Edgar,

Good question!

Experience (as I define it - monistic) is just experience - Just THIS!  Since 
it is monistic there is not a pluralism of me, you, the dog, the rabbit, etc...

Perception is dualistic/pluralistic.  Each intellect that creates the delusion 
of dualism/pluralism creates its own perception.

...Bill!


--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Bill,
> 
> Then 'whose' experience is it? And whose perception is it that arises in 
> "your" mind if not your self's?
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 9:43 PM, Bill! wrote:
> 
> > Edgar,
> > 
> > I understand why you think my POV (and maybe the Buddhist/zen POV also) is 
> > 'solipsism', but there is an importance difference which you are ignoring.
> > 
> > 'Solipsism' in every definition I've read includes a focus on a belief in a 
> > 'self', in fact an exclusive belief in 'self'. Here is just one example:
> > 
> > "a theory holding that the self can know nothing but its own modifications 
> > and that the self is the only existent thing; also: extreme ." - 
> > Merriam-Webster Online
> > 
> > My POV (and what I believe to be the POV of all zen teachings) is the 
> > 'self' is delusive. My POV does not focus on the 'self' and claim it is the 
> > only existent thing.  My POV focuses on experience (sensory, monisitic) and 
> > denies the existence of a 'self' - except as a delusion.
> > 
> > I'd be willing to read other definitions of 'solipsism' or hear your own 
> > definition that convinces you that the gist of what I've been saying is an 
> > example of 'solipsism'.
> > 
> > ...Bill! 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Mike,
> > > 
> > > PS, I agree it is the "Buddhist line" that I've been defending against 
> > > Bill's solipsism ad infinitum..
> > > 
> > > Edgar
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 10:23 AM, uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Edgar,
> > > > 
> > > > When have you ever said that?? Btw, ego has nothing to do with my 
> > > > stance. I've been stating the Buddhist line ever since I've been here 
> > > > and you've just about disagreed with everything I've ever said (or just 
> > > > got basic Buddhist principles plain wrong). 
> > > > 
> > > > Mike
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > > 
> > > > From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@>; 
> > > > To: <[email protected]>; 
> > > > Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but how 
> > > > plain is that? 
> > > > Sent: Tue, Jul 9, 2013 1:28:51 PM 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Mike,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Funny. That's exactly what I said so why are you "completely 
> > > > disagreeing with me"?
> > > > 
> > > > I suspect just because your ego insists you have to preserve itself?
> > > > 
> > > > Edgar
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 8:26 AM, uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Edgar, 
> > > >> 
> > > >> I think you'll find that I've been arguing here that "just THIS!" 
> > > >> isn't really the full picture. But anyway, I completely disagree with 
> > > >> you. Yes, there is an ultimate reality, but that reality can only be 
> > > >> known subjectively. That's why my iPad creates sensations for me, but 
> > > >> absolutely none for you. This is why Buddha taught that reality can 
> > > >> only be known within "this fathom long body". If someone shows Dave 
> > > >> and John a picture of a nude woman they will both have totally 
> > > >> different reactions to it depending on a multitude of personal 
> > > >> factors. The photo stays the same, but the reactions are what counts.
> > > >> 
> > > >> Mike
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >> 
> > > >> From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@>; 
> > > >> To: <[email protected]>; 
> > > >> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but 
> > > >> how plain is that? 
> > > >> Sent: Tue, Jul 9, 2013 12:09:41 PM 
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Mike,
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> That is your local perception of reality. Obviously you and I perceive 
> > > >> reality quite differently. But it's the same reality we both 
> > > >> perceive....
> > > >> 
> > > >> You can't just define your own reality. That leads to all sorts of 
> > > >> inconsistencies and delusions...
> > > >> 
> > > >> That's another reason that Bill and your "just this" just doesn't cut 
> > > >> it. All experience is always mediated and processed by one's internal 
> > > >> biological and cognitive structure. Thinking that "just this" is 
> > > >> somehow direct perception of actual external reality is just not true. 
> > > >> That's exhaustively proven biological and physical fact. Doesn't 
> > > >> matter how enlightened you may or may not be...
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Edgar
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:55 AM, uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > >> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Edgar,
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> How about a bat or an ant? Plus, my reality is different to yours. 
> > > >>> This iPad in front of me creates many sensations and perceptions, yet 
> > > >>> for you it doesn't exist. But my previous point is that you can't 
> > > >>> know if something is what you perceive it to be. The perception is 
> > > >>> more crucial than the apparent reality of what it is (eg the snake 
> > > >>> and rope).
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Mike
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@>; 
> > > >>> To: <[email protected]>; 
> > > >>> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but 
> > > >>> how plain is that? 
> > > >>> Sent: Tue, Jul 9, 2013 11:35:42 AM 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Mike,
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> There is no "our reality". There is only one reality. You can't 
