of the Sears
Tower, I'd still need a tower 50' taller than I currently have access to
out
here.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Directv IF frequencies.
Lower IF 950-1450 MHZ
Upper IF 1650-2150 MHz
So, we are not in the middle of either of those bands.
The IF signal should be stronger than any spur an SM or SU could produce.
- Original Message -
From: Larry A Weidig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
the time to
figure out what the new ones are.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:31 AM
Subject: Re
Anyone got any old 2.4 Proxim or Western Mux T1 radios they want to part
with. We are in a bit of a pickle due to our not getting trango to work
for
a couple of T1s last week. Please hit me on or off list.
Other than blatant patent infringement and knocking off my product
(and some of the equinox), no, no problem at all with DMS. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Re:
A KA has been a ham longer than a KD.
(assuming it is not a vanity call sign)
Long time hams have more passion for the subject.
But really, I agree with almost everything said. Ham really has been dying
for a very long time.
I just get bent when some WISPs take the entitlement attitude towards
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4
What can it do that Radio Mobile does not?
I have been engineering microwave paths since 1978. Back in the day it
was
curved
I'll take a copy of your excel file Charles.
;-)
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Pathloss 4
Hi Michael,
All Pathloss basically does is calculate
Anyone can apply for a rural broadband grant from the RUS. The RUS has a
person assigned to each geographical area called a GFR (government field
rep) and the GFR is supposed to investigate the area to make sure it is
unserved prior to awarding a grant. We have seen several companies pull the
.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VoIP deployments?
Businesses
radio
stuff, non-commercial.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
Good bunch of info here. Almost all of can be applied to us
, 2008 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
OTARD and PRB1 do not pertain to AP or backhaul locations
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:43:37
To: WISPA General
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
There are two parts of the telecom act, OTARD and the Ham ruling that
should be able to be used
Anyone else having trouble using the FCC geographic search feature?
I called tech support and they said there were known issues. But nothing
further.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Don't call me an idiot you imbecile, I am an moron.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tower site licensing problem
A requirement, yes. A burden, no. Just
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 1:08 PM
To: WISPA General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] FCC geographic search
Anyone else having trouble using the FCC geographic search feature?
I
Telecommunications Act of 1996 on Zoning for Mobile Communications
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (S.652)
Section 704
FACILITIES SITING;
RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSION STANDARDS.
(a) NATIONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITING POLICY- Section 332(c) (47
U.S.C. 332(c)) is amended by adding at the end
SEC. 253. [47 U.S.C. 253] REMOVAL OF BARRIERS TO ENTRY.
(a) IN GENERAL.--No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or
local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the
ability of
any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.
Note that in Section 332 unlicensed services is explicitly mentioned and
included in the definition of personal wireless services.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
That is near muddy frog's territory.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:30 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Anyone service Pasco Wa.?
We're at 2731 Birch Rd., Pasco.
Not true. Employers own the content of all correspondence, whether
electronic or otherwise.
That has been time tested.
Plus, in this state we can record the phone calls. We can record you on the
phone without even notifying you if we call you or if you call us.
- Original Message -
We can buy the ONT for $375.
The COE per sub works out to about another $200.
So $500 plus the strand of fiber. Drop fiber can be had for 25 cents per
foot.
Contractors can put it in for a buck a foot. Including cleanup.
In a subdivision, I can do FTTH for less than $1K per sub.
And my arpu
Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Employee Tracking Program
Not true. Employers own the content of all
If that is what it cost me, I would never be able to afford it.
Good thing it only costs me about $1K per sub.
- Original Message -
From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fiber Costs
--
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:25 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Emergency FCC Information - Florida
DIsasterArea
Do you really think the FCC has specified P-15
I am a rural telecom, one of the most rural in the nation. And I wasn't
exempt at all.
- Original Message -
From: Jeromie Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I want to port their numbers
But if you are selling voip, you want the local ILEC customer to be able to
keep their number.
In that case the ILEC has involvement.
- Original Message -
From: cw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I
That is included in the 5.4 band.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Delp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 10:33 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Part 15 Frequency Chart
I am looking for an up to date chart with all of the unlicensed
Even if Powercode was a vendor sponsor of WISPA (not sure one way or the
other), openly hawking product on the general WISPA list seems to be frowned
upon.
