On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:43:40 -0000, Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
The broader point is we wouldn't really need it yet - we don't have
any code that actually uses these new features, and plenty of code
that may be broken by changes in CMF 2. All in good time - of course,
if you want to help work on CMF 2.0 compatability for the 2.5 branch
when it starts stabilising, all the more chance we can get it into
Plone 3.0 :)
i have every intent of pushing for Plone 3.0 to require CMF 2.X (for
some reasonable value of X).
And I have every intention of supporting you :-)
You kick ass, Rob.
in fact, my first efforts towards GenericSetup and Plone integration
were based on running Plone against the CMF trunk. it was then
(correctly, IMO) decided that CMF 2.0 would cause too much breakage to
3rd party Plone products, when the last major release of Plone had
already required most products to be rewritten.
one of the biggest motivators for creating CMF 1.6 and using it for the
basis of Plone 2.5 was so that it would be easier to do parallel Plone
development against CMF 2.0 without having to maintain separately two
entirely different site creation infrastructures.
Indeed - and thank you so much for all the hard work you've put into this!
Martin
--
(muted)
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
