Hi.
I've been browsing through the Zope and Zope-dev archives without finding
anything related to this, please stop me if it has already been dealt
with. :)
technical person = someone who doesn't mind fuzzing around with the
manage_main pages
non-technical person = someone w
On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> call, it won't redirect. So you should be able to achieve the same
> results just by invoking manage_addImage without including the REQUEST
> object.
But I have to pass something with the REQUEST, or else it won't add the
image, right?
> A conventi
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Chris Withers wrote:
> Why I'm asking is 'cos it'd be really nice not to have to keep
> re-writing UI when there's perfectly good stuff available in the
> management interface, things like add forms, edit forms, etc...
Exactly.
> Any ideas or am I missing the point?
You a
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Steve Alexander wrote:
> Silly idea: Write a wrapper that you put around the RESPONSE object that
> does its own thing when it is told to redirect. You might have to wrap
> the REQUEST object too, so that it returns a wrapped RESPONSE object.
That would work, but don't you t
Hi.
I was fiddling around with my Zope-instance, and decided to Pack the
database, I had just deleted a lot of objects and the Data.fs was reported
to be about 15MB large; which I knew couldn't be true.
Under Control_Panel/Database I pressed the "Pack" button with "days older
than" set to '0'.
I'm not quite sure if this is already reported or not, so I won't give
much information on it (I've looked for something similar, but I
haven't found it). I'm runnig Zope 2.2.0 under Linux.
I have this product I've made myself - called TravelAgent. I add an
instance of it to the Zope root-fold
[Shane Hathaway]
| Johan Carlsson wrote:
| >
| > I just want to check if things work the way I think (hope) it does.
| >
| > In a transaction, are objects attributes safe from other threads.
| >
| > self._v_mytemp in my request does not conflict with other requests?
|
| This is correct (or it
[Shane Hathaway]
| It means that a correctly operating ZODB will behave this way.
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying that. :)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encodi
[Petru Paler]
| - how this should be aproached
Couldn't this be implemented by adding more properties to you objects?
One thing that would be great, though, variable checking :)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailma
Hi, all - someone suggested to me that I should try the zope-dev list
instead of the zope list, here goes.
When I create ZClasses I can make the Available Objects shrink to just
a couple of available objects via subclasses and so forth. How would
I do this with a Python Class in a Python Zope P
Hi.
Does the performance of Zope degrade as the Data.fs get larger? Both
on startup time (which I'm pretty sure will degrade) and on respons
time, serving a object f ex?
Another thing. Have anyone tried to encrypt all data inside the
Data.fs file? I mean, encrypted the data so that not even
[Chris McDonough]
| [Erik Enge]
|
| > Another thing. Have anyone tried to encrypt all data inside the
| > Data.fs file? I mean, encrypted the data so that not even root can
| > access it, only if you have the right passphrase (or whatever) in the
| > management interface are
On 15 Oct 2000, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> Is there a method available that'll return a nested list of ids (or
> something similar) of the current object?
"current object"? You probably mean objects?
Couldn't you do that with getParentNode().id?
_
[Dieter Maurer]
| There are objects, that should be usable by Anonymous inside DTML
| but should not be viewable over the web (as they will only confuse).
| All page components (such as "standard_html_header/footer") fall
| into this category.
Do you have any idea of how this could be done nicel
Hi, all.
I might have misunderstood the Racks place in ZPatterns, but anyway...
To me, this sounds like a really, really cool idea. If we passed the
User object along to the Racks (which is what it does now?), and let
the Rack (GPG/PGP Rack, that is) have access to either an external or
interna
[Chris Withers]
| The point behind CatalogAware was, as I understand it, that the object
| inheriting from CatalogAware wouldn't have to worry about managing its
| own indexing. Sadly, that didn't work out...
I haven't been following this discussion, so my question may be
redundant, and if it is
[Michael Bernstein]
| When called, they find the nearest (acquisition-wise) ZCatalog
| (named Catalog by default),
I think you can specify the ZCatalog it should index itself in by
putting the default_catalog attribute in your class.
I think, that this object (in pseudo) would index itself in
[Michael Bernstein]
| I need to know how far the ZCatalog will scale using this indexing
| and search strategy. Does anyone have anectodal or benchmark data to
| suggest if (and when) I will hit a 'wall' regarding the number of
| objects being indexed and searched?
I'm going to try to stuff 27 m
[Michael Bernstein]
| We seem to have disposed of the wildcard issue [snipped out
| below], and I'm looking forward to Eric's results, but does
| anyone else have any information about whether there is a
| practical upper limit on how many objects can be indexed and
| searched in a ZCatalog?
