Chris, I am in agreement with your thoughts. Thanks for jumping in.
Edgar On Jan 15, 2009, at 2:14 PM, cid830 wrote:
Edgar, This is a very good point! Please forgive me for butting in, but... It was a samurai's duty to be prepared for the fight. I'm not sure of how many samurai's were actually zen 'masters', but it is my understanding that they practiced zen as part of their training. Being trained in their skill did not mean they were "planning" ahead of time how they would react to a certain situation. They were not to anticipate or worry about what might happen. It meant that they would be able to precisely act from Buddha Nature to the situation at hand. The combat training gave them the fighting skills, and the zen training gave them the ability to implement those skills without the "fear" of death or other "thoughts" that may hinder their fighting ability. In the Zone, so to speak. This is the theory as I see it anyway. Again, sorry for jumping into your discussion. I'm sure Bill will have a much better response. Thank You, Chris --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen <edgaro...@...> wrote: > > Bill, > > The samurai prepares for such a situation in advance. Do you claim he > can't then act from Buddha Nature when the time comes? Just the > opposite, by preparing his body is tuned to act as it needs in the > moment far more efficiently than if he had not trained. > > Edgar > > > > On Jan 15, 2009, at 10:22 AM, <billsm...@...> wrote: > > > Anthony, > > > > I will try to answer your question which I assume is: 'What would > > you do if confronted with someone who was threatening your life?" > > > > I can absolutely truthfully say that I don't know what I'd do. If I > > knew what I would do then that means I would have thought it all > > out ahead of time, and then it would me Bill! acting and not Buddha > > Nature. > > > > I can tell you I would probably do what all animals due when > > confronted with danger: flight or fight. I would either try to get > > away - that could be by using persuasive talk or actually running > > away; or fight - that also could be with threatening talk or > > behavior, but could include physical assault. If what you are > > looking for is a definite statement that I would be passive and not > > commit violence, I can assure you that would not always be the case. > > > > Like responding to a koan, the answer depends on the entire moment: > > who's asking, what's the situation and what's my experience at that > > moment. > > > > I hope that response satisfies you. It satisfies me. > > > > ...Bill! > > > > From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] > > On Behalf Of Anthony Wu > > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:04 PM > > To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God > > > > Bill, > > > > I understand your 'zen logic' in view of a lack of a proper word. > > In my case: > > - If I run into a killer, I will run away, scared to death. > > - If I am starving, I will suffer a lot, complaining about bad karma. > > > > Understanding your action cannot be my template, I am still curious > > what your reaction is in that position 'at this moment when you are > > writing'. Don't worry about the next moment when you may react > > differently. I will be disappointed if you say you cannot answer > > because you only have 'just this' at the present. > > > > Anthony > > > > > > >