George Cobabe wrote:
> There are those on this list that in the past have argued that Eternal
> Marriage is NOT essential for exaltation.  Exaltation is living in the
> presence of God the Father and receiving His blessings.  Yet it is 
> suggested
> that to live in the Celestial Kingdom it is not necessary to have an 
> Eternal
> Marriage.

Still, it's possible to be in the Celestial Kingdom and NOT be exalted.  
I think that's where the misunderstanding among members comes in.  D&C 
131 indicates that temple marriage is needed for the *highest degree* of 
the Celestial Kingdom.  On the basis of that scripture, it does appear 
that a single person might be able to enter at the lowest degree.

But the lower degrees of the Celestial Kingdom represent a type of 
eternal damnation.  Yes, persons designated for that place can be in the 
presence of both the Father and the Son, but exaltation goes beyond 
being in their presence, and means becoming as God in all things, up to 
and including godhood.  If you can receive a degree of Celestial Glory, 
yet be unable to attain the status of godhood (being designated, for 
instance, as a ministering angel), then by definition, one's progression 
stops and damnation occurs.  

Still, in practical terms, I don't know how likely it would be for a 
single person to reach the lower degrees of the Celestial Kingdom.  For 
if someone desires to enter into the covenant, makes the needed 
sacrifices, yet cannot locate a suitable companion, teachings indicate 
that provision will be made later in the post-mortal existance.  At the 
other extreme, someone who goes out of their way to avoid temple 
marriage could be judged as being rebellious or disobedient...perhaps 
the judgment might even be in the direction of the Terrestrial Kingdom?  
In the middle, I suppose, are those individuals who seek to be obedient 
in the Gospel in most things, yet don't care one way or the other about 
temple marriage.  Then they die without being sealed to a companion, 
realizing too late that they should have given the matter greater 
attention.  They might have been exalted, but for their diligence in 
seeking an eternal companion.  I suspect it would be these individuals 
who would become the ministering angels in the lower Celestial rhelms.  
(But would there be that many?)  Even so, all this would be my personal 

All the best,

The Rabinowitz Family, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spring Hill, Tennessee

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

Reply via email to