Mike,

That is clear and is what I thought you meant.  I just wanted to make sure 
everyone else also knew the difference between 'Self' and 'self'.  Thanks.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@...> wrote:
>
> Bill!,
> 
> Self, Buddha Nature, Ground of Being, Awareness etc etc. are really all 
> convenient labels for 'mind and body dropped away'. This is our True Self, 
> Original Face. Small s self is our ordinary mind - the one that thinks 'Mike' 
> is real and separate from the world (dualistic). The Self that I refer to is 
> the no-self (non-dualistic) and is unborn and so doesn't come into existence 
> (always exists - just as the sun is still there when obscured by clouds). 
> Hope that's.. clear? 
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Bill! <BillSmart@...>
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Monday, 3 September 2012, 3:21
> Subject: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
>  
> 
>   
> Mike,
> 
> The 'self' does not always exist.
> 
> I have experienced this myself and know many, many others that have also.  In 
> fact this dissolving of 'self' is a pre-requisite (from my experience) to 
> uncovering Buddha Nature.
> 
> Maybe in the post below when you used the term 'Self' in the last line you 
> meant 'Buddha Nature'?  Or maybe you meant 'self' always returns?
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], mike brown <uerusuboyo@> wrote:
> >
> > Kris,
> > 
> > Very good! You must have given that a lot of thought ; )
> > 
> > >Self can be found nowhere else
> > 
> > Of course. Self/Buddha Nature/Awareness is unborn (and therefore never 
> > dies) and so is ever present regardless of what we are thinking/doing. But 
> > suffering arises when we think there is an independent 'I' having those 
> > thoughts. That we have this Realisation is the difference. How this 
> > Realisation manifests is unimportant. For some it will be sudden for others 
> > gradual. But you're correct that Self alwaysis. 
> > 
> > Mke
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Kristopher Grey <kris@>
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2012, 15:42
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils"
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > On 9/2/2012 7:05 AM, mike brown wrote:
> > > But if you do find yourself thinking, just come back gently to the breath.
> > 
> > A tri-ku for you:
> > 
> > With each rise and fall
> > The breath is grasped and released
> > Each, a birth and death
> > 
> > Immersed in thinking
> > Self can be found nowhere else
> > Always lost in thought
> > 
> > Mind, a stream of thought
> > Following, or flowing by
> > The way, like water
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to