a good CMS should NOT allow users to use HTML to fulfill all their
fantasies.
See, this is -- to me at least -- where the laboratory gets hit smack in
the face with reality. Yes of course styles should rule. But try telling a
user their tabulated data can't be entered into the cms (tables are
They probably won't even want to talk to you for a minor deal of $500.
You are talking with sales people, not with donkeys ;)
Micha Schopman
Project Manager
Modern Media, Databankweg 12 M, 3821 AL Amersfoort
Tel 033-4535377, Fax 033-4535388
KvK Amersfoort 39081679, Rabo 39.48.05.380
Has
Claude Schneegans wrote:
What for instance would you like to have?
You pretty much listed our requirements :)
- a good CMS should NOT allow users to use HTML to fulfill all their
fantasies.
So, users should not be able to define any color, font size and what
ever, instead, they
should
Yes, I have not posted ALL code.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 August 2005 00:17
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFFORM error
before digging thru this...is that /cfoutput after your cfform supposed
to be there?
On 8/10/05, Russ Michaels [EMAIL
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 18:03, Peter Shaw wrote:
Thanks Tom,
I'm stumped now.
Unless you know enough ASP or something to try it 'native' ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
We did indeed write an ASP version which exhibited the same symptoms. So we
packed it all off back to
If you'd like to provide the parsed query, you can do so in one of two
ways: 1) copy the parsed query from your debug info or 2) comment out
the CFQUERY tags and replace them with CFOUTPUT tags.
Actually, just a trick to display parsed query. If you insert a cfabort just
above your /CFQUERY tag
On CFMX 7 you can also add the result attribute to the cfquery tag and dump
that without changing any of your other code...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Dina Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF7 lots of new Ambiguous
cfform action=#script_name#?action=domains.default method=POST
name=domainform
/cfoutput
I looked through all your code and the only odd thing is the /cfoutput just
after the cfform I would move that ABOVE The cfform as I don't believe
it's needed for the #script_name# to be evaluated since
I think the DW type solution is what some folks are looking for.
It never occurred to me to check out from SC direct to prod.
In our current operation we check out from sc to local, change files and
deploy to dev for initial teating, then migrate up to test (for QA/UAT) and
then to prod
Finally, the HTML editor should not allow users to upload any image
anytime.
Cuz god only knows nobody should ever want to put an image into a web
page. They should always have to call the server administrator in order
to do so.
I guess that's a fine idea if you don't care about usability
Somebody needs to keep a control on job security... ;-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:36 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
Finally, the HTML editor should not allow users to upload any image
If you're going to stay a couple extra days, get out of Anaheim/LA proper
and head to the coast. You could go north towards Santa Barbara and San
Louis Obsispo and the Southern California wine country (where much of the
movie Sideways was filmed). You could go South and drive along Highway 1
There is an opening cfouput in the code above the cfform (not posted as it's
just a bunnch of cfsets and cfparams and comments), and I have tried moving
the cfoutputs around as well.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 August 2005 12:16
I'll ditto the It Depends comment, and also ditto the Model-Glue
recommendation. I'm really digging MG so far.
On 8/10/05, Scott Stroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Model-glue = more gooder.
Though, I agree with Barney and Joe, the answer really is, 'It depends'.
On what? Well, the type of
I understand that, but my point is I don't think you need the /cfoutput AFTER
the cfform. In any case, if moving it above cfform didn't solve the
problem, then the typo is somewhere else in your code and we're not going to be
able to help unless you can post all the code in the template AND
FYI - when I run that code you gave us without the /cfoutput below the
cfform I don't get the error message. I would look above your cfform for
the error and definitely move the /cfoutput above it.
Hope this helps.
Dave
I just think it's great that we have such a choice with CF. We argue (converse)
about which one is BEST! That's what makes it so powerful. You can be an
amateur like me and code the basics, orrr you can code like lots of you
guys do.
