:) I shall try to make this effort of yours effective.
Thanks, Chris Austin-Lane Sent from a cell phone On Nov 17, 2010, at 13:39, Anthony Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Chris, > > I want you to post more. How do I upset you more? > > Anthony > > --- On Wed, 17/11/10, ChrisAustinLane <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: ChrisAustinLane <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: FW: Amazon book > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, 17 November, 2010, 11:18 PM > > ED: > > Your posts do have a tendency to come off as being sly and a bit mean, > despite your claim to have transcended karma, I mean Judeo-Christian notions > of morality. > > You will recall that Mayka's posts also rub some people the wrong way, a > phenomenon that has been thoroughly dissected here and attributed to some > interesting linguistic goings on and the off bit of whoop ass. > > Perhaps you will share what you see as the causes for people to mis-read your > intent in your posts. Perhaps you won't trust this forum that much. > > If you say that the causes are all external to you, I have to comment that > there is not a dividing line between ED and Mayka. > > For the record, I found your use of the word "restrained" to described Bill's > right speech to make me think you were being sly, and your reply to Mayka to > definitely communicate negative emotional content. > > Thanks, > Chris Austin-Lane, who definitely is more likely to post here when upset than > when not upset > Sent from a cell phone > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 6:25, "ED" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Mayka: >> Is it mama patting Billy on the head for being a good boy? >> Or is it a product of the fecal finger-pointing Judeo-Christian tradition? >> Or is it the historical Spanish inquisitorial spirit rearing its ugly head? >> Or is it something else? >> --ED >> >> --- In [email protected], Maria Lopez <flordel...@...> wrote: >> > >> > Bill: >> > >> > You would have been in your right not to give a reply to malicious >> > posting. >> > >> > Mayka >> >> >> > Ed and Kristy, >> > >> > I didn't mean to be overly restrained. I can only give you my impressions >> > of them before they became Dharma successors and were just two of a group >> > of monks and students at the center - albeit 2 of the most senior and >> > seemingly advanced students. I will say that I was always more comfortable >> > with Bernie then Gempo. Gempo just seemed a little less approachable, but >> > I've always just wrote that off as just a personality mismatch. >> > >> > ...Bill! >> >> >> > Ed, >> > >> > Well then, it seems we all are "underwhelmed" by Gempo...k >> >> >> > Kristy, >> > >> > My (slight) interest in Gempo was aroused by your mention of him. >> > >> > Bill has been restrained in his speech about his dharma brothers. >> > >> > --ED >> > > > >
