Hello All,
I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site
(http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/). Nearly complete and
just requires copywriting completion.
Specifically the following are of interest:
Rendering on mac in Safari and IE,
Usability,
Mistakes I may
With larger text sizes, your sidebar headings become white on white.
I'd suggest vertically expanding that background image, or setting a
similar background color along with the image. That and a few things
like empty paragraph elements and stray /div on some of the pages.
Last (and probably
Last (and probably least), a future-proofing warning: If you ever
decide to serve that site as xhtml instead of text/html, it'll break
because of the content of your style elements.
Nevermind, it might not. I've become so paranoid that I tend to
enclose any non-xml/html in cdata's because I
Kenny Graham (thoughtfully) wrote:
With larger text sizes, your sidebar headings become white on white.
I'd suggest vertically expanding that background image, or setting a
similar background color along with the image. That and a few things
like empty paragraph elements and stray /div on
Jay Gilmore wrote:
I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site
(http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/). Nearly complete and
just requires copywriting completion.
All opinions are welcome. If there are mistakes out of ignorance please
point me to a
On 12/22/05, Jay Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I would like to know if I have made any huge gaffes with this site
(http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/).
On this page: http://www.smashingred.com/clientspace/clattco/renovations/
the last photo is overlapped by the
I'm almost done: http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/noteworthy
I'm wondering if this is the correct markup for this:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/noteworthy/templates.asp
Should I use a table instead? It seems that I need some headings and that
I'm cheating with the first DL in there.
Also,
On 12/19/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm almost done: http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/noteworthy
I'm wondering if this is the correct markup for this:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/noteworthy/templates.asp
Should I use a table instead? It seems that I need some headings
Christian Montoya wrote:
On 12/19/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm almost done: http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/noteworthy
I'm wondering if this is the correct markup for this:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/clients/noteworthy/templates.asp
Should I use a table instead? It seems
I seem to have fixed most of the issues and I have gone live with it:
http://guild.murdoch.edu.au/
I would still really appreciate a site check though!
Lloyd
On 12/15/05, Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am working on a web site for my Student Guild and I would love some
feedback.
Hi Guys,
I am working on a web site for my Student Guild and I would love some
feedback. It has been done very quickly and a lot of the content is
still being prepared but I have tried to keep standards and
accessibility in mind.
http://www.lloydy.id.au/guilddev/
It validates but I would love
Guys and Gals,
I have just switched my site to a fluid layout vs. the old 750 pixels
wide approach. I have also changed all my font sizes to em's to adjust
as needed.
Can people in mac and linux take a glance to make sure all is well for me?
Thanks,
Joe Taylor
http://sitesbyjoe.com
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
Guys and Gals,
I have just switched my site to a fluid layout vs. the old 750 pixels
wide approach. I have also changed all my font sizes to em's to adjust
as needed.
Can people in mac and linux take a glance to make sure all is well for
me?
Thanks,
Joe
On 12/12/05, Jay Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe, The site looks ok but I have a few of comments:
Why are you using a transitional doctype? What elements or deprecated
attributes are you using that require this?
Why are you using pnbsp/p for spacing? ...
Why are you using spans to
The poor practices mostly come from this code being slowly updated since
version 1, (which was really bad), hopefully in time all the no-no's
will be removed.
I appreciate the time you spent looking in there and noticing that
stuff, I forgot all about those stupid span tags all over the
pretty cool jay,
what about the top links bottom border disapearing on the hover though?
-kvnmcwebn
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to
kvnmcwebn wrote:
pretty cool jay,
what about the top links bottom border disapearing on the hover though?
-kvnmcwebn
kvnmcwebn,
Are you talking about my site: http://www.smashingred.com or Joe's
site: http://www.sitesbyjoe.com ?
All the best,
Jay
Jay Gilmore
Developer/Consultant
kvnmcwebn,Are you talking about my site: http://www.smashingred.com or Joe's
site: http://www.sitesbyjoe.com
?
sorryimeant joe not jay,
Thank you rob,
I'm not sure is it the weekend of my message wasn't clear, its the
first time this list return with only one response
Regards
Jad madi
Blog
http://jadmadi.net/
Web standards Planet
http://W3planet.net/
**
The discussion list
Hi,
We have alpha launched itoot.net yesterday, please give me your
opinion, feedback, criticism
Thank you in advace.
