the contract to what they are selling to others.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Providers
So what
And when I say re-negotiate, I mean sign a new contract at the other
rate.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eric Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
much.
We watch our usage and when the system hits 95% of capacity for mroe than a few
minutes per day we buy more capacity.
That help?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: ~NGL~
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 7:50 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio
We see each server with about 500 subs sucks down during peak load at
around 50M/s. or around 100 subs per 10M 10 users per meg.
Your mileage may vary.
We rarely see less than 20M for the same 500 subs
Marco
the residential that
will drive me crazy.
Bob-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 12:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio to Customers
Also I guess when you
We did a similar survey and found Travis was the biggest bandwidth nazi. I
was in the worst third :(
On Jul 31, 2010 10:48 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya, thats about right. At 300 subs, I'm seeing occasional burst of 20Mbps.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Josh Luthman
You mean Canopy down link? 66 and 33 as that is 2/3.
On Jul 31, 2010 10:38 AM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:
What ratio of bandwidth per 100 customers is being used to deliver 2M down
and 1M up?
WISPA Wants You!
How much bandwidth do you purchase per 100 customers to deliver 2M down and 1M
up?
From: ~NGL~
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 7:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio to Customers
What ratio of bandwidth per 100 customers is being used to deliver 2M down
and
Well we do 2x512 and 4x1 and 200 customers use roughly 15 megs.
On Jul 31, 2010 10:51 AM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:
How much bandwidth do you purchase per 100 customers to deliver 2M down
and 1M up?
*From:* ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net
*Sent:* Saturday, July 31, 2010 7:37 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
Ya, thats about right. At 300 subs, I'm seeing occasional burst of 20Mbps.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Well we do 2x512 and 4x1 and 200 customers use roughly 15 megs.
On Jul 31, 2010 10:51 AM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:
How much bandwidth
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:11 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio to Customers
Well we do 2x512 and 4x1 and 200 customers use roughly 15 megs.
On Jul 31, 2010 10:51 AM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net
General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio to Customers
My thinking has been 10 meg per 100 as a baseline but it really depends
on the usage in that network. If there are heavy Netflix or any other
HD video service, the demand could be double. Monitoring is the only
thing
://www.shelbybb.com
*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Robert West
*Sent:* Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:53 PM
*To:* 'WISPA General List'
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio to Customers
My thinking has been 10 meg per 100 as a baseline but it really depends
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:11 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio to Customers
Well we do 2x512 and 4x1 and 200 customers use roughly 15 megs.
On Jul 31, 2010 10:51 AM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:
How much
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:11 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Ratio to Customers
Well we do 2x512 and 4x1 and 200 customers use roughly 15 megs.
On Jul 31, 2010 10:51 AM, ~NGL~ n
Akami requires you to hit 75 Mb/s of their content before they want to
add a server to your noc.
mc
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
There is no such thing as collisions now on ethernet/fiber as we use switches
instead of
hubs. Each link is full duplex and capable of handing 100% capacity.
However if you basing utilization on 5 minute averages like MRTG, keep in mind
that's a
5 minute average and you could be going from
Lots of different factors.
One of the biggest is how fast you are growing. We build out in spurts.
I may add 10 towers in a three month period. As soon as marketing in
that area hits, growth is usually pretty fast.
The second biggest factor is how slow new bandwidth is to light up. I
just
BTW,
We retired our squid cache server a few years ago. It was based in
our main NOC, not at the edge. If I had to do it again, I would put
small caches at the edge instead. Just make sure if they die or hang
the customers can still get out. I would make the caches small (10G)
with multiple
On May 20, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
I had heard folks like Akamai will give servers if your network is big
enough - but never been able to get traction on that rumor sadly
http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_partner.html
--
Blake Covarrubias
When you peak at 65-75 percent its probably time to add more. It
depends on how fast your filling it up and how long it takes to
implement the new capacity.
-RickG
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
At what percentage of your backbone usage do you look at
What do your trends show you?
Take your yearly graph and draw a line along the averages. Extend this
line what does it do?
ryan
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:54 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
When you peak at 65-75 percent its probably time to add more. It
depends on how fast your
Old rule of thumb for Ethernet, because it is based on collision
detection, is 70-75% is the max you want. Above this and collisions
often become an issue. I assume the same is true for the faster links
as well.
Jeremie Chism wrote:
At what percentage of your backbone usage do you look at
That depends on how long your peaks last.
The bottom line is that peaks generally only last short periods. If you run
out of peak capacity, the side effect is usually minimal. All that occurs is
that transfers during those peak time slow down a bit and spreadout over a
longer period of time.
