On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:41:15 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 161221 Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 05:25:20AM +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote
> >> sys-apps/systemd:0= required by (sys-apps/dbus-1.10.12:0/0::gentoo,
> >> ebuild scheduled for merge) I hav
> On 2018-11-16, at 08:16, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:11 AM Andrew Udvare wrote:
>>
>> - use key to decrypt root partition (systemd job in the first systemd
>> launched within initramfs)
>> ...
>> Nov 16 00:01:52 limelight syste
Hello list,
Is anyone else having trouble emerging systemd-boot-241? This machine has a
small rescue system as an alternative boot, and I get a mysterious error when
I emerge the package. The end of the log shows this:
[248/248] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -o bootctl 'bootctl@exe
2012/10/29 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:42 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the solution a few hours ago here
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#PAM_support:_su.2C_sudo.2C_screen.
..
. Now everything is fine :)
About the packages
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:45 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/10/29 Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:42 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the solution a few hours ago here
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#PAM_support:_su
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:00 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
On 02/04/14 18:38, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/04/14 18:03, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to go from systemd to udev?
I don't like the way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/19/2014 04:50 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:34:35 -0600, Daniel Campbell wrote:
How is putting systemd setting in a profile that a user has to
consciously choose to use forcing anything on anyone? Profiles
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
mean this i must install now systemd? What can do when i not want systemd.
The system what i have is good, i want not change to systemd.
[ebuild U ~] sys-devel/gettext-0.19 [0.18.3.2] USE=acl cxx ncurses nls
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 01:06:52 +0300
Alon Bar-Lev alo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Once again, you do not understand the claim.
If a user of Gentoo chooses to use non systemd profile, it means that
we need to make sure systemd will not be a valid option, ever.
There is no such thing as a non systemd
On 12/12/17 18:55, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> You seem to know systemd reasonably well - maybe you've got it
> installed and you're using it. Please tell me whether my suspicion
> above (that systemd builds stuff into the system that is likely to be
> superfluous to a user, and possibl
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:45 PM, David Haller <gen...@dhaller.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>>Strangely enough, dmesg shows
>>
>>systemd-coredump[25375]: Failed to connect to coredump service: No such file
> ^^
:
[ humongous snip ]
4. Using systemd is more than just emerging it; you need to change
your init= line in grub-legacy or GRUB2 and reboot. The contents of
/proc/1/comm is systemd?
I only have this:
cat /proc/1/comm
init
[ snip ]
systemctl --all --full
Failed to get D-Bus
I will put the related output below
> > with inserted comments. I am using "unstable" gentooand I have masked
> > ncurses-6 for the time being. Portage also wants to downgrade my
> > systemd from 221(0/2) to 219_p112(0/2).
> >
> > [blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd[gu
stabilized yet. as in, there
are no plans in keeping gnome 2.x available after gnome 3.8
stabilization.
Am I correct in believing that gnome-3.8 (whether in testing as now, or
stable later) requires init=systemd? I am converting an old ~amd64
machine to systemd for practice so that I can convert my
On 02/05/14 14:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/14 13:06, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
[ humongous snip ]
4. Using systemd is more than just emerging
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:07:12 +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
Then write. Just be aware that to write a systemd profile, you need to
use systemd.
Or to create a non-systemd profile :)
We already have many of those
as conspiracy theorists or FUDders. Time will reveal all.
Indeed time reveals everything and part of this foiled plot
revealed itself two days ago. It was said earlier in the list by
systemd supporters, that this project is modular, fine split to
binaries and thus critical issues in the pid 1
J. Roeleveld antarean.org> writes:
>
> On Monday, June 13, 2016 02:10:27 PM James wrote:
> > wabe gmail.com> writes:
> > Still, if you manage 1000 linux workstations, then systemd does have
> > it's merits.
> Serious question: What makes systemd m
-connections.mount
sys-kernel-config.mount
sys-kernel-debug.mount
tmp.mount
var-lock.mount
var-run.mount
var-tmp-portage.mount
var.mount
cups.path
systemd-ask-password-console.path
systemd-ask-password-wall.path
session-1.scope
accounts-daemon.service
acpid.service
alsa-restore.service
ooand I have masked
> ncurses-6 for the time being. Portage also wants to downgrade my
> systemd from 221(0/2) to 219_p112(0/2).
