I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users more bandwidth and another group of users less
bandwidth. It's also important that the bandwidth usage within a group
be
My 24 hours is expiring and I don't want to pull this unit down.
Mikrotik's site wants me to authorize my credit card, a process I've
begun but my credit card company won't post the transaction for a few
days. Can anyone sell me a level 4 license for an x86 machine now?
Thanks!
Greg
Is going to circular polarization an option?
Greg
On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
I have a 23 mile link completely over water that I cannot get stable.
One end is approx 200ft AGL, 220ft ASL, the other end is 50' AGL, 90'
ASL. Antennas are V-Pol 29dbi grids, radios are R5H
I see the same issue. I'm on a satellite internet connection shared
with about 10 people. The satellite carrier does their own NAT and we
all appear as the same IP to the internet. The only fix for me is to
turn on my VPN.
It's not a NAT-failure or NAT mis-configuration issue, but it most
Some remote control devices I've been looking at for remote
controlling our generator:
http://www.controlbyweb.com/webrelay-quad/ (this one comes in a
commercial model that accepts 9-28vdc power)
Greg
On Oct 29, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Chuck Profito wrote:
Or do it your way and add this to
Yeah but it goes to 28vdc vs 24vdc. Those 4 extra volts might make a
difference for folks doing 24 volt solar.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Chuck Profito wrote:
Their $135 against $119.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Doesn't it stand for effective isotropic radiated power? Isn't your
EIRP the same no matter what receive antenna is on the other end?
I get your point, to have a sufficiently strong signal at the distant
receiver you could lower the transmit power and make up for it with a
more effective
Excellent advise. There's a maxim in the amateur radio community (from
the ARRL website) At all times, transmitter power must be the minimum
necessary to carry out the desired communications, for the same
reasons.
Greg
On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
EIRP is the
That stops the APs from interfering with each other but there must be
some point where when the APs all turn on at once they cause
interference for the CPEs if the density between APs is too great. Do
you see that in the field?
Also, that does nothing for the poor folk who are using the
Be careful using those diodes at sites where you're colocated with a
high powered transmitter. The diodes can do some weird stuff
(rectification, mixing) and could become a hidden source of
interference/noise.
Greg
On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:08 PM, Mike wrote:
Fine business using the diodes to
What are you guys doing who have some/all of your network nat'ed? Seems like
then more of the burden might fall on you.
GReg
On Nov 10, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Adam Goodman wrote:
To me the question is how much work should I invest in order to
protect their copyright interest. It makes sense to
But they also keep records of who had which IP when.
Greg
On Nov 10, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Keep in mind, too, that IPs are dynamic with most ISPs.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Can you tell me which 3 fields those are? Is there anyplace that you know of
(wiki, manual) which describes the process?
Thanks!
Greg
On Nov 14, 2009, at 1:57 AM, Jayson Baker wrote:
Don't know what else to tell you. I always find myself spending a lot of
time defending the equipment we
Something like the MT RB750 but with 802.11n. Top it off with an easier web
interface which would make basic setup as a home router/AP simple for the
uninitiated. I'm thinking something of quality with the power of a RouterOS
level 4 license to compete with the crappy dlink/linksys/netgear
I think the MT RB750 could sell for less, but I suspect the problem is volume.
I think they could add wireless and compete with the consumer grade junk if the
price was reasonable and if MT was a bit more of a household name. It would
take an easy and intuitive web interface, something for
I'd like to know what folks recommend for a plain jane low gain 2.4GHz omni.
No downtilt. Gain around 7-13 dbi but something solid for outdoor use. This is
to use with a Bullet2HP M.
Greg
WISPA Wants You! Join
Thanks! I just bought one a week ago to give it a try but it hasn't arrived yet.
Greg
On Nov 19, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I've several 9dbi Pac ones out there. I like how the bottom of the antenna
has a good 3' metal piece to put two hose clamps. Weather has never
effected any
Coax-seal
On Nov 19, 2009, at 6:42 PM, AJ wrote:
CANUSA adhesive shrink tubing is your friend :)
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:41 PM, lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
No 400 connector from any of the manufacturers is weatherproof by itself.
