Hi,
Martijn Faassen schrieb:
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2008-02-18 11:20:05 +0100, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Launchpad started the beta tests for their mailing list offers. A
while ago we discussed this option for future hosting of the mailing
lists.
The current
Stephan Richter schrieb:
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
The additional version specification should be merged into the
extends version
section. The version 1.3.1dev is the version the develop egg
specifies.
Yes. That's how it works now.
Cool, then I think the behavior
Hi,
Jim Fulton schrieb:
This only applies to Zope3 developers and people using the Zope 3 ZMI.
I'm trying to get rid of ThreadedAsync. zope.app.server uses it to
cause the asyncore main loop to stop as part of the server-control
functionality.
There are no tests for this afaict. Trying
Hi,
Launchpad started the beta tests for their mailing list offers. A while
ago we discussed this option for future hosting of the mailing lists.
The current implementation has the restriction that the mailing lists
can not be hosted using custom domains (@zope.org).
I was contacted by
Hi,
Aaron Lehmann schrieb:
Christian,
What if people are relying on those error messages to do different things?
Possibly they already have normalization code they expect to come into
play in this situation, which is different than yours
.
I see that people might be doing that, however, it
Hi,
Aaron Lehmann schrieb:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
Possibly instead of returning an error, it might resolve the name, and
take an optional callback that performs said resolution? That way,
people who have their own resolution code can easily factor it in.
Or
Hi,
the standard name chooser makes sure that the character '+', '@' are not
used in the beginning of a name and '/' is never used.
When asking the name chooser to choose a name for me, I thought it would
normalize those characters away, giving me a usable name.
Reading the interface,
Aaron Lehmann schrieb:
On Feb 11, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Aaron Lehmann schrieb:
Christian,
What if people are relying on those error messages to do different
things?
Possibly they already have normalization code they expect to come
into play in this situation
Hi,
Dieter Maurer schrieb:
Christian Theune wrote at 2008-2-4 13:23 +0100:
...
+# agroszer: 2008.feb.1.: currently the above seems not to be true
+# request will KEEP the response on close()
+# even more if a retry occurs in the publisher,
+# the response
Adam Groszer schrieb:
Log message for revision 83376:
fix of 599 error on conflict error in request
see: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-January/030844.html
I'm missing a test case here. Also the annotation style of the comment
should go into a bug report and not into the
Hi,
Adam Groszer schrieb:
Log message for revision 83382:
fix of 599 error on conflict error in request
see: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2008-January/030844.html
Changed:
U zope.server/trunk/setup.py
U zope.server/trunk/src/zope/server/ftp/publisher.py
-=-
Modified:
Hi,
Leonardo Rochael schrieb:
I should've been clearer, I meant reading and writing at the same time from
2 different file handles.
NamedTemporaryFile has the added complication of removing the file from
under 'blob' when it's closed, so even if I don't try to open the blob after
consuming
Christian Zagrodnick schrieb:
Hi,
the release of zope.viewlet 3.4.1 on pypi is missing the data files
(like .txt and .zcml), hence it is unusable. Also the date in the
CHANGES is wrong (2007 should be 2008)
Roger, it is good that you do releases, but could to please take take of
making
Hi,
Jacob Abraham schrieb:
I was trying to get the demo examples from zalchemy working with
Zope3 and came across this exception.(http://paste.lisp.org/display/54568
).
Please do let me know how I might fix this.
Honestly, the demo packages of z3c.zalchemy are a pain. None of the
Dieter Maurer schrieb:
Chris Withers wrote at 2008-1-15 09:42 +:
You know, you could have provided a link.
I believe it's Dieter's policy never to actually provide links to
anything ;-)
Indeed, I never search for others...
If I have the link at hand, you may get a link, but if not,
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 30.12.2007, 11:35 -0800 schrieb Saurabh Bagchi:
I would like to do the following for a specific file,
call it addMember.xls:
1) Print the name of the file.
