media rule doesn't get
picked up, and took me days to realize the quirk (guess I am a slow learner :-)
).
tee
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:55 PM, tee wrote:
> Checked one of a mobile sites I did that has inline image larger than 480px
> and no width/height attributes were declared in the CSS
png
http://greensho.nexcess.net/mweb/s3-safari.png
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
t/element you do not want mobile user to see off the screen, it
does not eliminate the sizes that slow the page load, eat up user's phone bill.
This site may give you a general idea how much it may cost your mobile user per
page.
http://mobiready.com
tee
*
ou switch from Landscape to Portrait and this creates issue with certain html
tags.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsub
On Aug 5, 2010, at 2:05 PM, David Storey wrote:
>
> On 5 Aug 2010, at 21:12, tee wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Having done 2 full sites+ many exercise mobile sites, I view at Opera Mini
>> (including the Mobile 10) the Internet Explorer 6+7, it's a brows
.
Opera mobile 10 emulator doesn't has the same issue though, but then I have
learned to never trust the emulator from day one.
tee
>>
>
> A friend checked it on an iPod prior to the inclusion of the @media
> declarations and reported no issues at that time. I will ask her
side note , next time you might want to post a tinyURL or bit.ly (I like
this!) address if ask mobile browser check because typing on a tiny screen
keypad on a tiny screen for a long url address is no fun :-) Some mobile
emulators do not allow copy and paste either.
tee
On Aug 5, 2010, at 11:
-child” and ignore all other selectors. Same behavior doesn't showed in
IE9 preview nor IE6/7.
http://greensho.nexcess.net/iebugs/grouping-selectors-bug.html
http://greensho.nexcess.net/iebugs/grouping-selectors-bug-ie8.png
tp://greensho.nexcess.net/em-vs-px/18px-fontsize.png
tee
On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2010/07/30 14:05 (GMT-0700) tee composed:
>
>> I did another test by increasing Safari's font size to 18px, and the
>> layout expanded. This makes the EM not stable
THanks Jody.
I did another test by increasing Safari's font size to 18px, and the layout
expanded. This makes the EM not stable to use for layout. I wonder if it has
always like this for Safari or is a new bug.
tee
On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Jody Tate wrote:
> If this helps: my Mac
ry I altered the font size for the
reason I did in previous machine (mentioned in my previous email).
Other browsers have default 16px.
Do you have idea how Safari makes the calculation that resulted 121px
differences with 14px font size setti
t about it, and a number of
sites I did, the font sizes turned out much smaller in clients' machines.
>
>> Set your font-size to 16px instead of 100.1% and the width will be fixed.
>
> 1-it's rude
I didn't th
://greensho.nexcess.net/em-vs-px/em-width3.html
font: normal 100%/1.5em Arial, sans-serif
http://greensho.nexcess.net/em-vs-px/em-width4.html
font: normal 1em/1.5em Arial, sans-serif
http://greensho.nexcess.net/em-vs-px/em-width5.html
Anybody has a Safari 4 to test on?
tee
On Jul 29, 2010, at 11:55 AM
g
EM only
http://greensho.nexcess.net/em-vs-px/em-width.html
http://greensho.nexcess.net/em-vs-px/safari-ss.png
My monitor is 27" 2560x1440 resolution, but I don't think this is the reason.
Can you confirm if you see the same?
Thanks!
tee
ked stylesheets into one.
A side note, I thought browser doesn't load the print media stylesheet unless a
printing requested by the user. Anybody knows this for sure?
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgr
tent, a paragraph where span tag is
used and is wrapped inside other tags, or if a client insists on using a Lucida
Sans or a typeface that result something similar to Lucida Sans.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.o
On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
> On 21 July 2010 11:52, tee wrote:
> EM can fail miserably in below senario for IEs for p, li and span tags due to
> inheritance making them very tiny and unable to get consistence font size for
> one block of content
not solved the problem
span span {font-size: 1.2em}
span span span {font-size:1.3em}
li li span {font-size:1.2em}
tee
On Jul 20, 2010, at 8:27 AM,
wrote:
> The basic plan that I follow is to use % for structural items, which
> generally need to be proportional to other struc
m browsers, still the size is
the same.
Any idea?
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
is key. (and perhaps
> that librarians are a bit slow to upgrade ;)
>
I think it's more to do with the fact that librarians are always getting
hand-me-down hardware :)
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org
do not used inline CSS in my work, but do not see no reason why it cannot be
used. At the end of the day, no body gets hurt, no visitor would have a
traumatic user experience as a result, site is functioning, usable and
accessible, and I get a good sleep knowing that the themes, the sites I
work on Magento projects these days that use inline script heavily,
experience show that lack of CDATA comment doesn't always trigger validation
error.
tee
On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Susan Grossman wrote:
>
> Raises another question. How does one handle inline javascript these
>
tell me to fix the validation error first or should you ask me to hunt down
Mark Zuckerberg first? :-)
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
Don't meant to hijack this thread, but I have had a nagging question for a
while and have not been able to find anything from google.
