On Monday 10 Apr 2017 11:08:05 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> > Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed
> >
> > on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an
>
Hi all,
Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed on my
machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an
executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so its
up and running. I've now just updated clang, from a working
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed
> on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an
> executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so
&g
On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed
on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an
executable. I can even nearly build my whol
On April 10, 2017 12:41:54 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>>
>>> Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed
>>> on my machine for
(paging Michał Górny..)
I've noticed that clang has gotten really slow, and while it does
great analysis during the various compilation stages (which is fine),
the startup itself is a major contributor to perceived slowness.
Nothing demonstrates this better than running ./configure in a r
On 04/10/2017 12:13 PM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed on my
machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an
executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so its
up and running
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:45:02PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote
> >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/compiler-rt-18.1.0
> * Building using a compiler other than clang may result in broken atomics
> * library. Enable USE=clang unless you have a very good reason not t
Il 10/03/24 15:08, Peter Humphrey ha scritto:
On Sunday, 10 March 2024 07:17:27 GMT Walter Dnes wrote:
So there are at least 2 people who've found out that Firefox can and
*MUST* be built with USE="-clang".
Ah. I'll change my USE flag straight away.
Thanks Walter.
T
On 10/04/17 18:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On April 10, 2017 12:41:54 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Do we have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed
on my machine for age
On 17-04-10 at 20:48, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> On 10/04/17 18:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On April 10, 2017 12:41:54 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Lowe
> > wrote:
> >> On 10/04/17 18:08, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:13:28 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
>
have any clang users out there? I've had clang installed
on my machine for ages and a simple "clang test.c" will result in an
executable. I can even nearly build my whole machine using clang, so
its up and running. I've now just updated clang, from a working
3.9.1
to a 4.0.0-
thing not understand, i make emerge -av clang and become
gentoomobile siefke # emerge -av clang
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N~] sys-devel/llvm-3.4:0/3.4 USE="clang libffi ncurses python
static-analyzer xml -debug -doc
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:46 PM Daniel Frey wrote:
>
> On 1/16/20 10:40 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > I have been trying for a while getting firefox emerged; no luck.
> > Inputs appreciated.
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Valmor
> >
>
Before this gets out of hand..
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100, Silvio Siefke wrote:
>> llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
>> different.
>
> Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang
> alone llvm i not n
.
Chromium switched to 'clang++ v5.x' as its primary compiler.
Why?
The Chromium devs are using 'c++' features supported in gcc v8+.
.
So ... first compile run is with 'gcc' ... then Chromium is re-compiled
with 'clang++'.
That is what I am seeing ( console
How could I go beyond this point?
/var/tmp/portage/media-
libs/mesa-12.0.1/work/mesa-12.0.1/src/gallium/state_track
ers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for call to
‘
clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang
function for call
> to
> ‘
> clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang::LangOptions&,
> clang::InputKind
> , llvm::Triple, clang::LangStandard::Kind)’
> =
>
> Extract from compile log attached.
>
>
On Saturday, 9 March 2024 12:49:33 GMT Walter Dnes wrote:
> I have "-clang" in USE in make.conf and no problems resulting from it.
> clang seems to be another "solution in search of a problem" along the
> lines of rust and cups and systemd and hatbuzz, etc, which ke
Rasmus.thomsen schrieb am So., 30. Apr.
2017, 12:19:
> Hello,
>
> it's entirely possible to replace gcc for clang for *most* packages,
> however some will not build currently and will require you to set up a
> package.env file with entries for those packages (like describ
Hello everybody,
I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my "Linux" PC as
1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled by clang.
2. The binaries of 1. depend on libc++.so instead of libstdc++.so.
3. libc++.so was installed by portage.
