Does your amplifier go up to 11?
On Fri, June 17, 2011 9:03 am, Grant Bailey wrote:
Hello,
I can barely believe that CSS2.1 has only just become an official
recommendation (see
http://www.css3.info/css2-1-and-the-css3-color-module-become-official-w3c-recommendations/).
Could anyone
Possibly you could use:
META NAME=ROBOTS CONTENT=NOINDEX, NOFOLLOW
so they're not indexed in the first place.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 10:14 am, Bob Schwartz wrote:
I have several sites where i use pop-up windows to present certain types
of information.
When someone does a Google search
Hi,
Search engines are blind readers - design for accessibility.
Each page on the Website should be on a specific topic (except,
perhaps,for the Homepage). Put the topic first in the title tag, so that
it is easily identifiable from the other pages.
The top header in the page content should
Might get some ideas from CSS Drop Shadows @
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/cssdropshadows/
On Wed, December 8, 2010 9:01 pm, cat soul wrote:
I hope I'm not bending/breaking the purpose of the list but wanted
opinions on best practices for preparing images for use on web pages
where
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/#tools
On Fri, November 26, 2010 11:25 pm, Daniel Anderson wrote:
G'day Everyone,
I was wondering if any of you have done any work on sites for the visually
impaired? I have just started a projet for a school for the visually
impaired and the
Or rather, start with the the semantic structure of the page, then insert
the image into the structure appropriately.
On Sat, November 13, 2010 1:46 am, Christian Montoya wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Patrick H. Lauke
re...@splintered.co.uk wrote:
On 13/11/2010 01:23, cat soul
On Sat, October 23, 2010 3:46 am, tee wrote:
Now I feel like the simpleton who tried enter the room with a long stick
holding horizontally.
tee
Is that horizontally, perpendicular to the entrance
or horizontally, parallel to the entrance?
But then again, how it displays is dependent on the fonts available on the
site visitor's system not what some graphic designer wants.
That's why many graphic designers make poor Web Designers - they can't get
their head round the flexibility that needs to be designed into a Website.
On Tue,
Any bets we'll still be using HTML5 in 2018?
On Sat, June 12, 2010 4:16 pm, Sam Sherlock wrote:
Any bets for it being done in time to watch the 2018 World Cup on an
HTML 5
video feed?
in a ie browser without any fudging?
my initial response was only if Google are in position to take
Hi Marvin,
On Wed, February 3, 2010 11:50 pm, Webb, KerryA wrote:
You should check the Top of page links on the Recipes page. They each
seem to go to the start of the previous recipe rather than to the top of
the Web page.
Kerry
That is, you have links with duplicate link-text pointing
I have a chicken - explain how to make it into an egg.
On Sun, January 31, 2010 11:46 pm, Andrew Stewart wrote:
Sorry to ask again, but please explain how the site could be made
accessible whilst maintaining the same ease of use?
On 1 Feb 2010, at 10:31, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
From:
yes
On Wed, January 20, 2010 8:58 am, Marvin Hunkin wrote:
hi.
last page for this site.
still getting errors.
am i stupid or some thin.
marvin.
Markup Validation Service
Check the markup (HTML, XHTML, .) of Web documents
Jump To:Validation Output
Errors found while checking this
Hi Marvin,
I don't have any experience with screen-readers, but here is a suggestion.
It seems the only place you have defined a font is on body.
Maybe it just reads out the explicit attributes you give the header, as in
center.
Try defining the same font-family on the header, as well, to see
Why,oh why, don't people validate their code and remove their own errors
before complaining about some browser or other doing it wrong.
This is supposed to be Standards list.
On Wed, January 13, 2010 2:34 am, stephanie campanella wrote:
Hey Guys,
I'm experiencing an issue with IEUn
It might be that xml requires lowercase only and that the problem is the
H in the id div_Heading.
On Thu, December 17, 2009 8:41 am, Grant Bailey wrote:
Hello,
I've recently started serving my web pages as xml pages using the MIME
type application/xhtml+xml rather than text/css as
Hi Marvin,
The semantics of the headers on your recipe page are wrong.
Headers show the structure of the underlying document with the numbering
indicating the position of importance and order.
