So you're suggesting we don't find an ED for the biggest org in the
movement because there's a thread on a mailing list about spinning bits of
it off?
I think hiring an ED can be done safely. Spinning elements off the WMF is
something that has already been done, repeatedly, be it duties (the FDC,
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> So when as a result of your yihad the worst of what you imagine comes out,
> the most you have achieved is that you can say "this is why I think he is
> an asshole". Then what. It does not change a thing.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Pine W wrote:
> Ironholds, I think that you're taking a negative interpretation. It seems
> to me that any ED candidate is going to want to know what they're getting
> into before agreeing to take the job, and if forks are on the horizon --
>
.
415-839-6885, x 6643
phili...@wikimedia.org
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia
list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
be getting into work in the
next hour or so ... should have more detail then.
- d.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community
on the
internet. Kudos to the legal team for doing such a good job on these,
particularly the new Terms of Use :).
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
they were
purchased.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia
://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
, but more useful
than a life spent doing nothing.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
On 30 March 2013 20:57, James Salsman jsals...@gmail.com wrote:
As a more specific practical reformulation of this question, how bad would
poverty in developed countries have to become before it would be
appropriate for the Foundation to advocate on the issue? Is it already
appropriate?
.
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
.
Apologies for the TL;DR rant :)
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
On 10 April 2013 22:07, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Oliver Keyes, 10/04/2013 22:43:
Are you speaking of yourself here? :)
As opposed to, speaking as a staffer? Well, I work for Product
Development. So the chances of me giving binding policy statements on
privacy
/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
**board#Charles:_We_need_**
Internal-l.2C_what_do_you_**think.3Fhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2013/Documentation/Day_2/WMF_board#Charles:_We_need_Internal-l.2C_what_do_you_think.3F
Oliver Keyes, 11/04/2013 17:33:
[...]
Neither I do. I only asked if they *require
Förderung Freien Wissens
Lausanne, +41 (21) 34066-22 - www.wikimedia.ch
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product
-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Whoops; sorry, all! Evidently it was a mistake to go near my laptop before
my morning coffee :).
Please ignore me; I'll be dunking my head in a barrel of water to wake up.
On 18 May 2013 15:48, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Howie
The person doing the email screener was meant
://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
are saying being a volunteer is
a security concern?
rupert.
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
.
-- Tomasz
__**_
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.**org Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
--
Oliver
...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
On 14 July 2013 00:44, Lucas Teles salvadore...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is that [1] the photo? I was expecting something worse per the opening of
this discussion. It seems to be fine for me (in a manly way of saying a
photo of another man is fine), expect for the removal of Brandon's fingers.
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-request@**lists.wikimedia.orgwikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=**unsubscribe
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject
@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing
...@lists.wikimedia.org
?subject=**unsubscribe
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
I can't speak for edit volume, but in my spare time I did some research
around blocks and found that the proportionate decline in bad-faith related
blocks since 2009 is (quite possibly) edit-filter linked.[1] So, whether
there's a causal link between the edit decrease and the edit filters or
not,
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo