I use the Trendnet TEW423-BRP (I think that is the right number)
Mike Hammett wrote:
Too expensive for a home router. I do use them most everywhere else,
though.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
It's got a similar reset process to a Linksys, hold reset button while
cycling power.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott
Hot glue in the reset hole and a bit of black tape over it hides it enough
to discourage the resets. :)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:05 AM
To:
Probably the 432. I don't believe you can disable the routing feature to
make it bridge.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009
I have used these without problems.
http://www.encore-usa.com/product_item.php?region=usbid=2pgid=82_10pid=428
They have an option to do bridging, but I have never used it. They are not a
big name brand, but for less than $40 wholesale, I can't complain.
Scottie
-- Original Message
Who do you use as a distributor? We used to go with Ma-Labs but their
prices crept up too high on most of the things we purchased.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scottie Arnett
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 10:19
Why not instead load a default script onto the router so if the customer use
the reset button it reset to a working default mode.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:24:11
To: 'WISPA General
Mikrotik's don't get reset so you're solving a problem that isn't one.
Also Mikrotik RBs are too expensive for this application. If the 750 had
WiFi...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that
Not sure if Linksys has fixed it, but we determined a while back the
lockup problem with them was the lack of robustness in their power
supply. They work fine in the city where the electricity doesn't sag
or spike, but in the country they are always locking up. Wind blows
trees against
The old power supplies were decent and I still have them around here but the
new ones are small and pop easily.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 10:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Does anyone here lease space from Crown Castle? I have a cell tower in an
area I've been trying to find access in and this tower is in a good spot for
us and our tier 1 provider has fiber running right across the road from it.
Any idea what they charge and issues with them? Looks to be a big
Last I looked, 3 sectors and 2 2' backhauls would be $1800/mo+. For a
single sector and one backhaul it was still over $1000/mo.
-Kevin
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
Does anyone here lease space from Crown Castle? I have a cell tower in an
Answer to Rubens' post on September 18th.
Please let us know if you have any further questions regarding the
Winlink1000 or Radwin2000.
Matt Musial
Radwin, Director of Sales
Cell- 562-659-1358
Radwin's radios consists of 802.11a or 802.11n modem chipset wrapped up with
proprietary radio
Charles Wu wrote:
Hi David,
While I applaud your efforts in being involved with the broadband stimulus,
it is my understanding that MVN.net is/was applying for stimulus funds for
Round 1 -- maybe I'm missing something, but I can't figure out how you'd be
able to over-come the conflict of
That's just crazy money. I can put up a used 160' tower for 2 grand plus a
500 buck permit here. I decided to just look for some land. With that kind
of money it just makes sense to own and not lease around here. I have 3
towers in storage but have been hesitant to do much with them.
Thanks
I have found the leasing relatively cheap. The expensive parts are the
engineering studies, application fees, and the
almost-impossible-to-afford insurance you'll need before putting
anything on the tower. FWIW, Crown Castle is offering a Wispa
discount. They are waiving the site
I need to hang a pac grid and a MT 411 board and run a cat5 line up to it.
Seems like an engineering study is way overkill! :)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 11:11 AM
To:
411, with an atheros card, won't pick up non-atheros noise.
Canopy SMs on the other hand will. AWESOME spectrum analyzer tools.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
Ouch. Ouch. Ouch.
I see a potential conflict of interest issue here. An employee of a
large telecom company could be a volunteer who reviews applications
received from WISPs and rejects them. As long as the reviewer wasn't
"involved" in the large telecom company's application and the WISP
Hah...
Just wait.
They will need to know exactly what brand of antenna, case, and even
cat5e you are using.
Randy
Robert West wrote:
I need to hang a pac grid and a MT 411 board and run a cat5 line up to it.
Seems like an engineering study is way overkill! :)
-Original
Add to that installation and maintenance. Crown requires you use approved
contractors
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:21:24
To: 'WISPA General List'wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re:
I wonder how many large companies have paid their employees to be
volunteers???