> > > >>> define reality as YOU like. It is self defining...
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> Edgar
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> On Jul 8, 2013, at 8:14 PM, uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > >>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Edgar,
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> You still haven't answered. You seem to be far more interested in 
> > > >>>> metaphysical entanglements than reality. Like I said previously, 
> > > >>>> reality has many definitions, but the one that counts is the one 
> > > >>>> that affects our mental processes and how we respond to them. Trying 
> > > >>>> to figure out whether an external object is what you think it is is 
> > > >>>> beside the point because It's impossible to determine in all cases. 
> > > >>>> However, how you react is real in 100% of cases and how you react 
> > > >>>> will determine whether you suffer, or not, from that reaction. This 
> > > >>>> is our reality. 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Mike
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> From: uerusuboyo@ <uerusuboyo@>; 
> > > >>>> To: zen group <[email protected]>; 
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but 
> > > >>>> how plain is that? 
> > > >>>> Sent: Mon, Jul 8, 2013 1:32:37 AM 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Edgar,
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Seriously, I have no idea what you're trying to say here. How would 
> > > >>>> I know if it's a snake and not a piece of rope - especially if my 
> > > >>>> reaction was to avoid it believing it to be poisonous? What if i 
> > > >>>> killed it believing it was a snake I believed to be poisonous, but 
> > > >>>> it turned out to be someone's harmless pet snake? Again, my 
> > > >>>> reactions are central - not what it actually is - if that is all I 
> > > >>>> have to go on at that time. They're all I have 'control' over. It's 
> > > >>>> really not a difficult point to grasp.
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Mike
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> From: yonyonson@ <yonyonson@>; 
> > > >>>> To: <[email protected]>; 
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but 
> > > >>>> how plain is that? 
> > > >>>> Sent: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 10:39:57 PM 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> you could try that, but it'd just be more of the same. 
> > > >>>> 10,000 things and counting...
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Hong
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Mike,
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> OK, I finally managed to pick myself up off the floor!
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> What difference does it make??????
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> OK, I hope I really have managed to stop laughing now.....
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Try stepping on a piece of rope and then a rattlesnake and maybe, 
> > > >>>> just maybe, you might understand the difference!
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Jeeeez....
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> Edgar
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 10:44 AM, uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Edgar,
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Sorry, I'm not following. What difference does it make whether it's 
> > > >>>>> a snake or a piece of rope if thats what I sincerely perceive at 
> > > >>>>> the time? It's my reaction that is important. 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Mike
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@>; 
> > > >>>>> To: <[email protected]>; 
> > > >>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... but 
> > > >>>>> how plain is that? 
> > > >>>>> Sent: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 2:25:37 PM 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Mike,
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Funny! Because Bill's (and now apparently your) "just this" at 
> > > >>>>> night would have been the snake that was really a piece of rope!
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> That's why "just this" JUST doesn't cut it. I can imagine Bill at 
> > > >>>>> the magic show yelling "just this" as every illusion is performed 
> > > >>>>> believing they are all real because they are his direct experience!
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> By claiming the immediate experience of "just this" is reality you 
> > > >>>>> mistake illusion for reality..... In the cases above it's obvious, 
> > > >>>>> but if you understand the biology of perception you understand it 
> > > >>>>> happens EVERY TIME....
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> Edgar
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:50 AM, uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> Edgar,
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> There many gold standards for what reality is, but surely what we 
> > > >>>>>> experience as humans is all we have to go on? If I see a snake at 
> > > >>>>>> night, how I react at that time is far more important than in the 
> > > >>>>>> morning realising it was just a piece of old rope. 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> Mike
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@>; 
> > > >>>>>> To: <[email protected]>; 
> > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... 
> > > >>>>>> but how plain is that? 
> > > >>>>>> Sent: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 1:29:39 PM 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> Bill,
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> The point is that Bill's "just this" is something produced by 
> > > >>>>>> complex sensory and cognitive processes. It does NOT correspond to 
> > > >>>>>> raw reality as he would have us believe. It's the RESULT of a very 