You need to weatherproof all of your connections. If they
UBNT says it will:
I received these two replies to that question (sort of, my question was a
Bullet2M HP and a PowerStation2 connecting):
NUMBER1
Hello,
yes the TDMA can be disabled. Our full 802.11b/g support is coming in V5.1 of
our firmware.
Thanks,
Is he completely cut off or restricted to only certain sites/email? Hughes
meters during business hours and if one goes over budget then they throttle you
to a crawl during the following business hours period. The meter is off during
the wee hours.
Greg
On Nov 21, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Robert
Mesh with 2.4GHz APs for clients and 5.8GHz WDS backhaul give much better
throughput.
http://www.wiligear.com/?q=products/mesh/mesh-mini
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Robert West wrote:
I've done plenty of WDS AP's in hotels. Quick and easy.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From:
Yeah, I saw that, many times. Are there any other reviews? I suspect the good
performance over and above a regular high quality AP is that it's dual band
mesh. The Ruckus gear is dual band mesh right? I get a lot of hits when I
Google ruckus dual band mesh mediaflex but the Ruckus site isn't
Running WDS bridged?
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Israel Lopez-LISTS wrote:
Hey All,
I did some field tests (for overseas volunteer project) with some
Ubituiti gear; Nanostation2 Bullet2HP.
One thing that was surprising was the performance degradation when
switching from 20MHz
Seems hard to believe that if I took a 10dbi antenna which isn't all that much
gain and put it on my AP and pointed it at my client I'd see that much of a
gain.
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 5:43 PM, 3-dB Networks wrote:
There are over 4,000 antenna patterns, with the relative gain of the best
Just for kicks I'd try WDS bridged. Do you have control from where you're at
now? Is the equipment still set up?
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Israel Lopez-LISTS wrote:
@Travis Johnson - Yes Upgraded to newest firmware for the two units
@os10rules - Nope, Fixed was simple AP and Mobile
where you're at
now? Is the equipment still set up?
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Israel Lopez-LISTS wrote:
@Travis Johnson - Yes Upgraded to newest firmware for the two units
@os10rules - Nope, Fixed was simple AP and Mobile was Station modes
os10ru...@gmail.com wrote
Does a sector work any better when there's no interference or when there's just
a few clients? In a highly urban area like an apartment building that's flooded
with microwave ovens, cordless phones etc sure. But what about a house in
suburbia where there's no real interference?
I guess that
Your right, the technology is alluring. Maybe someday
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 8:07 PM, 3-dB Networks wrote:
Only the 7962 and 7761 are dual-band mesh... the rest is straight 2.4GHz.
Mediaflex is their in-home equipment for streaming HD video... only wi-fi
manufacturer on the planet
As APs I'm running Bullets with gain antennas, PS2's and NS2's so I've got the
gain and great signals. I'm in a place where there's no interference of any
kind. I'm already in the sweet spot as far as signal strength goes and
clients are connecting at 54Mbps. What more is there to gain?
Greg
OK, you've piqued my interest. I'll try it someday and take your word for it
for now.
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 8:21 PM, 3-dB Networks wrote:
Greg... your looking at this from an outdoors service provider aspect. The
gear isn't designed for that. Its for indoor deployments (although there
AP's mostly outdoors, clients indoors.
On Nov 22, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Are you talking indoor or outdoor?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent:
- Yes Upgraded to newest firmware for the two units
@os10rules - Nope, Fixed was simple AP and Mobile was Station modes
os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Running WDS bridged?
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Israel Lopez-LISTS wrote:
Hey All,
I did some field tests (for overseas
http://www.edn.com/article/CA6296066.html
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/160867/ruckus_wifi_gear_goes_upmarket.html
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
- Yes Upgraded to newest firmware for the
two
units
@os10rules - Nope, Fixed was simple AP and Mobile was
Station
modes
mailto:os10ru...@gmail.comos10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Running WDS bridged?