BTW, I don't use any of them. My apps are usually too
As my CFFORM action has a coldfusion variable in it
cfform action=#script_name#?action=domains.default method=POST
name=domainform
A cfoutput is required. Otherwise what will happen is that the actual text
#script_name# will be output instead of it's value.
As I stated in another reply, I have
A cfoutput is required. Otherwise what will happen is that the actual text
#script_name# will be output instead of it's value.
Russ,
Look, I'm trying to help here. I told you before that you don't need to put
the cfoutput around the cfform to have the #script_name# evaluated. It
will
On 8/11/05, Russ Michaels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As my CFFORM action has a coldfusion variable in it
cfform action=#script_name#?action=domains.default method=POST
name=domainform
A cfoutput is required. Otherwise what will happen is that the actual text
#script_name# will be output
how would this be written using cfscript?
cfloop collection=#stShoppingCart# item=x
blah,blah
/cfloop
Che Vilnonis
Application Developer
Advertising Systems Incorporated
8470C Remington Avenue
Pennsauken, NJ 08110
p: 856.488.2211
f: 856.488.1990
www.asitv.com
Sorry, I have actually replaced the CFFORM with a FORM tag since, and [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
why the cfoutput is there.
When I pasted the code here I just edited it back to CFFORM.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 August 2005 14:15
To: CF-Talk
for (x in stShoppingCart) {
writeOutput(x); // struct key name
writeOutput(stShoppingCart[x]); // struct key value
}
On 8/11/05, Che Vilnonis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how would this be written using cfscript?
cfloop collection=#stShoppingCart# item=x
thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: easily question. could someone rewrite this line so it
works in a cfscript block?
for (x in stShoppingCart) {
writeOutput(x);
Ahhh, okay, so is everything working for you now?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFFORM error
Sorry, I have actually replaced the CFFORM with a FORM tag since, and [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Is full of garbage and this topic relates to Coldfusion.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Luce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: MAX 2005 - things to do in Anaheim - CFCommunity?
CFCommunity?
I don't know whether you've been to
Thanks all..
sas
Scott A. Stewart,
Web Application Developer
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS)
14026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 300
Chantilly, VA 20151
Phone: (703) 995-1737
Fax: (703) 834-5527
Many thousands of years ago, a blue faced Pict stepped on a bloated sheep
carcass... and
Ok I thought I had removed the cfoutput when I converted from FROM to
CFFORM, but I guess I didn't LOL!
Altho why that should cause such an error is strange.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Russ Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 August 2005 14:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFFORM
Which method do you recommend for developing a large-scale website/portal?
MG
Shrug...I don't think there is one. It depends on what you need. I
wrote Model-Glue, but I'm sitting here using Fusebox because it makes
the most sense for the project I'm working on.
-Joe
On 8/10/05, Michel
I just installed a product called WebDrive that lets you map an FTP folder
as a virtual drive in Windoze.. I have read that there's a similar product
for NetWare users called netdrive.exe (which has to come off the Novell
resource disk), so that might be an option for NetWare users that have
a good CMS should NOT allow users to use HTML to fulfill all their
fantasies.
But try telling a
user their tabulated data can't be entered into the cms (tables are about
the only way that'll happen)
When I said should NOT allow users to use HTML I was thinking of colors,
fonts, etc.
If colors
Cuz god only knows nobody should ever want to put an image into a web
page. They should always have to call the server administrator in order
to do so.
You didn't get the point:
I said that image upload must be done by the CMS, not the HTML editor.
--
___
Speaking as someone who ran a CMS with 70+ content authors, I could not
agree with you more. I often found it easier to let the users muck things
up and I would clean it up later. Less stress and hair pulling out. No
matter how many times you told them size 6 type is ugly, they'd do it
anyway.
This is also a good way to avoid popup blocker blues. Also, you ever work
with a user who just can't figure out where the editing window went, and all
the time, it was behind the page window?