I d
[Chris Withers]
| ...and is that specifically for BTree folders, or Zope BTree's in general?
I don't believe that B-Tree folders have those kinds of limitations by
general design. I'm more conserned that somewhere along the lines,
doing operations on a huge BTree Folder (Yes, in Zope) will be s
[Michael Bernstein]
| Erik Enge wrote:
| >
| > I don't believe that B-Tree folders have those kinds of limitations by
| > general design. I'm more conserned that somewhere along the lines,
| > doing operations on a huge BTree Folder (Yes, in Zope) will be slow.
|
| Wh
[Morten W. Petersen]
| There's a new product available, which enables unique ids in a given context,
| take a look at http://www.zope.org/Members/morphex/ThreadSafeCounter>.
What happens if you run this with ZEO? Will the file be kept «in
sync» with all ZEO Clients?
___
¡Hola!
Some of us over at ZopeZen.org (http://www.zopezen.org>) have
been discussing the fenomena that is called ZopePrints. I'll give a
brief explanation, and would appretiate feedback as to whether this a
good idea or not.
A ZopePrint is a document, or maybe a set of documents, which
describe
[Tres Seaver]
| Please see:
|
| http://dev.zope.org/Projects/PTK
|
| for our work-in-progress.
Hey, looks like what I'm after. I can see that it's a work in
progress, so if you need any help, give me a shout. It didn't say too
much about the project itself, do you have any such information o
[Morten W. Petersen]
| There's a new product available, which enables unique ids in a given context,
| take a look at http://www.zope.org/Members/morphex/ThreadSafeCounter>.
On every view - a call to index_html() - it prints '{}' to stdout. Bug?
___
[Erik Enge]
| On every view - a call to index_html() - it prints '{}' to stdout. Bug?
Forget it. My fault. *shame, shame*
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross pos
[Shane Hathaway]
| If no one reports any problems
No problems so far :). Tried them with Zope 2.2.1.
| But here's the biggest news: the Refresh product
Excellent! When will this be included in standard Zope distributions?
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
[Morten W. Petersen]
| indeed a strange problem, anyone experienced this?
What did you do to make this happen? Versions?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
[Morten W. Petersen]
| The ideal solution would be to use an object that lives in the ZODB,
| I wonder if there is a way to keep the 'object history' empty? That
| is, keeping the counter 'packed' while retaining 'object history'
| information on all other objects.
I'm no ZODB expert, but I thi
[Michel Pelletier]
| We would love to see this description from you.
The description of such a system/model in a Fishbowl project? Or just
a general description? Sorry for being slow :)
| I think it would be great to get examples of your problems in a case
| study format, but also in a higher
[stefano ciccarelli]
| Is there any way to make an existing class catalog aware?
Is this ZClasses or Python classes, and are there any objects that
exist already?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-
[Cyril Elkaim]
| Of course I have tried REQUEST.PARENTS[0] but this is the parent
| inside the URL, I'm searching the PARENT inside the object system.
yourobject.getParentNode() should do the trick.
Have a read at lib/python/OFS/ZDOM.py
| Another question how can I get a reference of any obje
[Cyril Elkaim]
| I want to give the id (eventually qualified) of an object and get a
| reference to it. I'm talking about persistent objects inside the
| ZODB.
What do you need the reference for? How are you going to use it? And
when you're talking about «inside ZODB», does that mean that you'
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Where did getobject come from? I know about Catalog.data, but I've never
| seen a getobject() method...
It's a method of the brain ;). If you have a data_record_id, you can
use getobject() to retrieve the object it represents.
[Morten W. Petersen]
| It's a problem with Linux, if you want to be able to use databases >
| 2GB in size on Linux, a kernel >= 2.4.0 is required.
Nope. First, the limit is at file-level, not database-level (mind
you, a problem with the filesystem, not Linux per se). You can have
tons and tons
[Morten W. Petersen]
| BTW, there is a list called [EMAIL PROTECTED], for ZODB specific
| questions.
Actually, I think its called ZODB-Dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
*
Hi, Zopistas.
I've been reading a lot of Zope code the last couple of years, but
still I really don't see any overall structure of lib/python. Is this
documented somewhere?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/list
[Espen Sorbye Frederiksen]
| I need to automaticly execute a zopescript once a day
You could try Xron¹, cron-zope² or something external³. There is
something something called ZScheduler also.
¹ http://www.zope.org/Members/lstaffor/Xron>
² http://www.zope.org/Members/phd/cron-zope>
³ http://ww
Hia.