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 11:26 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Searchable Map of Stimulus
Not too mention the fee for this and the fee for that and the feet
dragging and the fee they tell you about while you are installing and
the fact that your climbers have to certified by them and...
Never again will I lease from Crown.
Robert West wrote:
That's just crazy money. I can put up
Hi John,
I appreciate hearing your thoughts and I believe that I understand the
ISP concerns that new regulations may force ISPs to pass large or
unlimited amounts of traffic to the detriment of 1) other ISP customers
and 2) the financial well-being of the ISP.
Again the two main Network
http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html
In addition to the four classic Network neutrality principles, the FCC
plans to pursue two more. Quotes from the speech:
* The fifth principle is one of non-discrimination -- stating that
broadband providers cannot discriminate against particular
Crown Castle is one of the worst companies (think ATT) I have ever
dealt with. They dont know their right hand from the left. Dont expect
anything to get done, especially billing.
-RickG
On 9/21/09, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Does anyone here lease space from Crown Castle? I
They can pry my firewall from my cold, dead hands. -RickG
On 9/21/09, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:
http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html
In addition to the four classic Network neutrality principles, the FCC
plans to pursue two more. Quotes from the speech:
* The fifth principle is
That's the one I have issue with. That would cause me to think I need a 1
to 1 ratio on bandwidth or at least close to it. This one item brings the
cause for metered bandwidth to the top of my list of things to push for.
Honestly, I'd rather not meter the bandwidth just for the sake of image but
Isn't the 28th amendment the right to keep and bear firewalls?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 12:37 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The Net Neutrality speech we've
For everyone's info I have had a terrible experience with CrowneCastle as well.
However, you need to be aware that CrowneCastle is Now a Vendor Member Of
WISPA as of a few weeks ago. They were giving WISPA discounts at many levels.
Look into this if you are interested in dealing with them.
Well, early on it was a pain to deal with them, but after working with
them now we've been able to get things moving a little faster but cost
can suck. The engineering fee is BS but they won't budge on it; that
will set you back about $1800. Plus you need $10 Mil in liability
insurance if you
What about spam? Even though there are laws against spam would we be
breaking the law by blocking it if this law is passed?
Would we have to pass all content and allow all spam?
Then if we accidentally block something our system thought was spam but
was not we might really be in trouble.
LaRoy
LOL! Can we get that through congress :)
What is so sad is that the government claims thery want transparency
yet they do the opposite.
What I want to know from anyone here is what and how do you block
specific content. Thats for the hosting companies, not the access
providers.
-RickG
On 9/21/09,
I can't agree more.
Blocking (0 bits passed) is constitutionally wrong IMO. Since I can no
longer distinguish legal traffic from illegal traffic I have to allow it all.
Shaping/Throttling/Caps is not only 100% within my rights, but as an ISP is
prudent and a critical part of my business model
I read the Fifth as I cannot discriminate - meaning block this but not that. It
says nothing about shaping.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of David E. Smith
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 9:33 AM
To: WISPA
Yeah... But when the MT config gets accidentally misconfigured, its not easy
to walk the customer through reprogramming it, as it is with a linksys.
Its a double edge sword.
But, we've been thinking about using the MT as a home gateway simply because
the Linksys's crap out so often, and because
The FCC has said that you cannot de-prioritize any type of traffic. You
have to do it by prioritizing other types of traffic.
Jeff
ImageStream
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Monday, September
With the possible exception of Australia, I don't think anyone has a true
transparent internet. All governments, including the US, have their
blacklist.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, September 21,
If you're rate limiting in a neutral way, why would it bring your
network to its knees? Doesn't matter who the packets are coming from
or going to if you rate limit the total number of packets a user can
generate/receive, right?
Chuck
On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:33 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
Limiting the number of packets would indeed be the neutral way, in my
opinion. But what problems would that cause with Voip and video? You
certainly have to give priority to Voip.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
I can put up a used 160' tower for 2 grand plus a
500 buck permit here
Depend on the location. In my town, it will cost $17,000 minimum just for
the first phase of a special exception process with County Zoning.
