-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CHUCK M
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 2:00 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's
reach
Then The JURY members were uneducated boobs... a little reading and
it
is very evident he
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Victoria Proffer
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:38 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
I don't know if you are aware of this but there is no law
needs
the information you allready have. It's not that big of deal provided we
don't have to pay for the census data.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: CHUCK M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
for the census data.
Frank
- Original Message -
From: CHUCK M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking
broadband's reach
Then The JURY members were uneducated
- Original Message -
From: Steve Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
I agree, I would also like to know the position of WISPA. It looks
It looks like Mark from Neofast is back disguised as muddyfrogwater. How
fun is this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
It looks like Mark from Neofast is back disguised as muddyfrogwater. How
fun is this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED
] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 4:16 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
It looks like Mark from Neofast is back disguised as muddyfrogwater. How
fun is this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
ROFL LMFAO !!! I forgot about Mark form NeoFast, that's too funny...
I was wondering how long it'd be before someone started making Mark
sock-puppet jokes.
This new fellow, like Mark, does occasionally make some valid points, he
just goes about making them in a very silly way.
David Smith
Below.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
Hold
] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
It is Mark http://www.muddyfrogwater.us
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 9:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Hi John.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
I
of the nation, prepare to be regulated.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
Below.
insert witty
-
From: Chuck McCown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s
reach
Hold your horses there a bit, the FCC is tasked to produce the
highest and
best use
without just compensation
It is taken every day of the week. And we always provide just
compensation
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking
While at it, bill the IRS for your time in filling out their data requests
which they will use against you.
Ditto the census bureau, you must be really steamed when they roll around...
Or perhaps you are one of those that doesn't believe the govt has the right
to impose an imcome tax...
I feel
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
While at it, bill the IRS for your time in filling out their data requests
which they will use against you.
Ditto the census
witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
That's not quite accurate. There is a law on the books
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
They have EVERY FREAKING CHOICE IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD.
They could hire a research company to physically find out and map
I think people get too worked up over nothing.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new
bands were created. The FCC is our
friend, whether or not you believe it.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadbands reach
They have EVERY
@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
But were those bands created for WISPS, or for all the home routers,
telephones, etc and we get to piggy back on them? IMHO, the only thing I
have saw the FCC do for WISPS
are simply reaping what we've sown.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
Sigh.
I am in an industry
of their time learning how things work and don't have time to
screw with us.
Until that's done though, lets deal with reality.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves
with reality.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
Im going to repost a response I made privately, leaving off
I'm curious to know WISPA's official position on this is.
Looking back in the archives, I see little discussion about this, but the
only way this information is going to be obtained, is if ISP's are required
to determine the location of each census unit and then plot on maps of the
census unit
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
I'm curious to know WISPA's official position on this is.
Looking back
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband’s reach
There are ways to do this in GIS software and I thought I heard mention
that the FCC was going to provide a site to do this as well. The census
block is the smallest sized geographic polygon that they use as a unit
] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 3:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
I'm curious to know WISPA's official position on this is.
Looking back in the archives, I see little discussion about
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
I agree, I would also like to know the position of WISPA. It looks like
another great way for some company to make extra income off of my already
short bottom line. The current reporting is a pain but can be completed
@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
Im going to repost a response I made privately, leaving off the other
person... I want to be clear what's really bothering me lately.
==
Maybe I should be more
List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
I guess a benefit I can see (out west here) is that we constantly hear of
the need for government to step in and provide broadband because of the
lack
that up I'll post some
links.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com http://www.wirelessmapping.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:19 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's
reach
Im going to repost a response I made privately, leaving off the other
person
I can find absolutely no reason to think that ANY of us are going to
benefit
from this. The only people who could possibly benefit, would be the
Qwest's and the Clearwires of the world, who have publicly financed
expansion research done for them.
If the collated data are made publicly
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scottie Arnett
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 2:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
Notice he says with the number
of lines growing from 9 million to more than 100 million. Unless I
Notice he says with the number
of lines growing from 9 million to more than 100 million. Unless I feel
asleep, wireless uses no lines, but that statement comes from where Martin is
in bed with the telcos...for some reason he refuses to understand that there
are other providers TRYING to offer
Did this event take place?
On 3/16/08 8:46 PM, Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the following article, a number of FCC staffers are not
happy working under FCC Chairman Kevin Martin.
__
Does this mean our 477 forms are going to be more complicated?
Will we need to figure out the correct census tract for each of our
customers?
And I looked up the tract that I live in (quickly, at http://
factfinder.census.gov/servlet/AGSGeoAddressServlet ). It seems to be
tract #314.01,
, March 20, 2008 12:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Approves New Broadband Mapping Plan
Does this mean our 477 forms are going to be more complicated?
Will we need to figure out the correct census tract for each of our
customers?
