Hello,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 20:13, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> For the time being Zope2 must be used as a develop egg. Like e.g. so:
> http://svn.zope.org/CMF.buildout/trunk/
>
I got it working without development egg:
[buildout]
parts =
instance
eggs =
some_project
zope2
# Re
Hi,
I usually love gmail, but in these last discussions I have trouble to
understand, where I should write my reply to, since I can not see a
thread. So I write a reply to the first mail and reference to various
mails below. Sorry for that confusion to the people who use real mail
readers!
I woul
Hi,
I agree with the package inflation. It makes people nervous of the
complexity.
But putting everything back into a pile of mud sounds like going back from
where we came, and I this situation makes people even more nervous when they
want to look into zope.
As far as I know, the big dependency cl
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 15:29, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> > We can ameliorate the situation in a few ways:
> >
> > - We can reduce the number of distributions.
> >
> > - We can make each current Zope package distribution independently
> useful.
> >
> > My suggestion is tha
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 16:23, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
> > I start being scared of using pypi.
>
> Why?
Because I can imagine case where I would like to remove a package.
I did just that in a totally unrelated piece of software where I wrote an
extension. After a while I realized, that anothe
Hello,
I am a bit confused about self.request and self.REQUEST.
Can anybody point me to an explanation of the different tasks that both
have?
Googling for request vs REQUEST is not helpful...
Here is the reason why I am wondering:
Context is a small product to be used in plone.
A testcase in my
Hi, thank you for all that answers, this was really helpful!
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:18, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Patrick Gerken
> wrote:
> > A testcase in my code fails, and after a lot of digging, I am finding
> that
> > the reason a
Hi,
we had all kinds of funny behaviour that all was rooted in a bad
object in a BTreeFolder.
When calling folder.objectIds() I get the id of the object in
question, when I call folder[object_id] I get a Key Error.
Stepping into the code with the debugger, it looked like the Tree
stores the object
Hi,
I have removed that profiler for python2.6
My understanding of the python api is, that we were using an
undocumented feature to merge two hotshot profiler results.
Since nobody maintains hotshot any longer, there probably won't be
anybody adding this feature officially.
Tests on 2.6 work for
, Sep 15, 2009 at 21:21, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Patrick Gerken
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have removed that profiler for python2.6
>> My understanding of the python api is, that we were using an
>> undocumented feature to merge two
Hi,
while this "can't pickle" issue is fixed in zc.relationship, the
latest packaged egg
of plone.relations still depends on zc.relationship<1.1. Thus this
issue persists if one uses the latest plone.relations egg.
This has been fixed on in svn, could somebody with permissions create a new egg?
B
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 14:28, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> today's the third weekly meeting and here's the reminder including the
> proposed agenda. Time and place, building on previous weeks, are 3pm UTC
> at #zope at freenode. That's about 90 minutes from now.
>
> If you'd like to
2005/11/12, Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +1 on the general goals, however I have no idea if it's easy to implement.
> > Does this sound reasonable to make the behaviour of opening the ports
> > configurable? Does anybody have an idea how hard this would be to do?
I was curious and trie
2005/11/24, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Interestingly, you can raise things that don't subclass Exception in
> python. This was discussed before, and I firmly agree with, that zodb
> conflicts should _not_ sublcass exception. That way, there's less chance
> of them being caught by inexper
Forwarded as a discussion starting point about bug fixing problems (If
I understood Jim correctly)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 11, 2006 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] The bug fixing problem
To: Patrick Gerken <[EMAIL PROTE
p.com/?l=zope-dev&m=100160092618036&w=2
The basic difference is that DTMLFile does some mangling with the
global namespace that HTMLFile doesn't, thus making HTMLFile a bit
more dangerous.
Might HTMLFile be a candidate for deprecation?
best regards,
On 10/2/06, Olavo Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a quick side note.
Many "deprecation sign for any user" are clearly signs that Zope
developers are unable to maintain certain Zope features. This is bad,
specially for guys that have to manage large, complex and long time running
z
Above all,
I should mention that I believe this discussion is largely about Z3,
and I do not live in Z3 world yet. Actually I am developing more in
2.7 currently. But the policy I state below is valid for 2.x also,
afaik.
