+1
-Original Message-
From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com]
Sent: 18 January 2013 12:41
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared
network' from Citrix.
+1 (binding)
-Original Message-
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 January 2013 12:15
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Documentation for various
features from Citrix
-Original Message-
From: Chip
+1
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:43 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public
IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from
+1
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:51 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of support security group enabled
network in advanced zone from Citrix
+1 (binding)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13556133#comment-13556133
]
Radhika Nair edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-602 at 1/18/13 8:04 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13556133#comment-13556133
]
Radhika Nair edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-602 at 1/18/13 8:04 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557037#comment-13557037
]
Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
Thanks. I can probably have
+1
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:43 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public
IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557039#comment-13557039
]
Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
Ok, on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557042#comment-13557042
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
Tnx Marcus. I will wait for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557037#comment-13557037
]
Marcus Sorensen edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-938 at 1/18/13 8:15 AM:
Bharat,
Can you update the FS with the relevant feedback provided by the
community and bring it to closure.
-abhi
On 17/01/13 4:31 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have reviews Multiple IP Ranges FS available @
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of support security group enabled
network in advanced zone from Citrix
+1
-Original
+1 (binding) to start implementation.
I see that all the changes have been incorporated in the FS
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/base-image-updation-facility.html.
-abhi
On 03/01/13 6:00 AM, Hari Kannan hari.kan...@citrix.com wrote:
I wish to restate this a bit differently -
The
Hi,
On 01/16/2013 02:35 AM, Edison Su wrote:
After a lengthy discussion(more than two hours) with John on Skype, I think we
figured out the difference between us. The API proposed by John is more at the
execution level, that's where input/output stream coming from, which assumes
that both
Hari P/Mannan,
I think there is a need to make several global parameters to be more
granular. Can we come up with a list of these params that we think require
immediate consideration.
-abhi
On 05/01/13 3:31 AM, Prasanna Santhanam prasanna.santha...@citrix.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at
Hi Edison,
Yes wasted space is an issue. But base disk cleanup isn't an issue. The base
disks are not exposed as VDIs. They are read only base copy and the VM1/VM2
Root disk parent to them. Deleting the VM root disk also removed the base disk.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Animesh,
So now I am confused with all those [VOTE] threads…
Are we voting on each proposed donation separately from the docs or is the
Hi everyone,
With tons of new features being worked on, it would be nice if the developers
of a particular feature could record a screencast to demo what they have done.
I understand that there is the wiki but more often than not the documentation
is lagging.
Screencasts would help with
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:57:46PM +0530, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Hi everyone,
With tons of new features being worked on, it would be nice if the developers
of a particular feature could record a screencast to demo what they have done.
I understand that there is the wiki but more often
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557089#comment-13557089
]
Pradeep Soundararajan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1003:
---
This is a run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557093#comment-13557093
]
Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-1003:
a) What is the
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-nonoss-rhel63/
Yes, it is started breaking from build # 34.
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-nonoss-rhel63/34/console
Till 33, it went fine...
Thanks,
Pradeep S
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557098#comment-13557098
]
Pradeep Soundararajan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1003:
---
We are using
On Jan 18, 2013, at 10:38 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:57:46PM +0530, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Hi everyone,
With tons of new features being worked on, it would be nice if the
developers of a particular feature could record a screencast to demo
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 03:49:39AM +0530, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Folks
There are many patch review request in review board that have not
been attended to. Many of them have been pending for more than a
month. Please attend to them. Also when submitting a patch remember
to provide unit
Bharat,
I guess you can start work on this.
FS is here
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cpu-and-ram-overcommit.html
-abhi
On 18/01/13 3:23 PM, Bharat Kumar bharat.ku...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have included the information form the discussions in the functional
spec and I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557116#comment-13557116
]
Kishan Kavala commented on CLOUDSTACK-1010:
---
commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-810.
Resolution: Fixed
Added to master with following commit
commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kishan Kavala resolved CLOUDSTACK-1010.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Host count and Secondary storage count always shows 1 in
Update the FS with the below discussions.
Please find updated FS below.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Multiple+IP+address+per+NIC
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013
Tips?
I use Camtasia to record. I suggest flipping back and fore between a
powerpoint that sets the context for what you're doing, and the CloudStack GUI
/ shell / tool that you are demonstrating.
-Original Message-
From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/#review15484
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Jan. 17, 2013, 12:46
You might want to check the XenServer support.
I had problems with detaching VDIs on Wheezy on XenServer March/April 2012.
There was no reason to report the problem at the time, because XenServer didn't
cite Wheezy as a supported guest OS. Also, I expect I was using an older build.
DL
HI All,
Is there any Functional spec available for Backup DR/VM DR, Volume feature.