Thus,
h1recipe nameh1
h2Ingredientsh2
h2Directionsh2
h3Country/h3
would relate the country, h3, to
What you're trying to do is alter the display of the native list structure
- not the links.
That is you want to display the list-items inline and floated left. (
e.g.
.navlist li {
display: inline;
float: left;
list-style-type: none;
}
On Wed, November 18, 2009
A good start would be to validate your coding and correct the errors.
On Mon, November 16, 2009 1:38 pm, Prisca schmarsow wrote:
Hello everyone :)
Would you be willing to evaluate a website which is a resource for web
designers and developers on the topic of web accessibility and
Since links are inline elements, they shouldn't contain block elements,
such as div and p.
Why not use span (native) inline elements? You should then be able to
use CSS to display them as you wish (including display: block if you want)
using the classes you have ascribed.
On Wed, November 4,
I'd recommend backing files up.
On Tue, October 20, 2009 2:57 am, Luke Hoggett wrote:
Hi,
Sorry you lost your file.
As a precaution in the future I'd recommend installing some sort of
version control e.g. svn can seem a bit daunting to install or overkill
for 1-2 people but in the long run
handler
Alternatively place the script at the bottom of the page?
mike
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone
Sent: 09 October 2009 11:00
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE6 display
Try onload() event handler, see:
http://javascript.about.com/library/bltut31.htm
On Fri, October 9, 2009
6:55 am, Western Web Design wrote:
Kepler Gelotte wrote:
In IE6, although the image fades and replaces etc, the #header is
enlarged to accommodate all 4 images though three remain hidden.
Hi Marvin,
I am interested in your angle on regarding the repeating alt attribute
values in your menu, e.g. alt=Closed Banana.
This would appear to be against basic WCAGC accessibility guidelines, and
also totally unnecessary verbiage for the listener.
What is your reasoning for doing this?
Perhaps you could use separate lists for each sub-heading then use the
appropriate start value for each list.
Using something similar to:
http://www.arraystudio.com/as-workshop/make-ol-list-start-from-number-different-than-1-using-css.html
(maybe an unordered list(definition list?) of
On Sun, August 9, 2009 3:53 am, tee wrote:
...
However, seeing that HTML 5 has given hr tag a new purpose:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-hr-element
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#flow-content-0
quote:
The hr element represents a paragraph-level thematic
Hi,
if the different links are in clearly defined different areas there should
be little confusion, even with using the same colors reversed. If you mix
them in the same menu, then there's obviously a problem of consistency of
the meaning.
However, what you should NOT do, from a usability
sine qua non = indispensible
On Thu, July 2, 2009 9:27 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
It is the sine qua non of accessibility
And that's exactly the point I'm trying to make...just addressing the
font-size issue
is the most basic form of accomodation possible. We can do better.
On Thu, Jul 2,
Try http://www.expresspdf.com/ConvertHtmlToPdf.aspx
with page orientation set to LANDSCAPE.
On Mon, March 30, 2009 2:30 pm, agerasimc...@unioncentral.com wrote:
I have a problem converting my web pages, which are CSS driven into PDFs
(users usually do Right Click - convert page to PDF) - they
The point of the introduction of Web standards was so that user-agent
manufacturers can create browsers that render them as intended by the
designer.
And that, yes, in 10 years time the browsers that exist then (whatever
form they may take)will still render them as intended because they are
This list is aware of many marketing practices that are against Web
Standards.
On Wed, March 25, 2009 3:46 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
No, previous arguments still miss the point.
Having a button on a browser for booksmarks is not comparable
to having a Bookmark this page link on the
The Web Standards Group is for web designers developers who are
interested in web standards (HTML, XHTML, XML, CSS, XSLT etc.) and best
practices (accessible sites using valid and semantically correct code).
We aim to:
* Provide web developers and designers with a forum to discuss issues
possibly something to do with:
#websemantics a {display:none}
producing an empty h1/h1 ?
On Fri, March 13, 2009 10:33 am, Foskett, Mike wrote:
An excellent tool.
I'm intrigued as to why this code would flag an error:
titleWelcome to siteName - blah blah blah/title
...
h1a
Err... sorry about my initial confusion - I've had a long day.