When entering the ZMI and clicking on «Control_Panel», «Database
management» and then «Cache parameters» I get two new tabs: «Contents»
and «Undo». It's probably just me, but I don't quite understand these
two. Couldn't we display the «Undo» tab along with «Database», «Cache
parameters» an
[Erik Enge]
[about undo tabs]
Hm. Just discovered this. Both
/Control_Panel/manage_undoForm
and
/Control_Panel/manage_UndoForm
work fine. manage_undoForm redirects to manage_UndoForm after you've
pressed the «Undo»-button though. Maybe that's
This might be picking on very little things, but hey, someone has to
do that too. :-)
When adding a Version, the «Help»-button is there. Not a «Help»-link
which seems to be the standard these days. Same goes for Mail Host,
External Method, Z SQL Method and ZCatalog.
Accelerated HTTP Cache Manag
[Erik Enge]
| This might be picking on very little things
And so is this: why isn't there a grey line above the Users in the
acl_users?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross pos
[Erik Enge]
| [Erik Enge]
|
| | This might be picking on very little things
|
| And so is this
Yeah, this also - but I promise, this is the last one. For today
anyways. Either my eyes aren't quite awake yet, or this line appears
two times in the «Credits»-section of /manage_copy
[Dieter Maurer]
| Erik Enge writes:
| > I've been reading a lot of Zope code the last couple of years, but
| > still I really don't see any overall structure of lib/python. Is this
| > documented somewhere?
|
| I find the names quite self explanatory.
Yes, the names are
[Michael R. Bernstein]
| Erik Enge wrote:
| >
| > I'll let you know how it goes. (And please, do poke at me if it takes
| > too long.)
|
| Ok, I'm poking :-).
Thanks. Keep doing it till you get what you need, I truly don't
mind. :-)
| How did it go?
Thanks to
[Michael R. Bernstein]
| What I'm looking for is any indication that object creation time
| and/or indexing time goes up with the number of objects already in
| the ZODB.
Well, one thing I've already learned - which you all probably know -
is that you do _not_ want to put index_object() in your
Hiya.
variable:tokens
is a bit fubar. If I raise it on the next page it says stuff like
['item', 'item1', 'item', 'item']
ie. it repeats some of the items in variable for no apparent
reason (variable contains only 'item' and 'item1'). Also, if I do:
">
and raise variable2 on the
If you click the Help-link in a manage_propertiesForm screen (point begin
to bring up the Help for the properties) and have a look down where it
says in bold "Note:", followed by this strange line of text:
[...] This property (or method) should return a list of
strings will be use
Right.
This is the traceback I get, after doing a search (searchResults) - which
goes fine by teh way - and then trying to do an
getobject(x.data_record_id_) as a non-emergencyuser user get up an login
box and press escape:
Unauthorized
Sorry, a Zope error occurred.
Traceback (innermost last):
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> how do I turn off this annoying traceback that is always printed out when an
> error occurrs?
Start Zope with out the debugging switch; "-D". Look in your z2.py file
for expalation of it, and in start (or start.bat on Windows?) to remove
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I'm not sure why this isn't in 2.3.1b1, but yes, the code in getobject was
> changed to use unrestrictedTraverse for this very reason.
On closer inspection, I can see that it is actually changed in
2.3.1b1. It does say unrestrictedTraverse (line 457
Today's show opens with an usability bug (that's what it looks like to me,
anyway). Sit back and feel free to buy an albatross from the strange man.
I've got a ZCatalog named Catalog, living its normal life at /.
When I'm in /Catalog/manage_catalogIndexes the index names are 's. Strange, since
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> No...
"No" to which question?
> what are you getobjecting? Does it happen only with certain kinds of
> objects? Are they ZClass objects or Product-based objects?
It happens with all kinds of objects I have in my index. All my objects
in the inde
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> On the subject of numbers, I was wondering how to index
> alphanumeric values like ISBN numbers.
Why can't you use FieldIndexes?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mail
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Probably. Keyword indexes work too.
Yeah, that was what I was getting at :)
> This is the number of objects indexed by the index. If it's not working,
> that's a bug.
Then it looks like a bug. Lucky us, I don't have time to analyze this in
a we
Is it just me, or has the tracebacks provided by Zope when an Exception is
raced gotten "worse"? In Zope 2.3.1b1 it usually says file: DT_In (or one
of them), and doesn't even mention the file which the Exception was raised
from.
Also, When I set the default width/height with the new ZMI and bri
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > Maybe a "This How-To covers product such-and-such version x.x" is in
> > order as a standard feature of the How-To?