Thanks Tom for the information. I appreciate you taking the time our
of your busy day to give me such good information. It is greatly
appreciated. I will make some adjustment to increase cpe bandwidth and
see what happens. Most of my traffic shoul be bursty because it is
business but I do
to the design and technology of the backbone.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Consulting Tower Climbing Network Support
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 09:54:49 -0400
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
When you peak at 65-75 percent its probably time to add more
, May 20, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
Old rule of thumb for Ethernet, because it is based on collision
detection, is 70-75% is the max you want. Above this and collisions
often become an issue. I assume the same is true for the faster links
as well.
Jeremie Chism wrote
- Original Message -
From: Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
To point one, it depends on the device and the settings. If set to full
duplex, there should not be collisions in a ptp
11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
Well Put.
Have you guys thought about - (sorry jumping in the back end here)
adding squid or caching?
I have seen some major drops on bandwidth when caching is put in place
- up to 30+%
On the other hand - squid is not a replacement
: [WISPA] Bandwidth
Well Put.
Have you guys thought about - (sorry jumping in the back end here)
adding squid or caching?
I have seen some major drops on bandwidth when caching is put in
place
- up to 30+%
On the other hand - squid is not a replacement for the additional
bandwidth.
On May
and technology of the backbone.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Scott Reed scottr...@onlyinternet.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
Old rule of thumb for Ethernet, because it is based on collision
detection, is 70-75% is the max you want. Above this and
collisions
often become an issue. I assume the same is true for the faster
links
as well.
Jeremie Chism wrote:
At what percentage of your
Matt;
Thanks for sharing your information.
Frank
On 5/6/2010 11:11 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Since there has been a lot of discussion about bandwidth caps on this
list recently, I thought that I would share the one that we recently
implemented, along with some details on how we are
Hey Matt,
Can you give us your customers' reaction to this change after a few weeks?
ryan
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.comwrote:
Since there has been a lot of discussion about bandwidth caps on this
list recently, I thought that I would share the one
EXCELLENT post. This is worth framing.
Thank you very much for the information and publishing this with us.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] bandwidth available
In the words of a good friend, never underestimate the bandwidth of a
Ford Pinto loaded with CDs / DVDs traveling 90 miles per hour down the
highway.
Where are you located? We've got some pretty good contracts in place.
Marco
On Tue
: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 11:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] bandwidth available
In the words of a good friend, never underestimate the bandwidth of a
Ford Pinto loaded with CDs
Marco, could you just mail me some?
I have a hard time finding wholesale bandwidth in my market; I wish I was
closer.
Friendly Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marco Coelho
Sent: Tuesday, April 27,
We use Ipacco http://ipacco.sourceforge.net/
This collects the IP accounting data from our border cisco router(s)
and puts it into a central MySQL database. But it makes a HUGE
database with lots more data than we need that is really slow to
query. So we wrote a PHP script that runs every few
Bandwidth or bits?
Actually ip track kind of does both. Each customer can see the speeds that
their system was averaging. We never use it because we worry about peak
speeds, but the data is there.
All data is sent by the main routers.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Matt Larsen -
We use mrtg/rrd to collect data transfer values from cpe. Then we use mrtg
totalizer to produce graphs that have daily and month totals. We also have
a modified totalizer script that checks to see if that are any bandwidth
abusers because they have used more than x in the last 30 days and y in
Matt
I think Cacti Made Easy is a great solution for you :-)
In short - CACTI will listen on SNMP - as well as at the switch level and give
you this control.
As of Freeside - Not sure - btu would assume there should be an import.
Call me off list - and I can help ya - one fat cowboy to
Matt -
I almost forgot the link
http://cactiez.cactiusers.org/
On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
I am looking for a solution that will keep track of the monthly
bandwidth consumption for all of my broadband customers and am having a
hard time coming up with a
If you can run IPTrack (see some of Marlon's previous posts) you have
have the MTs report by IP address back to the server.
I have done this on my network, though it is not running right now. I
would be glad to help if you opt to go this way.
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Hello list,
I am
Scott,
4) StarOS routers performing NAT at each backbone location
It's StarOS NATing the customers off of the backbone.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue
That is a great link! I don't think it will solve my immediate
problem, but I may look at using this to replace our current Cacti
server at some point.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 3/30/2010 1:30 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
Matt -
I almost forgot the link
http://cactiez.cactiusers.org/
IPTrack is Brandon Checkett's program, and we did experiment with it,
but it doesn't do exactly what we are looking for, and we were concerned
about its apparent lack of any new development.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 3/30/2010 1:32 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
If you can run IPTrack (see some of
StarOS is NATting at each backbone location - that is why I wanted to
put this collection in place between the core router and the NAT router
so it can see the customer data in its native (pre-NATted) state.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 3/30/2010 1:34 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Scott,
4)
3) Mikrotik core routers at each backbone location
I took it that all traffic goes through these as well.