2) By the side of the file, print its modification
time.
I can do this for all the files in the folder, but not
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 12:32 -0500 schrieb Chris McDonough:
I also have zero opinion about this but I'll note as the dedicated
whiner, that, delta some policy change, until this gets worked out,
the Cheese Shop is broken for people who want to install zope.app*
packages (and
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 12:39 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Good job! :)
I agree that this is really annoying.
Really, this needs to get unscrewed. I'm skeptical that this is
released in 3.4 since a dependency on an unreleased alpha egg is
involved.
It turns out that there are
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 10:28 +0100 schrieb Christian Theune:
We have different to topics that need discussion/decision:
a) There is breakage in publisher eggs for which the XML-RPC stuff
assumed to be the reason. I'll figure out what's going on there today so
that the immediate
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 10:28 +0100 schrieb Christian Theune:
b) We intended to remove the functionality this week as it was not
agreed on to include. However, we (gocept) found that it was already
released in the 3.4 series as we (gocept) let the topic slip for too
long. This means
Hi,
I've moved the buildout configuration that I wrote a while ago to
monitor buildout projects in the repository to its own (virtual) machine
today.
I'm still fiddling with the setup to make everything work with buildbot
0.7.6 which has some updates regarding in-flight reconfiguration and
Stupid me, I forgot to mention the current address:
http://195.62.106.62:8010/
This address is temporary.
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and
Am Donnerstag, den 27.12.2007, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Brian Sutherland:
Apologies for posting this here, but I couldn't find the right
bugtracker for z3c.zalchemy (I looked in Launchad and the README). Where
is the right place?
It looks like z3c.zalchemy.AlchemyDataManager._cleanup doesn't do
Hey,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 09:58 +0100 schrieb Christian Zagrodnick:
Yes, what do others think? It's quite hard for me to do anything
because the discussion is kind of nebulous.
We have different to topics that need discussion/decision:
a) There is breakage in publisher eggs for which
Hey,
Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 12:32 -0500 schrieb Chris McDonough:
I also have zero opinion about this but I'll note as the dedicated
whiner, that, delta some policy change, until this gets worked out,
the Cheese Shop is broken for people who want to install zope.app*
packages (and
Hi,
we're (still/again/...) working on the common criteria project. We're in
a mode to try to finish it up and get done with.
I feel that Zope3/trunk/doc/security is not the right location for those
documents. I'd move them to a top level project in svn or something like
Zope3/common-criteria/.
Hi,
the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s Sharing security policy.
I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release to be
evaluated.
The most straight forward thing I can think of is to create a branch
derived from the 3.3 release series that includes zc.sharing and is
Hey,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2007, 06:04 -0500 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Wednesday 07 November 2007, Christian Theune wrote:
A name proposal would be Zope 3 Common Criteria Edition. The question
would be whether to let it have it's own version number (1.0) or to
start from the version
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2007, 10:03 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
On Nov 7, 2007, at 4:47 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the common criteria evaluation is using zc`s Sharing security
policy.
I need to specify a version number/name that describes the release
to be
evaluated
Hi,
the most current version I found was this:
http://www.zope.org/DevHome/Subversion/ZopeSVNFAQ
Can we update the rules for setting the global ignores to include
'.egg-info' directories?
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle (saale) - germany
www.gocept.com -
Am Donnerstag, den 01.11.2007, 23:43 -0400 schrieb Chris McDonough:
In summary:
[...]
