Ok, but you still haven't explained the intention of this proposed change. So what are they expecting to be provided?
"The floor control valve for all intents and purposes is going the way of the dodo bird. Starting with the next edition, each floor for building 3 stories and above must be set-up as an individual system. It's also amusing if you follow the current criteria trail, there is nothing that dictates the floor assembly displayed in A.8.17.4.2(b) is currently required (even on a high-rise)!!! Roland" Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive Spartanburg, SCĀ 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 CH2MHILL Extension 74102 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Floor control valve The combined standpipe/sprinkler riser complies with the definition for a system so no change. No change on zoning. Things wil still be done as you see today for high-rises but it will actually be stated (and of course applied to mid-rises as well). Bullseye Mike. You aptly did not identify a water flow switch per floor as part of the high-rise requirements. Fortunately that as never been challenged (and everyone provided one) but other than a reference in the 907 section of the IBC on fire alarms, nada. Roland On Apr 12, 2012, at 8:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > So each floor will have a separate riser instead of using a combined > standpipe riser? > > Craig L. Prahl, CET _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
