Ricardo Newbery wrote at 2008-1-30 13:14 -0800:
> ...
>I meant easier for the end user, not the developer. It's kind of
>complicated right now to explain how to set up a ZEO configuration to
>work with your third-party product. Makes it a bit of hurdle to
>distribute such a thing for genera
Ricardo Newbery wrote at 2008-1-30 12:24 -0800:
> ...
>Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class with
>conflict resolution in the core distribution?
There can be no *general* class with conflict resolution.
Conflicts usually are fatal. Precise knowledge about the intended
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class
with
conflict resolution in the
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class with
conflict resolution in the core distribution? The Length class works
for simple
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:59 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Has anyone given thought to maybe providing a more general class with
conflict resolution in the core distribution? The Length class works
for simple counters and I guess it
On Jan 30, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Okay, then assuming you've installed ZEO from Zope software,
if your third-party product includes conflict resolution by
instantiating a class defined in the Zope product directory, then is
it also safe to assume that this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
> Okay, then assuming you've installed ZEO from Zope software,
> if your third-party product includes conflict resolution by
> instantiating a class defined in the Zope product directory, then is
> it also safe to assume th
On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ricardo Newbery wrote:
Another related question. With respect to conflict resolution, is is
safe to assume that products (with _p_resolveConflict methods) in the
main Zope products directory are al
Brian Brinegar wrote at 2006-9-14 14:49 -0400:
>> > One ZEO server can deal with multiple storages just fine.
>> > Transactions involving multiple storages commit just fine.
>>
>> Caveat: You buy nothing by having a single ZEO process serve several
>> ZODBs when you're trying to decrease commit tim
Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
If I had the Time I whould do it. My ToDo List goes around up to the moon
an back twice. About the funding I have to talk to my superior when he is
back from his vacation.
Bear in mind that you will need serious amounts of cash to get this
implemented. This is a massive
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 3. Mai 2006 09:15:45 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >Every major innovation was extremely uncommon bevor it was implemented.
> >So thats not a reason not to do it. Is there a way to get this to wor
--On 3. Mai 2006 09:15:45 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Every major innovation was extremely uncommon bevor it was implemented.
So thats not a reason not to do it. Is there a way to get this to work.
I Think it whould be a very nice feature. Because it whould increase the
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:56:28AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 3. Mai 2006 08:35:48 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >It was lost in the 2.6 version of the Zope book i have scanned the Page
> >with the Picture. See http://etustar.ze.tum.de/zopebook.jpg
> >
>
--On 3. Mai 2006 08:35:48 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was lost in the 2.6 version of the Zope book i have scanned the Page
with the Picture. See http://etustar.ze.tum.de/zopebook.jpg
Scary...no idea why it is in the printed edition...at least the 2.6 and 2.7
editi
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:22:22AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 3. Mai 2006 08:11:44 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >The question is why is it impossible to run a zeo as a zeoclient.
>
> Because this usecase was/is never supported.
>
> >I can
> >setup a zeo with
--On 3. Mai 2006 08:11:44 +0200 Gerhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The question is why is it impossible to run a zeo as a zeoclient.
Because this usecase was/is never supported.
I can
setup a zeo with a zeoclient storage i See teh invalidations coming from
the backend zeo. So this
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:23:40AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> > I try to reduce the load of the line between the backup Computing Center
> > and the Mainsite by having a zeo server as Proxy between the zope server
>
Tres Seaver wrote:
ZRS secondaries go into "recovery mode" whenever they lose connection
with the promary: that recovery is sufficient to allow it to resync
(even to bring up a new, "empty" secondary).
Hi Tres. This is sort of how I envisioned ZRS (though I have never seen
or used it). I tho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Pratt wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>>
>> repozo does not help you syncing multiple ZEO server..it just performs
>> an incremental backup of an existing Data.fs file. And I don't know of
>> any solution have multiple "master" ZEO servers. There
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Re: Zeo as a Zeo Client
Andreas Jung wrote:
repozo does not help you syncing multiple ZEO server..it just performs
an incremental backup of an existing Data.fs file. And I don't know of
any solution h
Andreas Jung wrote:
repozo does not help you syncing multiple ZEO server..it just performs
an incremental backup of an existing Data.fs file. And I don't know of
any solution have multiple "master" ZEO servers. There can be only one.