> > > >>>>>> complex sequence of processes.
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> That's why Bill's just this is actually "just this ILLUSION 
> > > >>>>>> mistaken for reality"....
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> True you don't experience reality like this. Because you ARE NOT 
> > > >>>>>> EXPERIENCING REALITY AT ALL!
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> Edgar
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 9:14 AM, uerusuboyo@ wrote:
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> Edgar,
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> But you don't experience reality like that. Do you have to 
> > > >>>>>>> understand the endocrine system to take a pee?
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> Mike
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> From: Edgar Owen <edgarowen@>; 
> > > >>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>; 
> > > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] "It's as plain as the nose on your face" ... 
> > > >>>>>>> but how plain is that? 
> > > >>>>>>> Sent: Sun, Jul 7, 2013 12:58:56 PM 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> Bill,
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> That's very bad biology. There are 3 general stages involved. Raw 
> > > >>>>>>> sensory experience which occurs separately in each different 
> > > >>>>>>> sense organ. There is considerable pre-processing there where eg. 
> > > >>>>>>> edges and motion are preferentially detected. 2nd there is 
> > > >>>>>>> perception in the optic lobes, 3rd the brain itself makes what is 
> > > >>>>>>> perceived into objects in the context of one's internal model of 
> > > >>>>>>> reality.
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> You can't just make things up that are contrary to the way 
> > > >>>>>>> biology actually works...
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> Edgar
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>> Edgar,
> > > >>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>> What's causing confusion is you continue to look at experience 
> > > >>>>>>>> only from a pluralistic POV. From a pluralistic POV there is a 
> > > >>>>>>>> distinction between sight, sound, taste, smell and touch. From a 
> > > >>>>>>>> monistic POV there is no distinction. It's just experience. 
> > > >>>>>>>> Experience is only separated into the different senses when 
> > > >>>>>>>> pluralism arises along with perception. It's then that you see, 
> > > >>>>>>>> hear, taste, smell and touch. Before pluralism there is just 
> > > >>>>>>>> experience - Just THIS!
> > > >>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>> It doesn't matter if my perception is different (worse or better 
> > > >>>>>>>> - like eyesight or hearing) than yours. For example blurry 
> > > >>>>>>>> vision doesn't produce a different experience than clear vision. 
> > > >>>>>>>> The vision being blurry or clear is a perception, not an 
> > > >>>>>>>> experience. The same goes for vision and touch. If a person is 
> > > >>>>>>>> blind but can feel then they are sentient and do experience; BUT 
> > > >>>>>>>> a blind person or deaf person does not have the same perception 
> > > >>>>>>>> as a person who sees and hears well.
> > > >>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>> ...Bill!
> > > >>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >>>>>>>> > So why is the experience of you different from someone who 
> > > >>>>>>>> > needs glasses, or a blind person?
> > > >>>>>>>> > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > Which has the 'true' experience of the 'true' reality?
> > > >>>>>>>> > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > Which is the true 'just this' when you have 3 different just 
> > > >>>>>>>> > thises?
> > > >>>>>>>> > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > Edgar
> > > >>>>>>>> > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > On Jul 7, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > Edgar,
> > > >>>>>>>> > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > Experience (awareness of the 'real world') is not dependent 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > upon eyeglasses, corneas or eyes. It is however dependent 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > upon what we call senses. If you were not sentient then you 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > could not experience and would have no awareness.
> > > >>>>>>>> > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > There would be nothing.
> > > >>>>>>>> > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > ...Bill!
> > > >>>>>>>> > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> > > >
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > Panda,
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > Good point. Which is the REAL world Bill. With or without 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > glasses? With or without corneas? With or without eyes?
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > After all reality does NOT consist of focused light images 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > of 'things'....
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > Edgar
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > On Jul 7, 2013, at 1:43 AM, pandabananasock wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > > Are you wearing glasses right now?
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > > Can you see the frames in your periphery?
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > > Did you see them before I asked?
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > > > >
> > > >>>>>>>> > > >
> > > >>>>>>>> > > 
> > > >>>>>>>> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> >
> > > >>>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >>> 
> > > >> 
> > > >> 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to