Is there cheat sheet or references that documents approved HTML 5 elements?
Even better, advanced browsers have alreayd implemented.
Thanks!
tee
On M
Forgot one important note.
Even if max/min widths are removed, OM still show the same rendering for table
whether a width is declared in table.
tee
On May 15, 2010, at 7:45 AM, tee wrote:
> I'd just discovered that Apple approved Opera Mini browser for iPhone/iPod
> (maybe onl
ferently just
for the sake of supporting mobile devices.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
tirely sure how to go about implementing it, this is godsend!
I have always enjoyed presentations created by Russ.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstand
vices' users?
Thanks!
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
eing a Mac user
preventing any malicious attack from happening in my machine or mailbox that
may infects other email addresses who are in my address book.
Can something WSG do to prevent similar email from sending again?
Thanks!
tee
*
and keeping the layout integrity with text size increases/decreases;
the way I see it, it's clean, and effective approach. But putting color
contrast into play, depending on the background color, it will go against
either darken or lighter foreground color.
Should SC1
into account.
So my question, how accurate is for Juicestudios Color Contrast Analyser and
Color Checker Firefox extension? Will the brightness of monitor affect the
result.
Thanks!
tee
***
List Guidelines:
think the "focus ring" you are refering to is another one (in the above
screen shot, the links menu is outlined) that I am aware of and do not think
it's a bug.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/ma
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:31 PM, tee wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:51 PM, tee wrote:
>
>> In this site, if you click on Accordion menu, in the second (last) menu,
>> Safari shows a rectangular outlined block; hover to the Links' menu, you can
>> see the e
On Apr 28, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, tee wrote:
>> On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:51 PM, tee wrote:
>>
>>> In this site, if you click on Accordion menu, in the second (last) menu,
>>> Safari shows a rectangular outlined blo
On Apr 25, 2010, at 2:51 PM, tee wrote:
> In this site, if you click on Accordion menu, in the second (last) menu,
> Safari shows a rectangular outlined block; hover to the Links' menu, you can
> see the extra outlined block. Seems to be related to hover but I can't
&g
ssimo site, I removed the .ui-tabs-panel { overflow:
hidden;} and replaced it with:
#recent-comments,
#blog_sidebar #recent-posts {clear:both; border: 1px solid
#EAF3F7;border-bottom:3px solid #EAF3F7}
I couldn't find what I did tri
time my backup external harddisk died and I was able to retrieve all data
from a data rescue software.
It has PC version and the personal use license is inexpensive. You can
actually download a trial version which allows you to test out before buying.
http://www.pros
it's proprietary approach, not a standards approach.
>
> It's like when people said that the very "popularity" of IE means we don't
> need to deal with other browsers. I don't think that was healthy.
>
>
>
> On Thu, April 1, 2010 8:57 p
x27;s a healthy, less
money-wasting and more standard-compliant approach that we don't need to deal
with many mobile web applications
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
I am giving the benefit of doubt that there might be a good
reason.
Can others who deal with JAWS and Window Eyes comment on this?
Thanks!
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
On Mar 29, 2010, at 12:51 AM, David Dorward wrote:
>
> On 29 Mar 2010, at 08:24, tee wrote:
>
>> You are saying W3C is wrong on the techniques for WCAG 2.0 for group radio
>> buttons?
>
> This is a good example of just how hard it is to write a "validator&
label element that identifies the purpose of the control
after the input element
Thanks!
tee
On Mar 28, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Jayachandran Kandasamy wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> This is the correct syntax please follow this, some of the validators give
> errors even when
on for this is an onchange event to show
x number items per page. If I add the form tag, the error does go away, but
it's a vicious circle that does nothing to improve accessibility for the page,
it starts complaining missing button, missing fieldset and legend.
tee
**
number of sites, it kept complaning missing div which I
couldn't find.
Thanks!
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
>
>
> http://d3895.mysite.westnethosting.com.au/
>
> In other browsers it works ok.
I see it in Safari too.
Version 4.0.4 (6531.21.10)
Giving a width to "testimony" does the trick.
Speaking of Chrome, I find the Mac
h :) Maybe
wrap the .donation inside the .column_cushion can prevent having extra div.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
ixed;width: 220px;}
......
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
of the top/left, use padding instead.
Hope this helps!
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
cessibility knowledge using English and learn from the
West.
