Well said Dewald! You've captured exactly how I feel about this.

On Apr 13, 12:07 am, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not only do we feel entitled, we ARE entitled to an open and honest
> explanation when open and honest communication is offered and promised
> to us.
> There are two possible paths to follow:
> a) Give us spin, and don't promise open and honest communication.
> b) Promise us open and honest communication, and give us exactly that,
> not spin.
> Those are the two paths that do not undermine credibility, because
> then we know what to expect, and we get what we expect.
> On Apr 12, 10:34 am, notinfluential <notinfluent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 12, 2:44 am, Jason Rundell <jason.rund...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > When will Twitter answer: 1) Why did Twitter acquire Tweetie? 2) What
> > > is Twitter planning to do with Tweetie?
> > Since when does Twitter owe you or any of us any sort of explanation
> > for their business practices?
> > Lemme get this straight.  Twitter is FREE.  The Twitter API is public,
> > well documented, and FREE.  Our privilege is to build tools and
> > businesses on top of Twitter's FREE services.  Twitter doesn't want a
> > cut of your business.  They don't require approval of your apps.  But
> > for some reason you (and others) feel entitled to an explanation, or
> > details somehow outlining their strategy and practices?
> > The tone of this group never ceases to amaze me.  Get back to coding
> > and building cool stuff.
> > @notinfluential

To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.

Reply via email to