Is there anyone who is using anything other than Trango who sees this
same issue?
Scriv
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
I"m on the other end of the country - Oregon...
I saw no changes in my 5 ghz stuff. Solar activity would have an impact
here too, right? how long does the influence last?
No
None of my Trango or Tranzeo 5.x stuff missed a beat.
Maybe Y'all aint living right :-)
--
Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
318-728-8600 - Rayville
318-303-4107 - Monroe, La
318-450-4101 - NOC
John Scrivner wrote:
Is there anyone who is using anything other than Trango who
I agree. Continental is a tennant and has exclusive use of the space. Don't see that as different that any other MTU. And they are not wanting to receive the same signal that MASSPORT is sending out, they want their own, if I read it right.
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networ
Yes. You should be concerned about landlords cutting exclusive deals
with telcos and cable cos to prohibit competing wireless
networks. I'm not talking about roof top access; I'm talking about
asserting control over internal networks so that you can't reach
business customers. The OTARD rule
Blair
- We are working on a software upgrade to our RWO product line which will have
polling.
- The cost is from $139.95 to $289.95 depending on models.
- We have N connected versions.
- We are coming out with a 400mW 5Ghz RWO CPE and Base in the next 1-2 weeks
which will have polling.
Keep an
Tell him to go to the WISPA homepage and
click on the State Government Webpages Drop Down
List. All 50 states are there. He should be able to search for what he wants
from that page. ;)
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482 Office
260-307-40
Will it be TC compatible on the cpe side?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 11:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: RE: [WISPA] Looking fora new system
>
>
Hello John,
Redline.
Barry
Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 8:49:52 AM, you wrote:
JS> Is there anyone who is using anything other than Trango who sees this
JS> same issue?
JS> Scriv
JS> Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
>>I"m on the other end of the country - Oregon...
>>
>>I saw no changes in my 5 ghz stu
Hi All,
Who will step up to the plate and take this issue on? We need someone to
head up and write a filing.
thanks,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)
I agree, we need to firmly stand behind Continental. This is a clear case
where Continental should have the right to broadcast its signal, without
exception under OTARD rules. The common antenna exception also doesn't
really apply for this type of situation where the antenna does not have any
No. Its no possible for anybody to create a TC compatible system because of the
patents.
Sincerely, Tony Morella
Demarc Technology Group, A Wireless Solution Provider
Office: 207-244-9068 Fax: 207-433-1008
http://www.demarctech.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
Dan, can you check out the NWWNET.NET entry of the WISP list??? the link doesnt link. also... we need some data cleaning as there are many eroneous points that need some moving or deleting... How's the editing wizard coming along?
Scott... hi.. as far as editing your locations.. i am working on
team... we are doing a major site upgrade now... so... you're data will be well cared for... and many of the issue you've raised will be resolved in a few days...
hang in there... thx
On 8/3/05, Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John...
ok... no prob.. i'll chan
That looks great! Care to head up the submission of this to the FCC?
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net
Guys... oh.. i see what you mean.. well... the problem is simple...
since i have the page redirecting from a frame... we gotta do a link to target="blank" tag for your url to show... i'm working on that...
as far as why some links work and others dont...
all urls need to start with HTTP://www.
I know this is not exactly WISP business but since many of us are
multipurpose ISPs on this list I thought this would be of importance.
Beside, if the Bells get their way here who's to say that they won't go
after the airwaves so that their cell divisions have the only access.
Please check out
Yes, Star-OS 5.8 Links as well as a Karlnet KN150 5.8 solution.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 7:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.8 GHz PtP - weaker RSLs
Is there anyone
You are seeing the same intermittent issues with Redline?
Thanks,
Scriv
Barry at Mutual Data wrote:
Hello John,
Redline.
Barry
Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 8:49:52 AM, you wrote:
JS> Is there anyone who is using anything other than Trango who sees this
JS> same issue?