--
Regards
Jad madi
Blog
http://jadmadi.net/
Web standards Planet
http://W3planet.net/
**
The discussion list for
On 12/2/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have alpha launched itoot.net yesterday, please give me your
opinion, feedback, criticism
Looks good, no issues. That is to say, no issues with design and
performance. The about page could use some revisions. The quotation
marks aren't pretty (in
Hiya all,
I've been working in my free time for over a month to create the best
possible standards compliant theme for the Typo weblog system. It's
an entry for the Typo theme contest.
My template is valid XHTML 1.0 Strict and should work in a very large
amount of browsers. I still have
My question: What do you guys think of the template,
Great!
do you spot any
problems in certain browsers
In FF 1.5, when I hover over the links on the right, the pop out to
the left 1 pixel. When I scroll down and back up, they are fine again.
I'm not sure if this is an FF problem or
Hiya all,
My question: What do you guys think of the template, do you spot any
problems in certain browsers and
is there a way to get it to behave in MSIE 5.2 for mac?
My experience is that with Fx 1.0.7, the text seems quite unreadable
and blurry.
I don't know if this is intentional, but it
Hi Marco,
The template looks really great... but why does the text look jagged. I
get a javascript error using W2K/FF 1.07
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
Hmm this is funny...
There's one person reporting it's blurry while another one calls it
jagged.
Could this have something to do with font smoothing settings?
I do know the jagged look is because of ClearType not being enabled.
Win2k doesn't even have it
at all which will render any
I just tried FF 1.5RC3 on my mac and I am not experiencing this
behaviour so I guess it's indeed some sort of rounding error. It does
fix the problem 1.0.7 has with the tags cloud in the sidebar having
more right margin than left margin. That looks like it does in Safari
and MSIE now,
.sidebar-node li a {
display: block;
margin: 0;
width: 206px;
background: url(../../images/theme/sidebar_linkbullet.gif) no-repeat top left;
font-size: 11px;
font-family: Trebuchet MS;
color: #aaa;
line-height: 18px;
text-decoration: none;
padding: 0 0 0 23px;
}
bah, pixel
On 11/26/05, Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's gotta be pixel sized or it will screw up big time when the
letters get bigger than the area they're in.
What's so wrong with pixel size anyway?
Just out of curiosity...
Actually, the list items are fine when I resize them.
What exactly do you mean by 'making them work the same way the list items
do' ?
And yes, a screenshot would be nice because I can't see any problem
neither on my PC nor on my mac
Thanks in advance,
Marco
On 11/26/05, Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's gotta be pixel
On 11/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly do you mean by 'making them work the same way the list items
do' ?
And yes, a screenshot would be nice because I can't see any problem
neither on my PC nor on my mac
Thanks in advance,
Marco
Here you go:
Thanks for the reviews and suggestions from before.
I have made some changes and added some more pages. I would appreciate your
feedback once more.
I still have some issues to address
e.g.:
the forms need to be made fully
accessible
the table needs to be madefully
accessible
Nice! I wish I had thought of scaling screenshots to percent width, it looks better and would have saved me a lot of trouble.When I view the site using Safari it briefly renders the unstyled page. I haven't noticed this behavior before. Perhaps it's the @import?Steve Ferguson -
On 10/10/05, Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice! I wish I had thought of scaling screenshots to percent width, it looks better and would have saved me a lot of trouble.
When I view the site using Safari it briefly renders the unstyled page. I haven't noticed this behavior before. Perhaps
FOUC?
an empty script tag will do it, ie:
script type=text/javascript/script
(after the styles are imported / included iirc...)
Paul
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I expected the manual inputs to accept hex values since that's typically how we work with colors on the web. Perhaps you could offer the option of using hex or decimal?Steve Ferguson - Illumit L.L.C. http://illumit.comOn Oct 8, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Christian Montoya wrote:Hey all, Thanks for the
On 10/9/05, Steve Ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I expected the manual inputs to accept hex values since that's
typically how we work with colors on the web. Perhaps you could offer
the option of using hex or decimal?Steve Ferguson - Illumit L.L.C. http://illumit.com
I will, later.
-- - C
I just (hopefully) finished a somewhat complex layout. It's liquid, and has max-width for all the good browsers. As for IE, it has some _javascript_ that forces IE to implement max-width. After that, it's just an untamed liquid layout for the IE users without _javascript_... who probably don't
Hello all.
I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not
too concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering
if it works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here:
http://color.rdpdesign.com
Any advice is also welcome.
Thanks!-- - C Montoyardpdesign.com ...
, October 09, 2005
9:14 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Site check:
color.rdpdesign.com
Hello all.