And I looked up the tract that I live
- Original Message -
From: John Valenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Approves New Broadband Mapping Plan
Does this mean our 477 forms are going to be more complicated?
Will we need to figure out
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 8:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Approves New Broadband Mapping Plan
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/AGSGeoAddressServlet?_lang=en_programY
ear=50_treeId=420
, 2008 8:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Approves New Broadband Mapping Plan
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/AGSGeoAddressServlet?_lang=en_programY
ear=50_treeId=420http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/AGSGeoAddressServlet?_lang=en_programYear=50_treeId=420
That's
systems.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES
important!
Mac
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Mac Dearman wrote:
I thought I would
Why would it fall on Mikrotik to implement something to lock the power level. I
have used many certified radio's with certified antennas that I can set the
power level up with higher powered certified antennas and be out of legal
limits. In this instance, I would be the one breaking the law. I
that Mikrotik is jumping on the FCC Certification
bandwagon.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Scottie Arnett wrote:
Why would it fall on Mikrotik to implement something to lock the
power level. I have used many certified radio's with certified
antennas that I can set the power level up with higher powered
certified antennas and be out of legal limits. In this
Mac Dearman wrote:
I thought I would share some of MikroTik's FCC certified gear with the list.
[ snip ]
Okay, I'm gonna hate myself for asking this, because it means opening
the dread Pandora's Box that is FCC certification questions.
The Routerboard 52 is just a mini-PCI card. Is this
and will soon be on the market for resale with that little
white sticker that seems so important!
Mac
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
sday, January 23, 2008 3:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Mac Dearman wrote:
I thought I would share some of MikroTik's FCC certified gear with
the list.
[ snip ]
Okay, I'm gonna hate myself for asking this, beca
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Travis Johnson wrote:
Here is where it will get interesting... in the actual MT software.
How are they going to lock down the software so the power
outputs, channels, etc. are all within FCC guidelines? They are
almost going to have to have a seperate MT version... which
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Mac Dearman wrote:
I thought I would share some of MikroTik's FCC certified gear
Wonder if the wireless PCB is available without the box? I could build it
into an antenna.
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Mac,
Here is where it will get interesting... in the actual MT software. How are
they going to lock down the software so the power outputs, channels, etc.
are all within FCC guidelines? They are almost going to have
23, 2008 7:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Wonder if the wireless PCB is available without the box? I could build
it
into an antenna.
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Wonder if the wireless PCB is available without the box? I could build
it
into an antenna.
- Original Message -
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL
23, 2008 7:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Anybody know what type of RF connectors are on the board?
What should one expect to pay for large quantities of the bare board?
- Original Message -
From: Gino Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Mac,
Here is where it will get interesting... in the actual MT software. How are
they going to lock down
, January 23, 2008 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Mac,
Here is where it will get interesting... in the actual MT software. How are
they going to lock down the software so the power outputs, channels, etc.
are all within FCC guidelines? They are almost
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Those products don't automatically turn the power down when you
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Anybody know what type of RF connectors are on the board?
What should one expect to pay for large quantities of the bare board
Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
I'm pretty sure that they already are locked down by FCC domain. The
only place
fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Certifiable MikroTik? YES!!
Anybody know what type of RF connectors
Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Mike Hammett wrote:
If you have equipment, you fill it out.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message - From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Sam Tetherow wrote:
Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)?
No; it covers any telecommunication services that are regulated by the FCC.
-Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
If you have equipment, you fill it out.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 10:38 AM
Subject: [WISPA] FCC Form 499
If my contribution is under $10,000 ($10,000 is several times my entire
annual revenue from my wisp, before expenses) do I still need to file?
If I do have to file, how much will I be billed when I get a 499 number
assigned to me?
Jason
Mike Hammett wrote:
If you have equipment, you fill
In case people weren't aware...2 somewhat exciting things in the world
of Part 101
1. 2' dishes are legal in 11 GHz
2. FCC dropped licensing fees (now costs about $2500 to license a link
vs. $3500 a month ago)
Additional things that would be helpful (just my personal opinion)
1. Relax the
On 10/15/07, Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additional things that would be helpful (just my personal opinion)
1. Relax the interference resistance requirement for Part 101 (systems
today don't need the 90 dB SNR that analogue systems from the 80s
required...)
2. Decrease the license
Hi Matt,
On behalf of WISPA members, WISPA's FCC Committee filed comments on this
NPRM with the FCC this past week.
Here's a link to them: http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=89
Individual WISPs are also invited to file their own comments directly
with the FCC.
jack
Matt wrote:
] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 8:58 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Says White-Space Spectrum Device Doesn't Work
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Patrick Leary wrote:
Well, most that can are probably doing what we are doing Mike,
which is to study, monitor
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] fcc committee survey
I hate it when someone says me too, but...me too. ;-)
A lot of the things the FCC has are just silly... like PC with wireless vs.
our stuff. Why a HAM can take a test any joke can pass and then manufacture
gear himself
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] fcc committee survey
For personal use only- not for resale.