Matt, does all your traffic run through an MT somewhere on its way out?
Josh Luthman wrote:
Scott,
4) StarOS routers performing NAT at each backbone location
It's StarOS NATing
I think we need to find out if I am looking for a solution that will
keep track of the monthly bandwidth consumption for all of my
broadband customers... means how much you're entire upstream is using
or how much each customer is using individually so you can find the
top few heavy users.
Josh
Hi Josh,
I'm wanting to track how much each individual customers is using so I
can bill the ones that go over our bandwidth cap.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 3/30/2010 1:57 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I think we need to find out if I am looking for a solution that will
keep track of the monthly
Then you will need to find a solution with StarOS. Can you maybe set
a single queue for each customer and then obtain that via SNMP?
I'm totally unfamiliar with StarOS.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure
Actually, I could potentially do it from the Mikrotik router at the
core, behind the StarOS NAT server. Only problem is that the NetFlow
collector on Mikrotik is broken. That is why we are leaning toward
something between the core and NAT servers to collect the data.
Queues will not work,
What is broken in netflow? I've been using it for over 5 years now to
collect traffic data and it seems spot on.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
On 3/30/10 3:30 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Actually, I could potentially do it from the Mikrotik router at the
core, behind the
Cacti would be what I would start with. I have set it up where business
customers have their own individual logins and can see just the graphs you
want them to. It has built in graphs for 95th percentile. There is a
plugin called nectar which allows you to have graphs e-mailed. You can also
We're also big fans and long time users of Cacti, so I'd happily
recommend it as well.
On 3/30/2010 16:46, Justin Wilson wrote:
Cacti would be what I would start with. I have set it up where business
customers have their own individual logins and can see just the graphs you
want them
prtg will meet your needs
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists
li...@manageisp.com wrote:
Hello list,
I am looking for a solution that will keep track of the monthly
bandwidth consumption for all of my broadband customers and am
having a
hard time
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 4:49 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
We're also big fans and long time users of Cacti, so I'd happily
recommend it as well.
On 3/30/2010 16:46, Justin Wilson wrote:
Cacti would be what I would start
Hi Matt,
I have built usage-based accounting systems for ISPs using NetFlow and/or
RADIUS Accounting and MySQL running on Linux. Contact me directly to
discuss.
Tim
--
Tim Sylvester
Network RADIUS
(408) 826-8350 (o)
(408) 334-1700 (m)
tim.sylves...@networkradius.com
-Original Message-
Have you looked into PMACCT with NetFlow?
Tim Sylvester wrote:
Hi Matt,
I have built usage-based accounting systems for ISPs using NetFlow and/or
RADIUS Accounting and MySQL running on Linux. Contact me directly to
discuss.
Tim
--
Tim Sylvester
Network RADIUS
(408) 826-8350 (o)
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Well, This would be a little more time consuming. And would need a hell
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Jenkins
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 4:34 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Have you looked into PMACCT with NetFlow?
The short
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Scott,
4) StarOS routers performing NAT at each backbone location
It's StarOS
List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Actually, I could potentially do it from the Mikrotik router at the
core, behind the StarOS NAT server. Only problem is that the NetFlow
collector on Mikrotik is broken. That is why we
- Original Message -
From: Richey myli...@battleop.com
To: n...@brevardwireless.com; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
I had CactiEZ running in a VM Ware on a Dell 1850 with 4GB of ram. It did
fine
]
On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Well, This would be a little more time consuming. And would need a
hell of a
cacti box. But you could SNMP hit each customers CPE device if it
supports
: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Well, This would be a little more time consuming. And would need a
hell of a
cacti box. But you could SNMP hit each customers CPE device if it
supports
it. That would be quite the load
graphs now.
Richey
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Well, This would be a little
30, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Well, This would be a little more time consuming. And would need a
hell of a
cacti box. But you could SNMP hit each customers CPE device if it
supports
it. That would be quite the load
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Well, This would be a little more time consuming. And would need a
hell of a
cacti box. But you could SNMP hit
graphs now.
Richey
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Tracking Solutions
Well, This would be a little
Marco
We are looking for 50 meg pipe in Pulaski Tn.16724 west college st.