Greg
On Nov 22, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Israel Lopez-LISTS wrote
As a Mac OS X/Windows/Linux user (OS X natively and Windows, Linux under
Fusion) I'd like to see the configuration apps be universal (Java?) or
something cross platform. But I realize you can't fight city hall. So I'll
always have Fusion for a small handful of apps (Mapwel, Dude, WinBox).
Greg
Turn the power down!
On Nov 24, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
The silicone sleeve is just for appearance. It's not needed, according to
them.
I'm tempted to setup a Rocket and sector in a shower and just leave them
there for a couple weeks.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
You have to check the specs. The possible problems are high VSWR. Rather than
transiting through the device the radio waves bounce back from the device. This
could damage your transmitter, will reduce your transmitted power, and increase
receive loss (reduced receive signal strength). It's also
Does this rely on some unpublished feature of the current Atheros chipset which
could disappear in the next evolution making the project obsolete and the
effort wasted?
Is there a URL for the project?
Greg
On Dec 1, 2009, at 12:56 AM, MDK wrote:
Actually, it's far better than
Do you think you're hitting the limit of 802.11b/g or is it the lack of
horsepower on the AP's CPU?
Greg
On Dec 2, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Jason Hensley wrote:
On this same subject, would it be better to put up 3 individual AP's, or
would something like the Deliberant Quad work well if the issue is
I had not heard that different metals are more or less effective at RF
shielding at higher frequencies. I had heard of Mu metal that's used in audio
recording studios to specifically block 60Hz hum.
I tried to find info about what attenuation different materials offer and all I
could find was
I know some special purpose plastic enclosures made for RF work have
conductive/shielding qualities to them. There's even conductive/shielding paint
one can buy for RF projects. So those plastic boxes might not be as bad as you
think.
Greg
On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I thought the heavy duty EMP shielding the govt/mil does at protected sites
uses copper.
Greg
On Dec 4, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
Can you point me to a source to confirm this? Aluminum is a better
conductor than steel so I would think it does a better job. I would be
interested
Isn't copper a better conductor? Aluminum is lighter but not as good of a
conductor. That's why high tension wires have to be fatter than copper wires to
carry the same current but they're cheaper and lighter.
Greg
On Dec 4, 2009, at 7:29 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
I would think so. Aluminum is
There are some really cool (and cheap) ASIC boards with Ethernet based
connectivity that you need to write a custom program for but you could get
really fancy with. They have A/D converters and you could monitor the battery
voltage accurately, and you could have the device email you at the
This is the sort of thing I was thinking of:
http://tuxgraphics.org/electronics/200904/embedded-webserver-equipment-control.shtml
Something along the lines of a hobbyist kit project - cheap but some legwork
involved.
Greg
On Dec 5, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Robert West wrote:
Good thoughts. I'll
Is this something specific to the RB450/450G? I have the RB750 and I'm running
4.3 and having no issues.
I'm using the RB750 on a 15Mbps/2Mbps cable connection with numerous pcq queues
doing prioritization (no limiting) on outbound (queuing with no prioritization
on the inbound) and I'm
Maybe government has to be the answer if we're going to address the problem of
the vast number of people who could afford insurance but choose to spend their
money elsewhere. It's going to require the government forcing them to buy
insurance or pay some tax that is used to fund health
The important specs are twists per foot and capacitance per foot with the
capacitance being the most important. The lower the capacitance per foot the
lower the attenuation and the lower the crosstalk (because there is capacitive
interaction with neighboring pairs as well). If you can find a
Just taking issue with the I was charged $8 for two Tylenol, I was charged
$10 for a Tylenol. A beer in a bar (with far less overhead) is $5.
Isn't the fact that if one doesn't have insurance the hospitals work with you
at the very least go to show that the folks providing us healthcare aren't
I believe the proposed changes have only dealt with the insurance side
(government provided and more rules for the private sector insurance
providers). On the healthcare provider (doctors, hospitals) side I believe
they've only talked about rules. Maybe new government clinics that provide
I was taught in tech school that pencil erasers give off an acid that can
damage the contacts. Who knows if it's true.
