[WSG] styling address tag or microformat hcard

es in Magento, do you know if I can incorporate Microformat hcard easily? Many thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [

[WSG] first-child selector not always work?

x27;t*/ . /* adjacent works! Red background show up) */ . /* this one shows black background and is correct. */ according to w3c css2 spec, 5.11.1 :first-child pseudo-class: The :first-child pseudo-class matches an element that is the first child of some other element.

Re: [WSG] form select help needed

Yup, I see it too. In IE, the option attribute inherits the select attribute. I tried adding a class and placed to the option, but doesn't work. tee On May 28, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Bob Schwartz wrote: tee, That seems to have brought FF around, but IE6 is still clipping. Bob On M

Re: [WSG] form select help needed

On May 28, 2008, at 5:19 AM, Bob Schwartz wrote: Any way to get the other browsers (and especially IE6) to display like, or nearly like (I would be happy if IE6 was at least like FF), Safari? add width to option attribute. #rht_col option {width: 250px; padding: 0 3px; } tee

Re: [WSG] a question concering shopping cart function (somewhat usability issue I think)

for you site. No law backs me up, and I am unable to sell that 'maybe, possible' 1% accessibility. A good notion and “The power of the Web is in its universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an essential aspect.” won't work unless there is a law says so.

Re: [WSG] a question concering shopping cart function (somewhat usability issue I think)

regretted being jumping in too early for this software, however, as the site's launch date gets closer, I feel that I have after all made a great choice talking client into waiting this long - I'd been building this site since day 1. A great learning opportunity that I

[WSG] a question concering shopping cart function (somewhat usability issue I think)

shopping. Also makes sense too, though not for my habit, but I have learned that I don't make sites for myself :-) I hope this is ON topic as I view it as a usability issue. Thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://w

Re: [WSG] possible to make absolute position moves down with fontsize resize?

7;s 200kb I can live with it :-) Thanks Thomas for the padding suggestion too. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

[WSG] possible to make absolute position moves down with fontsize resize?

technique that I am totally unaware of (already googled and visited the archive of css-d). example ($xx/month): http://lotusseedsdesign.com/s/raz_compare_plans.html Thank you! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] help with menu positioning

On May 13, 2008, at 7:39 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: tee wrote: My brain isn't working. I thought I have the answer but it's not working :-( http://lotusseedsdesign.com/menu.html Missing base-position... #menu li a {background-position: left top;} Georg Georg, than

[WSG] help with menu positioning

m8 {width: 78px; background: url(../images/menu/m8.png) 786px 0;} Any pointer is greatly appreciated. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsub

Re: [WSG] background-position-x (and y)?

Sorry, please ignore me. My brain isn't working after a long and tiring day:-( The answer is right in front of me and I couldn't see it until I wrote it out asking for help. #menu a:hover {background-position: left bottom;} tee On May 13, 2008, at 1:02 AM, tee wrote: I have a

[WSG] background-position-x (and y)?

button has different width with differnt position x but shares the same y. I want to have something like #menu li a:hover {background-position-y: top} But it won't work because the property is not valid. Any tips

Re: R: [WSG] is display:none inheritance

Safari, is totally unreadable, for a second I thought the Safari messes up the style sheet. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help

Re: R: [WSG] is display:none inheritance

been avoding it lately. I think I am going to insert Dean Edwards' updated IE7 script, hopefully it magically solved 99% of the ie6 problem of this particular site :-) tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgrou

Re: R: [WSG] is display:none inheritance

On May 10, 2008, at 1:41 AM, Diego La Monica wrote: Hi tee, simply: ul#nav li ul li ul{ display: none; } Hi Diego, it doesn't work - all sub-level show up. However, if I add the #menu it works #menu ul#nav li ul li ul{ display: none; } As previously mentioned, I figured it out with

Re: [WSG] is display:none inheritance

On May 10, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Fuji kusaka wrote: hi tee, i would to help you but i need to see your source code and if possible the website so that i can be of good help. you can have a look at some of my drop down menus. Fuji, thanks for the response. I got it working while trying to

[WSG] is display:none inheritance

ks and all sublevels of second level also display to none, but it doesn't work if I have it declare from third level #nav ul ul { display:none; } or #nav ul ul li { display:none; } or #nav ul li ul { display:none; } ? tee *

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

Ok, I think I need to modify my comment a bit. It looks like Firefox has a dependency on Mac's keyboard access - it didn't occur to me to check out the System Preferences that something needed to enable because Safari has no problem. tee On May 5, 2008, at 7:32 PM, tee wr

