Wasn't there also an issue with WMUK processing payments, in that they couldn't pass 100% of the donations on to the WMF but had to retain some or most of the funds in order to remain independent under British law? That seems like a good reason why the WMF might not want WMUK to process payments, and the byzantine ruleset they'd have to abide by to have a regime of chapter-based processing is a very good reason to avoid that model in general. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Fæ
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the... Michael Maggs
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in... Russavia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in... Russavia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Nick Birse
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Michael Maggs
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Russavia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Chris Keating
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Nathan
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Chris Keating
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Lisa Gruwell
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Gerard Meijssen
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the UK Russavia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in the... Lisa Gruwell
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in... Russavia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in... Lisa Gruwell
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in... Russavia
- Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fundraising in... Charles Gregory