-aj
For sure. I guess the best one could have would be re
--On 2. Mai 2006 12:38:28 -0300 David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
- Another possibility would be to use 'repozo' to create deltas
on the primary, and then propagate them to the secondary via
rsync, then apply them via 'repozo'.
Hi Tres. I have also been in
Tres Seaver wrote:
- Another possibility would be to use 'repozo' to create deltas
on the primary, and then propagate them to the secondary via
rsync, then apply them via 'repozo'.
Hi Tres. I have also been investigating strategies but had not thought
of this possibility. I am not s
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:23:40AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> I would look for a replication strategy to create your "intermediate"
> storage server: the setup you are trying is not supported by the
> current ZEO setup. Such strategies include:
>
> - Zope Corp's "Zope Replication Services" pr
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:03:29AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:13:34PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Perhaps your FS grows because ZEO write the cache files to /tmp (which is
>
Dennis Allison wrote:
Hi Paul, Thank you. And, yes, I saw Chris' posting, but I don't think
that's the right solution for us. A fast shared session variable store
seems to me to be a better way to go and a whole lot more fail safe.
Hi Dennis,
I posted a solution some time ago. Search the history,
Hi Paul, Thank you. And, yes, I saw Chris' posting, but I don't think
that's the right solution for us. A fast shared session variable store
seems to me to be a better way to go and a whole lot more fail safe.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:14:56PM -0400, T
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:14:56PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dennis Allison wrote:
> > I am just setting up a multi-headed distributed system with several Zope
> > heads all communications with a ZEO backend. The zopes can be on the same
> > m
FYI,
Back during 2.6.x, I developed my whole system on a Windows Laptop,
migrated to a Windows ZEO System, 1 client, 1 server. Then moved the
ZEO client & server to Red Hat AS 2.1, and now finally to SuSE
9.0. The only differences for me were the steps in installing PIL
(Python Imaging Lib
ken wood wrote:
I appreciate all the great tips on the cionfiguration issue. But my main
issue is about infrastructure:
Which hardware and / or operating systems can be used for a Zope/Zeo
system.
OS: pretty much any Unixish OS, though on anything but Linux, BSD, and
Mac OS X (and maybe Solaris)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:54 pm, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Bakhtiar A Hamid wrote:
> >>>Richard Jones wrote:
> >>http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/ZSQLSessionDataManager
> >
> > ark!
> > insufficient priveleges
>
> Works now !
Well, it does *somet
On 4/14/05, Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Richard Jones wrote:
> > > Yeah, I remember poking around that code way back, and it seemed
> > > reasonable. Its interactions with transa
Tres Seaver wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Members/richard/ZSQLSessionDataManager
Cool. Where is CVS for that, so that I don't bug you for features. ;)
I could import it to cvs.zope.org, if you like.
I'd like to add Oracle support since I need it myself, and when I have
working changes would like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21 am, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Richard Jones wrote:
> > Yeah, I remember poking around that code way back, and it seemed
> > reasonable. Its interactions with transactions are the bits that scare
> > me. Using a standard RDBMS conne
Please note that we recently found a bug in ZODB FileStorage
that causes it to fail miserably if a file gets over 2GB.
This bug is fixed in Zope 2.2.1, which is being released in
beta today. Note that even with this fix, your
OS/File-System/Python-config must support files over 2GB
to allow l
Jørgen Skogstad wrote:
>
> Sven Hohage wrote:
> >
> > Hallo Jorgen,
> > I write you cause I've got a question about Zope.
> > You've posted on the mailing list on my question with the filesize of
> > the data.fs or in ZEO ZSS.
> > My problem is that I'd like to know which Unix - versions don't ha
If you don't wan't to run Sun or HP-UX you could always look
at one of the open *BSD clones. As I can recall both OpenBSD
and FreeBSD have filsystems that manage >2GB files.
/Johan
> Sven Hohage wrote:
> >
> > Hallo Jorgen,
> > I write you cause I've got a question about Zope.
> > You've pos
37 matches
Mail list logo
