I don't recall them saying that.
>In a past SCC, there B13 project SE-R never had a short shifter installed.
>They said they avoided it because, as mentioned before on the list, the
>tranny is cranky when its cold.
I still don't understand how you are forcing the tranny harder with a short
shifter. It's like holding a metal bar at the end, versus holding it at the
middle. You are still lifting the same weight, it just feels heavier when
you are holding it at the end. All you are doing is changing the fulcrum of
the shifter. It is harder for you to shift, but it still takes the same
amount of force to get the car into gear, cold or not. I hope you see what
I'm talking about. Just my opinion though. I might be totally wrong.
>There is more force required to row through
>the gears since the shifter is shorter. If you force the tranny harder when
>it's hasnt been warmed up, then it will grind trust me. They thought it
>wasn't worth it.
Have you ever driven a car with one?
>This is why i have avoided it in the past.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
+---------------------------- Advertisement ---------------------------+
Super Group Buys - http://www.supergroupbuys.com
Buy as a group and save on all the best performance parts!