I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not too
concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering if it works
ok in Mac and Linux. The site
Christian Montoya wrote:
I just finished a site and it looks ok in IE 6 / FF / Opera. I'm not too
concerned about compatibility with older browsers, just wondering if it
works ok in Mac and Linux. The site is here: http://color.rdpdesign.com
The ads are overlaying the content on FF 1.0.5 and
Hey all, Thanks for the checks. The problems come from the page being sized in em's, and the ads being absolutely positioned with ems... I've decided that's too difficult. I'll probably put the ads back in, but in a more robust way, so they don't risk covering content.
-- - C Montoyardpdesign.com
http://www.tjkdesign.com/eStore/
I've put it through a few browsers on PC, but I'm pretty limited on the Mac
side...
Thanks,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi,
Butterfly.com looks good in Safari 2.0.1, Firefox 1.5.1 Beta, Opera
8.0.2
nav_bar shifts to the left in IE 5.2 in the mac.
On Sep 15, 2005, at 7:51 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/eStore/
I've put it through a few browsers on PC, but I'm pretty limited on
Looks good on FF, OS10.3.9
The menu tab slides away when the window is resized too small, but it
is not likely people will go as far as I did.
Love the content!
pd
On 9/15/05, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/eStore/
I've put it through a few browsers on
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/eStore/
I've put it through a few browsers on PC, but I'm pretty limited on the Mac
side...
Thanks,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
XP_SP2 IE/Moz/FF/Opera
It is an attractive and aesthetically pleasing site, Thierry. The two
butterflies
but there is so little out there that is as well thought-out as this.
Nice work.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:44 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check (eStore
Hi Ted,
If were gonna git nitpicky.
I'd clean up this code on the shopping cart:
Ouch! I guess I still have more work to do then :)
I've started with a commercial (shopping cart) package.
Out of the box, the markup doesn't validate, tables are all over the place,
deprecated markup, bunch of
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
If were gonna git nitpicky.
I'd clean up this code on the shopping cart:
I was going to change the markup as you suggested, but then I thought that a
list may not be the correct markup for this. Because it would suggest that
there are 3 different items when in fact it is
A standards Compliant e-solution for future reference:
(http://www.zen-cart.com/modules/frontpage/)
C
On Sep 15, 2005, at 11:13 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Hi Ted,
If were gonna git nitpicky.
I'd clean up this code on the shopping cart:
Ouch! I guess I still have more work to do then :)
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
I like using definition lists over paragraphs for their inherit
structure and the hooks they provide for CSS.
Do you see any reasons to not use a dl?
I like DLs too ;)
I have 2 or 3 in this site already. But here I don't think it would be the
correct markup.
Beside that,
.
You are also showing warnings when run through Tidy.
Regards
Scott Swabey
Lafinboy Productions
www.lafinboy.com
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Chris Kennon
Subject: [WSG] Site Check [BushidoDeep]
I've put it through as many hoops (UA's) as I own, let me
know how it holds in yours
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
I've put it through as many hoops (UA's) as I own, let me know how it
holds in yours.
Overall you're looking good, Chris.
Some nit-picking notes--
- a little slow to load
- unable to read content if images disabled.
- font-size on body okay at 80% better (for me)
Hi,
Very thoughtful and helpful, will implement as many changes as
necessary.
C
On Sep 11, 2005, at 6:42 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
I've put it through as many hoops (UA's) as I own, let me know how
it holds in yours.
Overall you're looking good, Chris.
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
I've put it through as many hoops (UA's) as I own, let me know how it
holds in yours.
Looking good in Opera, Firefox, IE6, Safari iCab.
IE/Mac is lost on width-- spreading everything out.
---
HTML Tidy lists a number of minor errors.
---
div#content-primary
Hi,
Is this suggestion a usability or aesthetic decision?
On Sep 11, 2005, at 6:42 PM, David Laakso wrote:
- would delete all the buttons and the validator thing in footer
On Sep 11, 2005, at 6:42 PM, David Laakso wrote:
- would delete all the buttons and the validator thing in footer
Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
Is this suggestion a usability or aesthetic decision?
On Sep 11, 2005, at 6:42 PM, David Laakso wrote:
- would delete all the buttons and the validator thing in footer
Neither.
--
David Laakso
http://www.dlaakso.com
Chris Kennon wrote:
What tidy settings are you using. I get one nested span error from
the default settings. However, I would like to see your settings and
results.