4. The b
Other distros like Ubuntu support the installation of multiple versions of
LLVM/Clang side by side. One of the things Clang is really good at is
support for the most recently approved upcoming features of the C++17
standard. The best support for testing such features is with the latest
sys-devel
>
> > I would do something like 'emerge -1 xorg-server xorg-drivers
> > @x11-module-rebuild mesa llvm clang' then restart X and try again.
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Initially, I understood the above recomendation as the suggestion to
> rebuild the
Hello,
it's entirely possible to replace gcc for clang for *most* packages, however
some will not build currently and will require you to set up a package.env file
with entries for those packages (like described on clang's wiki entry). Clang
usually compiles faster than GCC does, bu
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 08:43:46PM +0100, ralfconn wrote
> Given the warning message reported by Peter ("Enable USE=clang unless
> you have a very good reason not to.")
That message comes from sys-libs/compiler-rt which is a dedicated
runtime lib for clang. It makes sense
Hi everyone,
I've been trying to update my clang but I keep getting linking errors.
I'm on the default/linux/amd64/23.0/split-usr/musl profile. My system
has been acting kind of weird ever since the profile updates 17 -> 23.
Can anyone point me in the right direction here?
ther programs pull in llvm:6 (via clang:6)
>
> Does anyone have an idea how to get a working kdevelop again?
I think you have to not have multiple LLVM/Clang installations,
unfortunately. That's what the bug indicates.
I am not having issues with KDevelop with Clang support and I
Sorry, I mistook the operation of Gmail.
I will send with full-written article again.
2013/12/26 やまぐちたかゆき :
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my "Linux" PC as
> 1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled
sys-devel/llvm:0
sys-devel/llvm-3.5.0:0/3.5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge
conflicts with
sys-devel/llvm-3.5.0[clang(-),-debug,python,static-
analyzer,abi_x86_32(-),abi_x86_64(-)]
required by (sys-devel/clang-3.5.0-r100:0/3.5::gentoo, installed)
I have both installed:: [I] sys-d
On Thursday, 3 May 2018 18:00:45 BST Corbin Bird wrote:
> .
> Chromium switched to 'clang++ v5.x' as its primary compiler.
> Why?
> The Chromium devs are using 'c++' features supported in gcc v8+.
> .
> So ... first compile run is with 'gcc'
allium/state_track
> > ers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for
> > call to ‘
> > clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang::LangOptions&,
> > clang::InputKind
> > , llvm::Triple, clang::LangStandard::Kind)’
> > ==
Sorry for earlier mis-send.
I send the article again.
I'm going to build and install llvm and clang packages in my "Linux" PC as
1. Binaries of llvm and claag installed finally were compiled by clang.
2. The binaries of 1. depend on libc++.so instead of libstdc++.so.
3
ong
-Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment -Werror=date-time
-std=c++11 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual
-fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -Itools/clang/lib/Sema
-I/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.7.1-r3/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/tools/clang/lib/Sema
-I/var/
nused-parameter -Wwrite-strings
> -Wcast-qual -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long
> -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment -Werror=date-time
> -std=c++11 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-common
> -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-strict-aliasi
2018-08-02 3:16 GMT+03:00 Adam Carter :
>> > I would do something like 'emerge -1 xorg-server xorg-drivers
>> > @x11-module-rebuild mesa llvm clang' then restart X and try again.
>>
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
>> Initially, I understood the
from
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/../../../include/clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h:22,
from
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-3.6.2/work/llvm-3.6.2.src/tools/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/../../../include/clang/Stat
ther programs pull in llvm:6 (via clang:6)
>
> Does anyone have an idea how to get a working kdevelop again?
I think you have to not have multiple LLVM/Clang installations,
unfortunately. That's what the bug indicates.
I am not having issues with KDevelop with Clang support and I
-client/thunderbird-102.6.0/work/thunderbird-102.6.0'
>
>> Can you post the outputs referenced above/the full build log and your
>> portage configuration?
>
> Files attached - not sure it's everything you want, but I'm sure you'll
> let me know if I've m
; ├── media-video
> │ └── vcdimager-0.7.24
> ├── sci-libs
> │ └── gdal-2.0.0
> └── sys-devel
> └── llvm-3.6.2
>
> 36 directories, 0 files
> tortoise portage #
>
> ###
>
> In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86
ot; 82,629 KiB
>
> Total: 3 packages (3 upgrades), Size of downloads: 292,827 KiB
>
> WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a
> dependency conflict:
>
> sys-devel/llvm:0
>
> sys-devel/llvm-3.5.0:0/3.5::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge
> conf
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Firefox-Clang-LTO-All-Platforms
"Firefox nightly builds are now built with the LLVM Clang compiler on all
major platforms and the Linux build in particular is also now utilizing PGO
optimizations too. Faster Firefox is coming thank
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:16:37PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote
> On Saturday, 9 March 2024 19:37:40 GMT Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:45:02PM +, Peter Humphr
> > The real question is what else, besides clang and its libraries,
> are you buildin
g how
fast this list changes, 6 months ago, this machine was at 107 and 6
months before that 87.
Andrew
Just in closing on this subject, thanks to those who responded, have a
quick look at this page from the llvm/clang project:
http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html
For my non FE
s the target but I don't quite understand
>>>> the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do
>>>> it?
>>>
>>> No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a cross-compiler.
>>
>> You can't use LLVM/Clang to compile for th
Il 10/03/24 23:44, Walter Dnes ha scritto:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 08:43:46PM +0100, ralfconn wrote
Given the warning message reported by Peter ("Enable USE=clang unless
you have a very good reason not to.")
That message comes from sys-libs/compiler-rt which is a dedicated
runti
On Sunday, 16 June 2024 12:39:40 BST efeizbu...@disroot.org wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been trying to update my clang but I keep getting linking errors.
> I'm on the default/linux/amd64/23.0/split-usr/musl profile. My system
> has been acting kind of weird ever sin
ia-
>>> libs/mesa-12.0.1/work/mesa-12.0.1/src/gallium/state_track
>>> ers/clover/llvm/invocation.cpp:212:75: error: no matching function for
>>> call to ‘
>>> clang::CompilerInvocation::setLangDefaults(clang:
midi-2.5-r2
> ├── media-video
> │ └── vcdimager-0.7.24
> ├── sci-libs
> │ └── gdal-2.0.0
> └── sys-devel
> └── llvm-3.6.2
>
> 36 directories, 0 files
> tortoise portage #
>
> ###
>
> In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-
t; ├── media-video
> │ └── vcdimager-0.7.24
> ├── sci-libs
> │ └── gdal-2.0.0
> └── sys-devel
> └── llvm-3.6.2
>
> 36 directories, 0 files
> tortoise portage #
>
> ###
>
> In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.
On 1/16/20 10:40 AM, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
Hello list,
I have been trying for a while getting firefox emerged; no luck.
Inputs appreciated.
Thanks,
--
Valmor
* sys-devel/clang:9 is missing! Cannot use LLVM slot 9 ...
Do you have this installed?
What's the output of `equery list
On 24/01/2014 20:44, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
>> different.
>
> Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I
On 12/03/2022 17:36, Dale wrote:
I've
sort of read about llvm and clang and I seem to recall things like
Firefox needing them or something.
I've just watched firefox emerging (yes I know, paint drying and all
that :-), and there's loads of Rust code in there.
To the best
Cal,
On Sunday, 2023-01-01 13:21:34 -0800, you wrote:
> ...
> You're right, it looks like the Thunderbird ebuild has a clang USE
> turned on by default;
On my rig "clang" and "llvm" used about 90 minutes each to build and af-
terwards often caused rebuilds f
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:44:38 +0100
Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something
> > very
different.
>
> Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 08:04:06AM +, Wols Lists wrote
> For anyone else who hits this sort of problem, I did an
>
> USE=-clang emerge --update @world
>
> (firefox and thunderbird were the only programs I thought this would
> touch), and it worked.
I have "-cla
either. o_O Before trying new settings for that,
I tried newer versions of clang, llvm and their friends to see if there
was a fix that wasn't applied to older versions. When you unmask one
thing, it snowballs a bit. Anyway, after getting a more recent version
of clang and llvm, it still fai
Here's a partial list at least.
net-libs/webkit-gtk
kde-plasma/kpipewire
sys-devel/clang
sys-devel/llvm
When I couldn't get a couple to complete. I just went to my chroot and
started a emerge -e world. Then the packages above started failing as
well in the chroot. This all starte
0n multilib
DESCRIPTION="Search and query ebuilds, portage incl. local settings,
ext. overlays, version changes, and more"
HOMEPAGE="http://eix.berlios.de";
SRC_URI=""
PROPERTIES="live"
LICENSE="GPL-2"
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS=""
IUSE=
Hello,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:00:26 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> llvm-3.4 is not hardmasked. It is marked ~x86 which is something very
> different.
Correct, i mean Clang in version 3.4 is hardmasked. I want install clang
alone llvm i not need. I think mesa use llvm too but i has not s
ec-2.4.8::gentoo (Missing IUSE: python_targets_python3_6)
> (dependency required by "sys-devel/clang-9.0.1::gentoo" [installed])
> (dependency required by "@selected" [set])
> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
Why do you have clang 9 installed? It
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 March 2022 08:03:04 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
>
>> To the best of my knowledge, gcc can't currently handle Rust, so yes
>> LLVM is needed. (Not Clang, because it isn't C :-) (Although Firefox
>> probably also uses loads of C,
::
" Alex Xu (Hello71) 2016-08-17 15:26:17 UTC
please attach example build.log"
If you work with the requests on BGO, then they are much more likely
to work on your bug, or at least process. If there are other similar
bugs in BGO, then stay on top of them too.
I've only mildly used
't believe I possess the abilities to be developer. :-)
> GCC 7.3 and Clang 6.0 do support these options, but if you're using a
> version that doesn't, it's of no consequence. Warning options do not
> affect code generation.
OK, I think it's clang what done
Hello list,
Bug 596022 reports failure to build dev-libs/libclc with the latest version
of sys-dev/clang. I've been trying to trace a problem running MilkyWay@home,
specifically with its use of the GPU, so I'm keen to make sure that I have a
properly working OpenCL system.
Is m
On Saturday, 9 March 2024 19:37:40 GMT Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:45:02PM +, Peter Humphr
> The real question is what else, besides clang and its libraries, are you
> building that requires clang?
Firefox.
--
Regards,
Peter.
On 1/1/23 13:05, Wol wrote:
> On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote:
>> FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of
>> your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang, but you may
>> wish to use a package.env override to build Thunderbird w
Hi,
before I do a lot of reconfiguring, recompiling and finally
do the same thing again in the opposite direction:
What are the experiences to replace gcc with clang for either
only userland tools or the whole system (with haveing gcc as
fallback)?
Is it worth the effort?
What are the benefits
Hello mates,
I am facing the following issue, not sure why I have been trying to fix it
for 3 days now.
I've also installed Clang, but the same results.
Additional information:
~AMD64
emerge --info
here: http://tny.cz/c2210f24
Build log:
^[[32;01m * ^[[39;49;00mPackage:net-libs/w
Nevermind mates,
I've just upgraded the GCC to latest and it worked out.
Thanks!
On 27 July 2013 20:55, Carlos Sura wrote:
> Hello mates,
>
> I am facing the following issue, not sure why I have been trying to fix it
> for 3 days now.
>
> I've also installed
t other packages are failing, but some are compiling just
> fine. Here's a partial list at least.
>
> net-libs/webkit-gtk
> kde-plasma/kpipewire
> sys-devel/clang
> sys-devel/llvm
> /var/tmp/portage/net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.44.2/work/webkitgtk-2.44.2/Source/WebCore/platf
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:58:03PM -0400, P Levine wrote:
> Other distros like Ubuntu support the installation of multiple versions of
> LLVM/Clang side by side. One of the things Clang is really good at is
> support for the most recently approved upcoming features of the C++17
> st
On Sunday, 13 March 2022 08:03:04 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge, gcc can't currently handle Rust, so yes
> LLVM is needed. (Not Clang, because it isn't C :-) (Although Firefox
> probably also uses loads of C, so Clang would be needed for that.)
And tha
Thanks bud
Dave
On Sun, Jan 1, 2023, 4:22 PM cal wrote:
> On 1/1/23 13:05, Wol wrote:
> > On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote:
> >> FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of
> >> your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang
On 10/03/24 at 01:50, mp666 wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 08:04:06 +, Wols Lists wrote:
For anyone else who hits this sort of problem, I did an
USE=-clang emerge --update @world
(firefox and thunderbird were the only programs I thought this would
touch), and it worked.
There were a couple
intel -nouveau -r100 -r200 -r300 -r600 -vmware" 7,103 KiB
[nomerge ] sys-devel/llvm-3.7.1-r3:0/3.7.1::gentoo
[3.5.0:0/3.5::gentoo] USE="clang libffi ncurses python static-analyzer
-debug -doc -gold -libedit -lldb% -multitarget -ocaml {-test} -xml"
ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32
d and not being
pulled
by the second command. What happends if you add --with-bdeps=y --backtrack=30?
Also
try without the -p (I think it runs more code like autounmask etc so it may
cause
the extra output).
Is clang/llvm stuff still popping up on the list of skipped packages? I
remember a
sim
On 2022-03-12, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700
>>
>> Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand
>> the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do
>&
On Monday, 1 May 2023 00:34:11 BST Alan Grimes wrote:
> There does not seem to be a gcc-config or eselect for LLVM / clang
>
> The ebuild for today's chromium requires LLVM 16 -> LLVM 16 is
> installed. Fine so far...
>
> So therefore somethin
ut the -p (I think it runs more code like autounmask etc so it may
cause
the extra output).
Is clang/llvm stuff still popping up on the list of skipped packages? I
remember a
similar conflict around the time of your first post and it turned out that the
latest
stable clang blocks the latest stable
Am Sonntag, 19. August 2018, 17:57:55 CEST schrieb Andrew Udvare:
>
> I am not having issues with KDevelop with Clang support and I have
> everything on the latest version:
>
> LLVM 6.0.1-r1 libffi ncurses
> Clang 6.0.1 +static-analyzer LLVM_TARGETS="AMDGPU BPF NVPTX X86&
do
it?
No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a cross-compiler.
You can't use LLVM/Clang to compile for the host on which it's
running?
Why not?
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you
> might want is 32 bits
> 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something
> else and move on.
> You must pick one of those two. There is no mag
e new version!"
&& echo
echo "Mounting /boot for intel-microcode to install." && echo
mount /boot
emerge $@ -1 --jobs libtool && emerge $@ -1 --jobs llvm clang wxGTK &&\
emerge $@ --jobs --keep-going --nospinner @system linux-firmware intel-
microco
Hi there,
After recent upgrades of mesa, llvm, clang etc kdevelop does not work anymore.
It crashes immediately after start with errors
: CommandLine Error: Option 'help-list' registered more than once!
LLVM ERROR: inconsistency in registered CommandLine options
This issue is cove
On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote:
FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of
your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang, but you may
wish to use a package.env override to build Thunderbird with GCC as a
workaround until the problem can be fixed upstream
James tampabay.rr.com> writes:
> > 1. Relax your stance and accept that some software out there that you
> > might want is 32 bits
> > 2. Refuse to have 32 bits, so give up on llvm and clang. Find something
> > else and move on.
> > You must pick one of th
There does not seem to be a gcc-config or eselect for LLVM / clang
The ebuild for today's chromium requires LLVM 16 -> LLVM 16 is
installed. Fine so far...
So therefore something selects llvm 15 to build =(
#
* sys-devel/clang
Latest version a
Try enabling clang and see what happens. llvm is a really good piece of
software.
I generally also have pulseaudio and hwaccel enabled but thats up to
you.
---
Aisha
blog.aisha.cc
On 2020-01-25 04:39, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I'm checking that as I type. It may not solve all my problems b
-i965 -ilo -intel -nouveau -r100 -r200 -r300 -r600 -vmware" 7,103 KiB
[nomerge ] sys-devel/llvm-3.7.1-r3:0/3.7.1::gentoo
[3.5.0:0/3.5::gentoo] USE="clang libffi ncurses python static-analyzer
-debug -doc -gold -libedit -lldb% -multitarget -ocaml {-test} -xml"
ABI_X86="32 (64
On 18/07/16 20:03, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/18/2016 07:19 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
I'm attempting to update llvm & clang and am getting a failure. Portage is
reporting:
* ERROR: sys-devel/llvm-3.8.1::gentoo failed
On 19/08/18 18:21, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
After recent upgrades of mesa, llvm, clang etc kdevelop does not work anymore.
It crashes immediately after start with errors
[...]
It seems as if multiple slots of llvm cause the problems. mesa pulls in llvm:
5, while other programs pull in llvm:6
ices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750 / R7 250E]
I did notice in a gentoo blog that openmp is a testing option for Clang-3.7
now? [1]
Try not to loose faith, we all have had bad experiences, but clustering,
distributed and systems aggregation codes are rapidly coalescing into
On 18/07/16 21:18, Andrew Lowe wrote:
On 18/07/16 20:03, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/18/2016 07:19 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
I'm attempting to update llvm & clang and am getting a failure.
Portage is reporting:
* ERROR:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 08:04:06 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> For anyone else who hits this sort of problem, I did an
>
> USE=-clang emerge --update @world
>
> (firefox and thunderbird were the only programs I thought this would
> touch), and it worked.
>
> There were a coupl
On 09/05/18 19:18, Martin Vaeth wrote:
> As mentioned, I wonder why gcc/clang do not yet support this
> horribly slow but spectre-safe option. It can't be that hard to
> implement in the actual code-producing back-end.
Given the response by the gcc team to security people compla
build time (gcc, bin-utils, llvm, clang ... etc.) and
now rust.
Tongue in cheek, but have you tried doing away with gcc, clang etc?
If you're going to use a source-based system, a bunch of compilers
"comes with the territory".
Many people see Rust as a "better C than C&
On 01/01/2023 21:05, Wol wrote:
On 01/01/2023 20:08, cal wrote:
FWIW, Thunderbird builds fine with GCC on my machine -- I'm unsure of
your reasons for setting your Portage compiler to clang, but you may
wish to use a package.env override to build Thunderbird with GCC as a
workaround unti
systemd/selinux
exp
amd64default/linux/amd64/17.1/systemd/selinux/merged-usr
exp
amd64default/linux/amd64/17.1/clang
exp
amd64default/linux/amd64/17.1/systemd/clang
el
selected: 2.99.917_p20190301
protected: none
omitted: none
dev-python/pyxattr
selected: 0.6.0-r1
protected: none
omitted: none
sys-devel/clang-runtime
selected: 10.0.0
protected: none
omitted: 10.0.1
app-admin/metalog
selected: 20181125
protec
On 2018-05-09 20:04, Wols Lists wrote:
> > As mentioned, I wonder why gcc/clang do not yet support this
> > horribly slow but spectre-safe option. It can't be that hard to
> > implement in the actual code-producing back-end.
>
> Given the response by the gcc team t
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