I think fixing this sort of stuff is important if it's a goal to allow
people to use Zope technologies outside of Zope-the-appserver. I'd
like to participate by making new releases, but I'm not sure
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Benji York wrote:
Why the test extra?
to get it working. :-) There were several packages required by
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 02.11.2007, 10:53 -0400 schrieb Stephan Richter:
I only know of the general problem and not the specific one. Let's say you
have a package A with extras AE1 and AE2. Then you really have to write tests
for three installation cases: A, A with AE1, A with AE2. Currently we
Am Samstag, den 20.10.2007, 13:02 +0530 schrieb Baiju M:
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Oct 18
12:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Oct 19 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5
messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK ---
Am Mittwoch, den 17.10.2007, 11:13 +0200 schrieb Wichert Akkerman:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Cool,
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2007, 17:16 -0400 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
Log message for revision 80896:
Added LAZY_FILE_LOADING constant to PageTemplateFile. When set to True
Hi,
Am Montag, den 15.10.2007, 17:29 -0400 schrieb Erik Rose:
Here's a little patch that eliminates some duplication in
getRequiredAdapters(). It changes it to use the
_adapterishRegistrations() utility function, as getProvidedAdapters()
does, rather than repeating the
Am Montag, den 15.10.2007, 16:38 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake:
On 10/15/07, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure automated bug expiry is a very bad thing.
Agreed; it's completely unhelpful.
Think so too.
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle/saale -
Log message for revision 79633:
Updated manual to reflect reality about Zope 2 security and views.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/Five/doc/manual.txt
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/lib/python/Products/Five/doc/manual.txt
Hi,
(sorry for the cross-post, please do not reply on this list, please use
zodb-dev or mail me in private for discussions, I won't post for this
issue on these lists again)
gocept received interest in finishing the ZEORaid project and we're
trying to do a fund-raising round. If you're
Am Sonntag, den 12.08.2007, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Tino Wildenhain:
Philipp von Weitershausen schrieb:
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 8/12/07, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to make it short: I propose to move the Zope 2 bugtracker to
Launchpad. Since the Zope 3 bugtracker works already
Hi,
the repository is now mirrored at this location:
http://svn.zope.de/zope.org/
It syncs to the master repository every 5 minutes.
It currently does not have the same UUID so switching from a read-only
checkout to a writable checkout is not possible right now.
Cheers,
Christian
--
gocept
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 14:12 + schrieb Reinout van Rees:
On May 3, 8:40 am, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makes you feel the zope.org server moved to 1.4? It doesn't support
the replay command, so it doesn't look updated.
Sorry, I must have drawn the wrong
Hey,
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2007, 11:34 + schrieb Reinout van Rees:
On Mar 2, 12:01 pm, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Reinout van Rees wrote:
On Mar 1, 2:50 am, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the DZUG is working on a read-only mirror
Humm.
Am Donnerstag, den 03.05.2007, 08:33 +0200 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hey,
Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2007, 11:34 + schrieb Reinout van Rees:
On Mar 2, 12:01 pm, Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously Reinout van Rees wrote:
On Mar 1, 2:50 am, Christian Theune
yay!
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Hi,
this is a friendly reminder that I need help sorting out ZClass errors
on this branch:
http://svn.zope.org/Zope/branches/ctheune-zodb38zope34/
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 10.03.2007, 07:36 +0100 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Christian Theune wrote at 2007-3-7 22:05 +0100:
...
If 5 seconds are spend in the application thread to untangle mime data
which has nothing application-specific about it and then only 100ms or
so in the application itself
Log message for revision 73117:
- Making a Zope 2.9 flavour that supports ZODB 3.8.
This is an unofficial branch.