I am pretty certain Tim Berners-Lee on "The power of the Web is in its
universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an essential
aspect" includes 99% of empathy.
tee
>
***
ut, emptiness isn't. Also, the menu items at
footer section is best centralized vertically within the blue bar.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org
ntact the developer is through feedback form however my query
went unheard.
Or if you have recommendation for desktop validator that validate Accessibility
2.0 and Markup, and Mac compatible? I can't find any except the Total Validator.
Th
> Does screen reader read everything in post that didn't trim?
>
This actually bring another question, how does Jaws handles the W3C validation
page and Validation output. Is it accessible?
It seems Marvin has difficulty with Validation outp
on results.
>
If I am not mistaken, Marvin cannot see and he uses screen reader. I am curious
if it would be helpful to him and other too if you trim your post? Does screen
reader read everything in post that didn't trim?
Thanks!
tee
*
d
> Remove all such cases and use CSS to get extra space.)
The two extra breaks are in line #32 and #32, they are inside the UL from
Navigation. You cannot use break or other tags in a UL; you can use break and
other tags inside the UL only if they are placed
ransparent;" does work. I must have mis-typed
'transparent' before my original post as I tested it twice and couldn't see
the result.
tee
On Jan 18, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Russ Weakley wrote:
> Tee,
>
> First of all, the spec you link to is a little out of date (2003).
&
it to li instead of li a, the screen shot taken is from li.
#element li{ text-shadow: 2px 2px 2px #000;}
http://picasaweb.google.com/weblist99/UntitledAlbum
tee
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:49 PM, tee wrote:
> I declared text-shadow in an a element
>
> #element li a {text-sha
arent;} <-- since we can have transparent, I thought
it may work. Silly me!
According to w3, the choice is quite limited.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-shadows
itself is defined as "[ ? |
? ?]".
tee
**
ates more problem for
larger screen? Apple sold million copies of its new iMac, likely is just a drop
in computer user pool, it does however brought to my attention to have to pay
attention to these users.
tee
***
List Guidelines:
'd
> avoid W3Schools.com like the plague, it is severely lacking in up to date
> tutorial materials.
How could nobody mentions http://css.maxdesign.com.au/
We owe Russ this much :)
tee
***
List Guideline
On Jan 7, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Peter Hislop wrote:
I'd look to the postal standards for countries that you're expecting
to ship
to.
Paul,
Thanks! Great tips!
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgrou
not entered a
State or Zipcode. I think this can be solved with extra JS validation
to enhance the usability today.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
form :)
Here's an example where Country comes before state:
https://www.discovery.apply2jobs.com/index.cfm. Scroll down to
Division then select Country.
This makes sense and echoes my client's take.
tee
***
List Gu
ld is placed at the last (exclude phone/fax fields). I checked over
30 sites from 10 countries, no exception.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org
t.
Is is a non-issue how the order is? For sites that cater international
users, is there a more standard format for address in web form?
Thanks!
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
if we need to worry about fixing IE6 or
not.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:32 PM, tee wrote:
Oops, no need to try, just checked, same issue with border-spacing.
http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png
Sorry, wrong url.
http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing-alex.png
tee
On Oct 21, 2009, at 3:27 PM, weblist99 wrote:
Alas, it doesn't work for IE. Turns out IE doesn't like "border-
spacing". I have not checked it on IE8 but don't think this will
make a difference.
http://submarine2.etrivo.com/border-spacing.png
Going to try Alex&#
bad or better in an absolute point of view. I use h1 for most
important heading when I consider the logo doesn't deserve H1.
Do you include a second H1 on the page too? No?
A bit arrogant question. Guess you think people who use h1 for logo
the hand user
is illegal and wrong? I eat with my right hand when I visit India and
Nepal and when I eat with my muslim friends. And I use fork and spoon
when I am with friends who use only this combination or visit non-
Asian restaurant.
tee
***
dards compliant XHTML - CSS
I have heard many positive things about Prestashop, curious to know if
Prestashop works with JS switches off, or the JS codes are progressive
enhancement? Unlike Magento which is not and near impossible to get
rid off.
This has been an intriguing problem! If your cell height is
constant, you can make one table and insert a background border
(that doesn't quite fit) in the appropriate cells. See here:
http://www.betasite.fsnet.co.uk/gam/tee/teeproblem.html
It works, it is cross browser compatibl
iv's because margin doesn't seem to
apply to
td's. At least this will get you the format you want.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://websta
ell client technically this can't be done but this
issue really struck me as it didn't occur to me a layout that simple
can't be done with a table. Now it's more a personal quest than
fulfilling client's requir
The image below the table is the exact layout I needed.