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

Ben, Thanks for the tips. I thought I had the full universal access turned on, but was missing the full keyboard access. Geee, so much for Apple universal access - just like the one button mouse ! totally useless. tee On May 5, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Ben Dodson wrote: If it's a mac issue

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

the famous tweakmag :) I am delighted to know you are here, as that means your extension is of high quality :) OK, Mac issue it is, but if Safari can get it right, it doesn't sound like it's Leopoard's problem but rather the Mac version F

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

show you :( tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

On May 4, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Diego La Monica wrote: Hi tee, can you provide an (un)working example? Here you are, http://74.52.59.43/index.php You need to add a product, then either use 'get a quote' (simple form) or go ahead with 'proceed to checkout', then

[WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

I'd just noticed that Firefox skips the dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing. Anybody knows if there is a workround? Thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: Re[2]: [WSG] accessible client side form validation

Hmm, why the Republic of JS kept saying it's form validation? tee On Apr 23, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Alexey Novikov wrote: Hello, friends. There is no client side form *validation*. There is client side form *assistance*. Validation should be performed on s

Re: [WSG] accessible client side form validation

ted errors'. It's probably a bug by Safari 3.1 (552513) because I had people tested for me in their Safari with different version, and they all worked. I was forced to remove Matt's script as a result, and have the server- side validation. tee On Apr 22, 2008, at 8:58 PM, Mat

Re: [WSG] accessibility and brower compatibility for Kiosk mode?

hat I have never seen an ATM machine that has scrollbar. tee On Apr 17, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Steve Green wrote: Unless you have a keyboard, it probably doesn't work. Some touchscreens (try) to let you do dragging and stuff, but I think you are going to have to change your select

Re: [WSG] accessibility and brower compatibility for Kiosk mode?

#x27; and 'Ctrl + shift' to select multiple options, how does this work with touch screen? tee Have you got wrapping your checkboxes? If not, try that, with a bit of padding. Mike *** List Guidelines: http://w

Re: [WSG] accessibility and brower compatibility for Kiosk mode?

Micahel, Thank you so much for the reply. Tee, It sounds like you are having a bit of difficulty with the 'Accessibility' label here: Accessibility is just one branch of Usability, neither of which ever go away completely. Yes, a bit of this I supposed; The site doesn't suffer

[WSG] accessibility and brower compatibility for Kiosk mode?

omination? My google search showed up IE only. Thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] border-radius for IE8?

On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:09 AM, Frederik Vig wrote: No it won't, according to this: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc351024(VS.85).aspx Frederik Hi Frederik, Thank you. Great resources there. Never think to look for MSDN's librar

[WSG] border-radius for IE8?

Do you know if IE8 will support border-radius? Can't find this info from a quick 5 minutes google search. Am working on a site that I uses webkit and moz border-radius for many blocks, I thought I might as well through in the IE8 pre-support if possible :) thanks!

[WSG] nest heading properly

fully understand the need for proper order of heading elements, but in real world practice, I have yet noticing any site that follow this to the letter, and it's more than a challenge for a complicated columned layout that designer tends to use h3 for every bold text tit

Re: [WSG] premature to test/worry new site for IE8?

Hi Jody and others who responded to my post. I am very relief to know that I don't need to worry. tee On Mar 26, 2008, at 10:20 AM, jody tate wrote: IE8's default setting will be to render web pages in standards- compliant mode. You can opt out of standards compliance with a meta

Re: [WSG] Fieldsets outside of forms. Was: Safari 3.1 and webkit-border-radius

NOT". This way, it makes no wrong suggestion to people who are not English tongue and who needs to depend on English dictionary to understand the spec - I am speaking of me :-) tee Keryx's point of view seems to be dominant, I fear. Even the teacher at my web design class seems to

[WSG] premature to test/worry new site for IE8?

Say, I code my CSS with best practice just like I'd always do, and treat IE browsers with CC should it be needed. Do I need to worry anything with IE8? It didn't occur to me to worry anything at all until client was makin

Re: [WSG] Safari 3.1 and webkit-border-radius

Hi Lars I thought fieldset (with legend) are used only for form elements, I am curious why you would used it in your right column's content. tee Lars Gunther *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] inline floated right problem in Firefox

s no chance of overlapping in such a "reverse styled" case, and the source-order is the the same as the visual order. One more span needed though. Yes. I try to avoid adding extra span as there are too many items needed to float

Re: [WSG] inline floated right problem in Firefox

n IE as my Parallels desktop has networking issue and I can't connect to the Internet from Windows XP, so I am not 100% sure if the problem only occur in Gecko browsers. Thanks! tee On Mar 12, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Rachel May wrote: Hi Tee, Without seeing an example I'm a bit confus

[WSG] inline floated right problem in Firefox

ve the cake and eat it too? Thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] SEO, fact or fiction

didn't know robots text was important for accessibility, however I learned from the accessites team that it is. Thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] IE8 news

the XP and I couldn't do anything on Mac during the startup; after that everything was very slow on both Windows and Leopard. I uninstalled the IE8, which took over 30 minutes, after than everything goes back to normal.