- Original Message -
From: Austin Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, September
. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
In all honesty, it's turned into quite a scam hasn't it. About is rampant
from what I see.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck
] gotta love USF
If you are running a hundred miles of fiber for 30 people you are not
right in the head...
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
It is a cost recovery mechanism. I got audited by USAC this year to
prove
that the USF we receive is to cover the costs of providing the service
The current USF audits by USAC are turning up collusion between school
districts (the principle is the brother of the local ISP) and provider of
goods and services of E-rate funded projects. The audits have not shown any
telephone company to be misusing this money.
And I want to repeat, this
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
Tacking a fee on my telephone bill is a form of taxation. -RickG
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current USF audits by USAC
utility by tax dollars that we all were forced to pay. IMO, that means
that we should be able use it without being encumbered by fees other
than what are necessary to support the system is was designed for. Am
I really off base here?
-RickG
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Chuck McCown [EMAIL
USF
If you are running a hundred miles of fiber for 30 people you are not
right in the head...
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
It is a cost recovery mechanism. I got audited by USAC this year to
prove
that the USF we receive is to cover the costs of providing the service.
But
think
on such things?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] gotta love USF
Hold your horses there Marlon... the government pays... the government
pays
for USF
I used to give one month free with the referral, plus a free install and one
month free for the new customer.
We had more installs in those days than we could service.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday,
We use them at times. That is a pretty good price if they are in good
enough shape to climb.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:09 AM
Subject: [WISPA] old utility poles
Anyone using
How tight do you want it?
I make a very sharp waveguide BPF for 5.8.
I'll attach the response curve.
- Original Message -
From: Jon Langeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:48 AM
Subject: [WISPA] 5.5Ghz highpass/lowpass
2.4, 5.2, 5.4 and 5.8GHz
(sorry, feeling like a smarta** today)
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 8:59 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Interference at the neighbors
Just curious, how are you
the
crap out of me.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] old utility poles
I still have my hooks and belt.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon
And it will have a metal tag or stamped into the wood in that area something
like:
4-40
or 5-25
The first number is the class and the second is the length in feet.
- Original Message -
From: D. Ryan Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, October
We have tried the full sized nanostations. They have an external SMA
connector so you can put an antenna on them with some decent gain.
I would pay the extra for the full sized unit just to have that option.
They do what they say they will do. But just like all 802.11x products,
you have to
of them and my guess is that the first round that makes it to the
states is going to be beta.
Just like any 802.11a product, the NS5s will run circles around Canopy
if properly deployed. So yeah, you can consider them as a Canopy
replacement. :^)
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Chuck McCown
yeah, you can consider them as a Canopy
replacement. :^)
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Chuck McCown wrote:
We have tried the full sized nanostations. They have an external SMA
connector so you can put an antenna on them with some decent gain.
I would pay the extra for the full sized unit just
So, */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik On-Line Training
at the end of your note is NOT advertising?
I am confused. Daniel was responding to a specific question. I thought it
was apropos.
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
We generally use Dragonwave or fiber to the AP. So no latency to speak of
there.
From our Canopy sub to our NOC I would say 7 is what most get.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 1:08 PM
Subject:
Nothing, if you own the fiber.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] heavy usage customers
We generally use Dragonwave or fiber to the AP. So no latency to speak
of
to set aside for
ARQ.
Thats pretty cool. is that a new feature as of a specif fiormware, or has
it been there all along?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
No but they will be about 20 feet high for an H pol 600 MHz slotted
waveguide 16 dBi 120 degree sector.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Theoretical TVWS
I would suggest a noise generator. Here is an article on a do it yourself
unit.
http://www.ham-radio.com/sbms/sd/nfsource.htm
Using a noise generator that is pretty flat and a spectrum analyzer is one
of the easiest ways to tune filters if you don't have a sweep generator.
- Original
Are you wanting to have a dissertation of FCC part 36 separations and
settlements and the uniform system of accounts?
Or perhaps NECA Tariff 5?
My answer was a philosophical answer.