Perhaps,
The text content of each h1 element should match all or part of the title
content.
means that ALL the h1 text content,
Welcome - work, you're welcome to it
should match PART of the title content - which of course it
of the title content (which of course it doesn't).
Try removing the tagline so it just reads Welcome and test again.
On Sat, March 14, 2009 12:35 am, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
possibly something to do with:
#websemantics a {display:none}
producing an empty h1/h1 ?
On Fri, March 13, 2009 10:33
No contradiction.
WCAG 2.0 Recommendation is the normative document.
Not all techniques can be used or would be effective in all situations.
Therefore, any particular TECHNIQUE is not REQUIRED for conformance.
That is to say, if you have some other technique that meets the WCAG
Which IS semantic and separates content (the link) from presentation (a
button).
On Mon, February 23, 2009 10:56 pm, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, John Horner wrote:
Thanks for all the discussion so far. It seems I'll have to re-code.
I will definitely not be using
Which IS semantic and separates content (the link) from presentation (a
button).
On Mon, February 23, 2009 10:56 pm, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, John Horner wrote:
Thanks for all the discussion so far. It seems I'll have to re-code.
I will definitely not be using
Possibly
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html
On Fri, February 20, 2009 3:25 am, Chris Vickery wrote:
Thanks. Not really what I'm looking for. I know the principals myself...
I'm looking for a site, a guide... something more substantive or with some
authority. If it's in relatively
Also take account of results in published surveys of actual users.
For example, see screen-reader user survey:
http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/
On Sat, February 14, 2009 11:35 pm, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On 11/2/09 05:59, Henrik Madsen wrote:
What similar software /
Mmm.. something strange happening with line spacing, cursor positioning or
something in this column.
If you try and block (as in block and paste) a piece of text you
actually have to move the cursor along the line above. Weird???
This could mean that you can never actually position the cursor
Another clue... If you position the text cursor (as opposed to the mouse
cursor) on the text just before a link... then use the right-arrow key to
move this cursor over the link... then the link works as it should.
On Fri, February 6, 2009 11:53 pm, Kristine Cummins wrote:
Hi all:
I'm having
See:
http://accessites.org/site/2007/02/graceful-degradation-progressive-enhancement/4/
On Fri, January 30, 2009 12:29 pm, kie...@humdingerdesigns.co.uk wrote:
Agreed - people certainly aren't getting any smarter as far as web
technologies go. Particuarly as the web is now viewed as a common
I think it's a clash between microformats VS html AND accessibility
standards.
On Mon, January 19, 2009 12:48 am, Ben Rowe wrote:
on microformats.org, it suggests the ABBR element and title attribute
for machine code. however, title attribute for this element will be read
out to a screen
As I said - the coding errors.
On Sat, January 17, 2009 8:03 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
What did you find to be so bad about the site, Stuart?
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Stuart
Foulstone
Sent: Saturday
Perhaps the students should code the site - they couldn't do much worse!
On Fri, January 16, 2009 7:00 pm, Fred Ballard wrote:
Take a look at Sullivan High School's http://www.sullivanhs.org/. As you
can
see in the homepage's lower right corner it's from the Chicago Public
Schools,
If the text in Flash is accessible SEs will index it.
Search robots are in effect blind readers.
If text in Flash is accessible, screen readers can read it.
However, sensible screen-reader users disable Flash.
On Wed, January 14, 2009 7:21 pm, Christie Mason wrote:
It seems that SEs are
but is effectively not
one. However, complying with WCAG confers added benefits which
standards compliance creators strive for.
On 29/11/2008, at 09:22 , Stuart Foulstone wrote:
It may validate, but valid code is just a pre-requisite to achieving
standards compliance.
On Fri, November 28, 2008 8:43
Blinking text is against standards in itself, so how can you do it in a
standards compliant way?
On Fri, November 28, 2008 10:45 am, Dave Hall wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 23:11 -0600, Brett Patterson wrote:
What Dave?
I was simply illustrating how to make text blink in a standards
It may validate, but valid code is just a pre-requisite to achieving
standards compliance.