Apache CS ID #671
Regards
Sadhu
Jayapal,
The FS seems to be updated with the feedback received on the forum, I
guess you can start implementation.
-abhi
On 18/01/13 4:33 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
Update the FS with the below discussions.
Please find updated FS below.
In CloudStack we can already reserve the public IP range to an account but not
release it back to the free pool, so how about we divide this requirement into
2 parts - 1) Dedicate Public IP range 2) Dedicate Guest VLAN's per tenant.
Since Part 1 has already implemented, we need to only add the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8853/#review15486
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On Jan. 7, 2013, 8:26
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-988.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
committed to master
commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das reopened CLOUDSTACK-988:
resolution reason was incorrect
HV version must be updated in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donal Lafferty updated CLOUDSTACK-999:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
Plugin to provide Hyper-V 2012 support
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/#review15487
---
Is this just for the sake of consistency ? Was something affected
I need to read HV version as part of CLOUDSTACK-672. It not just for
consistency, the HV version was not getting updated in the correct place.
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Mehta
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:21 PM
To: Alex Huang; Nitin Mehta
Cc:
Hi Murali,
I am planning to take the QA job for this feature. Have reviewed the functional
spec and have the following questions
1. As per the FS, we are going to have a region and zone level flag for GSLB
capability. Why do we need a flag to be set at zone level ?
As the cloud admin is going
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:17:13AM +0530, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
+1. Sounds more like a new feature than a 'refactor'.
What I'd like is a DSL-kind of experience (which is what cloudmonkey is
tending to)
Then we could use Lettuce or Cucumber to write some tests.
Thanks Chiradeep, the marvin
Isaac,
I really appreciate for all your efforts . Your patch looks good just that the
refactoring of the code seemed to be a point of concern . I tested your patch
and it seemed to be working fine . Perhaps you could send an updated patch by
removing the whitespace errors and I can push it to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koushik Das resolved CLOUDSTACK-803.
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in master with commit
commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557188#comment-13557188
]
Murali Reddy commented on CLOUDSTACK-820:
-
Quick update:
I have basic
Hi Hari,
am the QA resource for this feature. I have reviewed the Functional spec and
please find the review comments below:
1.Are we going to implement Cloudstack HA support for VMware or still will
depend on Native HA.
2.Is the Cloudstack HA support for VMware is only for DRS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-891:
Assignee: venkata swamybabu budumuru (was: Sangeetha Hariharan)
QA High
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557301#comment-13557301
]
Rayees Namathponnan commented on CLOUDSTACK-1011:
-
Hosts are up after
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
On 04/01/13 8:19 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
Splitting this out of the SNMP thread, as I think it needs it's own
discussion.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
Hi Vijay,
Any update on this? If we want to switch the netscaler plugins over
to the OSS build for 4.1.0, we'd need this to be in place pretty soon
(like next week).
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam
vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote:
Thanks Prasanna for the link.
Yes to
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
This came in as I was following up on action item from IRC today. This
feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 and
processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in
Donal,
Did you have Xen guest tool installed on system VM?
Thanks
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 6:15 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build SystemVM template
You might want to
+1
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:09 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public
IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from Citrix.
+1
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 3:05 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of support security group enabled
network in advanced zone from Citrix
+1
-Original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557368#comment-13557368
]
Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-602:
-
After I installed Cloudstack, there
I was using Xen guest tools, but not for a System VM. Instead, I was using the
VM to write disk images to volumes from within my CloudStack account.
Details of the bug are below.
Changing from Debian 7.0 to Debian6.0.5 appears to have solved problem.
...
Donal Lafferty - 6/18/12
Thanks for comments,
It is nice to have security group in NIC level
checked AWS, which is implemented with Elastic Network Interfaces (ENI), but
when deploy VM , all NICs of the VM are associated with same security groups,
which is the same as what we did in the FS.
Maybe we can implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangeetha Hariharan updated CLOUDSTACK-1007:
Summary: Not able to delete Shared network because of not being able
So if I understand this correctly, the message bus is only used by the
management server as a queue for events to forward to some other
endpoint?
Chip,
Message bus is just abstraction (with publish, subscribe, unsubscribe
semantics), used to push action events, alerts, usage events and
It may help to remove the UI from the model -- the UI does not guarantee a
stateful session.
The UI interacts with the management server using end-user API calls.
Mutating API calls generally have 2 steps:
1. Create / modify the entity in the db
2. Call the backend provisioning steps. This is the
+1.
On 1/18/13 12:00 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 January 2013 12:15
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of
Fixed
On 1/18/13 1:54 AM, Pradeep Soundararajan
pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com wrote:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-nonoss-rhel63/
Yes, it is started breaking from build # 34.