The making of the sausage is ugly. But at the end of the day, all accounts
are settled.
- Original Message
Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] My favorite quotes from the FCC TVWS meeting today...
The licensed
Yep, pretty cool huh?
We recommend only DECT 6.0 and that is the only thing we stock in our store.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:10 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 1.9ghz?
I would put up an AP.
- Original Message -
From: RickG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL
Wireless has it's obvious advantages but if you go the BPL route you
can use the Motorola
Motorola is likely to be first out of the chute. But none of them were
putting the final touches on anything until the rules were published. Now
they have to finish their products, do type approvals, do beta tests, then
perhaps we will see some new tools to use. I'll bet it will be 6 months
Save your money, Wikipedia says that Wi-Fi spray is simply re-packaged
Astro-Glide personal lubricant. American Towers is the largest consumer.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] DTV
A channel 2 yagi is not something you can throw in the back of your
installer vehicle.
I have installed 4 X 6 element channel 2 yagi arrays before. (14 dBi)
You couldn't fit them in this office I am sitting in right now.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Lower Power TV and Translators (they are pretty much the same license) are
Exempt.
However most of them are conveying the signal of a larger network station.
The larger network station will want the translator chain to be digital if
they can.
Many of the translators in Utah have a digital unit
Perhaps the question was a little more general.
A TV translator is nothing more than a repeater.
For example channel 6 would be received, translated to channel 55 and
retransmitted.
Normally they were VHF in and UHF out. Low power. 2 to 200 watts.
Out west, where we have lots of mountain
translator that season,
then when football started on channel Y it would get the good translator.
I love small towns!
ryan
Chuck McCown wrote:
Perhaps the question was a little more general.
A TV translator is nothing more than a repeater.
For example channel 6 would be received, translated
Perhaps once TVWS gets used and it proves a success, then they will open up
adjacent channels.
Once they do that there will be holes everywhere.
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:58 PM
the most? Looks like the DTV signals
will interfere with our AP receivers AND our CPE transmitters will
interfere with nearby television receivers. Of course, I could be
wrong What's your take on it?
Chuck McCown wrote:
Perhaps once TVWS gets used and it proves a success
Perhaps John wants a job working part time for WISPA?
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:06 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Fw: [isp-wireless] unlicensed
range
to .
jack
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
For adjacent channel use, we don't have to use a 6 MHz channel.
We
could
use 5 or 4 or whatever it takes to make it work.
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
a supplementary
wind-generation system. Seemed to work well for them to have wind power
when the weather is bad, solar when it is good. Pretty windy place as
well.
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
Here is a note I posted several days ago on the Motorola list about solar
powering.
From: Chuck McCown
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont
Good point :) It's not too severe down here in So Utah.
Randy
Chuck McCown wrote:
They must not be subject to ice storms.
- Original Message -
From: Randy
feelin' da luv today
(As some might suspect, I do have a passion for mountain-top solar and wind
power, having had to risk human life on more than one occasion to keep
things alive or restore service. $2000 helicopter rides after the storm
blows through is also a good reason to get it right.
Not our building, but ours looked just like it. This is after a week of no
possible way to access the site. And of course no sunlight for a week of storm.
Then with panels being coated like this, no sunlight until you get up there to
chop off the ice or do other things that are more effective.
attachment: deice crew.jpg
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
experience with this?
Regards,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Remote Powered Access Pont
feelin' da luv today
(As some might
, November 20, 2008 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] one more
This is how you access it... that's why we finally had to buy one. :) We
have six tower sites that can look just like your picture (all over 8,000ft
elevation).
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown wrote:
Not our building, but ours
Dang, and here I was anticipating a beach scene, with some beautiful
things to look at...
- Original Message -
From: Scott Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:31 AM
Subject: [WISPA] FW: one more
If you're stuck in a
OK, then buy a Canopy 430.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NetFlix Streaming Bandwidth Information
rantThis is why we need gear capable of higher
at the port
I've found $5/meg at the port the issue is getting it from the port to your
NOC. :(
Travis
Microserv
Chuck McCown - 3 wrote:
There deals clear down to $7/meg.
Ask vendors for a 2 year contract, GigE 100 Mbps burstable.
