John W. Redelfs wrote: > > Ron Scott wrote: > >If that's how you define, eternal marriage between one man and one > >woman, > >then no problem. > > Between man and woman. According to D&C 132, plural marriage is OK as > long > as it is authorized by the priesthood. --JWR
And, technically, it *is* presently authorized in one very specific instance: Brother A is sealed to Sister B. B dies. (By definition, this sealing continues beyond death.) Brother A can at a later point be sealed to Sister C. In fact, I think that was what happened with Howard W. Hunter. It's only when A seeks to be married to living sisters B, C, D, (etc.) *simultaneously* that Official Declaration #1 comes into focus. /Sandy/ -- The Rabinowitz Family, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spring Hill, Tennessee ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html --^----------------------------------------------------------------