-Original Message-
From: Pete Jordan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11,
style control in fckeditor works for us.
Yes, it is ok, the only thing I don't like, is that the designer must
use XML to describe the styles,
not always an easy approach, even developpers are not always familiar
with XML.
In my editor, (and I'm sure with some others), a regular CSS file can
That's what I want. When working on simple sites, I want to be able to put
and get with a single click. I'd love for that ability to be in CFE.
Constanty Connie DeCinko III
Web Architect, Webmaster, Web Developer
Lone Jet Enterprises
Glendale, Arizona
www.LoneJet.com
-Original
This is also a good way to avoid popup blocker blues.
I solved this problem with a pop up enabled test on the admin login.
If pop ups are not allowed, the user is sent to a page that explain how
to allow them
at least for the domain thay are working for.
Don't forget that the CMS is intended
So you have the HTML editor launch the CMS image upload module. Everyone's
happy.
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best Rich Text Editor
Cuz god only knows nobody should ever want to
I just think it's great that we have such a choice with
CF. We argue (converse) about which one is BEST! That's
what makes it so powerful. You can be an amateur like me
and code the basics, orrr you can code like lots of
you guys do.
BTW, I don't use any of them. My apps are usually too
When a form is submitted, the form.fieldNames variable contains the
fields in the same order as they appear on the form page itself.
Can I actually always count on this to be true?
Is this a per-browser implementation or is it a standard?
Is there a good chance that CF will one day sort the
Does anyone know of anything out there that will allow CF to talk with
Novell? They want to avoid creating new logins for a web system. I
personally have no idea about anything with Novell, but someone asked me
about it. They were going to try to write a c++ cfx tag to achieve
this, but I
Personally, I wouldn't count on it. That's something out of your control and
it's always dangerous to 'count on' something out of control. Besides, as far
as I know, no one here can tell the future. ;-)
Why would they need to be in a certain order anyway? What are you trying to
do? Maybe
We are building a simple form mailer script and would like to email the
form fields in the same order as they appear on the page.
One solution I thought of would be to specify a list of the form fields
in the specific order. However, that leads to duplication of code and
then what happens when I
I have JRUN set up and working on Windows XP Pro (my development
workstation). I have CFMX6 and CFMX7 both deployed and seem(ed) to be
working fine. The specific information for each deployment is as
follows:
CFMX6: http://localhost:8101/
context path: /
document root: C:\Inetpub\wwwroot
Also, let me add that the web designer also wants field names to contain
spaces and colons to help control formatting and other display
properties.
I think this can be pretty flexible, but to me, it seems like a
mish-mash of worst-practices. ;^)
All in all, the form mailer will only be used by
hi ppl.
How i can create an Java Object passing arguments? , i have a class with few
constructors , but when i use createObject i can't pass arguments.. or at least
i cant figure out how. the the object is created with the default constructor.
Any tips?..
This in CF5
A little JS would make this pretty easy. A simple function that is triggered
on submit of the form could easily parse through the form array and delineate
the fields into a particular field for this purpose. This way it is based on
the structure of the form and does not rely on how the
This I think works.
variables.randomAccessFile = createObject(java, java.io.RandomAccessFile);
variables.randomAccessFile.init(variables.file,r);
At least when I forgot the r access type in the init function call I got an
error something like Could not find Constructor with the combination of
Dawson, Michael wrote:
One solution I thought of would be to specify a list of the form fields
in the specific order. However, that leads to duplication of code and
then what happens when I forget to add a field to the sort order
list?
