Chris,

>As you wrote so eloquently, 

Now I know you're taking the piss!

Mike


________________________________
 From: Chris Austin-Lane <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012, 23:40
Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
 

  
I enjoy your annotations -  carry on. As you wrote so eloquently, many paths, 
same path. But i laughed aloud at the exchange on Zen forum vs Buddhism forum 
vs gruel forum. 
On Sep 2, 2012 2:38 PM, "mike brown" <[email protected]> wrote:


>
>
>Chris,
>
>
>Guess we could all just shout "Kwatz!" at each other from now on then...
>
>
>Mike
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Chris Austin-Lane <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012, 21:52
>Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
> 
>
>  
>This day it is the annotated Zen Forum. 
>On Sep 2, 2012 4:05 AM, "mike brown" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>Bill!,
>>
>>
>>
>>Isn't it the Zen BuddhistForum, at least by implication? Isn't it fair to 
>>talk about comparisons?
>>
>>
>>>ED, Just sit.  Don't think.  Just sit.
>>
>>
>>But if you do find yourself thinking, just come back gently to the breath. 
>>When you find your mind has become calm become mindful of how the breath (or 
>>any bodily sensations) arises and passes. How it is that there is no 'you' 
>>doing the breathing - rather the universe is breathing 'you'. Note how even 
>>pleasant sensations eventually pass and more unpleasant, or neutral, 
>>sensations take their place. With such mindfulness you may find you gain some 
>>insight into the 3 Characteristics of existence: impermanence, non-self, and 
>>the unsatisfactoriness of phenomena. With diligence and patience, you may 
>>become liberated from suffering. 
>>
>>
>>
>>Not exactly pithy, I admit. And Zen is certainly direct in pointing to our 
>>True Nature. But "wash your bowls", "just sit" and "Just This!" is also not 
>>'it' either. So if we're going to have instructions/guides, then there is 
>>definitely a place for more descriptive ones (even tho the endgame will 
>>always be that they are ultimately dropped). The method is NOT the meditation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Bill! <[email protected]>
>>To: [email protected] 
>>Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012, 11:33
>>Subject: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
>> 
>>
>>  
>>Mike,  Point taken, but this is the Zen Forum, not the Theravada Forum or the 
>>Here-Have-Some-More-Rice-Gruel Forum.
>>
>>ED, Just sit.  Don't think.  Just sit.
>>
>>...Bill!
>>
>>--- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bill!,
>>> 
>>> A great instruction, and is certainly direct, but Joshu's instructions were 
>>> given to a monk who had probably been practicing meditation for a long time 
>>> and was already 'ripe' for awakening to happen. Imagine how useful that 
>>> instruction would be to a neophyte coming off the street asking about the 
>>> search for truth or something similar. Joshu's instruction is just that - 
>>> an instruction. That's why i believe Buddha's skilful means (upaya) is so 
>>> useful as a teaching method. On the one side we can have the direct 
>>> pointing to the Dharma (Zen) and on the other we can have Therevada 
>>> Buddhism with it's more step by step instructions, such as following the 
>>> Noble eightfold Path. 
>>> 
>>> The Buddha was very wise to understand that there are many different kinds 
>>> of people/cultures/personalities etc. out there and no one method will work 
>>> for all. I think it should be clear now that "wash you bowls" just isn't 
>>> going to work for someone like ED. If you agree, what else could you say 
>>> that might help him?
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>>  From: Bill! <BillSmart@...>
>>> To: [email protected] 
>>> Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012, 9:48
>>> Subject: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   
>>> ED,
>>> 
>>> Mind if Joshu and I jump in?
>>> 
>>> "WASH YOUR BOWLS!"  That's how...Bill! (and Joshu)
>>> 
>>> --- In [email protected], "ED" <seacrofter001@> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > Edgar,
>>> > 
>>> > And how is this magic trick accomplished?
>>> > 
>>> > --ED
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > ED,
>>> > >
>>> > > Stop practicing and just BE your Buddha Nature!
>>> > >
>>> > > Edgar
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > > > Edgar,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Therefore, although each of us is complete, we need to practice
>>> > > > diligently at all times with no objective in mind?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --ED
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > 
>>> > > > > Joe and Merle,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > There is no 'goal' of enlightenment to be achieved without which
>>> > you
>>> > > > imagine you are incomplete....
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > There is no incompleteness. This understanding is an essential
>>> > aspect
>>> > > > of realization...
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Wham!
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Edgar
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
 

Reply via email to