Greg
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Phil Curnutt wrote:
Try a pencil erasure.
Phil
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
OxGard works too! They
I was merchant marine. Who's right? : - )
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:39 PM, Phil Curnutt wrote:
Used them all the time on UHF and VHF equipment back in the day. Matter of
fact it was taught at my tech school; USCG.
Phil
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:33 PM, os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I was taught
Matt,
I wasn't meaning history is a guide or a box (as in we base what we do
now on the past), but merely something to remind us that yes, we are different
from Europe. Europe's methods have their merit, but many Americans would feel
stifled and over regulated in a European system.
Sorry guys, I just have to jump in on the Cuban health care thing. I live in
Venezuela and we have LOTS of Cuban doctors. I know some personally. I know
Venezuelans who have studied in Cuba. It's nothing like they (the Cuban govt)
say it is. The numbers are good because it's a closed
Matt,
Chill, you're taking a really harsh tone. I'm talking about Cuba
because I know about that. I have many Latino friends. I speak Spanish. I know
Cubans and I know a lot of people who have been to Cuba. You're putting words
in my mouth. I'm not refuting all those other countries
Matt,
Please reread what I said. I wasn't commenting on the whole healthcare
debate. I was talking about Cuba. CUBA CUBA CUBA. Do you get it now? Just CUBA.
Reread the original post and get off your high horse. Have you noticed everyone
else stopped replying to you.
Everyone
Those currants are killers.
Greg
On Dec 10, 2009, at 10:17 AM, e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
As little as 1v with enough currant will kill you. It's not voltage that
kills but rather the currant. It takes 200ma to stop your hear but to get
that much to the hear you have a lot of resistance
Just need two.
Greg
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Yeah, I'm doing Bullets to tide me over too. But with the bullets there's no
mimo unfortunately.
Sure wish there was an MT offering that had router board and radio (or RB and
integrated radio) with enclosure antenna all for $100 or less. Oh yeah, and it
be in stock more often then out of
Just cost, less assembly and config
Greg
On Dec 11, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
Is there any compelling reason to stick with the Bullet as the CPE when the
CPEs are out of stock?
Is the only trade off of using another pmanufacturers product during those
shortage periods just that
Is that for real? Reminds me of Google hoax internet technology commercial
about using the sewer lines. It was a NIC you'd connect to your computer then
flush down the toilet. Using dark sewer pipes they provided high speed
internet.
Greg
On Dec 11, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Robert West wrote:
I
http://www.google.com/tisp/
On Dec 11, 2009, at 8:09 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Fiber to the Toilet
On 12/11/09, os10ru...@gmail.com os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that for real? Reminds me of Google hoax internet technology commercial
about using the sewer lines. It was a NIC you'd connect to
With Google Earth you can specify the cache size (make it big) and then zoom
around the area you want while you're connected and you'll be able to see that
area offline. Be careful - if you reconnect and zoom around someplace else
you'll flush the good stuff out of the cache.
Greg
On Dec 12,
One option would be to use the product Mapwel to make your own maps which
then you could load into the other folk's Garmin GPSes. I don't know if this is
more than you need. You'd need the advanced version of Mapwel so you can use
the maps with any Garmin GPS. You can make the maps transparent
Professionally? Specifically a holder of which FCC license?
On Dec 15, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
According to Ubiquiti themselves and the FCC:
This equipment is required to be professionally installed
The device has been designed to operate with the antennas listed below
and
Technically speaking? What about politics? : - )
Greg
On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I don't believe there is an official answer. I believe professional
simply means someone that knows their rear from a hole in the ground.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing
Be real careful the paint is not metallic. You might want to spray
something microwave safe and put it in the microwave oven to see if it
gets hot or sparks for a test. You could end up losing a lot of db in
the paint.