Changed:
A Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/
-=-
Copied: Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8 (from rev 73116, Zope/branches/2.9)
Log message for revision 73118:
- moved pointers to ZODB and zope.proxy to trunk
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python/
_U Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python/zope/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python
Log message for revision 73120:
- updated to newer zodbcode because of testbreakage
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python
___
Name:
Log message for revision 73121:
- fixed test that was too strict
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python/OFS/tests/testHistory.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python/OFS/tests/testHistory.py
Log message for revision 73132:
- backported feature to support named temporary files
Changed:
U Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/doc/CHANGES.txt
U Zope/branches/2.9-with-ZODB3.8/lib/python/ZPublisher/HTTPRequest.py
U
Log message for revision 73083:
- creating branch for integrating zope 3.4 and zodb 3.8
Changed:
A Zope/branches/ctheune-zodb38zope34/
-=-
Copied: Zope/branches/ctheune-zodb38zope34 (from rev 73082, Zope/trunk)
___
Zope-Checkins maillist -
Log message for revision 73084:
- ZODB's setup.py madness integrated
- fixed test for history
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/ctheune-zodb38zope34/lib/python/
U Zope/branches/ctheune-zodb38zope34/lib/python/OFS/tests/testHistory.py
_U
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2007, 01:40 -0300 schrieb Sidnei da Silva:
On 3/7/07, Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. This optimization is about leveraging the fact that in many
situations the upstream bandwith is *much* lower than the IO bandwith to
the disk.
Another
, at 9:57 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
[modified slightly from a similar proposal to zope3-dev to match Zope
2's publisher]
I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient
Blob
handling possible.
This includes not copying
Hi,
I've started working on the integration of Zope 3.4 and ZODB 3.8 into
Zope 2.11.
I have a breaking test on ZClasses that I couldn't understand. I'd
appreciate any help.
The error is a max. recursion of an object that tries to load its state
and something goes off. Here's a part of the
Hi,
[modified slightly from a similar proposal to zope3-dev to match Zope
2's publisher]
I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient Blob
handling possible.
This includes not copying the data from an uploaded file, but using a
`link` operation when possible.
However,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 14:01 -0300 schrieb Sidnei da Silva:
What exactly do you mean by 'link'? As in 'soft links'? The uploaded
file usually is a temporary file, so you are saying you would create a
soft link on the 'blobs' directory to a file in the $TMP directory? Or
maybe the other
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 09:34 -0800 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
Christian Theune-2 wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 14:01 -0300 schrieb Sidnei da Silva:
What exactly do you mean by 'link'? As in 'soft links'? The uploaded
file usually is a temporary file, so you are saying you
+0100 schrieb Christian Theune:
Hi,
[modified slightly from a similar proposal to zope3-dev to match Zope
2's publisher]
I'm writing up a proposal for the ZODB to make even more efficient Blob
handling possible.
This includes not copying the data from an uploaded file, but using a
`link
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 21:48 +0100 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Christian Theune wrote at 2007-3-7 20:09 +0100:
I was looking through some publisher code and found that the
`process_request` method which takes the request body as a file-like
object and processes it as a FieldStorage
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 13:00 +0100 schrieb Zope Tests Summarizer:
Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Tue Mar 6 21:17:31 EST 2007
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2007-March/007404.html
I'm questioning those tests. I have two tests
Hi,
few questions:
a) I want to do the switch to ZODB 3.8 (currently trunk)
b) That needs zope.proxy as of Zope 3.4 (currently trunk)
Is there anything that would block this and if something how I can
contribute unblocking it?
Christian
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - forsterstraße 29 - 06112
Hi,
the DZUG is working on a read-only mirror that will be accessible via
anonymous HTTP.
It will likely be available shortly after the upcoming Subversion
ugprade.
Christian
Am Donnerstag, den 08.02.2007, 20:02 +0100 schrieb Reinout van Rees:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Reinout van
Hello everybody,
the Zope project starts using launchpad.net for some services. We'll
start out with using the launchpad bugtracker for the Zope 3 development
in the next weeks.
However, we have to make some changes to the existing data in launchpad
to clean up some structural problems. We'll
Am Montag, den 22.01.2007, 00:25 -0800 schrieb Ross Patterson:
Christian Theune ct-w5oghCfH6z/[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't spot a comment in the CHANGELOG for this.