On 10/4/06, Jean-Marc Orliaguet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick
On 10/27/06, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It has not worked for a long time, and that's because not many peopleuse it. But those who do usually uses it a lot, so it would be bad ifit goes away.I would propose that somone that uses this heavily (like the Nexedi
people), joins the Zope
t mean a good documentation of integration
of zsi generated code in your product code.
Best regards,
Patrick Gerken
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 03:00, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> Non-OK results
> --
>
> [1] FAILED winbot / zc.ngi_py_265_32
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-April/060115.html
Seemed to be a strange one time error.
__
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 03:00, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> Non-OK results
> --
>
> [1] UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-April/060949.html
>
>
> [2] UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64
> h
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:00, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> [1] UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-April/061065.html
>
>
> [2] UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
> https://mail.zope.org/piper
All failures are because of import errors for zope.interface.
Looking at some newer builds, the new failure is that pkg_resources
are missing. Something seems to be seriously screwed up there.
The two unknown build status are due to a timeout while trying to kill
a process.
I wish these builds w
Or maybe could another windows dev also provide support? Virtually
everybody would know what to do with a failed linux build but with
windows I am clueless.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/09/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests
The first error (zope.app.appsetup) is due to deprecation warnings.
I am not sure here. Is it normal that tests configure logs to output
deprecations to stdout?
Is this the standard?
The zope.configuration errors are due to path issues with windows and
linux. '/' just isn't a path separator for e
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> [1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063362.html
Bug in test code, looks like a refactoring went bad.
Error in test test_EnsureProtec
I am
seeing that the latest plone still pins versions of ztk 1.0 zopeapp,
and zope.app.appsetup even is a dependency somewhere in plone.
Aww, too bad.
Best regards,
Patrick
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Patrick Gerken
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> On 05/22/2012 04:32 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
>
>>> [2] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
>>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-May/063350.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> [1] FAILED Repository policy check found errors in 337 projects
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-June/064183.html
Is somebody working on this?
> [2] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope: 62
> h
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
[2] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zope: 62
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-June/064178.html
[3] FAILED Total languishing bugs for zopeapp: 1
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012
Hi,
The ZF notes from May mentioned a VCS discussion. Is this the the
latest thread or did I miss one more current for some reason?
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Alexandre Garel wrote:
> Le 01/02/2012 14:21, Lennart Regebro a écrit :
> With dvcs everyone got full history of zope libs. I person
> [1] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-June/064225.html
That one is new, but I start to believe that there is a harddrive or
virus or anything.
The error is a compilation error of c code in zope.security._proxy.c
The last chang
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Jan-Carel Brand wrote:
> Do you also sync the git repo with new changes from the svn repo?
Yes, but unfortunately
1. It takes ages
2. I have to do it on my laptop because none of my servers has enough
inodes for that task.
I do it once a day at the moment.
__
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> [1] FAILED ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-June/064516.html
>
>
> [2] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2012-07-02 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-07-03 00:00:00 UTC:
>
> See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
>
> An up-to date view of the builders i
zope.component 4.0.0 and zope.browserpage 3.12.2 are not compatible.
Tres, I think you made browserpage compatible on trunk, can you create
a new release?
Or anybody can add me as a package maintainer on pypi, I am do3cc.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
> On Wed, Ju
Looks like 1.6. buildout does not work well with windows.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2012-08-15 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-08-16 00:00:00 UTC:
>
> See the footnotes for test reports of u
Most of these tests seem to be real failures. I was wondering why they
do only provoke errors on the winbots, this resulted in more
questions.
@Christophe Combelles @Marius Gedminas
Both buildbots do not provide the xmlrpc interface any longer, do you
know why? Did you maybe upgrade and this xmlrp
Hi,
I am having trouble with zc.relation and persistent token objects that
I could not remove.
I'd like to file a bug report, but it seems, there is no bug tracker
for it, or is there?
Best regards,
Patrick
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zop
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I'm missing linux buildbots for our packages.
> ZTK itself seems to be well tested, but stand alone packages, most
> importantly trunks seem to have no public buildbots (or just I missed them?)