Then what if you need to get up 300-400ft? 300-400ft towers are way more
To this day I have never seen a MT default excluding reinstallation.
Excluding having the customer do work, the MT options.
If you have MT as your wireless CPE - you're screwed if it is defaulted.
Default config will not set wlan1 so it must be manually done.
If you have another device as
You can setup a default script to be used during Netinstall. This will
default it back to YOUR original settings. No matter how many times
they default/reset it, it will go back to the way you set it up using a
script during Netinstall.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
Wow you are my hero. Best quote I have ever seen.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009
Chuck - tried this with a wireless card?
As of v3 they starting doing
int wireless
set 0 name=blah ssid=blah
so it may be possible now...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains,
David,
I'm grateful for your post because it provides new information that I
did not know.
After reading it, and hearing that you can only review applications in
states where your employer does NOT do business and that several
reviewers read each application, I feel somewhat more
What's the difference between prioritizing all traditional services above
other and deprioritizing the bad ones below other?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@comcast.net
Yeah, here it's just a 500 buck inspection fee for a communications tower.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Crown Castle
You'd have to ask the FCC. Seems like it's the opposite side of the same
coin.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The
Many government grant programs are reviewed by three people and then
scores averaged in round 1. A number are tossed out during that round
based on their scores. The ones tossed are then looked at by a
government reviewer for concurrence with the first three pairs of eyes.
Just my past
Lets go ahead and let all the viruses and spam through too.
Scottie
-- Original Message --
From: David E. Smith d...@mvn.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:33:26 -0500
http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html
I'm thinking there should be a list on the WISPA page for it's member's
Facebook fan pages (assuming you're in on the social marketing train)?
Thoughts?
Apparently if you have more than 100 fans you can get a custom URL from
Facebook. We are just over 60 fans. Can I get some help from our WISPA
OH GOOD POINT!!!
How could we dare discriminate against the poor troublemakers and doo doo
gooders, phishers and thieves?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scottie Arnett
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 12:08 PM
To:
I think you're all jumping to conclusions. There will be
modifications. You will probably find that you'll be able to limit
outgoing bittorrent and block spam from botnetted machines, block
illegal activity, etc. How do you determine illegal bittorrent
(uploading of copyrighted content,
Just needed to be worded based on service or type of traffic not
destination.
All TOS byte 184 traffic priority 1
All DNS priority 2
All HTTP priority 4
etc...
WE DO NOT want
cnn.com, twcbc.com, abc.com priority 1
google.com yahoo.com priority 2
whitehouse.com superhotstuffhere.com
I said this in another post, but they're talking about keeping
Time-Warner Cable from prioritizing Time-Warner entertainment's content
over NBC, or myspace over facebook or youtube over hulu not whether or
not you can block outgoing smtp traffic from a bot-netted machine or
illegal uploads of
Does anyone have a complete list of URL's that these rouge antispyware programs
use to deposit their payload? I am talking Personal Antivirus, Windows Police
Pro, Antivirus 2009, etc...
I found this site that list URL's for each separately:
http://www.spywarevoid.com/ . My idea is to block all
Curtis Maurand wrote:
I think they're saying things like Time-Warner can't prioritize CNN
(which is owned by Time, Inc.) over MSNBC or Youtube over hulu, etc.
That may be what they mean, but that sure isn't what they're saying (or
at least that's not what it sounds like from way up here in
Excactly.
--C
Josh Luthman wrote:
Just needed to be worded based on service or type of traffic not
destination.
All TOS byte 184 traffic priority 1
All DNS priority 2
All HTTP priority 4
etc...
WE DO NOT want
cnn.com, twcbc.com, abc.com priority 1
google.com yahoo.com priority 2
Would we REALLY want the gov micromanaging our networks THAT close?
At 02:26 PM 9/21/2009, you wrote:
Just needed to be worded based on service or type of traffic not
destination.
All TOS byte 184 traffic priority 1
All DNS priority 2
All HTTP priority 4
etc...
