"You mean the videos I shared and the copy-paste from Mozilla's docs are
non-facts? Or the tcpdump tests?"
Actually, I was more talking about the forks then firefox itself.
"Did you even read that (#48):
>> It is not an argument to prefer Chromium but an argument to avoid
Firefox/forks.
?"
Okay, Well it just seemed suspicious that you attacked firefox forks too.
Because essentially, if you attack firefox forks even, you basically have
nowhere to move to...
Unless lynx is your fix,
"Thanks but in this thread I am not asking for help."
Okay, well I thought wrong I guess, its just kind of strange that someone
would attack both firefox and chromium as if they were both on the same
level...
When firefox is actually somewhat better on its own... With tweaking and
without...
"RMS wouldn't even know about the IceCat's background leaks if I didn't tell
him. And that is still not fixed in IceCat + there are no plans to actually
remove completely the telemetry code from it (recent feedback from the
developer). I will let you figure out for yourself what value have these
endorsements is."
Okay, does RMS plan to have the problems fixed? I would guess he would if it
is a problem otherwise, he would find a better fix that is more substantial
than the one the developer has.
"Just because someone wants to consider more essential factors about security
of communication than endorsements and licenses, doesn't quite mean he does
not "get it". As you may have noticed I prefer to question what is a
"hardened kernel" and "hardened package" and learn about it rather than
easily accept and trust nice sounding words giving a false sense of
security."
Yes, well all I know is its based on grsecurity's linux 4.9 patches. I
neglected to mention that, because, I forgot the specfics,
That is how it is hardened, but after 4.9 as we both know, grsecurity is
going to bully people into paying money to see the source code... which is
absurd completely and totally...
As such with 4.14
Essentially, someone has to fill grsecurity's shoes in the future for kernels
after 4.9 kernel fades away from support from debian even...
Anyways, my bad, I thought you were nitpicking.
Although, tcpdump I know little of, first I heard of it was a month or two
ago which probably was you. right?
so yeah...