Greg
On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:34 PM, 3-dB Networks wrote:
I'm just trying
Do you block smtp on non-standard ports? Is SSL filtering necessary
(gmail smtp is over ssl for example)?
Greg
On Jan 8, 2009, at 12:41 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Does anyone use the Barracuda's for outbound spam filtering and is
it as
good as the inbound version? I need to keep my mail
I'm sure if you looked at it on a spectrum analyzer you'd see the
signal occupies a wide band of frequencies, hence it's probably
susceptible to interference on a wide range of frequencies.
Greg
On Jan 8, 2009, at 12:54 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
OK, can we put this in plain English?
That should be easy. I've never used Barracuda but I have used the
Sonicwall and also open hardware based UTMs such as Astaro, Endian,
Untangle and ClarkConnect. Any decent solution should work. Do you
already own the Barracuda? If not you might want to consider using an
old PC with
Kurt,
Will getting the Barracuda outbound require more hardware or is it
just a service you can turn on with the current hardware for a fee?
I'm not familiar with the Barracuda but I would assume there's
nothing you have to set up as long as nobody is doing ssl. These boxes
I agree, those dedicated boxes are expensive and then there's the
annual fee as well correct?
I think I'd go with Endian on a PC. Is your spam assassin running
native or as a virtual machine?
Greg
On Jan 8, 2009, at 2:32 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Will
It sounds like what you really have to do is tighten up your webmail.
It's better to fix that than to put a band-aid on it. Though a good
smtp spam filter is never a bad idea.
Greg
On Jan 8, 2009, at 4:37 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, those dedicated boxes
Is using fiber-optic cable out of the question?
Greg
On Jan 9, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Thanks Mike,
The change to 10 meg half doesn't help. In fact, most devices won't
connect
at all then.
The worst part is that the most expensive gear is most effected by
this!
I think you'll find the products which are sold as
inverters (Xantrex for example) which have built in battery chargers
will have a quicker recharge time because they are engineered for
folks who run a generator for a few hours and then invert off the
batteries the rest of the time. Most
You could use a real inverter which has a higher capacity charger
built in (much faster recovery time). Another advantage of an inverter
is the batteries are sold separately so you can size them accordingly.
You could have much longer run time on the batteries. Though having
lead acid
FYI there's also a semi-official hack (information is on their forum:
forums.untangle.com) about how to install ntop reporting as well.
Hopefully that as well as more detailed reporting will be included in
future releases. I participated in the recent Astaro beta and that
really spoiled
Is anyone using the NS2 or NS5 where the AP's are a mesh network, or
is everyone using AP's with backhauls? I want to try a mesh network
with the NS2. It looks like the firmware options are open-mesh or
something proprietary such as http://kalpeshwireless.com/overview.htm.
I've contacted
On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:53 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Isn't this controlled by the frequency like 900, 2.4, 5.8? I wasn't
aware
that a higher gain antenna would widen the beam.
The higher gain is achieved by focusing the power into a smaller area.
Greg
Can you tell me which in radio Ethernet protectors you use? Thanks!
Greg
On Feb 10, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs wrote:
Not wishing to say anyone does a better job or worse. One of the
biggest mistakes I have seen is the plastic standoffs. Not only do
they
fail, but they
Yeah, I notice I don't receive copies of the messages I send. But I
see replies so I know they go through.
Greg
On Feb 10, 2009, at 7:06 PM, Phil Curnutt wrote:
And it went through.
Phil
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net
wrote:
I've sent several replies
What about the Mac OS? I has Linuxy goodness with lots of apps.
Greg
On Feb 11, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Virtualization. Not only does it make things a lot easier to backup
and
move.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy,
Does anyone have experience using RouterOS (on RouterBoard or x86) for
doing Skype QoS? I've been trying many different Linux based servers
(ZeroShell, pfsense, Endian, ClarkConnect specifically for achieving
good QoS with Skype - more specifically to keep the P2P stuff from
killing Skype
The problem I'm having is Skype is not impossible to detect, but it is
difficult and some QoS mechanisms miss it because it's designed to be
hard to detect and stop so it can slip out networks where the admin
tries to block IM apps. The better network security devices and detect
and filter
I put dns, email (ports 25, 110, 143, 465, 587, 993, 995) and voip
(sip, h323, skype) at the top or maybe email just below voip and dns;
web ssl and uncategorized in the middle of the range; and p2p at the
bottom.