- Original Message -
From: John Thomas [EMAIL
Got tired of adding it up each time.
Book1.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 3
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 9:47 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WISPA] Massive Fraud - Ballot Boxes Stuffed! ;-
Brand # Subs % By Subs
Redline 286 0.37%
Alvarion 3527
Redline 286 0.334058
Alvarion 4027 4.70367
Ubiquity 1728 2.018361
Canopy 38583 45.06623
Other 7816 9.129348
Trango 11252 13.14271
Tranzeo 10029 11.71421
MT 11893 13.89142
Total 85614 100
Responses 85
Redline2860.29%
Alvarion40304.02%
Ubiquity20782.07%
Canopy4486744.78%
Other95269.51%
Trango1147211.45%
Tranzeo1317913.15%
MT1476614.74%
Total100204100.00%
Responses98
You copycats...
;-)
(Did you guys pay for the better account, it really would be helpful).
- Original Message -
From: Rick Harnish
To: 'WISPA General List' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:45 PM
Subject: [WISPA Members] Please
I remember the woodpecker. Have not been on HF in years. Need to get a QRP
rig and do some CW.
- Original Message -
From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [TowerTalk] Some spectacular
We always kill the customer when the RIAA sends a notification. How is this
different?
- Original Message -
From: CHUCK PROFITO cprof...@cv-access.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:05 AM
Subject: [WISPA] RIAA
Now the RIAA wants us to
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 10:15 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] RIAA
We always kill the customer when the RIAA sends a notification. How is
this
different?
- Original Message
did the person hold on to
when climbing?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Chuck McCown ch
Back in the day, we climbed wooden poles with nothing other than our hooks
and hands. Once you got up, then you would throw the one single belt around
the pole. Most of the time the drop was between 20 and 30 feet. Enough to
hurt you pretty bad but probably not kill you. I burned one pole
for
about 4 years I couldn't imagine using some of the stuff people used to
use.
-Cameron
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 4:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re
Think wavelength.
AM wavelengths are hundreds of feet long.
There is a giant reactive near field around the AM antenna.
(Electric fields and Magnetic fields)
Your cat 5 was probing the electric field at two different voltage points.
For AM broadcast frequencies, you can actually take a volt meter
I have used the Trango GigaLink and DragonWave. DragonWave is rock solid.
Never a problem. Have several systems.
We are still trying to get the Trango to play. Lots of signal but not
running well at all.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General
Wonder if the wireless PCB is available without the box? I could build it
into an antenna.
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Here's your chance to actually do something about it:
Universal Service at the Commission
Word on the street is that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will
soon put out for comment the Joint Board's Recommendation on Long-Term USF
Reform. You may recall, the Joint Board submitted
Get a WAAS enabled machine. Then you can get accurate elevation
measurements. Without elevation figures are pretty bad on a hand held
device.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject:
Would that be right hand vertizonical or left hand vertizonical?
- Original Message -
From: Eric Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Temporary Telescoping Mast
I think the technical term is
But, but, but... we LOVE small rural ILECs...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Connected Tennessee
There is a growing controversy centered on the Connected
are part of our
culture now. If I remember right you are actually an ILEC aren't you
Chuck? :-)
Scriv
On Jan 31, 2008 3:19 PM, Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, but, but... we LOVE small rural ILECs...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
I have had nothing but heartbreak with wind. Solar always works well.
Wind, no joy for me...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Off Grid System Design Comments.
We are
Lower wind loading, ice shedding, pattern retention during ice and freezing
rain, protection of the feed from the elements and critters, aesthetics.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 4:02 PM
Subject:
I have seen a 160 meter 2 element yagi. This thing is a baby compared to
that.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 8:40 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Sometimes I forget how cheap and easy it is for
overhead for security).
-- Bryan
Mike Hammett wrote:
I dunno if I'd use anything less than G.711.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown - 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
I guess I should qualify that a bit. They suck when you are comparing voice
quality.
They are superior when delivering arguably acceptable voice communication
with a minimum of bandwidth.
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless
, April 08, 2008 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Femtocells
Polycom's new HD voice uses one of the G.722's.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless
1 - 100 of 552 matches
Mail list logo
