Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

Thanks Matt! Yes, the first thing I did was set up my own speed test site "on net". On 1/22/07, Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RickG wrote: > Dave, > > Thanks for the explanation. Really, my clients want to improve their > browsing speed. Of course, like most people, they associate speed

RE: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

d and outbound failover, but does NOTHING for load balancing. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 9:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers RickG wrote: > A

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

RickG wrote: Dave, Thanks for the explanation. Really, my clients want to improve their browsing speed. Of course, like most people, they associate speed with speed test website such as speakeasy, etc. In order to improve speed you need lower RTT and less congestion/packet loss on any given rou

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

Dave, Thanks for the explanation. Really, my clients want to improve their browsing speed. Of course, like most people, they associate speed with speed test website such as speakeasy, etc. -RickG On 1/21/07, David E. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RickG wrote: > According to the responses I

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

RickG wrote: According to the responses I'm getting is that load sharing wont work. So, why do I find so many article sayign it does such as http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=13103 ? Depends on your definition of load-balancing. Traditionally, that means you can balance traffic

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

This has been the case for me. Everyone wants a unique connection to the net in case of an outage. Not to beat a dead horse but back to the load-sharing question: According to the responses I'm getting is that load sharing wont work. So, why do I find so many article sayign it does such as http:/

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

We just picked up a big account here. The owner of a coffee shop chain is adding day trading to his offerings. Someone was trying to sell him two adsl lines. One for redundancy. After laying the idea of wireless as a true redundancy we got the contract for the whole chain. Superior Wireless New Orl

RE: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

ginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom DeReggi Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 6:51 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers And Using two links to one provider does nothing for true redundancy, diversity, and failover.. Tom De

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

i RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:33 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers > Juat catching up on the list after

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

nt: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:33 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers Juat catching up on the list after a busy couple of weeks. So, are we saying that all the products that claim load balancing dont work? I can testify that the auto-failover works but the load sharing seems to make things s

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

f Butch Evans Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 1:49 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David E. Smith wrote: >> This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and >> load balancing but fail-over is priority.

RE: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David E. Smith wrote: >> This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and >> load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll >> look into the

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

Another thing for my R&D department! Thanks! -RickG On 1/7/07, Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David E. Smith wrote: >> This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and >> load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll >> loo

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David E. Smith wrote: This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll look into the microtik. Thanks! -RickG Rick, keeping in mind that "load balancing" where you don't control both

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

RickG wrote: This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll look into the microtik. Thanks! -RickG I could never get load balancing and policy routing to work quite right, but it also wasn't a high pri

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

David, This is for the end user cpe side. I'd like to see both fail-over and load balancing but fail-over is priority. No need for wireless. I'll look into the microtik. Thanks! -RickG On 1/6/07, David E. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RickG wrote: > Hey, I've been testing Dual-WAN routers.

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

Nice article! Thx! RickG On 1/6/07, CHUCK PROFITO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: NO EXPERIENCE, BUT AN INTERESTING ARTICLE TO READ AT http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2004/0913rev.html CHUCK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Sa

Re: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

RickG wrote: Hey, I've been testing Dual-WAN routers. I've used Xincom, Linksys, & D-Link. The Linksys seems to be most reliable because it has a "health check feature". Has anyone out there tried anything else? Are you just looking for redundancy (i.e. automatic failover so if one ISP or con

RE: [WISPA] Dual-WAN routers

NO EXPERIENCE, BUT AN INTERESTING ARTICLE TO READ AT http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2004/0913rev.html CHUCK -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 12:35 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Dual-W

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

Unlesss your doing BGP/OSPF or something fancy, might want to check out www.hotbrick.com ~$250. You can configure some nice little things(email alert, universal client on LAN, services 'binding', desired loadbalancing %, etc.)in a matter of minutes that would take considerably longer on a Mikro

RE: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

CWLabTechnology Architectshttp://www.cwlab.com -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac DearmanSent: Monday, June 19, 2006 10:03 AMTo: 'WISPA General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers Bo,     I would

RE: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

Title: Message are you planning on getting your customer an AS & running BGP?   if not -- and you're willing to roll up your sleaves a bit, you can "hack it" w/ some Mikrotik scripting (In my ISP days, one of my customers back in 2002/2003, Larry Yunker actually, was doing this b/n our conn

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

Thanks everyone for all the feedback!!!    Bo  On 6/19/06, Sam Tetherow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you are familiar with RouterOS a routerboard 500 would do the trickand only run you about $175    Sam Tetherow   Sandhills WirelessDylan Oliver wrote:> You might check Peplink.com

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

If you are familiar with RouterOS a routerboard 500 would do the trick and only run you about $175 Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Dylan Oliver wrote: You might check Peplink.com for its Balance products - http://www.peplink.com/productsLoader.php?productName=balanc

RE: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

Bo,     I would use a MikroTik box in an indoor enclosure, The RB532 w/64Megs of ram running OSPF would be easy, fast and as reliable as anything I know. Another solution if you were looking for a rack mount set up would be to get a Cisco router and drop a couple modules in it and do thei

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Bo Hamilton wrote: I'm in the market for a dual WAN router. Could I get some feedback on the some that you guys and gals are using. I have some clients using me as a backup for their T1's, so Im just trying to find out wich one's are the best to go with. Mikrotik with

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

You might check Peplink.com for its Balance products - http://www.peplink.com/productsLoader.php?productName=balance . The 200 supports two WAN connections with max throughput of 30 Mbps, and the 700 has seven WAN ports with max throughput of 350 Mbps. They are $845 and $3995, respectively.I've bee

Re: [WISPA] Dual WAN Routers

I have a Hawking wireless one.  Nothing to write home about thought.   If there's a t-1 involved I'd think you'd want to use the cisco (or whatever) that's already on the t-1.   If you are going to back up a t-1 I'd certainly look at a higher end unit than a Linksys or something along those l