And for non commercial use only
As someone else has asked... what are the fixed wireless companies doing in
the white spaces?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Frank Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday,
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Patrick Leary wrote:
Well, most that can are probably doing what we are doing Mike,
which is to study, monitor, and plant some seeds. It is a bit early
to market an actual system. The nature of the band will require
some atypical technologies and the applications will
Butch:
There were actually two different whitespace devices tested by the
FCC, and they were very much prototypes.
Making a device for whitespaces is markedly different than anything
vendors such as Alvarion have ever done, because a whitespaces device
has to guard against interfering with
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Leary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Says White-Space Spectrum Device Doesn't Work
Well, most that can are probably doing what we are doing Mike, which
this.
- Patrick
Alvarion
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Says White-Space Spectrum Device Doesn't Work
Well, so far Google, Dell, etc. have
!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] fcc committee survey
For what is worth
#1 Certified Components!!!
Being able to mix-n-match parts to make it work HERE is my biggest issue!
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
The FCC Committee would like to know your top few issues (3 to 5) that
you'd like us to PROACTIVELY work on. Things, mainly, that you'd like
For what is worth, I believe that the USF ALREADY includes broadband
services.
My understanding is that in order to qualify for USF funding for your
broadband services, you must also be conducting business as a ILEC or CLEC
in that service area. In other words, telephone companies that service
Amen
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] fcc committee survey
#1 Certified Components
I was going to offlist this, but, I might as well put my foot where my mouth is.
In my opinion the top things I want addressed would be:
I would like to see a WISP License like a Ham License. Its very simple
in idea but I think it would truly change the industry. Any one
wanting to be a wisp
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] fcc committee survey
I was going to offlist this, but, I might as well put my foot where my
mouth is.
In my opinion the top things I want addressed would be:
I would like to see a WISP License like a Ham
Open Access here does NOT mean wholesaling the network.
Open Access here means Carterphone. IOW, the unlocking of the iPhone.
- Peter
David Hughes wrote:
FCC Majority Backs Open-Access Plan for Airwaves
By Kim Hart
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 25, 2007; D02
A majority of
Hi there! New to the list but wanted to jump in with comments:
This was, IMO, a great hearing. I watched about the first 2 hours of it and
was delighted by the responses of the witnesses. Hearing the chair of the
committee refer to the ATT iPhone contract as being a Hotel California
service where
Gawd, it is this kind of thing that makes me wish I was a Democrat. Why
can't we all find the
middle?
-m-
David Hughes wrote:
FCC Auction Should Allow for Open Wireless Network, Say Lawmakers
By Kim Hart
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, July 12, 2007; D08
Key lawmakers on Capitol
. The size shape etc of the DRE can be any size or shape (small)
providing all the network criteria is satisfied.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 9:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC
---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of michael mulcay
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 11:09 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Public Notice
] On
Behalf Of michael mulcay
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 11:09 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Public Notice
Charles,
The request for a declaratory ruling applies to all frequency bands. The
bands of immediate interest are 3.7 to 4.2GHz and 5.9 to 6.4GHz (an easy
freq change
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 1:03 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Public Notice
But what about the 36 / 38 dBi antenna rule for 4 6 GHz? The SIA is
all over Fibertower's 2' request in 11 GHz...imagine 4 GHz, which could
knock out a lot of C-band downlinks (now, not being a satellite
Wouldn't you be better off lowering antenna size requirement for the 3.7
GHz band first?
No one (specifically WiMAX) is going to make anything cheap for 18 or 23
GHz
-Charles
---
WiNOG Wireless Roadshows
Coming to a City Near You
http://www.winog.com
Mike - Can Citizens at Large provide comment too? I
am involved in volunteer wireless project for a local
school district in my area. The CTO is always seeking
ways to do wireless on a limited budget. We already
have problems with interference in a confined urban
space and hypothesized a
, 2007 9:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Public Notice
Mike - Can Citizens at Large provide comment too? I
am involved in volunteer wireless project for a local
school district in my area. The CTO is always seeking
ways to do wireless on a limited budget. We already
have
: michael mulcay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Public Notice
Felix,
Yes, a Citizen at Large can provide comment and the concept of
public-private networks with WISPs would make a very powerful argument
Mike has sent the question to the FCC so I'll wait to hear a response
there or if enough time lapses I will pose the question to them.
I can't speak for anyone else, but *I* did not say that I interpreted
the law in any manner. I *asked* the question, what makes an SBC with a
a radio card any
Only if all radios were required to use the same time slot
assignments. That would make full duplex links impossible (or at least
hinder them greatly since they would have to have a down time not to
step on another radios RX period)
On 6/9/07, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WiMAX, scheduled
301 - 400 of 655 matches
Mail list logo
