Log message for revision 81360:
Use a newer version of zope.interface and zope.component
Changed:
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope
___
Name: svn:externals
- annotation
Log message for revision 81364:
Use an even newer zope.interface
Changed:
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope
___
Name: svn:externals
- annotation -r 77445
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to get their Plone site, it's a
Baiju M wrote:
Hi Limi,
Alexander Limi wrote:
Sorry if this has been asked hundreds of times before — I couldn't
find any info on this apart from the Summer of Code project related
to Zope 3.
Now only the packages under `zope` `zope.app` packages works
using Python 2.5 . I don't know
Alexander Limi wrote:
Will Zope 2 ever run on Python 2.5, or is that postponed indefinitely?
It will run on Python 2.5 when somebody makes it run.
We see an increasing amount of users trying to use Zope 2 with their
systems that have Python 2.5 as default.
Then I suggest you do something
On Thursday 01 November 2007 06:18:18 Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Hello
I am trying to checkout latest version of z3c.rml and i get the following error:
svn co http://svn.zope.org/z3c.rml/ z3c.rml
svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/z3c.rml'
svn: PROPFIND of '/z3c.rml': 301 Moved (http://svn.zope.org)
Thanks,
--
Catalin Constantin
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Oct 31 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Nov 1 13:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Wed Oct 31 21:46:50 EDT 2007
On Nov 1, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
We
see an increasing amount of users trying to use Zope 2 with their
systems
that have Python 2.5 as default.
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil,
evil (quoting Jim).
N, that's evil evil evil evil. Geez. ;)
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil,
evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 81348:
Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure for
efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids looping over
all utilities when registering a new one.
You are changing what looks like
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil, evil (quoting
Jim).
Sure, but if you ever want to be able to tell users to do:
easy_install plone
to get their Plone site, it's a
I would like to point out that on this thread people are getting too
tied up with restrictions about *installing* stuff on the system
Python and forgetting that for example, buildout will not install
stuff on the system Python, but people might want to run a Zope (2)
buildout on Python 2.5 just
This tells you how to use the svn repository:
http://www.zope.org/DevHome/Subversion/ZopeSVNFAQ
/Tim
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Catalin Constantin wrote:
Hello
I am trying to checkout latest version of z3c.rml and i get the
following error:
svn co http://svn.zope.org/z3c.rml/ z3c.rml
On Nov 1, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
I would like to point out that on this thread people are getting too
tied up with restrictions about *installing* stuff on the system
Python and forgetting that for example, buildout will not install
stuff on the system Python, but people
Hey,
[making Zope 2 work on Python 2.5]
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
[snip]
I believe this is a critical issue and the interested parts need to
work together on it. Maybe the Plone Foundation and the Zope
Foundation can work together and setup a bounty to fund some developer
to do this work?
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
I think buildout should work harder to get along with system Python.
I intent to spend some effort on this. Martijn has suggested an
option to ignore site-packages which may go a long way.
Yeah, one of my clients uses workingenv to use
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 81348:
Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure
for
efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids
looping over
all utilities when registering a new one.
You are
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 81348:
Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure
for
efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids
looping over
all utilities when registering a
On 11/1/07, Sidnei da Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we are closely approaching the
EOL for Python 2.4. Supposedly when Python 2.6 comes out next year
Python 2.4 will be officially discouraged and will not receive any
more fixes other than security fixes.
This seems to be a common
On 11/1/07, Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to be a common misconception; I'm not sure why.
Python 2.4 has *already* hit EOL. There will only be security fixes
released in source form.
When a new Python 2.X is released, a final 2.X-1 bugfix release is
made and 2.X becomes
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 81348:
Optimized un/registerUtility via storing an optimized data structure
for
efficient retrieval of already registered utilities. This avoids
looping over
all
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin6.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3029
Blamelist:
berndroessl,faassen,fdrake,geroldboehler,hannosch,jim,jukart,philikon,rossp,srichter,timt,witsch
BUILD FAILED:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote:
I think buildout should work harder to get along with system Python.
I intent to spend some effort on this. Martijn has suggested an
option to ignore site-packages which
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope trunk 2.4 Windows 2000
zc-bbwin6.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 3033
Blamelist: geroldboehler,hannosch,jim,witsch
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
zope.inferface.interface.InterfaceClass.__init__ defines a nice
attribute self.__identifier__ that stores self.__module__ + '.' +
self.__name__, which is very handy when indexing and searching
interfaces in Plone.
However, unlike __module__, __identifier__ is not part of the
IInterface
In summary:
- Uploading eggs that have loose install_requires dependencies to the
cheeseshop is harmful.
- Taking non-Zope-the-appserver deployments into account, I'd be
suspicious of any install_requires
dependency on zope.configuration except in a Zope-the-appserver
meta-egg.
-
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The recommendation is still System python is evil, evil,
evil (quoting
Jim).
--On 1. November 2007 23:47:28 -0400 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:28 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 31. Oktober 2007 22:00:46 -0700 Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:29:36 -0700, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The
Would it be possible to have a non-system python installed (by default
into /opt/python24) by the system python easy_install? I think it would be
useful to have eggs that provide commands on the path such as
easy_install_nonsystem24, virtualenv_nonsystem24, python_nonsystem24. With
a better
Hi
I've got this piece of code which is returning a keyerror on 'results' as I
haven't set up a dictionary for the variables. I'm not sure what the syntax
is for this within the ZPT. I've read about the 'options' dictionary. Can I
use that?
Thanks
ul
span tal:define=query here/testquery
li tal
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:48:04PM +, michael nt milne wrote:
Hi
I've got this piece of code which is returning a keyerror on 'results' as I
haven't set up a dictionary for the variables.
(snip)
span tal:define=query here/testquery
li tal content=results python: query(id='IT')
span
yeah I have modified to this
li tal:define = query here/testquery
tal:repeat=result python:query(id='IT')
span tal:replace=python:repeat['result'].firstnameFirst
Name/spannbsp;
/li
but get this as a result. Thanks for the reply.
Module Products.PTProfiler.ProfilerPatch, line 32, in
michael nt milne napsal(a):
yeah I have modified to this
li tal:define = query here/testquery
tal:repeat=result python:query(id='IT')
span tal:replace=python:repeat['result'].firstnameFirst
Name/spannbsp;
/li
1) don't make spaces around = in HTML attributes:
tal:define=query
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fine. Today, November 1, on both calendars not all events are appearing
in
the calendar from the default view. If you click back to October and then
back to November all of the events appear, this also sets the
date-calendar
1) don't make spaces around = in HTML attributes:
tal:define=query here/testquery
a mistake
2) Why do you use repeat['result'] ? Can you point us to documentation
where did you read it ?
tal:replace=result/firstname should work as expected or
tal:replace=python:result[
36 matches
Mail list logo