Ah, sorry. There are some holes in my best practices. Happy to
correct though. Shall I just fashion a CHANGELOG
Hi,
Am Montag, den 22.01.2007, 12:44 -0800 schrieb Ross Patterson:
Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Montag, den 22.01.2007, 00:25 -0800 schrieb Ross Patterson:
Christian Theune ct-w5oghCfH6z/[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't spot a comment in the CHANGELOG
Hi,
Simon Michael wrote:
Good day all.. I have turned off the automatic subtopic links which used to
appear below the main page content in the zope3 wiki. The wiki content was
and is being created to work without them so I think it's better without
them, even if it means a little more
Hi,
Fred Drake wrote:
There's more than one of these. zope.file was intended to use blobs
when they come along, so I'd suggest that making that support blobs
directly, with backward compatibility for the existing structure, is
the right way to go.
Intuitively my first guess is:
a) provide
Hi,
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
- What's the next step on supporting ZODB Blobs?
Start using it! :)
- Is there a branch of Zope that actually uses it?
Nope, not yet. I don't have any plans for Zope 2, but I'll be working on
the Zope 3 side.
I guess that we need to decide whether we want to
Hi,
Simon Michael wrote:
Hi Christian, all
Zwiki always tried to keep login effort to a minimum; until now, the
lightweight optional username cookie has been enough. (It's no longer
optional on wiki.zope.org of course.)
There has been talk of moving up to the next level, ie some kind
Hi,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
I don't know how easy this is to do, but one thing that would be
_really_ nice would be to use an existing compatible python install
rather than Zope splatting it's own in regardless.
-1
That's what Zope 3 does (it's a standard
Hi,
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Since I'm going to be building the installer for Windows I would like
to quickly ask if anyone expects multiple Zope installs to live
side-by-side. The existing installer atempted that but I don't believe
it was very successful.
I would like to know if anyone has
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
I'm thinking about shipping easy-install pre-installed with the installer.
Anyone thinks that's a good/bad idea?
Would anyone be interested in shipping more goodies (eg, PIL, PyXML,
elementree)?
I'm unsure about that. As soon as you include it, it becomes a part of
Hi,
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Summary of current status on DNS...
I've just updated the zonedit contact details to point to:
http://groups.google.com/group/zopeorg-dns
This is a private, members only group and I've invited all relevant
people to the group. If I've left anyone out,
So what's the price tag on the deal?
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Zone Edit offers DNS services on different continents for a small fee. We
can easily support our requirements with little effort from these folks:
ZoneEdit's basic service offers a pair of DNS servers with 24x7 monitoring
and
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Sep 17, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
I wonder whether this statement is true:
Any connection handed out after the connection breaks the ACID
compliance of the request.
I wonder what Any connection handed out after the connection
means.
Argh
Hi,
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
I remember having a conversation with Jim at some point where he
proposed a strategy for requests that could potentially take a long
time to finish. If I recall correctly, he proposed having a separate
ZODB connection pool.
One thing that is problematic today is
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 09:24:40PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
| I wonder whether this statement is true:
|
|Any connection handed out after the connection breaks the ACID
|compliance of the request.
|
| I think this is because:
|
|When finishing
Chris Withers wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
b) it's more convenient for developers
Why?
Early open port means: zopectl restart and reload in your browser
immediately without getting Connection refused. Dieter already
mentioned this use case
c) it's a good thing if you have 'smart
Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Unlike you, I prefer when the browser waits until Zope
has come up over me having to reload manually until it
finally is ready...
The branch Andreas just merged leaves the fast-bind option on by
default.
Cool, although I can't really see the use
Is Demostorage w/ ZEO broken in 2.9 again? I just hit that again ...
That's on (Zope 2.9.3-, python 2.4.3, linux2)
Error is:
File /usr/local/Zope-2.9.3/lib/python/ZODB/BaseStorage.py, line
108, in __init__
self._oid = base._oid
AttributeError: 'ClientStorage' object has no attribute
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Has this change been discussed?
I don't agree with it. Unicode strings aren't byte strings. File and
Image should only work with byte strings.