Re: [WSG] IE8 news

I wonder id IE team from M$ sends the flower bouquets and chocolates to Mr Meyer and Mr Zeldman with Hallmark cards to apologize for putting them being bug guys by supporting that silly idea. Sorry, I just can't resist to asking this question. tee "We've decided th

[WSG] is this menu accessible to screen reader and js off?

ible.html http://pfirsichmelba.de/artikel-scripts/dropdown/horizontal.html Also, this site using mootool and still accessible when the js is off. http://www.hotel-oxford.ro/ Thank you! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandard

Re: [WSG] CMS review

http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200802/looking_for_open_source_cms_and_portal_software_options/ tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscrib

Re: [WSG] strong element being more semantical and accessible for required field

users these screen readers using strong as an indication of a required field won't be of any help. Thanks for the great info. Exactly what I am after. I like the way Mike grouped the required elements, will borrow the idea for the next f

Re: [WSG] strong element being more semantical and accessible for required field

takes more codes to make these two browsers behave. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] strong element being more semantical and accessible for required field

ust something I thought of :) Hi Jason, That was my first thought for a quick fix actually :) I thought * First Name is a bit too excessive. Will the screen reader reads out "asterisk" "strong"? That maybe annoying for the ears. tee *

[WSG] strong element being more semantical and accessible for required field

ever I am also doubting my conclusion that it's more accessible for screen readers as I never tested on one. Before I try to convince client the strong element is better approach, I would love to hear your opinion. Thank you! tee ***

Re: [WSG] re: generate data

r one that is relatively small size and unobtrusive. Everybody claims he is unobtrusive, and I have difficulty to settle down with one. Thanks! tee On Feb 24, 2008, at 4:56 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: dwain wrote: if accessibility isn't cracked up to what it's supposed to be, then

Re: [WSG] Site review

make for a site without spacing. Cheers, tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

Hi Matt, thank you very much! Your JS library looks very interesting and I certainly will play with it. I see that the radio group has not been implemented, is this something coming out soon? The web form has radio buttons with multi-selection options. Cheers, tee On Feb 12, 2008, at 2

Re: [WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

said that. I am really confused with your comment. Isn't AJAX the JS of the sort? If JS gets turned of, none of the AJAX function will be working. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.c

[WSG] an accessible question: server-side vs client-side validation

particular curious how screen readers treat client-side validation. Thank you for you thought! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm He

Re: [WSG] question about max-width's behaviour

On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:05 PM, David Laakso wrote: This site uses min/max width and the behaviour I see is the same as mine. Oops, forgot to post the url in my previous post. http://www.thinkvitamin.com/ (one of the best layout I even seen!) tee

Re: [WSG] question about max-width's behaviour

7;limitation' should include the 'em' unit. The purpose of max-width loses if it can't overruled the em's behavior. Do I making myself clear or stupid? :) tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgr

Re: [WSG] question about max-width's behaviour

) This site uses min/max width and the behaviour I see is the same as mine. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join

[WSG] question about max-width's behaviour

that FF and Safari ignore the max-width. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] Site check

popping up on top of about button, this happens to other 3 buttons too. regards, tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] Skip nav links, tab through

On Nov 15, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: You need to turn FKA (Full Keyboard Access) 'on' in System Preferences > Keyboard and Mouse. Also for Safari and Camino: Safari: Preferences > Advanced: see the checkbox. Camino: Preferences > Web Features: see the checkboxes at t

Re: [WSG] Skip nav links, tab through

but when I 'tab', the feature never work for any sites but the Safari menu (address bar and bookmark bar) only. I don't know what I am missing, as I obviously can get the tabbing work in Firefox. tee ***

Re: [WSG] opera doesn't play nice with Opacity

e - I haven't really been able to check the Navjot, yes I filed it early this morning. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] opera doesn't play nice with Opacity