WE DO NOT want
cnn.com,
Hi all,
I currently am working on a project to develop a sustainable, manufacturer
agnostic, easy to maintain and provision authentication system for our ISP.
We have a mix of access points from Alvarion, Trango, MikroTik, Canopy, and
others. We're currently running a distributed PPPoE model with
David,
Regarding WISPA plans to adopt any official position on Network
Neutrality...that process is always active but it does have a number of
steps.
1. We've got to see what rules the FCC actually proposes.
2. We need to get general agreement (probably a majority view since
getting
Sounds like a job for FreeRADIUS to me.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM,
Right, which is why I phrased it that way. You can't deprioritize anything,
but you can prioritize anything (based upon what I've read on this list).
They accomplish the same thing, but at face value, one is permissible the
other is not.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
I have MT CPE, but the only time I've had to touch them is if I upgraded the
firmware to something I shouldn't have and it crapped out. Some people have
their internal AP built on a bigger RB, but that's more of a pain than I
care to deal with.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
The best suggestion I can offer you is that you should look into the folks
who are doing this type of setup in the DSL world.
Centrally authenticating / servicing 1000 to 100,000 subs is not un-common
in the wireline world.
Redback SMS500 or SMS1000/SMS1800 would easily terminate 1000 subs.
You
We use a Redback SMS1 to terminate our DSL/Wireless/Fiber/T1
customers via PPPoE/Bridges and Vlan's. Our wireless/DSL are all pppoe.
I use the redback's tcp policing on the wireless clients, any radius
server that's capable of using standard dictionary files will do. I use
a cistron based
We're doing this with Cisco 65xx switches. Each tower comes in as a
separate vlan, we do the PPPOE at the switch. We restrict all traffic
from the towers (except to/from private IP management interfaces) to
PPPOE. We use Radiator Radius with MySQL as a database backend. ~1500
PPPOE
I'm pretty safe with my opinion. Get the hell out of my business,
government.
BTW: Hulu is owned by ABC, NBC, Fox, and the tech company that came up with
it.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From:
2009/9/21 Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com:
Does anyone have a complete list of URL's that these rouge antispyware
programs use to deposit their payload? I am talking Personal Antivirus,
Windows Police Pro, Antivirus 2009, etc...
I found this site that list URL's for each separately:
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 13:01 -0400, Tom DeReggi wrote:
So my questions is How easy is it to solve those problems with Mikrotik
OS, to support the above common compatibilty things? So a rookie techs can
configure the MT in just minutes during install, equivellent to a Linksys?
How easy
I think first off, why the concern over Mikrotik longevity? Do you not think
the company will be around, or do you just not see it scaling (for whatever
reason) to the level that you want / need? Personally, I'm not sure what you're
looking for that's not already out there. Build a mikrotik
Well, you know some of those virus's may be important to the person who
is downloading them. Who am I to judge?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Profito
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:01 PM
To:
I know, I know. But in reality, this is how things are stretched and
twisted to where it's fact.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Curtis Maurand
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Why do you put superhotstuffhere.com as 8? Some of us count on that every
morning.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 3:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net
Some of us don't need porn every morning and those that do won't admit nor
complain about it. Saves us bandwidth.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must
For those that have not yet read it, the relevent site to read is
http://www.openinternet.gov/read-speech.html
We need to realize and seperate two things...
1) that the intent of NetNeutrality expressed at this site, is an
idealalistic view, to keep the Internet open and free, which is
There was a time when that was the case...
But Crown has evolved in recent years, and their staff as well are learning
more about the value of the WISP market, and what costs our market will
bear.
For me Crown has been a pleasure to work with.
Just like any relationship, to get good terms,
Worldwide, the US ISPs don't have that much power. See Comcast tell DT,
PCCW, NTT, etc. to fly a kite and Comcast will be the odd man out.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Tom DeReggi
Okay, there is no list of sites. We are also a retail computer repair shop
and we have been dealing with this program for over a year now. The story
is, it's first job is to see if you design websites. If you do and you use
something like FrontPage, it will steal your login info, go to your
OpenDNS won't block it. I run OpenDNS and still come across it because it
infects the sites you are trying to open.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:20 PM
To:
I think that's an excellent idea! At least for the wireless side of things
where we have to run things tight.