>
> This is a good idea. It would be an even better idea to allow folks to add
> comments to howto pages, so that if the original a
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > It happens with all kinds of objects I have in my index. All my objects
> > in the index are from Python-based products.
>
> Are they all of one type?
The same type (as in, they are all Python based), but with different
meta_types.
> Can you re
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> different python classes. Do they inherit from a common base class?
Yes. A homemade one.
> Did you make these objects or are they from another Product or are
> they standard Zope objects (like DTML methods, etc.)?
It's a mix. Most of them I cre
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> And any access to getobject with any data_record_id_ returns unauthorized
> for any user besides emergency user?
Hm... No, not entirely correct. If I don't get any hits, I don't get the
unauthorized, but that is probably because I don't even try th
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I meant to narrow down the problem domain in cases where you do call
> getobject... cases where you aren't calling getobject are not relevant.
Ok. I see.
> It would be helpful to find out for which objects getobject fails and for
> which it succee
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> The short answer is "you can't, easily".
I'm a bit confused.
Will FieldIndexes also behave like TextIndex, in that they remove stop
words, digits and so forth? I think I've picked up somewhere that
FieldIndexes treats the whole content of the attri
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> Feedback and debug information coming your way as soon as possible :)
Ok, I index DTML Methods, Python objects, and all different kind of
things. Then I did a search, meta_type set to 'DTML Method' and it gave
me an unauthorized. Stran
On 24 Feb 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> Someone suggested using BTreeFolder, but the documentation
> and examples for it are rather scarce. Does anyone know
> of products that make a good example use of BTreeFolder?
Can't you just subclass the BTree Folder as you would with OFS.Folder?
I
On 24 Feb 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> I've tried subclassing BTreeFolder, but then, whenever the object is
> accessed, zope falls flat on its face. :-\
Hm. That's usually a sign of a method being called that doesn't exist in
my experience.
__
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I can't replicate this behavior with normal objects. :-(
Riiight...
*thinking very hard*
I just realized how it all started. Me and a collegue was indexing
objects, searching, doing regular development (probably changing classes,
attributes etc
[Jason, I'm CCing the Zope-dev, someone might have another solution]
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Jason wrote:
> hi I have a Script now with this:
>
> > aString = 'lots and lots of angry-customer-bad-words'
> >
> > for word in string.split(aString, ' '):
> > for catalog_brain in self.Catalog.s
I have two nice methods. One of them (methodA) is called via the web.
These belong to one class; classA.
class classA:
"doc string"
def methodA(self):
"doc string"
objects = self.methodB(self)
objects.reverse()
attrib = ''
for object in obj
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
> I wasn't reading the code clearly the first time around.
>
> By far the simplest place to return copied results from methodB is to
> change the last line to
Thanks, it all works nice. Nearly, that is.
The reverse problem is now gone. But the f
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> I only get this when a ConflictError occur.
Nope, it occurs every time I change to another object. I need to do some
more testing here. It seems as if the 'objects' variable of 'methodB' is
semi-persisten
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> > The use of a literal anonymous list in methodb's signature for "objects" may
> > have something to do with the results you're getting on conflict. Try
> > assigning "objects" to an empty list in the method body instead.
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Try assigning "objects" to an empty list in the method body instead.
Woop. Works like a charm :). Thanks!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
> The list that is assigned to "objects" in the definition of arguments is
> only created once. There is only one instance of the list for all the
> calls to methodFoo. If you alter that list, then it is altered for the
> future too.
Doh! Of course
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Ausum wrote:
> I'm interested at writing a patch for Zope. In adition to the 11 "add property"
> options bundled with Zope, I'd like to have an "html-editor" type, for wich I
> already have a working stand alone version.
What does it do?
___
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> I've started seeing errors like this:
Hm. It might be related to the problem Andrew K. is seeing over at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinf
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Are there archives for that anywhere?
There sure is...
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2001-February/thread.html>
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinf
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Is it alright to rely on this attribute of the REQUEST object?
Hm What is 'steps' in context of REQUEST?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No c
Hi, Michael.
Sorry for taking so long getting back to you.
The programmer solving our problems with the post codes has solved it in a
different way than what I would've done (his method is way superior), so
we're not ending up adding all addresses as Zope Objects.
Therefore, I don't have any be
I need some help with indexes.
I'm confused about what I can index in which Index. Which index does not
remove numbers? Which of them do I use to index a telephone number
(containing characters). What about email addresses? Special characters?
*oink* Help...
__
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> I'm trying to find out of there is a point where you start getting
> non-linear performance penalties for additional objects (storing,
> retreiving, or indexing).
