On 18.10.2010 23:29, Ray Jones wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 14:11 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
It would be really helpful if people could spend a little time to
understand what is being debated before they start ranting.
Try again. I subscribed to this list last....May? I have received
perhaps a half dozen messages since then until this last week. Suddenly
I have 50 messages some dating back to June and July. The first message
I received in the bunch was the straw poll on javascript. Since then I
have carefully read every message I have received. There has been very
little discussion as to why js is needed, or I am missing a bunch of
messages, or the discussion seriously needs to be brought down to a
level that I can understand. So don't tell me to understand before I
start ranting if you are not part of the solution of helping me
understand. Until I understand, my vote still stands at no.
You misunderstood the poll question. Nobody is suggesting that freesites should
be allowed to have JS in them, but rather Freenet's own web proxy would have JS
in the interface. That JS would only be written by those same developers who
today write Java code for Freenet already.
- Volodya
--
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