At the moment all linux build
Oh wait:
the jenkins is running under jenkins.starzel.de
Best regards,
Patrick
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I think I'm missing linux buildbots for our packages.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2012-09-19 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-09-20 00:00:00 UTC:
>
> See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
>
> An up-to date view of the builders
Thank you Adam for fixing the buildout errors!
Best regards,
Patrick
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2012-10-01 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-10-02 00:00:00 UTC:
>
> See the footnotes f
Cool!
There is btw a full repo copy under github at my user account, do3cc.
Unfortunately a I dont push updates too often, but still a quick way to go
through history
Am 05.10.2012 10:21 schrieb "johannes raggam" :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dear Zope Devs,
>
> because
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/21/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
>
>> [1]FAILED Failure - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 50
>> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-October/068769.html
>>
>>
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> [1]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 51
> [2]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 35
These bots have been fixed and don't fail any longer.
___
Zope-Dev maillist
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> Reports received
> ...
>Total languishing bugs for zope2: 0
HORRAY,
zope2 is bugfree now!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-de
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2012-11-19 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-11-20 00:00:00
> UTC:
>
> See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
>
> An up-to date view of the builder
[1]FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 119
>
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/070665.html
>
>
>
> [2]FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 103
>
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/070666.html
>
This shou
Hi,
I wanted to fix some logging in Products.SiteErrorLog, but I am confused
where to go to.
zopefoundation on github has a small number of repos but not
Products.SiteErrorLog.
http://svn.zope.org shows me a web view of our old cvs server.
There is something wrong. Can I help with something?
Be
single repos from it by moving stuff around
and modifying the history.
git svn clone is dog slow with svn.zope.org.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:23 , Patrick Gerken
> wrote:
>
> > I wanted to fix some logging in Products.S
I am in favor of removing the trunks.
People who do not want to switch to git can still get the trunk by pinning
to a specific revision.
I run a CI tool and it is broken already because apparently a trunk has
been deleted already.
Thats not a bug, thats why I run the CI Tool. Would be stupid if I c
Hi,
I thought I have was part of the buildout organization, but I am not now. I
noticed because I wanted to recreate a branch that went missing.
Could I either get commit access or could somebody recreate the 1.6.x
branch. There is a buildout extension that breaks because of the missing
branch.
ZTK will probably show an error on the next summary mail too, but my
jenkins ran it successfully just now.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> > This is the summary for test reports received on the
> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> > [1]FAILED Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 171
> >
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-February/072267.html
>
> Same zope.container er
Hah,
that zope.container problem wasn't all that hard after all.
http://svn.zope.org/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-sources.cfg?rev=129373&view=diff&r1=129373&r2=129372&p1=zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-sources.cfg&p2=/zopetoolkit/trunk/ztk-sources.cfg
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:38
Hi,
Both the daily zope app tests and the zope app tests that run with each
commits have been deactivated.
And Marius, thanks for dedication to look into the errors each day!
Best regards,
Patrick
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 08:55
Am 07.03.2013 09:51 schrieb "Marius Gedminas" :
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> > [1]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 193
> >https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-March/073094.html
>
> The usual
>
> ./bin/buildout -t 3
2013/3/27 Zope tests summarizer
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2013-03-25 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-03-26 00:00:00
> UTC:
>
> See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
>
> An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
>
2013/4/12 Zope tests summarizer
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2013-04-10 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-04-11 00:00:00
> UTC:
>
> See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
>
> An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
>
2013/5/14 Marius Gedminas
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> > [1]Still Failing - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 266
>
> ImportError: persistent
>
This is also some sort of buildout issue, btw.
>
> > [2]winbot / ZEO_py_265_32
>
> The two blob pa
Hi,
was the summarizer on the same machine?
What is needed to get it running again?
Best regards,
Patrick
2013/6/13 Zope tests summarizer
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2013-06-11 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-06-12 00:00:00
> UTC:
>
> See the
Hi,
last month, all Mailing lists were unavailable for a week.
On twitter, I saw it took some time to set up due to time constraints. Are
there plans to increase the admin team to avoid time constraint issues?
Regarding Mailman itself, after we lost regular cmf tests, I set up my
jenkins to run t
Hi,
zopetoolkit-trunk under linux is fine.