On Fri, November 28, 2008 8:43 pm, Dave Hall wrote:
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 13:07 +, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Blinking text is against standards in itself, so how can you do it in a
standards compliant
Hi,
could used named ampersand character codes.
http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/text/specialcharacters.html
eg lsquo;SOAPrsquo;
On Wed, November 19, 2008 4:05 pm, James Jeffery wrote:
Never had a problem with character encodings on web pages, but since I
reinstalled the OS on my iMac I have
Actually, the label tag wrapped around form input is the old traditional
method.
The for attribute method was introduced later to allow designers greater
flexibility in positioning/styling forms whilst maintaining accessibility.
On Fri, October 17, 2008 12:53 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank
Hi,
Early screen-readers were not very good at differentiating links and would
run together the text of two adjacent links so it was necessary to use a
separator character.
The vertical line (pipe) became the preferred character to separate
adjacent links because, whilst it is quite verbose -
Section 508 is a minimum standard required for Websites of US Government
contractors, etc. and so has been adopted by many other Websites too. It
is not law, as such.
Disability Discrimination legislation in Europe, the US and Oceania are
all very similar and require Website owners to take
A list is the most appropriate for a list.
The fact that price list states list DOES mean a list should be used -
when you use the term list that's what the user then expects it to be.
If you don't want to use a list (for whatever pedantic reason) then don't
call it one. If you want to use a
On Mon, August 11, 2008 10:38 am, James Jeffery wrote:
Disagree.
...
Again, just because something is a list does not mean it should be in a
list. Take for example students grades. The school needs to list the name,
the subject, the expected grade, the outcome (30/30) and a percentage
If it's not a field it shouldn't be in a fieldset - which is a set of fields.
On Thu, August 7, 2008 10:07 am, Paul Collins wrote:
Hi all,
This is one I've never been sure of; should the submit button be in a
seperate fieldset, or should it even be in a fieldset at all because it is
not a
--
Stuart Foulstone.
On Fri, August 8, 2008 11:29 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To my mind, one of the most pressing questions that needs to be answered
in any particular case is: How is the fieldset labelled?
If it specifically says something like 'postcode' or maybe 'contact
details
I have no problem with elementary questions about Web standards.
But there are perhaps too many posts about how to write basic HTML mark-up
and elementary CSS. This is especially true when the 'poster' has
apparently not even tried to validate it (and, therefore, not seriously
tried to solve
Another problem is that there are organisations which still have large
investments in a legacy O/S (MS included) on which IE7/8 cannot run.
So it's not just a time issue for downloading the browser, but upgrading
to a new O/S.
On Mon, August 4, 2008 8:03 am, James Ellis wrote:
Hi
Not wanting
A dl is a LIST of definition terms and their description.
dt is a definition term to be described (not title).
dd is description of the definition term.
See http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html#h-10.3
On Mon, August 4, 2008 4:20 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was under
A drop down list with a Go button is better than a jump menu for
accessibility standards.
If a user [can't use a mouse and] has to use the arrow keys for navigating
the menu you will find that jump menus tend to open the second option
automatically (i.e. when the user first uses the arrow key)
Incidentally, the second part of the postcode should have maxlength=3
(it is always three characters long).
On Wed, July 9, 2008 9:49 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have created a form which acts as a interface to a system outside of my
control. This takes UK postcode in two parts (postcode1
For discussion on usability of breadcrumb trails see Nielsen,
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/breadcrumbs.html
On Fri, June 6, 2008 7:45 am, libwebdev wrote:
Hi folks,
My organisation manages around 7000+ pages for 100s of departments,
using a CMS. Mine is the only department outside the
Flaming is definitely off topic!
On Fri, June 6, 2008 9:38 am, Ted Drake wrote:
Damn, this is refreshing to hear for a change! Enough said.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Harris
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:13 AM
To:
But the Webpage (or the entire site for that matter) is not be about The
Sun or The Times - it's about the news. And the news is what the user
is looking for.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 9:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My take on this, is that IT ALL DEPENDS !
Every site is different.