I don't know, but I feel that is the case. Actually, I know it is the
case, but I
[observe the speed of Chris replying... *astounded* :)]
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Erik Enge wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused about what I can index in which Index. Which index does not
> > remove numbers?
>
> FieldIndex, KeyIndex
Wow, KeyIndex?
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way I can choose whether I want searchResults
to Or, Not or And the search? Or do I need to combine searchResult calls
and what not?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zo
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> You need to manually do unions or intersections on results from multiple
> calls to searchRequest currently.
Is this a feature to be implemented? If not, why not?
Oh, and by the way, "searchRequest"?
__
Hola,
please don't make me touch C or a ... erm... you know, one of those
compiler-thingys. I don't like them.
Does anyone have a nicely baked Splitter.c for Linux? The one that Spisak
hacked to make it chew and swallow anything?
Fhank you very much. :-)
___
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Steve Alexander wrote:
> If you have the Splitter.c file, you ought to be able to get a source
> distribution of Zope, delete the original Splitter.c, replace it with
> the new one, then run python wo_pcgi.py or python w_pcgi.py to set
> everything up.
Ok, thanks :-)
_
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> I'm trying to find out of there is a point where you start getting
> non-linear performance penalties for additional objects (storing,
> retreiving, or indexing).
I've just finished adding a somewhat small number of objects: 5000.
For every 1000t
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Are the imported object "CatalogAware"?
They are.
> The old (pre 2.3.1) catalog implementation was know not to be very
> storage friendly. If a significant portion of the catalog indexes
> would be affected by imports, then you would see a quadratic s
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> This level of growth doesn't seem like a sane level of growth... what
> Zope version are you using?
Zope 2.3.1b1
> > Someone told me that ZEO and bulk-adding could be a thing to look at...
>
> Isn't bulk-adding what you're doing now?
It is, but
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Erik Enge wrote:
> >
> > I'm using Zope 2.3.1b1 so that shouldn't be a problem?
>
> Yes, it will be. [...]
So the "bug" in Zope 2.3.1b1 which makes the ZODB
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Well, I thought the upgrade to 2.3.2b2 would solve the problem but it
> hasn't :-( I have a (very important :-S) Zope instance which hangs at
> what seems like the slightest touch.
Maybe I can help.
I've seen similar behaviour, and by some chance I di
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Very strange!
Indeed.
> Did you look in the log files? Have their been any core dumps?
I'll try to do an hour or so of analysing this tomorrow, and I'll get back
to you. :-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [
Hi.
I was adding a couple of objects to my system. Turns out, it's over a
million of them. I have a 1GHz Pentium with 1GB RAM and 1GB swap. After
I added all the objects with a little script (that took about 12 hours), I
was going to index them to the Catalog I have. (I had to uncomment the
in
Thanks for the fast reply!
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Have you read
> http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/HowTos/UpgradeToNewCatalog/index_html
> ? I suspect there will be improvement.
Surely there will be improvement, but not of factors two or three, or
more?
And, I can do t
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Why nto go for 2.3.2 final? IIRC, 2.3.2b2 had some nasty ZCatalog bugs
> in it...
Heh, that's what I get for not keeping up; I didn't even know 2.3.2 final
was out. Bleh. :-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EM
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Probably not much difference on bare bulk indexing speed, but I'll bet
> that it finishes this time. ;-)
We'll see :)
> I'd either make my own CatalogAware-alike mixin class that did things
> a bit differently than CatalogAware (perhaps didn't inde
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Why CatalogAware? You do know that the only thing CatalogAware does
> is add/remove/reindex objects in one particular Catalog when they're
> added, removed, or changed?
Yes, and this is all I need. Where is the overhead with CatalogAware
objects, t
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> YourCatalog.catalog_object(newobject)
>
> as opposed from inheriting from CatalogAware and relying on manage_afterAdd
> or calling object.index_item() manually. That's really it.
Well, if you put it that way :)
*removing CatalogAwareness*
> (it'
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I'll be curious to see the results. Hopefully you'll have better luck
> under 2.3.1b2.
I've indexed about 410.000 objects now. A plain query with 'meta_type'
and 'firstname' to searchResults takes about 3-4 seconds. Not too bad,
but not that good
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I'd be curious to know how long a query that involves only a single
> field index takes, and how long a query that involves only a single text
> index takes... does each take a roughly equivalent amount of time?
I might be able to check that for you
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Well, that's good, except I thought you couldn't get rid of objects?
Muhahaha. I got those little bastards... :)
> Yes, but not with 1,000,000 objects (see
> lib/python/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py). It would be nice to have
> such a report.
If
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
