pfarrell;320781 Wrote: 
> If you have a system that can happily run XP, I think there is no real
> difference. 
> 
> If you have a machine that is marginally old/slow/small, than Linux
> will generally run a bit better. I found it may work about as fast with
> 256MB less ram, and a model or two slower processor.

Another thing possibly worth considering is how much you'll be using
whichever theoretical computer for other stuff.

My SqueezeCenter started out on an XP box with a gig of RAM.  It's the
same machine on which I do the vast majority of my e-mailing, surfing,
audio editing, Quicken, etc., blah, blah, blah.  SqueezeCenter worked
more often than not, but was not completely stable, probably in part
due to Windows being...well, Windows...and partly simply because I was
constantly using the computer for all kinds of stuff.

I got huge stability boosts all the way around when I moved
SqueezeCenter, Firefly (mt-daapd for my old Roku Soundbridge) and
Apache off my Windows box and onto a slightly less powerful (but with
twice as much RAM) Ubuntu 8.04 box.

Everything running on the Ubuntu box is much stabler than it was under
Windows and the Windows machine is now much more stable because three
server apps have been removed.

I'm not overwhelmingly comfortable monkeying around with Linux, but
getting this stuff working wasn't particularly difficult.  Of course, I
had help from these very forums!


-- 
atrocity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
atrocity's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16009
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49951

_______________________________________________
unix mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/unix

Reply via email to