Clay McClure wrote: > On 9/25/07, Ihsan Zaghmouth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >> you can not use LU on systems with zones >> Solaris 10 sparc 120272-12SMA Patch . 120011-14 depends on it >> >> The following patch has been withdrawn and until a new version is released >> you can not use LU on systems with zones >> Solaris 10 x86 120273-13SMA patch . 120012-14 depends on this >> >> The SMA patch for both SPARC and X86 has been WITHDRAWN. >> > > Why does Sun offer patches that depend on withdrawn patches? That > seems counter-productive :) > Hi Clay the Ku 120011-14 was released prior to it's requirement being withdrawn, so it was installable when it was released. In hindsight the SMA patch should not have been withdrawn, but warning attached to the README toindicate the problem and resolution.
Enda > We ran into a problem with our S10U3 deployment that required the > application of 120012-14. This happened on 9/19, the very day that > 120073-13 was withdrawn. Editing (hacking) some pkginfo files tricked > patchadd into thinking 120273-13 was already applied, but I'm still > having trouble applying 120012-14. > > Our installation (correctly or not) has zones on ZFS file systems. > This seems to prevent the 'zoneadm mount' command from being able to > loop-back mount the zone's root filesystem under > /var/run/.patchSafeRoot/path/to/zone/root. I am curious if this would > be a relatively simple problem to work around. > > Thanks, > > Clay > _______________________________________________ > zones-discuss mailing list > email@example.com > _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org