Ray
- Original Message -
From: Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
Can you give an exact address
, February 05, 2010 8:59 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
Marco
We are looking for 50 meg pipe in Pulaski Tn.16724 west college st.
Ray
- Original Message -
From: Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent
Can you give an exact address and quantity of bandwidth you're looking for?
Marco
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Ray Jean webbil...@surfmore.net wrote:
Anyone know of a cheap provider of bandwidth in southern middle Tennessee?
Thanks Ray Jean
One man's cheap bandwidth is another's OH HELL NO!
Try asking your county engineers office or the county tax office. They
should have fiber maps and would be able to tell you who owns what and
where. After that. A big black hole with large dollar signs if
you aren't careful.
Pay attention to utility markers on the side of the road. Eventually you'll
notice patterns of routes and what companies use what markers. If I see a
red rectangle on a metal post in area A, I know it's the power company. In
area B, I know it's Comcast. If I see a faded
the cost we pay.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of John Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
We buy ours through a reseller, and they have quoted us
Kinda sounds like a WISP, eh? As long as they aren't overselling it to
the point quality suffers, who cares? We had to work at just doing a
speed test on our 100 meg connection as most of the servers couldn't do
100 meg up and 100 meg down. We finally were able to do a ftp and get 95
meg/95
The best way to test bandwidth is to use simple tools like iPerf.
Techs should load iPerf on their laptops as well.
Iperf was developed by NLANR/DAST as a modern alternative for measuring maximum
TCP and UDP bandwidth performance. Iperf allows the tuning of various
parameters and UDP
of my rambling...
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: John Thomas jtho...@quarnet.com
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 4:59 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
We buy ours through a reseller, and they have quoted us $1000/month for
Gig at Hurricane Electric in Fremont CA.
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if GigE connections were under $1 now.
I know a couple
General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
Resellers are a little bit more expensive actually and all of them don't
have fiber already ran. It's ridiculous the cost we pay.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:42:09AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
As Matt Larsen has been talking about, he built out 125 miles of backhaul to
connect his network back to civilization. Others have even further to go.
-
Mike Hammett
Looks like we'd have to go across three states to get
.)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:56 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
On Wed, Jan 27
Plus they want to oversell this cheap bandwidth. They don¹t want you to
max out that Gig circuit. Allows them to oversell their bandwidth that much
more.
--
John,
You are correct, Gig is starting to go for $1-$2 per mb. Not only from
Hurricaine, although Hurricaine is clearly a
@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:42:09AM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
As Matt Larsen has been talking about, he built out 125 miles of backhaul
to
connect his network back to civilization. Others have even
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
Did you mean $9/meg or $0.90/meg? $9/meg isn't much to write home about.
;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
Hosting Consulting Tower Climbing
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:33:16 -0500
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
I hear $1500 for a gig!
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:39 PM
General List wireless@wispa.org; RickG
rgunder...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
Yup. If you are at an on-net building you can get it even cheaper.
One
client is buying for $9 a meg in bulk in Chicago. Their biggest hurdle
are
peering agreements with the big boys. The ATt¹s
] On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
Did you mean $9/meg or $0.90/meg? $9/meg isn't much to write home about.
;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
Did you mean $9/meg or $0.90/meg? $9/meg isn't much to write home about.
;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 2:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
Location, location, location...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources
@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
50Mbit for $450 a month isn't bad for a pipe to ATT. We're paying 10x
that from ATT right now.
$0.90? come on give me a break. If that's possible then we should sue ATT
for highway robbery.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
50Mbit for $450 a month isn't bad for a pipe to ATT. We're paying 10x
that from ATT right now.
$0.90? come on give me a break. If that's possible then we should sue ATT
for highway robbery.
-Original
should sue ATT
for highway robbery.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
Did you mean $9/meg or $0.90
--
From: Andy Trimmell atrimm...@precisionds.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 2:20 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
50Mbit for $450 a month isn't bad for a pipe to ATT. We're paying 10x
that from ATT right now
into the colo.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: John Thomas jtho...@quarnet.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Promo
We buy ours through
I have seen a network feeding 80 megs of cogent for about 3 months now.
No complaints for the users. But this network also has a BGP feed from
Tier1.
We have servers on a cogent link in downtown Chicago. No problems with
them and there are 200+ web-sites hosted on those boxes.
--
2nd that. Cogent in Wisconsin has been solid for us for the past two
years or so. I have not heard bad things about their network out of
Illinois either. Some people have problems with them in other markets.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net wrote:
I have seen a
101 - 200 of 313 matches
Mail list logo