Greg
On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:09 PM, RickG wrote:
Since we're on the subject,
Thanks!
Greg
On Feb 14, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I STRONGLY suggest you put email at 2 if voip is going to be 1. DNS
can
stay at 1, though. You don't need jitter every time someone sends or
receives an email message.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct:
I haven't used this stuff but I've been researching it and have
contacted the companies. One is some ready-made two radio (2.4ghz for
clients, 5ghz for backhaul) mesh hardware from Wiligear
http://www.wiligear.com/?q=products/mesh/wbd-212
which still requires to you package it up
One more thing I forgot, if you want to use something that is more
experimental, more do-it-yourself and which supports a greater variety
of hardware there is OpenWRT's firmware with mesh and also
http://nightwing.lugro-mesh.org.ar/en/
. These are options using routing options such as
Mr. Burgess,
What frightens me about taking the leap into Mikrotik is it appears
the web interface is of no use in the advanced configuration and it
sounds like one must get heavily into the CLI and scripting. I don't
see an online repository of scripts for programming or even a
Mr. Burgess and the others who responded - thanks!
I just downloaded Winbox and I'll be trying it with the x86 version on
an old PC first.
Mikrotik seems inevitable if one's network progresses beyond the
something very small and simple. Thanks for the push!
Greg
On Feb 17, 2009, at 11:08
Mr. Bledsoe,
I've heard it said that WDS isn't the best option for mesh because
under WDS each AP is going to repeat every packet regardless of the
physical location and whether or not the data needs to pass that AP in
order to get from the gateway AP to the AP the client for whom
Amazon's S3 service is very inexpensive and well done. There are many
different clients out there which work with S3. I like Mozy but I
think Amazon is more likely to be around in the long haul (too big to
fail?).
Greg
On Feb 17, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I'm looking at
Yeah, that too big to fail thing was a bit of a joke, but they
probably have stronger fundamentals than Mozy.
The only thing I like about off site storage is you could have a
devastating disaster (fire, hurricane/tornado etc) and lose it all.
Amazon's S3 is probably in a different
Mr. Larsen,
Thanks. I've heard very good things about StarOS as well. It
certainly has it's devotees. But as you mentioned Valemount doesn't
have the presence in the marketplace that Mikrotik has and that makes
me wonder what kind of position Valemount will be in a number of years
Interference?
Greg
On Mar 4, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Mark Nash wrote:
One AP with one radio.
We've gone through the moisture issue. Originally, Ubiquiti thought
that
the radios were taking in too much static and we needed to DC-ground
each
piece of equipment. We did that, bought new
A good final coating over the tape (be it pure rubber or vinyl) is
3M's Scotchkote
http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en_US/3MElectrical/Home/ProductsServices/Products/?PC_7_RJH9U5230GE3E02LECIE20OES1_nid=6Q3BGBPJ7CbeFR7R0D83TCgl
We used that on seagoing ships for outdoor connections that
What about the PicoStation?
On Mar 11, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
last time I heard, false.. not enough ram.
* ---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
With VoIP is it really a bandwidth issue or is it a latency issue? My
experience is mostly with Skype and not SIP/H323 but what I've seen is
that the bandwidth consumed isn't very high but the latency makes it
or breaks it.
Greg
On Apr 11, 2009, at 1:54 AM, Scott Carullo wrote:
Or
Are you using the optional QoS module that does layer 7 traffic
shaping? I was using that at home but found the QoS in the Tomato
firmware for Broadcom based APs to be more accurate. I haven't found
any of the free open source Linux based firewalls to be very good at
traffic shaping. I
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