I got some 'href lacks value', 'tabindex lacks value' and an 'action
lacks value' -- in addition to the 'nested emphasis span'.
Hi,
I've put it through as many hoops (UA's) as I own, let me know how it
holds in yours.
C
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the
Of Chris Kennon
Subject: [WSG] Site Check [BushidoDeep]
I've put it through as many hoops (UA's) as I own, let me
know how it holds in yours.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
http://63.135.116.208
Hi all,
I have a few questions:
- Is a DL the right markup for the FAQ and Directions pages?
- On many pages (Home, CheckOut, FAQ, Directions), I'm using the same link
text to refer to different resources (13.1 Clearly identify the target of
each link). Should I be really
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
- Is a DL the right markup for the FAQ and Directions pages?
I think a definition list is the most semantically correct markup for an
FAQ. If you look at the w3 documention on lists it says that DLs
...consist of two parts: a term and a description which is pretty
close
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tatham
Oddie (Fuel Advance)
Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2005 10:58
AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: Tom
Harvey
Subject: [WSG] Site Check: VVE
Guys
n gals,
In
light of the Broadleaf discussion/brawl the other week, I have a new proposal
Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance) wrote:
In light of the Broadleaf discussion/brawl the other week, I have a
new proposal for you. In this case, bandwidth was critical due to the
existing site’s traffic base and formed a major design goal.
http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/vve/
David,
Tidy Online will eliminate all the white space on your file.
The page is dynamically generated, hence all the weird tabbing that steps in
an out. I'll get a server side filter working shortly that does that kind of
stuff.
Why are you using XHTML 1.1?
Why not? Am I missing something
Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance) wrote:
David,
Tidy Online will eliminate all the white space on your file.
The page is dynamically generated, hence all the weird tabbing that steps in
an out. I'll get a server side filter working shortly that does that kind of
stuff.
Why are you
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:35:34 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
readable, usable, accessible content
Is the page breaking in one of your browsers?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:35:34 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
readable, usable, accessible content
Is the page breaking in one of your browsers?
No, this page
http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/vve/Dashboard/Default.ashx is not
breaking in any of my
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:36:39 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, this page
http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/vve/Dashboard/Default.ashx is not
breaking in any of my browsers.
Regards,
David Laakso
So, XHTML 1.1 is bad because?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:36:39 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, this page
http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/vve/Dashboard/Default.ashx is not
breaking in any of my browsers.
Regards,
David Laakso
So, XHTML 1.1 is bad because?
Hi Tom,
Tatham has
From: Tom Livingston
So, XHTML 1.1 is bad because?
Is there an issue that XHTML 1.1 should be served as media type
application/xhtml+xml and should not be served as text/html?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/
As I understand it current browsers aren't well equipped to deal
with
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2005 4:31 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check: VVE
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:36:39 -0400, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No, this page
http
Great work Tathan!
The markup is very tight indeed! there is very small thing - that is
you've left out the type attribute on the link tag at the top of the
document.
link rel=stylesheet href=../Skins/Vision.css type=text/css
media=screen /
Otherwise its great. It looks good and behaves well!
v. nice. Nothing really needs changing but you might consider:
1. Maybe use search instead of query as a label for the search form.
2. Your CSS issues may come form the use of multiple classes, which
some browsers don't handle very well (I'll leave the css-d folks to
look into this)
3. You
G'day
http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/vve/
http://testdrive.fueladvance.com/vve/Dashboard/Default.ashx
Pretty good (looks clean, code and layout wise). I don't like using as
many classes as you do, but that's personal preference.
The only real problem I see is accessibility
1. Maybe use search instead of query as a label for the search form.
Maybe use Find instead of search or query (then again, your target
audience is developers, so query is part of their vocab). 'Search'
suggests that a 'hunt and peck/ hit and miss activity will follow.
More important than that
-
From: Donna Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf
Not exactly a clean user experience then. Particularly troublesome when
designers rely on the background image and define colour for their text
Donna Jones wrote:
Not exactly a clean user experience then. Particularly troublesome
when designers rely on the background image and define colour for
their text to be readable against it, but fail to provide fallback
background colour.
Zengarden is an experimental site, showcasing in many
Mugur Padurean wrote:
Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good reason
for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
I surely didn't mean to be doing that, please see below.
1. Over 90% percent of the world population
Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good
reason for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
1. Over 90% percent of the world population do not live there and do
not have dial-up access or other types of network access
Mugur Padurean wrote:
Hello, reality check here.
