On Wednesday 18 January 2006 00:17, Martin Aspeli wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:43:40 -0000, Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin Aspeli wrote: > >> The broader point is we wouldn't really need it yet - we don't have > >> any code that actually uses these new features, and plenty of code > >> that may be broken by changes in CMF 2. All in good time - of course, > >> if you want to help work on CMF 2.0 compatability for the 2.5 branch > >> when it starts stabilising, all the more chance we can get it into > >> Plone 3.0 :) > > > > i have every intent of pushing for Plone 3.0 to require CMF 2.X (for > > some reasonable value of X). > > And I have every intention of supporting you :-) > > You kick ass, Rob.
+1 on Rob kicking ass! Plone 3.0 needs to be on CMF 2.0 IMO as well. Alec _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