Code dealing with them should always know and assume that they use str.
Anything using unicode with them is broken or has done
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 6/18/06, Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1, I'd like some way to easily know when a release is no longer
maintained. i.e., what's the X in the above formula.
Well, it's 2 versions, so far. I.e, current release and last release.
Unless we decide to change that
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 18. Juni 2006 14:36:06 -0400 Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, Zope 2.8 is still available for stable download ... so we
currently have 7 branches to watch out for.
Yes, but in most cases a fix only affects only Zope 2 or Zope 3. So
we are back to 3
Hi everybody,
the ZODB team is proud to announce a technical preview of a Blob
implementation for ZODB.
Blobs are used to efficiently storage large amounts of binary data
within a database. This implementation uses real files on the file
system in combination with any ZODB storage (FileStorage,
Log message for revision 65575:
- updated eternals
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/blob-integration-test/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/blob-integration-test/lib/python
___
Name: svn:externals
- ZConfig
Log message for revision 65576:
- Made skeleton include hints about blobs
Changed:
U Zope/branches/blob-integration-test/skel/etc/zope.conf.in
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/blob-integration-test/skel/etc/zope.conf.in
===
---
Log message for revision 65494:
creating a copy that will use the zodb from blob-merge-branch
Changed:
A Zope/branches/blob-integration-test/
-=-
Copied: Zope/branches/blob-integration-test (from rev 65493, Zope/trunk)
___
Zope-Checkins
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 12:11 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
A while ago, we had some discussion on when to make releases and
how long to support deprecated features. The discussion has died down
so I'll summarize what I think the conclusions were:
- We'll move releases up one month to may and
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 13:40 -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:27:25AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| The installers do not require much Windows expertise. In fact, they
| require a lot of 'makefile' expertise right now, and some Inno Setup
| expertise, not much else.
|
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 09.12.2005, 08:58 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
When presenting users with ordered text (e.g. sorted lists of options),
simply sorting Unicode strings doesn't provide an ordering that
users in a given locale will find useful. Various languages have
text sorting conventions
(Sorry for X-post)
Hi,
I proposed to clean up the developer zone a bit.
I'll do that without a lot of fuss as I have to goals:
- get information up to date
- reduce the amount of false / out-of-date information
- structure it in small steps so important stuff is found easier
I'll make an
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 02.12.2005, 10:03 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 30.11.2005, 15:52 +0100 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
From where I'm standing, with Zope 2.8.4 it's as safe as with Zope 2.9
(which actually *requires* Python 2.4...) So
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.11.2005, 15:52 +0100 schrieb Philipp von
Weitershausen:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Let's say it this way: it's safer than with Zope 2.8.3 but it is still not
supported :-)
From where I'm standing, with Zope 2.8.4 it's as safe as with Zope 2.9
(which actually *requires*
Hi,
a while ago I realized that I liked the initial opening of network ports
immediately on server start.
After working on a busy site with ZEO in the summer I wished that this
feature would be configurable. There are different scenarios that ask
for opening the network ports early or late:
Am Freitag, den 04.11.2005, 10:02 -0500 schrieb Jim Fulton:
I propose to retire this list and move the traffic over to zope-dev.
+1
--
gocept gmbh co. kg - schalaunische str. 6 - 06366 koethen - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 3496 30 99 112 -
fax +49 3496 30 99 118 -
Hi,
I announced myself stepping back from doing the windows builds some
while ago. Although nobody stepped up in taking this task, I'll make a
hard cut right now.
I'm preparing the 2.8.1 builds right now and those will definitely be
the last windows builds prepared by me.
Two reasons for the
Hi,
it looks like in principle the windows building mechanism got a bit
better in the last time. Unfortunately I'm extremely busy and couldn't
follow all the changes that are required on my building site, so I'm
technically currently not able to compile the release for 2.8 final.
If Tim (or
501 - 600 of 687 matches
Mail list logo