Is this possible?
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cf
On Aug 9, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Bushidodeep wrote:
Hi,
As usual, all the replies to my post have been valuable, providing
much to think about. Does a JS/DOM script exist for
checking CSS3 support across user-agents?
http://www.css3.info/selectors-test/
tee
On Aug 9, 2009, at 1:36 AM, David Dorward wrote:
On 9 Aug 2009, at 03:53, tee wrote:
Then my question, what about those who prefer to stick with XHTML?
By "Stick with XHTML" do you mean "not to move to an unstable, draft
markup language"? Plenty of people are happi
order background property.
Then my question, what about those who prefer to stick with XHTML? The
hr tag is deprecated.
In gassho,
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
U
On Jul 12, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Joseph Taylor wrote:
Tee,
It looks like you should (warning - people will argue about this)
markup up a table, with the column headings as the "labels" at the
top. Be sure to specify the scope="col" attribute.
Then in each cell markup y
can't
think of a better way to have the line 1's labels associate to line 2
- line 10 input fields and drop-down lists' IDs.
Is this doable ?
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.
y basic. I guess
it's a so-called benevolent dictatorship.
tee
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***
On Jun 27, 2009, at 3:21 AM, tee wrote:
This happens twice in two sites I was working.
One is with Magento, another one WordPress site, that IE8 does not
pick up
This happens twice in two sites I was working.
One is with Magento, another one WordPress site, that IE8 does not
pick up
f you want to put the button text in the image, add a span class and
wrap it inside button, then use one of the image replacement
techniques to push the button text off the screen viewpoint.
tee
***
List Guidelines:
ee Magento site in my opinion.
Would love to see your exceptional skill reflects on a JS free Magento
site.
Thanks!
tee
On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:22 AM, Adam Martin wrote:
Magento by default uses javascript for its one page checkout.
However you
can easily turn this off and use a more t
, include non-link, printable characters
(surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links. [Priority 3]
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgrou
confirming it, and the tests.
I don't supposed this will get fixed until IE9? Just curious.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscrib
there.
Thanks for all the details. "left: 730px! important;" seems a better
workaround than negative margin left.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubsc
On May 28, 2009, at 6:06 PM, tee wrote:
there is) (script sets it)
to place "search_autocomplete" in right position set left to "0px!
important"
or fix script
Me again, sorry!
The code fixes the layout I posted, but the dropdown get pushed to the
left at the edge o
unity :-)
Can you tell me exactly which line the code is in prototype.js? I
tried look into but couldn't find.
tee
On May 28, 2009, at 12:54 AM, Сергей Кириченко wrote:
there is) (script sets it)
to place "search_autocomplete" in right position set left to "0px!
importan
but I am not convinced this
is a better approach – if this problem isn't go away I will have to
fix it again when IE9 comes out (hopefully by then I have retired).
None of the hasLayout remedies works.
tee
***
List Guide
ck them out as this is an IE8 issue. Anyhow, for the site that I
can't show, the fix for IE6/7 is re-adjusting margin and width in 'li'.
Thanks in advanced.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsg
the the large image
block intact. I have not check the page in IE yet, so not sure if the
same bug occurs.
Anybody encounter this bug before and if you have a fix for it?
p/s. if you want to see the actual page, please write me offlist so
that I can show you the url.
Many thanks!
Thanks Ben for the link, I am going to read it later.
It doesn't cover IE6;
This is strange. Wasn't that the whole Compatible Mode was "to not
break the web" because of the massive IE6 users in co
or IE6 and once I have it fixed and it shows correctly in compatible
mode I don't need to double check on IE7/6 standalone to double confirm.
Thanks!
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guideline
On Apr 25, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
tee wrote:
Two divs wrap - background image not showed up in iE6/7
http://lotusfromthemud.com/gbtv/products.html
Old IE usually doesn't render an absolute positioned element when it
is
next to a float in the markup.
In that parti
p://lotusfromthemud.com/gbtv/products.html
Three divs wrap - background image showed up
http://lotusfromthemud.com/gbtv/products-1.html
Checked, IE8 shows no such issue.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guid
No wonder these two areas are left out from 99% of the sites out there
on the internet because they think designers shouldn't touch code and
developers shouldn't touch design.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http:
g to die by the end of 2009. So I am really curious if Google
Chrome can help speed up the death of IE6.
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/
% of web developers of the entire web
design population !?
tee
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh
On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Essential eBiz Solutions wrote:
Tee, I've stopped trying to figure out what Varien have going on in
their
heads. When it comes to Magento I prefer to make my own .phtml files
now. At
least that way I know they'll pass validation.
At some po
201 - 300 of 676 matches
Mail list logo
