Thanks Craig. Noted. On Wednesday, September 21, 2016, <[email protected]> wrote:
> You might want to look at the wording in 9.3.2.4 which deals with Flexible > Coupling for Drops where it uses the term “drops to hose lines”. So a > line coming off a sprinkler system serving a hose line is referred to as a > “drop”, not a riser. > > > > Also, for example, 9.3.5.5 speaking of lateral sway bracing uses the > phrase “…and OTHER piping….”, therefore addressing piping in the system > which does not fall within the definitions of Feed and Cross Mains and > Branch lines which are the typical piping components of a sprinkler system. > I would submit that a drop to a hose valve would fall under the “other > piping” category. > > > > > *Craig L. Prahl* > Fire Protection Group Lead/SME > *CH2M* > 200 Verdae Blvd. > Greenville, SC 29607 > Direct - 864.920.7540 > > Fax - 864.920.7129 > > CH2MHILL Extension 77540 > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]. > org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] > *On Behalf Of *rongreenman . > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:40 PM > *To:* [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* Re: small hose connections [EXTERNAL] > > > > You might also want to point out for the approximately 650 lurkers on the > forum who may be confused that a riser is any vertical piping, regardless > of the direction of water flow that isn't a drop, sprig up or arm over > ending with a sprig or drop. > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016, Parsley Consulting < > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Cliff, > You've pointed out a conclusion on my part that was not in what Rocci > posted. He didn't say it was a part of a standpipe. That was a > supposition on my part. > If it were a part of a sprinkler system, such as a line feeding a hose > valve in rack storage, the horizontal portions would not require bracing, > in my perspective, as they simply aren't mains [longitudinal], and aren't > branch lines [lateral]. > Now, if they had an elevation change exceeding 3'-0", that pipe would > be regarded as a "riser", by 3.5.9, it would require a 4-way brace at the > top per 9.3.5.8.1. > It also might fall into the need for flexible couplings per > 9.3.2.3.1(1). > Good call. And I suppose I should acknowledge Craig's question, and > note that I made the conclusion that since Rocci is in California, where > almost everything has to be protected from earthquake damage, AND he asked > the question, that seismic protection was necessary on his system. > sincerely, > > > > > > > *Ken Wagoner, SET Parsley Consulting 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206 > Escondido, California 92025 Phone 760-745-6181 Visit our website > <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> * > > On 09/21/2016 9:10 AM, Cliff Whitfield wrote: > > Ken, > > > > If this is an 1½” hose line in an NFPA 13 condition (which Rocci didn’t > actually state but I’m assuming it is), then the definition of ‘branch > line’ in NFPA 14 would not apply. If that is the case, would this still be > considered a ‘branch line’ or does it become a ‘feed main’? > > > > Cliff Whitfield > > > > *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]. > org] *On Behalf Of *Parsley Consulting > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:06 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: small hose connections > > > > Rocci, > Glad to see you made it back safely from Nashville, and it was great > to meet there and put a face with the name. > By the definition in section 3.3.2 of NFPA 14 [2013 ed], the pipe you > describe is a "branch line." Section 6.1.2.5 of that document advises that > you need to follow NFPA 13 to provide protection against damage from > earthquakes. > Lateral bracing for that line is not required per NFPA 13 [2013] > 9.3.5.5.1, as it is not a branch line 2½" or larger. > Longitudinal bracing for that line is not required per 9.5.6.1 as it > is not a feed or cross main. > My opinion only. Please see the disclaimer below. > sincerely, > > > > > > > *Ken Wagoner, SET Parsley Consulting 350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206 > Escondido, California 92025 Phone 760-745-6181 Visit our website > <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> * > > > > *IMPORTANT NOTICE: This correspondence is not a Formal Interpretation > issued pursuant to NFPA Regulations. Any opinion expressed is the personal > opinion of the author and does not necessarily represent the official > position of the NFPA or its Technical Committees. In addition, this > correspondence is neither intended, nor should it be relied upon, to > provide professional consultation or services It should be noted that the > above is my opinion as a member of the NFPA Automatic Sprinkler System > Hanging and Bracing Committee in accordance with the NFPA Regulations > Governing Committee Projects and should therefore not be considered, nor > relied upon, as the official position of the NFPA or its Committees* > > > On 09/21/2016 8:17 AM, Rocci Cetani 3 wrote: > > Do I need to earthquake brace my 1½” feed for hose connections? > > > > *Rocci Cetani III, **CET* > > *Designer* > > *Water-Based Fire Protections Systems Layout, Nicet Level III* > > > > *Northern California Fire Protection Services Inc.* > > 16840 Joleen Way Bldg. A > > Morgan Hill, CA 93037 > > P-(408) 776-1580 EXT.111 > > F-(408) 776-1590 > > > > > > [email protected] > > www.norcalfire.com > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any document accompanying it may > contain confidential information > > belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of > individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or > the employee or agent responsible to deliver this message to the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or taking > of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please > immediately notify us by telephone to arrange for return of the documents. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > > > ------------------------------ > > [image: Avast logo] > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sprinklerforum mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > > > > > > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