For
I seem to remember someone in a previous thread, about similar problem,
suggested using,
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
On Sat, May 17, 2008 3:39 pm, Darren Lovelock wrote:
Hi list,
I've been trying to find a solution that will allow me to vertically
center
all the items in
But that's not because lots of people don't know how to use the address
bar, its because MOST PEOPLE find it easier to type partial URL's into
Google rather than typing the whole URL into the address bar - plus if you
make a slight error you get prompted for the correction rather than just
told
This point originally concerned which character to use IF you use a
character to separate links. It did NOT say that this was the preferred
method.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 2:18 am, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
Screen-reader users have said that the vertical bar is THEIR preferred
character
Really? Do
The reason for putting the character there in the first place is
explicitly to help screen-reader users distinguish between links.
Screen-reader users have said that the vertical bar is THEIR preferred
character (even though this means repeating vertical bar) since it is
not used for anything
From a usability/accessibility point a view.
The most common separator used in such circumstances (and therefore that
most expected by screen-reader users) is the vertical bar.
i.e. IF you add extra characters for accessibility, use the ones they are
familiar with (usability).
Addition:
://sitesbyjoe.com
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Or use a CSS class to do the same,
div class=centre
and
.centre {
text-align: center;
}
On Sat, May 3, 2008 10:22 am, Diego La Monica wrote:
What about div style=text-align: center ?
Diego La Monica
Web
happens when you go
against the natural order of things.
On Sat, May 3, 2008 7:15 pm, Dean Matthews wrote:
On May 3, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
To be clear, I have a 1pixel bottom border on hover (It looks better
than the default underline).
The problem is to easily
, Chris Price wrote:
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
CSS classes are for presentation.
Content is content.
Centering content is presentation.
Class names should not use keywords such as center.
centre is not a keyword and can be used.
The class centre can then be used anywhere centering is desired
Yes there is a simple way.
Set up the anchor hover rule using,
text-decoration: underline;
An image is NOT text so it will not underline the image.
The image should be given an alt text description for when the image is
not available. This text WILL be underlined on hover which is as it
Or use a CSS class to do the same,
div class=centre
and
.centre {
text-align: center;
}
On Sat, May 3, 2008 10:22 am, Diego La Monica wrote:
What about div style=text-align: center ?
Diego La Monica
Web 2.0 - Standards - Accessibilità
mobile: +39 3337235382 - skype:
PS
As someone mentioned earlier you should also remove borders from the image,
a img {
border: 0;
}
(since some browsers will treat border as underline in these circumstances)
On Sat, May 3, 2008 10:11 am, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Yes there is a simple way.
Set up the anchor hover rule
Why The Fuss?
On Fri, April 25, 2008 9:28 pm, Rick Faircloth wrote:
Chill, out... and watch the language...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of ?? ?
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 3:54 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Your problem is probably because your CSS converts the normally inline
span elements to floating block elements.
On Sun, April 27, 2008 10:41 am, Naveen Bhaskar wrote:
hi,
I have a table like this. Each table cell has two values which has put
inside a span. I want this two values come
On Mon, April 14, 2008 3:25 pm, Samuel Santos wrote:
Semantically speaking, what is the right HTML/XHTML element to represent a
path or a file name?
Would it be samp, kbd, or simply code?
Best regards,
--
Samuel Santos
http://samaxes.com/
Hi,
None of the above.
The samp tag is
Hi,
From a usability and accessibility point of view doing this is a very bad
idea, so is way OT for Web Standards Group.
On Thu, April 10, 2008 11:54 pm, Laert Jansen wrote:
Hello everyone.
Well there´s something I want to do but I have no idea if it´s possible to
be done and how would I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Stuart Foulstone
Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2008 8:43 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Frames and title relevance to screen readers
Hi,
You might find the following link useful:
See http
Hi,
You might find the following link useful:
See http://www.webaim.org/techniques/frames/
Stuart
On Wed, April 2, 2008 1:13 am, Anat Katz wrote:
Hi team,
Just a general question - is there any value from a screen reader point of
view, to have a specific title to the actual pages that
While yet another 50+ age group, who invented the Internet and the World
Wide Web, continue to set the standards which stop it descending into
chaos.
On Mon, March 31, 2008 3:39 pm, Michael Horowitz wrote:
I find most do. I think there is a wide disparity depending on who you
work with.
But the bold text titles in this situation are usually at the same level
in the document structure so should have the same , say h3, heading level.