JS> Scriv
JS> Mark K
"If the vote goes according to Mr. Martin's plan, and the telecommunications companies find themselves free of the requirement that they open their broadband networks to competitors, it could have an immediate effect on ISPs such as America Online and EarthLink. This fall, they could find themselve
I don't think the FCC has much choice in the matter. The Supreme Court has
ruled that they can't force the unbundled elements issue.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)
GRIN. I already wholesale to other
isp's. AOL would be welcome!
Guys this could be the greatest thing in the world
for us. This may force Earthlink or whoever to go around and buy up every
wisp they can get their hands on.
Marlon(509)
982-2181
Equipm
What will this ruling do to those who are reselling BellSouths DSL
now? There are several other ISPs in the area who resell Bells DSL and
one has really sold a lot of it :-) Does this ruling man that they will
shut him down?
--
Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
318-728
I have a hard time believing that even SBC and Qwest will just suddenly shut
it all down one day.
I suspect mostly things will continue as they have, where they have found it
financial beneficial to do so.
North East Oregon Fastnet, LLC 509-593-4061
personal correspondence to: mark at neofast
Anyone used any Hermes II PCMCIA radio cards?
What card do you use and what pigtail do you need to go with it?
Thanks,
--
Blair Davis
AOL IM Screen Name -- Theory240
West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648
A division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wi
They will raise the rates, and refuse to provision any new lines
That is what SBC plans to do. Or so my contacts tell me..
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
I have a hard time believing that even SBC and Qwest will just suddenly shut
it all down one day.
I suspect mostly things will continu
Mac Dearman wrote:
one has really sold a lot of it :-) Does this ruling man that they will
shut him down?
I kinda of had similar thoughts about the consequences my competition
would suffer that I wouldn't. Because I don't provide dsl and they do.
But getting away from the selfish
Guys, remember this phrase. Use it whenever you are talking to your
representatives, peers, regulators etc.
Facilities based competition.
It's the ONLY way to prevent junk like this. You've got to own your tools
kids.
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
One thing that everyone here seems to be missing is that this will
effect you. As SBC and AT&T merge and Sprint and Nextel and Verizon and MCI
this create 3 companies that will control a vast majority of the services
offered. And they won't have to share. This will give the three cont
I'll tend to agree since the BOC/LECs could not
even get the rules straight on the TRRO UNE rule changes back in Dec 2004.
Frank
- Original Message -
From:
Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 5:03
PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA]
Its more scary than that because it is regional. We have the ability to buy
Verizon loops on the mid-atlantic, but not SBC as possible in the
South-west. So if Verizon and MCI merge it merges the two local option from
an ISP. So the point I'm making is the SBC even consider a player on the
ea
AOL and Earthlinks don't need us. They will
build their own. We just get more competition in the Wireless
world.
ILECs stop having competition, WISPs start having
competition. The WISP indistry grows, but existing WISPs start to feel the
squeeze.
The independant ISP is our friend. Most like
Until we sold our WISP, and no longer could
guarantee that we had good cost effective Internet connectivity for ourselves
:-)
What I will say, is if this decission doesn't spark
significant interest in partnering with, funding, or
purchasing Wireless companies from the AOLs and Earthlink's
Ah,
But don't forget Craig McCaw and Clearwire. They have been quietly
buying licenses and setting up to deploy wireless broadband nationwide. This guy
built two major wireless empires before (Cellular One - sold it to AT&T and
Nextel). He will be ready to pounce on the market that gets c
Brian,
Excellent comments. However, I don't
personally have the problem, as I don't currently utilize any ILEC services
on our network. Allthough I provide service occationally to Ilec employees
/ teleworkers with broadband for their home. I strictly use
independant fiber companies such
If anyone recalls the argument I had with Charles Wu...about how I would
NEVER surrender ownership of every part of my own network, from customer to
carrier hotel if there was any way of keeping it...
This kind of dependency upon regulatory whims, or the goodwill of public
agencies is NOT healthy
35 matches
Mail list logo