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-nonoss-rhel63/3
4/console
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557432#comment-13557432
]
Sudha Ponnaganti commented on CLOUDSTACK-1007:
--
Marcus, does this have
Marcus/Edison,
Wanted to check if defect [1] has anything to do with the fix done for
Cloudstack - 1011
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1007
Thanks
/sudha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti resolved CLOUDSTACK-1011.
--
Resolution: Fixed
KVM host getting disconnected in cluster
Hi Kishan,
First of all thanks for responding to my questions. I have some additional
questions / comments below:
Comments:
1. I am assuming you will update FS based on all these answers
2. I am assuming that you will document all the workflows, manual
processes and other items you mentioned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557442#comment-13557442
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-1003:
-
Pradeep, the changes are fine,
Kind Regards,
Marlon Davids
..
P: +44 (0)845 619 7444 ext. 200 | M: +44 (0)7956 920 496 E:
mdav...@umbee.co.ukmailto:mdav...@umbee.co.uk
Thanks Sangeetha for confirmation
-Original Message-
From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 10:55 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ASF41][QA]CLOUDSTACK - 1007
Tested with latest build from
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:51 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: new storage framework update
Hi,
On 01/16/2013 02:35 AM, Edison Su wrote:
After a lengthy discussion(more than two
Marlon
You can unsubscribe by sending an email to
cloudstack-dev-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org from the email you used to
register.
Animesh
From: Marlon Davids [mailto:mdav...@umbee.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 10:36 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: How
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
The spec calls for dualstack, so ipv4 would still work?
I think it would be stage 2 of phase 1, after ipv6 stack only.
--Sheng
On 1/17/13 3:49 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at
Merged to master.
Thanks
-min
On 1/17/13 9:28 PM, prasanna t...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 January 2013 10:50, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
This integration test just runs API server responding concurrent api
calls, but it assumes that there is a demo account (not root admin) in
the
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-1014:
---
Summary: Merge ManagementServer and ManagementServerExt
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1014
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1014
Project: CloudStack
+1 (binding)
On Jan 15, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a
donation from Citrix for Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning
The initial discussion is at [1].
The content has been
+1 (binding)
On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
Reposting with subject line VOTE
Committers have binding votes for this decision.
Please respond with your vote:
+1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this enhancement
+1 (binding)
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:47 AM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a
donation from Citrix to provide Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with
Basic Zone.
The functional specification is
+1 (binding)
On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Reposting with subject line VOTE
Committers have binding votes for this decision.
Please respond with your vote:
+1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this
+1 (binding)
On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Reposting with subject line VOTE.
Committers have binding votes for this decision.
Please respond with your vote:
+1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557514#comment-13557514
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-602:
mkisofs and genisoimage are
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:02 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of support security group enabled
network in advanced zone from Citrix
On Thu, Jan 17,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557526#comment-13557526
]
Richard Shevel commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
i updated both .jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557531#comment-13557531
]
Min Chen commented on CLOUDSTACK-355:
-
Have fixed the following apis:
listHosts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557531#comment-13557531
]
Min Chen edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-355 at 1/18/13 7:41 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557537#comment-13557537
]
Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
---
The missing checkbatchs2svpn.sh won't
Dual stack in user VM or router VM?
router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:13 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557531#comment-13557531
]
Min Chen edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-355 at 1/18/13 7:48 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557531#comment-13557531
]
Min Chen edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-355 at 1/18/13 7:49 PM:
Take a look here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cisco+VNMC+integrati
on
This is something I had been prototyping without any real enthusiasm.
There's 3 ways to control the ASA1000v:
1. By logging in via the CLI. Strongly against this.
2. By using VNMC
3. Via Cisco's
David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-1015:
Summary: [UNIT TEST] failure
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1015
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1015
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557531#comment-13557531
]
Min Chen edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-355 at 1/18/13 8:01 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sangeetha Hariharan reopened CLOUDSTACK-995:
Edison,
With your fixes , I assume we should be able to add the host with
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Anthony Xu xuefei...@citrix.com wrote:
Dual stack in user VM or router VM?
router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?
Dual-stack is one interface has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
If there is dual-stack, it must be at both user VM
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Mark Hinkle mark.hin...@citrix.com wrote:
I secured the Lanyard sponsorship for DevOps Days
Austinhttp://devopsdays.org/events/2013-austin/ for Citrix but would much
rather donate the sponsorship to the Apache CloudStack community and give the
project the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-976:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1)
4.0.2
unable to start
I see
-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:17 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Anthony Xu xuefei...@citrix.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557593#comment-13557593
]
Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938:
Thanks for testing this
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