James, I have no idea whether Opera uses Qt4 or 3 but it may filter through in time to a new Opera release (try Opera 9.5 beta - it may have it already). I have 9.5 Alpha Beta. Do you know if Opera is quick to bug fix? If not, I don't want to bother to report the bug. :-)

Re: [WSG] opera doesn't play nice with Opacity

nd not on #col1, #col2, #col3. yes, they do have background colors, they are located at goldenlotus.css. I wanted to use this style sheet for structure layout and the content.css for positioning and presentation, probably not well o

Re: [WSG] opera doesn't play nice with Opacity

#left_col should be black text, there in Opera some of the texts are showned in #fc3 color which is the background color of #left_col. http://lotusfromthemud.com/goldenlotus/opera.png tee *** List Guidelines: http://websta

[WSG] opera doesn't play nice with Opacity

sn't change at all. http://www.lotusfromthemud.com/goldenlotus/mac.png http://www.lotusfromthemud.com/goldenlotus/pc.png Thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandards

Re: [WSG] Styling [Forms]

wsers. I do care the aesthetic inspiration, but using JS to overwrite browser default for option attribute isn't something I aspire :) 'width' works for all browsers I have tested : Safari, IE, Opera, Firefox and Camino 'text-align' only work in Opera and Firefox

Re: [WSG] skip to content: care of accessibility causing usability

n the idea from it ；） http://www.themaninblue.com/ tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] How z-index works

y entering your IP address, then report to your webhost. The first time I couldn't see a site and the site owner had no idea why, someone from another list told me to look up the IP address of that site to look for anomaly, thus I was able to tell the site owner to seek help from his

Re: [WSG] skip to content: care of accessibility causing usability

h approach will _just work_ in all browsers, and make it much easier to get IE6 to behave like a browser. I need to accommodate 800px screen for a very specific reason, but this layout doesn't look good (especially in product page) in 800px. tee *

Re: [WSG] skip to content: care of accessibility causing usability

ip to (content/navigation) useful for me. Now you pointed out ( John and other did too but I was blind :) ), makes me realized I was mainly viewing this feature from my own' benefit. Glad that I asked. Sometimes one has to show one's ignorance so one can

Re: [WSG] skip to content: care of accessibility causing usability

:both} IEs show a 6px to 8px gap between h1 logo and the menu., so I have margin-top: -6px for IEs. my guess is the clear class causing it. It works except that in IE 6, as described, the header reloads after the page fully loaded. Thanks! tee ***

[WSG] skip to content: care of accessibility causing usability

rsor to the top. If I, the site builder, find it annoying, what will the users find ? I am beginning to think this is causing a usability issue and is killing all other usable elements that I work so hard to try to get them right. Please give me your thought. Many thanks!

Re: [WSG] browsers render differently with "Optroup"

On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: On Oct 24, 2007, at 3:27 PM, Tee G. Peng wrote: I am working on a web form that has Optgroup in it, and the first time I realized browsers render this attribute differently. IE Mac displays 'CA' in your 1st exampl

Re: [WSG] Title attribute and screen readers

So it's concluded that title attribute is as useless as tabindex and accesskey and therefor shouldn't be used at all? Need acknowledge by your accessible mastero :) Need acknowledge "from" your access

Re: [WSG] Title attribute and screen readers

refor shouldn't be used at all? Need acknowledge by your accessible mastero :) tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

[WSG] browsers render differently with "Optroup"

) Screen reader isn't graphic user agent, so it will read 'CA" instead of 'California'? It's quite annoying if I have to add : California tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.o

Re: [WSG] Priority 2 error - Clearly identify the target of each link.

Russ, On Oct 20, 2007, at 3:31 PM, russ - maxdesign wrote: Hi Tee, Is it an "Idiotic error"? Imagine you're blind... Ok, since you put it this way, I will reconsider my choice of word :) (thanks for the grammar correction). You have given a good reason, still, I think that

[WSG] Priority 2 error - Clearly identify the target of each link.

ticle is listed, that means more than one title attribute with 'continue reading', as a result I am unable to pass the Priority 2: 13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/#tech-meaningful-links Can this idiotically error

Re: [WSG] introducing a prompt to download or open a pdf

keyboard + click on mouse, this will open up the right click window for options. I think it worth to include this little info for user education when a web design opted to use right click for download/open new window. tee *** L

Re: [WSG] IE 7 check please

On Oct 14, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Donna Jones wrote: Tee, i just looked more at the http://www.thinkvitamin.com/ site. yes, i get the scroll bar at 800 wide in IE7 (not standalone). and yes, its because its not chopping off the footer (wouldn't have noticed, probably, though if K