Use JavaScript to traverse through all form fields on
On Thursday 11 August 2005 16:35, Dawson, Michael wrote:
mish-mash of worst-practices. ;^)
All in all, the form mailer will only be used by departmental web sites
that just need a quick email form. This is not intended to be used, at
They don't need the complicated formating controled
With Tiny's plugin authoring capabilities, integrating an existing
spellchecker is literally like 10 lines of code. We did that for our
main application, and it was a breeze. Tiny's also got a built-in
plugin for IESpell (which I've never used), and supports the Google
Toolbar's spellchecker
On Thursday 11 August 2005 16:28, Tangorre, Michael wrote:
application.thisServer.js = http://127.0.0.1:8101/site/js/;
Why are you bothering to prepend the protocol, host etc. ?
application.thisServer.js = '/site/js/';
will work just as well.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
didn't Novell go over to LDAP - or I'm pretty sure there is an LDAP plugin for
Novell, that being the case you can just use CFLDAP thats built into CF
john.
Does anyone know of anything out there that will allow CF to talk with
Novell? They want to avoid creating new logins for a web system.
Thanks ,
It Works.
-Mensaje original-
De: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:46 AM
Para: CF-Talk
Asunto: RE: createObject with Custom constructor
This I think works.
variables.randomAccessFile = createObject(java,
java.io.RandomAccessFile);
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why are you bothering to prepend the protocol, host etc. ?
application.thisServer.js = '/site/js/'; will work just as well.
Im not really concerned with that right now. What I am concerned with is
why a site worked ok on standard install of
I like FCKEditor v1.6.
Version 2 is out with additional features (like form creation, tables, fonts,
colors, etc). Some people love them; I consider them useless and potentially
dangerous - if given too many options, users will soon destroy the site's look.
(it should be pointed out that you
No.
Fly into SNA.
I live in Orange County. LAX sucks.
-Original Message-
From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 11:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Flights to MAX
Which would you chose: Fly into/out of LAX or SNA (Orange County)? Is it
worth
On 8/11/05, Tangorre, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have JRUN set up and working on Windows XP Pro (my development
workstation). I have CFMX6 and CFMX7 both deployed and seem(ed) to be
working fine. The specific information for each deployment is as
follows:
CFMX6:
-Original Message-
From: Irvin Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like FCKEditor v1.6.
FCKeditor v1 only works with IE.
Version 2 is out with additional features (like form
creation, tables, fonts, colors, etc). Some people love them;
I consider them useless and potentially
Correction: the features I listed as new were there in previous versions. New
features are flash objects, support for Active FoxPro Pages, etc.
I like FCKEditor v1.6.
Version 2 is out with additional features (like form creation, tables,
fonts, colors, etc). Some people love them; I
Toolbars can be configured in FCKEditor, too. And the new version works on a
couple other browsers.
TinyMCE is very nice, but the lack of image upload and preview is enough for me
to not use it. My experience is that clients need and love this feature. Rick
Root developed a plugin that kind of
I think that's the best solution too. This way, you will always have a field
called something like OrderedFieldNames that will always be in the order of
the form variables on the form (no matter who changes what). As long as no one
ever changes your javascript, your resulting
From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
are these doc roots set in IIS or the JRun instances? If you
have IIS connectors setup, why are you using the port number
of the JRun instance?
To be honest, I have not set this stuff up before. Usually I setup CF
and work right from
yeah, I run several JRun instances on my PC, one for CF, Flex, JRun
cluster testing, etc. I never hook IIS into any of them as its just a
dev PC. All doc roots are under jrun4\servers\servername\app-war\
and I access everything via the port for the internal JRun webserver,
in your case the 8101
You can install both CFMX6 and CFMX7 standalone and run web sites off
either.
Just remember to install the CFADMIN in a different location for one of
them.
You can then just modify the IIS file mappings to point to whichever version
you want to use for an individual site.
You could also install
From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yeah, I run several JRun instances on my PC, one for CF,
Flex, JRun cluster testing, etc. I never hook IIS into any
of them as its just a dev PC. All doc roots are under
jrun4\servers\servername\app-war\ and I access everything via
the
That's one reason I like TinyMCE, you can customize it to your needs so
you're not giving people access to completely break everything.
