> he is the one who is showing facts
You mean the videos I shared and the copy-paste from Mozilla's docs are
non-facts? Or the tcpdump tests?
> you are nitpicking to support Chromium.
Did you even read that (#48):
>> It is not an argument to prefer Chromium but an argument to avoid
Firefox/forks.
?
> I am only trying to help you.
Thanks but in this thread I am not asking for help.
> Also, keep in mind RMs endorses icecat which IS a FIREFOX BASED browser...
RMS wouldn't even know about the IceCat's background leaks if I didn't tell
him. And that is still not fixed in IceCat + there are no plans to actually
remove completely the telemetry code from it (recent feedback from the
developer). I will let you figure out for yourself what value have these
endorsements is.
> Emphasis needed because what I am saying is accurate and you seem to not
get it.
Just because someone wants to consider more essential factors about security
of communication than endorsements and licenses, doesn't quite mean he does
not "get it". As you may have noticed I prefer to question what is a
"hardened kernel" and "hardened package" and learn about it rather than
easily accept and trust nice sounding words giving a false sense of security.