Quoting the US and Australian available IT infrastructure, as a good reason
for building huge web pages, is wrong for at least three reasons:
I surely didn't mean to be doing that, please see below.
1. Over 90% percent of the world population
On 26/7/05 4:18 PM, Mugur Padurean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And accessibility means access for everyone regardless of technology
availability or other kinds of disabilities.
I think web standards were meant to raise awareness first and give an impulse
to all of us to build a better web. A web
True, but how do you keep your site local on the web?
And what if my bussiness in Romania on dial-up finds your services in
Australia (aimed at local broadbanders) so attractive that wants to
do business with you? Hey, maybe this way i can get my business on the
broadband level but here in Romania
quote
what feels seems different in this instance is that the
image is in the background so the image is not even necessary to see the
page and load the page.
/ qoute
Why put it there then ?
If it's not needed then make it go away ! And voila ... you just turned a broadband only into a everyone
On 26/7/05 7:07 PM, Mugur Padurean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, but how do you keep your site local on the web?
And what if my bussiness in Romania on dial-up finds your services in
Australia (aimed at local broadbanders) so attractive that wants to do
business with you? Hey, maybe this way
It does not matter who is it you aimed for. I CAN ACCESS IT. And i
don't mean me Mugur, but me, another multi-national, with headquarters
in another part of the world with local to ISP broadband connection but
no broadband outside the country, witch happen to be common practice in
some countries
Mugur Padurean schrieb:
Would you sent your client to war (for big bucks) with slow, clumsy outdated
weapons from the 20th century?
We shouldn't use war metaphors in a thread that has all qualities of an
holy war.
After reading all possible relevant and irrelevant objections, I would
a significant concern.
Thanks,
Tatham Oddie
Fuel Advance - Ignite Your Idea
www.fueladvance.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mugur Padurean
Sent: Monday, 25 July 2005 3:48 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check:
Broadleaf
Creative Media Centre
17-19 Robertson Street
Hastings
East Sussex
TN34 1HL
United Kingdom
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance)
Sent: 25 July 2005 07:51
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site Check:
Broadleaf
Mugur
www.fueladvance.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Clarke
Sent: Monday, 25 July 2005 5:08 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site Check:
Broadleaf
The problem is
youre designing for a technology [DSL],
not accessibility. May I
www.fueladvance.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mugur Padurean
Sent: Monday, 25 July 2005 5:25 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site Check:
Broadleaf
Your absoutely right when
you say our creativy shoud not be restricted by any means.
Still
@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG]
Site Check: Broadleaf
Mugur,
I hope you
are not upset with me.
Not at all.
J
I just fail to
understand people who are concerned about pages under 150k. Until about 2
years ago, 50k was my limit. However since then, I've been happy to add
of the template.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance)
Sent: 25 July 2005 10:16
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site Check:
Broadleaf
Mugur,
I hope you are
not upset with me.
Not at all. J
I just fail
G'day
I just fail to understand people who are concerned about pages under 150k.
Well, you probably fail to take a few things into account. Like
people leaving a slow loading site rather than complaining. Like
the cost of bandwidth. Like availability of broadband. I could
go on, but I
On 7/25/05 2:50 AM Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
But how about cutting down the size of your emails and making
them plain text? No need to repeatedly quote 40k of text with
all that Micro$oft formatting in it.
Regards
--
Bert Doorn, Better Web Design
100% agreement here.
You would have thought that a web standards group would be using a more
web standards compliant email client like Thunderbird ?
Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 7/25/05 2:50 AM "Bert Doorn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
But how about cutting down the size of your emails and making
them
On 7/25/05, Chris Cowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would have thought that a web standards group would be using a more web
standards compliant email client like Thunderbird ?
Targetting email clients is like targetting browsers, which is soo 90.
And don't forget the few of us who are on
On 25 Jul 2005, at 4:02 PM, Tatham Oddie (Fuel Advance) wrote:
Regarding the CSS errors - they are all IE hacks
* html is your friend. It validates and only IE loads it, and you can
group 'em together as a block rather than polluting individual rules.
Hide your PC only hacks from Macs using
] [mailto:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Clarke
Sent: Monday, 25 July 2005 3:08 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf
I suspect the 120Kb footprint of the background image is of more concern to
most visitors.
Edward Clarke
Sites where designers can show off their chops cater to a specific
audience - other designers who want to be thrilled by a primarily
visual experience. There is nothing wrong with eye candy sites for
people interested in eye candy, but using such examples as an argument
in support of creating
201 - 300 of 536 matches
Mail list logo