I've got one client with a TON of admin forms with FCK all over them.
The client does *everything* in Word and then paste, and that's why we
went with FCK.
Same answer: it depends. In this case it depends on the dev team
and their experience, whether you need a 100% separate between UI and
application (for multiple UIs) or if a little (or a lot) fudging is
ok, etc. There is rarely a simple answer.
If you pick one framework and always use it, you'd
Can anyone tell me WHY this won't work in NS6.1 but work fine in ie5-6,
firefox and NS8??
document.getElementById(CurrentHighlightedCell).style.background='#006600';
CurrentHighlightedCell is a variable that contains the current id of the
TD background color I am changing.
Thanks..
Jeff
Does it matter if you put the element ID in quotes?
getElementById(CurrentHighlightedCell)...
- Jim
Jeff W wrote:
Can anyone tell me WHY this won't work in NS6.1 but work fine in ie5-6,
firefox and NS8??
document.getElementById(CurrentHighlightedCell).style.background='#006600';
NS6 was a bastard that didn't work. Did you try backgroundColor?
cheers,
barneyb
On 8/11/05, Jeff W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me WHY this won't work in NS6.1 but work fine in ie5-6,
firefox and NS8??
document.getElementById(CurrentHighlightedCell).style.background='#006600';
if it's a literal ID value, then yes, he'd need quotes. I'm guessing
it's a variable.
Try backgroundColor (note the casing) instead of background.
On 8/11/05, Jim Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it matter if you put the element ID in quotes?
Barney Boisvert wrote:
NS6 was a bastard that didn't work.
He he, I have an uncle like that.
Ray
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
Who you hope doesn't subscribe to this list.. ;)
On 8/11/05, Ray Champagne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barney Boisvert wrote:
NS6 was a bastard that didn't work.
He he, I have an uncle like that.
Ray
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/
Got
Jeff:
I couldn't say for sure, but you might try using backgroundColor instead
of background as in:
document.getElementById(CurrentHighlightedCell).style.backgroundColor='#0066
00';
The background property (both in JS and CSS) is really a short-hand way of
styling every aspect of the
Its a variable..
On 8/11/05, Jim Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it matter if you put the element ID in quotes?
getElementById(CurrentHighlightedCell)...
- Jim
Jeff W wrote:
Can anyone tell me WHY this won't work in NS6.1 but work fine in ie5-6,
firefox and NS8??
I'll try the backgroundColor and give that a whirl...
Thanks,
Jeff
On 8/11/05, Charlie Griefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if it's a literal ID value, then yes, he'd need quotes. I'm guessing
it's a variable.
Try backgroundColor (note the casing) instead of background.
On 8/11/05, Jim
This morning we started experiencing a problem where whenever we tried to
connect to a certain Oracle DSN, the CPU on the ColdFusion (jrun.exe) server
spikes to 100% and stays there until the CF service is restarted.
The database server seems to be working correctly as applications that
What Bryan was asking Laszlo for was a collection of example using CF
with a Laszlo app. None of the demos provide that, so he's asked them to
work some up and send them out.
I think I can help Bryan out here. Laszlo was built primarily for the
presentation layer of application
Well isn't NS6.1 odd
It appears that BOTH my example and the new.backgroundColor example work and
don't work...
As if you couldn't tell this is a background cell changer. ...and this code
is firing on the ONCLICK of each cell :) Here is the weirdness...
Say I have 3 cells wide table...
Laszlo also doesnt support the same type of customization especially
with components that flex does so if you need a completely custom or
fitting look then flex is the choice.
As software engineer and a member of the team that built Earthlink's new Laszlo
based web mail product (now in
have you tried connecting to htis Oracle DB via SQL+? first thing I
would try and do. also, tnsping it to make sure the listner is up and
alert.
