I do not know how close they are to general availability, but for that role it seems the MX150 would be perfect. It is essentially vMX on Juniper hardware. You will get a VERY capable routing engine that way, unlike the MX80/M104 suggestions.
For larger deployments the MX204 is looking extremely attractive, especially if the prices I have seen are correct. Again you get a decent routing engine, but in addition you get the newest Trio chipset which means lots of high-speed interfaces. In both cases, make sure you get the right licenses; Juniper is working hard to make licensing complicated. Fortunately they are not (yet?) quite as skilled at that kind of thing as Cisco. /Benny > Den 6. mar. 2018 kl. 15.34 skrev Simon Gunton <[email protected]>: > > MX104? > > Simon > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, 14:58 Paul Bone, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi All, > > > > We are in need of a couple of 10G PE Routers and as a small provider cost is > always a factor for us unfortunately! > > > > We need 4*10G Ports, multiple 1G SFP ports, IPv4 and IPv6 L3VPN, L2VPN > etc…..we do not need any HQOS features on these devices. > > > > We use a fair few Cisco ME3600 but these only have 2*10G and are discontinued > so at the moment, the CISCO ASR920 is looking the most cost effective > solution but we are interested if anyone else has any ideas? We have Juniper > MX in the network as well, which we like, but I don’t think there is a > Juniper option as cost effective as the ASR920. > > > > Mikrotik CCR is out due to lack of IPv6 L3VPN and lack of isolation between > IPv4 vrf interfaces. > > > > Many thanks > > > > Paul > > >
