-devel
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 12:50 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Sam W2JDB
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
>From the WSJT-X User guide:
Section 7.1 : Standard messages -
" The RR73 message should be used only if you are reasonably c
should be considered.
Regards,
Grant VK5GR
From: Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 12:50 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Sam W2JDB
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
>From the WSJT-X User guide:
Section 7.1 : Stand
me.
73,Ed W0YK
Original message From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 13:18 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT
software development Cc: sdegroff
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
I don't know what F/H is, but i have seen wsjtx hang and not complete the qso
after RR73.
sin Sähköpostiista
>
> Lähettäjä: Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
> Lähetetty: sunnuntai 22. lokakuuta 2023 8.49
> Vastaanottaja: 'WSJT software development'
> Kopio: Reino Talarmo
> Aihe: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
>
> Hi Andy and all,
> The protocol is flexible o
@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andy Durbin Subject:
[wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.
I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73
after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H active but
not when F/H is not active. I
: Andrew Neumeier
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
In some cases the use of RR73 is problematic. I operate FT8 almost exclusively
on 2 meters, weak signal. If I am working a very weak station, and that
station chooses to use RR73 instead of 73, there
is a good chance that I
ThxSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/22/23 12:28 AM (GMT-05:00) To:
sdegroff via wsjt-devel Cc: Black Michael
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Fox/HoundFor dxpeditions...see
ThxSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Hasan N0AN via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/22/23 6:49 AM (GMT-05:00) To:
WSJT software development Cc: Hasan N0AN
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Fox/Hound modeHasanOn Sat, Oct 21, 2023
sjt-devel
> Date: 10/21/23 11:22 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: WSJT software development
> Cc: sdegroff
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
>
> Huh?
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>
>
> Original message
1,8 – 70 MHz
Lähetetty Windowsin Sähköpostiista
Lähettäjä: Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
Lähetetty: sunnuntai 22. lokakuuta 2023 12.56
Vastaanottaja: 'WSJT software development'
Kopio: Reino Talarmo
Aihe: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Keijo, which bands you have used? Perhaps HF
Date: 10/21/23 13:02 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT software development Cc: Ron WV4P Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? I wish this was THE way, the useless final 73 should have never existed and is the bain of the mode. Ron, WV4P On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 2:55 PM Andy Durbin via wsjt
-devel
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Lähetetty: sunnuntai 22. lokakuuta 2023 8.49
Vastaanottaja: 'WSJT software development'
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Kopio: Reino Talarmo <mailto:reino.tala...@kolumbus.fi>
Aihe: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed
software development'
Kopio: Reino Talarmo
Aihe: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Hi Andy and all,
The protocol is flexible on that issue. The original weak signal QSO do contain
a “RRR” that is “confirmed” by a “73” to keep both sizes of the QSO happy.
The “RR73” is really intended
, Reino OH3mA
From: Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2023 1:05 AM
To: Neil Zampella via wsjt-devel
Cc: Andrew Neumeier
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
In some cases the use of RR73 is problematic. I
Original message From: Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 15:08 (GMT-08:00) To: Neil
Zampella via wsjt-devel Cc: Andrew Neumeier
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
In some cases the use of RR73 is problematic. I operate FT8 almost
exclusively on 2
: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? I
don't know what F/H is, but i have seen wsjtx hang and not complete the qso
after RR73.Stan DeGroff W8SRDSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy
smartphone Original message From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 3:49 PM (GMT-05
+173,Ed W0YK
Original message From: Ron WV4P via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 13:02 (GMT-08:00) To: WSJT
software development Cc: Ron WV4P
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73? I wish
this was THE way, the useless final 73 should have never existed
You CQ DX message should be in TX6.
73
-Jim
NU0C
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 19:33:18 +
Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel wrote:
> After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use of
> F/H mode. I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto sequenced
> after RR73 was
11:22 PM (GMT-05:00) To: WSJT
software development Cc: sdegroff
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Huh?
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 7:06 PM (GMT-05:00) To:
wsjt-devel
What is F/H mode ?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: sdegroff via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 11:22 PM (GMT-05:00) To:
WSJT software development Cc: sdegroff
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
Huh?Sent from my Verizon
Huh?Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel
Date: 10/21/23 7:06 PM (GMT-05:00) To:
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andy Durbin Subject:
Re: [wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
After a review of ALL.TXT I
After a review of ALL.TXT I no longer think this was related to prior use of
F/H mode. I had set TX5 to a "CQ DX message" and that was auto sequenced after
RR73 was received.
I'll need to be careful to ensure TX5 is set correctly when in QSO.
73,
Andy, k3wyc
> On Oct 21, 2023, at 16:04, Andrew Neumeier via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> If I am working a very weak station, and that station chooses to use RR73
> instead of 73, there
> is a good chance that I have not received it, especially if I am waiting for
> a qsb peak on the signal.
And that’s
In some cases the use of RR73 is problematic. I operate FT8 almost
exclusively on 2 meters, weak signal. If I am working a very weak station, and
that station chooses to use RR73 instead of 73, thereis a good chance that I
have not received it, especially if I am waiting for a qsb peak on
FWIW ... if you received an RR73 .. there is no need to reply.
The station is saying that RR I got your last, and 'over and out' ...
The other party is not waiting for your reply, they're on to another
contact.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 10/21/2023 1:14 PM, Andy Durbin wrote:
WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win
@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Andy Durbin Subject:
[wsjt-devel] No 73 allowed after RR73?
WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.
I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73
after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H active but
not when F/H is not active. I suspect
I wish this was THE way, the useless final 73 should have never existed and
is the bain of the mode.
Ron, WV4P
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 2:55 PM Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.
>
> I have observed several times that I could not
WSJT-X ver 2.6.1, Win 8.1.
I have observed several times that I could not complete a QSO by sending 73
after I had received an RR73. This is expected operation with F/H active but
not when F/H is not active. I suspect that something is latched in software if
F/H mode has been used but is
28 matches
Mail list logo
