As I was saying: if it is gross negligence or malice, the SLA is
irrelevant.

anthony


Viktor Steinmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 03 Aug 2004:
> Just to clear up some misconceptions:
> 
> WE informed Swisscom, not the customer directly.
> WE agreed to pay 1600 CHF to Swisscom to fix it out of office hours
> 
> But still I think, that somebody who fucked up a service, should reinstall it 
> ASAP - even if it's out of office hours.
> 
> Let's dream for a minute and say, that the last mile was open to anyone - I 
> guess, no company selling services on that last mile would break stuff during 
> office hours and let customers pay for the fix outside office hours - no 
> matter what any SLA says. But in the world we live in, it's possible.
> 
> Let's take that thought a little further. If Swisscom doesn't make its figures 
> by the end of the month, they could simply fuck up some stuff 1-2 hours 
> before the end of office hours, which they know, people will want to have 
> them fixed right away.
> 
> And about that comment, that it's the wrong SLA, if the service is important: 
> Any provider knows the price pressure on the leased line market and it's 
> simply impossible to put a GOLD SLA on each customer circuit. But a circuit 
> marked "Carrier Line National" speaks for itself - the word "CARRIER" is in 
> there, not "PRIVATE"...
> 
> Cheers,
> Viktor
> 
> On Dienstag, 3. August 2004 13.42, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> > --- Steven Glogger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > If reading your contract formally, what would be your expectations for
> > > > the line to be fixed?
> > >
> > > that if someone breaks a line has to take care itself to fix it.
> > > and not to force the customer to pay for the fix...
> >
> > no, I meant, what would be the time expectation according to the
> > standard SLA, if the service stopped functioning on Friday afternoon?
> >
> > I'm not a leased line customer, and don't plan to, but that's just
> > interesting for the theory of operations. Of course, if it's the provider's
> > fault, it should've been fixed by provider asap. But that's according to
> > our common human common sence. From formal point of view, the client has
> > signed a contract, with some provisions in it. That's what my question to
> > Victor is - what does the contract say in terms of when he'd get his line
> > fixed?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > swinog mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
> _______________________________________________
> swinog mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

-- 
|  Anthony Uk            |  dataway GmbH     |  Tel. +41 1 299 9988    | 
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]         |  Hohlstrasse 216  |  Fax  +41 1 299 9989    | 
|  PGP key ID D64A5FAF   |  CH-8023 Zuerich  |  http://www.dataway.ch  | 
_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.init7.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Reply via email to