We are a bit of a different animal from Comcast and Time Warner. Hell, some
of us use them as the upstream provider!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
I really think the market should dictate how it's ran. That's the American
way, at least it's supposed to be. If my customers are having all sorts of
issues that this is to address, I think I'd hear about it. For the most
part, it's all My utorrent isn't fast!. Hardly ever that the video is
But why wait for the FCC? Why not be pro-active? We already know our
concerns and we could at least list the ways we would like to see this type
of thing designed. To just react to something isn't being the leader. We
should be at the front of this thing. At least that's what I feel I should
I've been trying to get around to FreeRADIUS. Do you use that, Josh? I've
been looking at Radius Manager as well and have the download but have yet to
do a darn thing with any of it.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
Uh.. That seems to be double speak. Isn't putting priority on
something de-prioritizing the things under it?
That's government for you.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, September 21,
I do not personally, no.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Robert West
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 17:36 -0400, Robert West wrote:
I've been trying to get around to FreeRADIUS. Do you use that, Josh? I've
been looking at Radius Manager as well and have the download but have yet to
do a darn thing with any of it.
I have been using it for almost 10 years and its one of
Was a joke. But some who need porn in the morning.. that's just weird.
But again, who am I to judge?!
(Is there really a superhotstoffhere.com)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday,
No I haven't.
Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 1:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
I have deployed FreeRADIUS for large ISPs terminating PPPoE on Cisco (14,000
subs) and RedBack gear (200K subs). Works great.
Tim
Disclaimer: By day I am a FreeRADIUS consultant.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of
Ah, an unbiased opinion! An honest man I see. I'll install the thing
someday. I'm only 2 years behind in my to-do list.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tim Sylvester
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 5:59 PM
To:
We have PowerRouter 732s (under 1500 MSRP) doing over 2500 PPPoE
sessions without issues, and PowerRouter 2282s with over 5k currently.
Just a FYI.
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Link
This is from the Tower Pro list. I have nothing to do with the equipment.
It is posted for information only. If you buy any tell Zack to mail the 10%
check to WISPA.
-B-
Hey all
I recently got the opportunity to buy a lot of
We have 200 new in the box 5210-3000 units at 159.00 each. Buy 1 or all.
Jack Weinberg
69 Public Square, 14th Floor
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701
570-823-9804
1-866-943-4737
ja...@wirelessunits.com
www.wirelessunits.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
That would be great. However, I read that it's 1000 fans to get your own
URL. I am hoping I was wrong! I am only in the teens : (
Martha Huizenga
DC Access, LLC
202-546-5898
*/Friendly, Local, Affordable, Internet!/**/
Connecting the Capitol Hill Community
Join us on Facebook
Tessco
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
Where are you buying them?
Jayson Baker wrote:
2GHz or 5GHz?
We used the 5GHz adjustable's years ago, and their performance was awesome.
Just bought some of the 2GHz version to do some testing with. Not sure
Dennis,
You have a very interesting product line. I appreciate your feed back on the
options that are available today with MikroTik. Looks like something worth
investigating.
--Nick Huanca
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.netwrote:
We have PowerRouter 732s
Hi Tim,
Do you know if the Cisco products or the Redback products support bursting
based on RADIUS attributes?
Thanks,
--Nick Huanca
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Tim Sylvester t...@avanzarnetworks.comwrote:
I have deployed FreeRADIUS for large ISPs terminating PPPoE on Cisco
(14,000
I would like to thank all those who responded for their insight and
experience. I had not seen if anyone had any experience with IPv6
implementations and PPPoE. Anyone out there running v6 networks?
Thanks,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Nick Huanca n...@gaw.com wrote:
Hi all,
I currently
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
