Hi Guy - if your suggestion is that not open-sourcing software is a flawed business model, then I'm not sure there's much to discuss. I disagree.
Thanks, Paul On 28 September 2012 11:02, Guy Rabiller <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Here is my feedback: > > Now that you've realized you had to move away from browser integration (at > least for now), perhaps you will realize that you still have a flawed > business model. > > That is, unless your intentions are to sell Fabric to Autodesk (or someone > else) as soon they will make a move, of course. > > You talk about Qt and Python in the industry, but both provide > open-sources, Fabric does not. > > So instead of becoming a new 'standard' - if not a true revolution in the > DCC area - Fabric will just be 'another' commercial toolkit we cannot trust. > > Until someone or some community redo the all thing as an open-sourced > toolkit. > > Qt wouldn't be a 'standard' by now without having provided a dual license > at first: > 1) free and open-source for integration in non-commercial/open-sourced > applications. > 2) paid for closed/commercial applications. > > Of course, if your intentions are to sell Fabric as quickly as possible, > please ignore this message. > > Cheers, > Guy. >