I create a fresh buildout every time, now I have to create a virtualenv
with --distribute, then I have to upgrade setuptools. Until I tested all
combinations, I had a bunch of failed test runs. I have a feeling I'll need
to buy rubber chickens for the ne
I am messing with my chef setup. I didn't figure out how to do this on a
test environment yet.
Sorry for the noise.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 08:53:54AM +0200, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> > On 09/05/2013 02:58 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > >-BEG
Hi,
I wanted to look into the script that summarizes the mails sent to zope-test.
The best code I found is this
http://cvs.zope.org/Packages/TestScripts/
but I suspect that there are newer versions, I just don't know where.
I'd like modifiy the script to understand status mails from buildbots too.
Hi,
the question says it all, what bugtracker is currently used for the formwidgets?
I have an issue with z3c.formwidget.query and created a branch with a fix.
But before asking for a new release I wanted somebody to look over it.
The branch is
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/z3c.formwidget.query/br
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:52, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Roger wrote:
>> The zope.componentvocabulary package defines some
>> basic vocabulary (factory) classes. Probably we
>> should move the zope/app/schema/vocabulary.py
>> to this package as registry.py.
>
> I
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 14:45, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
>> Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
>> Period Tue Aug 24 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Aug 25 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
>> There were 68 messages: ...
>> 14 from buildbot a
Hmm, thats a lot of new failures.
And after homing in
http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope2%20slave-ubuntu64/builds/345
http://dev.thehealthagency.com/buildbot/builders/zope2%20slave-ubuntu64/builds/344
I made out this changeset
http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/116291
as the c
Hi
It doesn't happen to me any longer, cause I learned my lesson,
but in the beginning I was always confused about the error message
when an exception happened in the __init__ method of a view.
The Exception gets caught, and interpreted as if the object object/view
does not exist. I then always c
I believe, nobody had yet the chance to change the configuration to
follow the branch.
that buildbot still follows the trunk.
Best regards,
Patrick
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 13:12, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 15.09.2010 um 13:58 schrieb Zope Tests Summarizer:
> [...]
>> Test failures
>> ---
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:54, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:33:35PM +0200, Adam GROSZER wrote:
>> Hello Patrick,
>>
>> Could you nag the buildbot maintainers to add an "svn info" step for
>> their bots?
>>
>> The issue is that you can get the svn URL only from the bot
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:50, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 10/7/10 08:52 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> For me personally the value has dropped so far that I am mostly ignoring
>> those emails. They are hard to parse to begin with and there are just
>> too many buildbot entries.
>
> Likewise. I've red
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:28, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 10/7/10 11:26 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> +1 for a brief summary, the direct links to the build results are
>> still important though and should be somewhere in the mail
Please don't forget we also have a page that links to all buildbot
Hi,
GenericSetup wasn't very good in handling non ascii chars on
exporting. I changed the behavior so that it will only dump strings to
files/zodb/tgzs and modified the provided exporters to default encode
text as utf-8. Since this breaks packages, I'd increase the minor
number from 1.6 to 1.7.
To
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 02:00, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> Non-OK results
> --
>
> [1] FAILED ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-November/053119.html
Hi,
regarding the network time outs happening a lot lately. I am a bi
Hi,
I have a very curious problem with relationfields, and I don't know
which bugtracker to use for z3c.relationfield.
So, hopefully somebody here can give me some pointers.
The relations are persistent objects and the from relation is stored
directly on them on the from_object.
For some reason,
,
Patrick
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 00:09, Patrick Gerken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a very curious problem with relationfields, and I don't know
> which bugtracker to use for z3c.relationfield.
> So, hopefully somebody here can give me some pointers.
>
> The relations are persi
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 15:18, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Patrick Gerken
> wrote:
>> I found out, somewhat surprised, that __parent__ pointers are just
>> disguised aq_parent pointers.
>
> Are you maybe trying to use or set __parent__
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 16:35, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Gerken
> wrote:
>> Hmm, since I didn't understand what magic happens with __parent__ pointers,
>> I tried the following in pdb:
>> unwrapped = aq_base(a)
>&g
82 matches
Mail list logo