On Fri, March 28, 2008 7:08 pm, tee wrote:
... it's more than a challenge for a
complicated columned layout that designer tends to use h3 for
as useful feedback that it is in fact, a
link. Predefined standard colours are less important these days, but
good design does seem to favour blue-ish for link as a convention.
Joe
On Mar 27, 2008, at 09:14, Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Hi,
Usability.
Users expect link-text
browser/user agent?
/Svip
On 25/03/2008, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
RE:
When I hid the del using display: hidden; the list would render
something like this
I can't say I've ever felt the need to use these tags, but isn't hiding
the content supposed to be the job
Hi,
RE:
When I hid the del using display: hidden; the list would render
something like this
I can't say I've ever felt the need to use these tags, but isn't hiding
the content supposed to be the job of the browser/user agent - rather than
you using CSS.
On Sun, March 23, 2008 12:43 pm, Thomas
Hi,
If it's a CSS background image then it's not content and doesn't have an
alt attribute.
(The non-preferred alternative is to to put it in an img tag with alt=)
If it IS content, it should be in an image tag rather than CSS background
image, with the alt attribute describing the content of
Perhaps you could try nested lists.
On Fri, March 21, 2008 1:56 am, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote:
Hi all
I'm developing a site for a non-profit organisation and one page is their
constitution. I'm trying to get the clauses to appear with a hanging
indent
as they currently do in the word
Hi,
Search robots are essentially blind users.
Design to Web accessibility standards and you remove all the clutter that
can get in the way of bots traversing your site and also include
information that they might otherwise miss (e.g. through alt attributes).
The easier it is to find keywords
Hi,
Search robots are essentially blind users.
Design to Web accessibility standards and you remove all the clutter that
can get in the way of bots traversing your site and also include
information that they might otherwise miss (e.g. through alt attributes).
The easier it is to find keywords
I agree - ignorance and couldn't care less are the commonest excuses for
not creating professional standards based Websites.
On Sun, February 24, 2008 4:02 am, Breton Slivka wrote:
I don't really feel like participating in the dramatic part of this-
But I can answer some of the questions
Hi,
Web 2.0 is basically what Web 1.0 was meant to be, before it was hijacked
by commerce, i.e. collaborative information sharing, social networking,
etc.
The difference is that nowadays we have Web technologies which make this
much easier and more extensive, e.g. Wikipedia and other wikis,
Very ironic.
On Wed, February 13, 2008 12:38 pm, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
...
NickFitz in about time to unsubscribe from this list if it's going to
degenerate into pretentious drivel mode...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
On Thu, November 15, 2007 12:42 pm, Christie Mason wrote:
This is a dynamic, database driven site to present product information on
around 2500 B2B products. Top Navigation is the product Division, bottom
will probably be a repeat of the site navigation, Product navigation is
drill down
Certain Islamic cultures have restrictions on images of any living thing -
not just people.
There are also differences of opinion as to whether this applies to just
drawings or to photographs too.
See:
http://www.muhajabah.com/pictures-fiqh.htm
Whilst some things of these may be unoffensive
But the point is that, this accessibility feature is for people who can't
use a mouse - i.e. they cannot click anywhere.
On Sun, October 28, 2007 6:46 am, Tee G. Peng wrote:
John said don't use display:block. Actually the very reason I used it
is because I want a user able to click on any
On Sun, October 28, 2007 6:38 pm, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
But the point is that, this accessibility feature is for people who
can't
use a mouse - i.e. they cannot click anywhere.
In general parlance, click has become the general term for activate.
Keyboard users
You might like:
http://www.wave.webaim.org/index.jsp
as a graphic aid.
On Fri, October 26, 2007 1:22 pm, Simon Cockayne wrote:
Hi Jen,
Ooh...http://www.tawdis.net/taw3/cms/en is nice. Thanks!
Simon
***
From: Jens Brueckmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Opera mini simulator:
http://www.operamini.com/demo/
--
On Thu, October 25, 2007 11:36 am, Rob Crowther wrote:
Geoff Pack wrote:
Does Opera on the Wii support handlheld and/or projection stylesheets?
SVG?
According to these articles, it supports handheld and tv media types,
SVG and
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