Re: [WSG] IE 7 check please

I amended my layout to "elastic + fluid" like the above two sites, and I am getting some 70px scrollbar at 800px screen in my standalone IE 7, not IE 6. (no special treatment is served for IE 6/7 for the outer wrap). At 800px screen in other browsers, n

Re: [WSG] IE 7 check please

On Oct 12, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Tee G. Peng wrote: Can you please tell me if you see a horizontal scroll-bar in these two sites in IE 7 (not standalone), in 800px wide screen. http://spanish-portuguese.berkeley.edu/ I forgot to mention, in the above site, it actually is about 776px before

[WSG] IE 7 check please

though, therefor I don't want to fix something I am uncertain whether that is a bug in IE standalone and beta. If it also show up in IE 7, has anybody encountered similar before and if you know the quick fix? Thanks!

Re: [WSG] Jquery and/or Yahoo UI

Can you comment on Ext JS ? http://extjs.com/ I'd been wanting to know how it measure up with standards but thought this is not a place to ask, but where is the better place to get a better answer regarding standards? :) tee On Oct 12, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Christian Montoya wrote:

Re: [WSG] Cost of Accessibility

with disability might sue me. I want to build accessible sites because that is the right thing to do and I have pride in what I do. Sometimes I do wonder, are some people (including me) in the WSG list live in our fancy world. tee *

Re: [WSG] Form styling

nd is WCAG AAA compliant. You are welcome to use my code. http://tinyurl.com/2b8ban tee On Sep 26, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: Hello list, OK, I hate form styling. It's my least favorite thing. I have started using Eric Meyer's "Reset" style sheet. Does anyo

Re: [WSG] question on 'logical tab order'

lace? Or rather, how you guys define/understand 'logical tab order'? A google search on 'logical tab order', shows up results that are related to tabindex. best and good weekend! tee *** List Guide

Re: [WSG] opera bug on hover, and the use of margins and left/right on absolute position

e or pag viewed in Lynx Viewer, content in the span class is revealed. But we don't always want this. tee On Sep 22, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Tee G. Peng wrote: Got an impression that Patrick and George are experts of Opera browser :) Can you guys take a look on this? Al, I reckon you ha

Re: [WSG] question on 'logical tab order'

perspective, I do think that sometimes putting a message like this on a site helps educate general public how to use their browsers to enhance their browsing experiences. Of course, only if they care to read the accessibility statement. Best regards, tee

[WSG] opera bug on hover, and the use of margins and left/right on absolute position

e position, I always need to declare a unit in top or bottom with 'zero' unit in left or right, then in combination with margin (left or right) to get it works properly. tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstanda

[WSG] question on 'logical tab order'

hen to add 's' and where 's' should be added". So if you can correct my errors and explain to me that will be great :) Many thanks! tee lotusfromthemud.com *** List Guidelines: http://webstanda

Re: [WSG] Accessible Open Source CMS

On Sep 12, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote: Tee wrote: Personally I don't think there is a fully accessible WYSIWYG Editor existed that delivers pure clean code. It all depends on how you define "fully". XStandard has a keyboard accessible interface and

Re: [WSG] Accessible Open Source CMS

san's work' (borrowed Partrick's word) made by Modx. In the blog individual article page, I even managed to score WCAG AAA. http://tinyurl.com/3deh87 tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] Accessible Open Source CMS

On Sep 12, 2007, at 2:13 AM, Web Dandy Design wrote: Hi, Can anyone advise on the most accessible, open-source CMS between Joomla, Drupal or Plone? Modx cms tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail

Re: [WSG] Speaking of alt tags . . .

On Sep 11, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Quoting "Tee G. Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: If it's decorative image, why not make it to background image? This is most appropriate way to handle it, and you don't need to worry about blank alt tag. Depending

Re: [WSG] Speaking of alt tags . . .

ay to handle it, and you don't need to worry about blank alt tag. regards, tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***

Re: [WSG] click on select element triggers block popup in IE7

submitted to client, I often get a reply that the page breaks in IE 6 when he started adding new CSS codes. best, tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/

[WSG] click on select element triggers block popup in IE7

olbar runs on IE6, and it doesn't work for the standalone version. Thank you and have a good weekend! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/joi

Re: [WSG] lack of 'lang' attribute fails WAI

site contains English and one or more of the above mentioned languages, it's likely at least x% of users who visit the site may use a native search engine, thus a valid reason to have more than one languages in the metad

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >