Why not create a rule to filter out messages with out of office
in the subject or text of the message, instead of leaving the
group, entirely.
Rick
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Reactivo Química Visual
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 4:37
Looks nice on a Samsung Fascinate!
Rick
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Stuart Shearing
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:04 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Desktop. Tablet. Mobile.
Hi Birendra
To say that the site
Friends don't let friends use marquee!!!
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Jason Grant
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:02 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] To marquee or not to marquee here is the question!!!
Use a marquee!
Hi, David.
Good design.and the paintings are nice, too! ;o)
Two comments.
1) I recommend a Home link on all pages.
I tried to get back Home and couldn't find a
way to get there, until I just happened to click
on your name at the top.
2) Just a minor thing, but I think the Show /
+ 1
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Julie Romanowski
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 9:42 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] mobile
It loaded quickly on my iPhone4 through the mobile connection.
Personally, I would prefer
He's not spamming, Krystian...he's blind and having trouble with the updated
validation site he's used to using. Apparently, it's been changed and
doesn't work
well for the blind anymore.
And I'm sure his replies to responses from this list are slower than for
those who can see,
so chances are,
Looks good, Raul!
I'm able to read the text without problem, on both analog and digital
monitors.
Don't make the text contrast any less, however, especially in the menu, as
those
with lesser quality monitors and poorer eyesight might have difficulty
reading it.
Would recommend a Home menu item,
a mute point, which will drive us towards other solutions,
such as whole
browser magnification, etc.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Stuart Foulstone stu...@bigeasyweb.co.ukwrote:
sine qua non = indispensible
On Thu, July 2, 2009 9:27 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
It is the sine qua non
' ?
Regards,
Mike
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org on behalf of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Fri 03/07/2009 14:01
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessible websites
sine qua non also means most basic - yes, it is the most critical aspect
Yes, thanks for the reference, Richard.
I believe that's exactly what I was reading about.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Richard Stephenson
donkeyma...@gmail.comwrote:
I think this may be the service to which you refer...
http://www.typekit.com
http://blog.typekit.com
--
DonkeyMagic:
But how will you magnify the images and layout as designed for me to view?
Addressing font issues is only the absolute basic attempt to make the web
more accessible...It's important to be able to see how something is said
and with
what supporting content and context, rather than just what is said.
, Rick Faircloth wrote:
But how will you magnify the images and layout as designed for me to
view?
Addressing font issues is only the absolute basic attempt to make the web
more accessible...It's important to be able to see how something is
said
and with
what supporting content and context
Web accessibility is being more properly handled by browser creators using
magnification functionality,
which more effectively provides a better, more satisfying user experience
because images, as well as text,
can be magnified. While previous magnification functionality has required
users to
Sounds like a nightmare, Mike.
I wonder if the former web designer has any real claim
to copyright on the site's original graphics, or did the client
pay to be owner of the site's graphics in their original agreement?
Rick
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
As was mentioned, it's a call to action. Those who are familiar
with marketing will understand this concept. Also, it a user-friendly
way to compel a user to bookmark the site for future reference without
jumping through the hoops the browsers require.
It's the same principle as putting Call us
@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] add to favorites?
This list is aware of many marketing practices that are against Web
Standards.
On Wed, March 25, 2009 3:46 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
No, previous arguments still miss the point.
Having a button on a browser for booksmarks is not comparable
A call-to-action Bookmark This Page does not provide the
same functionality as a browser's bookmarking button when
functionality is extended to include psychological functionality
from the designer's perspective.
From a technical perspective, a bookmarking link and a bookmarking
browser button
Quite right, Janice.
When you have a boss, you do as the boss says, like it or not.
Or quit, or be fired. Those are the options.
No web standard is worth the loss of employment.
If anyone wants to make the final decision about standards
adherence, become the boss.
Rick
-Original
The correct design (and web standards that are adhered to or not)
is that design for which the client is paying. Web designers should
offer suggestions and guidance to those who hire them for their
expertise, but the decision to follow or disregard standards is up
to the person footing the bill.
This seems like a good solution and I certainly would use it.
But the others who are against bookmarking links could not without
violating principle. Although that single link provides a lot of
convenience for the user, they could still visit all 11 plus sites
to register their site on
this question: Is
this an often-requested feature? When available, is it a much-used
feature? I would guess that the answer is no in both cases - but by
all means prove me wrong!
Andrew
On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
As was mentioned, it's a call to action. Those who
Pacific Northwest Region - Vancouver, WA
360-891-5024 - Voice | 360-891-5045 - Fax
dlapcew...@fs.fed.us
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing
it. -- George Bernard Shaw
Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com
Sent by: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
03/25/2009
[mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Morgan-May
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 6:50 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Who's responsible (was Re: [WSG] add to favorites?)
On 3/25/09 12:12 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
The correct design (and web
There's where the difference is.users are *allowed* to come to sites that I
build
as a benefit to them. I don't know of a single user who ever visited a site
(other than somebody's mother) for the benefit of the site's owner or
developer.
People don't visit newegg.com, Microsoft,com, or
huggroup/hug
Sorry that tag isn't to standard... ;o)
Rick
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Russ Weakley
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:58 PM
To: Web Standards Group
Subject: Re: [WSG] add to favorites? - ADMIN -
Wow...10 years from now...as fast as change occurs these
days, who knows what things will be like then!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of nedlud
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:58 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
hug
group
include template=Ewen.Hill
/hug
:o)
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of ewen.h...@dhs.vic.gov.au
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 9:07 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] add to favorites?
Any more
: Who's responsible (was Re: [WSG] add to favorites?)
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Wow...10 years from now...as fast as change occurs these
days, who knows what things will be like then!
Blind people flying around with jetpacks ;)
P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
I thought the post was brief, informative and to the point. If everyone
on this list with a commercial or open source product or service is
prevented from speaking about it at all, we'd lose a lot of content. I
don't think Sigurd's posts are over the top, any more than the numerous
I think you're perspective is correct, Christian.
I don't even test in browsers that are two generations removed from the
current release. Clients just have to update their browsers.
However, if a client insists on supporting IE 5 with IE 7 out, yes, it
will cost them extra.
Rick
According to statistics supplied by w3schools.com, as of Jan 08
approximately 95% of users had JS enabled.
Check out http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
and look towards the middle of the page for the stats.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
ROFLOL!
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of designer
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 4:38 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Examples of great high-school websites?
Visitors with images
What did you find to be so bad about the site, Stuart?
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Stuart
Foulstone
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 2:11 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Examples of great
...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 12:03 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Examples of great high-school websites?
What did you find to be so bad about the site, Stuart?
-Original Message-
From
Agreed!
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Matt
Morgan-May
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 2:50 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT
Hi,
Excuse me for jumping in
Are you a moderator for this list, Joe?
Sometimes, moderators know it's best just to let a comment
go, especially if it seems short-lived, rather than comment
on it as you and start up a fire storm.
It was the weekend, and it was just a comment about copyright.
It does help that a good
I don't think so...if you look through the webdesignerwall.com site,
you'll see that the author has posted tutorials about how to create
just such a menu.
If anything, the designer of foryoung.com has paid a compliment to the
author of webdesignerwall. by using the tutorial...
Rick
Darren...
I find your comment, I would most certainly not allow the use of
an image map, interesting.
What would you do, as is Jason's situation, if your client demands it?
You can always turn down the work, but would you simply because a client
wants to do something that you don't like?
Rick
not be a normal customer anyway if they know about image
maps. I'm interested to know why they requested it in the first place..
Quoting Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Darren...
I find your comment, I would most certainly not allow the use of
an image map, interesting.
What would you do
-standing (in internet-time) solutions well-documented on the
internet and in books.
On 8/5/08 11:10 AM, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I would like to know what a list on any subject is for if not for
helping
people understand the most basic principles and application
specific, remedial
problems
with long-standing (in internet-time) solutions well-documented on the
internet and in books.
On 8/5/08 11:10 AM, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I would like to know what a list on any subject is for if not for
helping
people understand
Sorry to come across blunt - but I don't think the web standards group
is meant to be a teacher of css. Great that people on here are wanting
to learn. But there are plenty of other places dedicated to these sort
of things.
And I would like to know what a list on any subject is for if not
Check out the link at the bottom of this page...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stuart
Sheridan
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 9:30 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Please unsubscribe me
Please unsubscribe me
43 matches
Mail list logo