DK
On 8/11/05, Ian Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This morning we started experiencing a problem where whenever we tried to
connect to a
That said, I have not developed in ColdFusion for some years, and
currently do not own a license for the server, so I am not able to provide
any examples. However, I do know that ColdFusion provides tags to perform
all of the necessary functions. There are many good tutorials on
Something else to take into account... If you're working with the
OpenLaszlo server deployment via a servlet container or enterprise Java
server, you should be able to access CFC methods directly from a Java
class through the new CFCProxy doodad once Merrimack is out. I think.
- Jim
John
that calendar tool example simply rawks! I have heard several in the
Flex community wanting one of those :)
DK
On 8/11/05, John Olmstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laszlo also doesnt support the same type of customization especially
with components that flex does so if you need a completely
Hi,
What is the easiest way to take all the form variables (probably loop over)
and put it on the session.
or maybe put the whole form object into session something like that.
I appriciate if someone can provide some sample code
--
Regards,
cfset session.form = form
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Asim Manzur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: FORM scope into SESSION
Hi,
What is the easiest way to take all the form variables (probably loop
over) and put it on the session.
I know...another best practices thread ;-)
I'm wondering how others out there are handling argument types for web services?
Typically if an argument is meant to be numeric you would code it as such. Now
if someone calling the webservice were to pass in a string instead of a number
and error
easiest?
cfset session.myFormStuff = duplicate(form) /
On 8/11/05, Asim Manzur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What is the easiest way to take all the form variables (probably loop over)
and put it on the session.
or maybe put the whole form object into session something like that.
I
CFLOCK SCOPE=session TYPE=exclusive TIMEOUT=10
CFSET session.formvars = Duplicate(form)
/CFLOCK
That should work.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Asim Manzur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: FORM scope into SESSION
Hi,
What
Asim Manzur wrote:
Hi,
What is the easiest way to take all the form variables (probably loop over)
and put it on the session.
or maybe put the whole form object into session something like that.
I appriciate if someone can provide some sample code
doesn't this work?
cfset session.form =
or cfset structAppend(session, form, true) /, for the former.
On 8/11/05, Dawson, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cfset session.form = form
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Asim Manzur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: FORM
Let them deal with it. I suspect that CF will automatically convert
string arguments to numeric, just like it does internally, but I don't
know for sure. Either way, it's up to the WS client to make sure
they're calling the service in the right way. The error message
should come from the
On 8/11/05, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asim Manzur wrote:
Hi,
What is the easiest way to take all the form variables (probably loop over)
and put it on the session.
or maybe put the whole form object into session something like that.
I appriciate if someone can provide some
IIRC I ran into that vary problem. Session.form = form does indeed just create
a reference and I believe it caused me problems. Session.form =
duplicate(form) does create a deep copy and is the solution I came to use, I
believe.
Sorry for the imprecise details. Hectic day, oracle database
Let them deal with it. I suspect that CF will automatically convert
string arguments to numeric, just like it does internally, but I don't
know for sure. Either way, it's up to the WS client to make sure
they're calling the service in the right way. The error message
should come from the
Jeff:
Barring a browser bug (which is certainly possible), the likely culprit is a
slight logic error with the JavaScript code. If you post the relevant code,
I'm sure the list can review it for you.
As to alternative ways of doing it, you might want to try change the cell's
Class instead of
Just ran a quick test to confirm and it does seem that cfset
session.myForm = form / creates a copy by reference...and it will not
persist beyond the form's action page.
Doing a cfdump var=#session# after the action page shows that the
structure key still exists...but it contains an empty
Doing a cfdump var=#session# after the action page shows that the structure
key still exists...but it contains an empty structure.
If you still want to play, you might want to see what happens if you create
another form and action. I think I remember the CF apparently uses the same
memory
Hi everyone,
I'm really wondering something.I found that Internet Explorer doesn't
support using the css border settings on a tr element.
Anyone know of a good reason why? It doesn't make any sense to me. Also, I'm
curious if other browsers support it. Doesn't seem to be a bug as The
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