>
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd[gudev(-)] ("sys-apps/systemd[gudev(-)]" is
> blocking dev-libs/libgudev-230)
> [blocks B ] sys-apps/s
Am 22.08.2011 20:29, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
update: edited the example in the gentoo-wiki now.
replying to myself once more, which makes it feel more like a wiki or
blog than a mailing-list ;-)
additional thoughts:
* as there is readahead-support in systemd I assume I could get rid
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html
Well, we intent to continue to make it possible to run udevd outside of
systemd. But that's about it. We will not polish that, or add new
features
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:52:11 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html
So, what is it going to take to convince Lennart that, contrary to what
he thinks, he actually isn't the only human on the planet?
I'd like
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 25.09.2012 10:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
So if I don't use systemd right now, it would be better to keep
consolekit? I give it a try now ... compiling stuff without that flag
for a test.
Did not work
want pulseaudio or systemd. Now it is forced
on everybody.
When systemd devs took over udev, one was told that of course, one could
use udev without [systemd] in the future.
Now they are talking about making udev systemd only.
obsolutly nonsense. what they remove , is the ability
is a valid reaction.
A
lot of people don't need nor want pulseaudio or systemd. Now it is
forced
on everybody.
When systemd devs took over udev, one was told that of course, one could
use udev without [systemd] in the future.
Now they are talking about making udev
. If it is also based on lies, hate is a
valid reaction. A lot of people don't need nor want pulseaudio or
systemd. Now it is forced on everybody.
When systemd devs took over udev, one was told that of course,
one could use udev without [systemd] in the future.
Now they are talking about
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:42:37AM -0600, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote
No, because the problem has never been in udev (nor systemd, for that
matter). It fixes how *Gentoo* packages udev; probably the devs read
2013/1/28 Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at
Am 27.01.2013 22:08, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
udev-197 in the tree installs everything to /; systemd-197 installs to
/usr. I'm pretty sure that is not going to end well; I haven't
upgraded to 197 in neither package.
forking this thread
systemd race condition.
It's not that important to me right now ... I will check back with later
releases and google bug-reports now and then.
Another update:
posted to systemd-devel and got pointed to LVM/DM-people ... I don't know:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-March
Am 05.03.2013 07:36, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
I don't. AFAIK, systemd provides systemd-timedated(8) since systemd
30:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/timedated
Yes, found that as well yesterday.
In normal desktops/laptops/servers, it just works.
I *had
, logind since systemd = 205 requires systemd and won't
work on openrc, upstart, and such
as in, the idea of using logind outside of systemd is a dead end
so keeping ConsoleKit in portage for long as it works for long as we
need openrc for Linux based systems
and when it no longer works, the contingency
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does is letting their OCD show
in ways
On 19/08/13 at 09:36pm, William Kenworthy wrote:
So why not a profile so those guys who want to play can get a
configuration that better suits them? - and vice versa if the whole
systemd push dies and Redhat drops it as I doubt anyone else big enough
will pick it up (they have a foot in both
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at writes:
Just found this note from Pacho on planet.gentoo.org:
http://my.opera.com/pacho/blog/2013/08/27/how-to-write-proper-systemd-unit-files
I will have to review some of my
Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling with
understanding that strange escaping etc ... :-(
I have now:
# cat /etc/systemd/system/dev-disk-by\\x2did-dm\\x2dname\\x2dswap.swap
[Unit]
#After=systemd-cryptsetup.service
After
Hello all,
I am currently updating my system and Portage wants to replace udev
(204) with systemd (208). My question is (hopefully) simple:
Can I use systemd as drop-in replacement for udev? In other words, can
I pretend that systemd is udev and continue using OpenRC as with udev
itself? I
On 02/04/14 18:38, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
[snip]
I'm using XFCE It all started to happen after I switched to systemd. So
maybe on the weekend I'll try to switch one of the machine back to udev.
I think all I need is to unmerge systemd and emerge udev without
rebooting.
As others have
On 02/06/2014 01:49 PM, Joseph wrote:
I have in make.conf USE: ... -systemd
But gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon wants to pull in systemd-208
so I need to emerge sys-apps/systemd-208-r2 and I have installed udev
which conflicts with systemd.
How about using XFCE? I think the last time I
On 2014-02-15 10:16 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
Not to revive a flame-fest against systemd, but...
I'm sure some or most of you have already heard about this, but I found
a really decent thread discussing this whole systemd thing. It is only
really comparing systemd
On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options were[1]:
1. sysvinit (status quo)
2. systemd
3. upstart
4. openrc (experimental)
5. One system on Linux, something else on non-linux
6. multiple
It should also
] systemd
[3] runit
(whatever choices are supported).
+1 from here
Personally i'm most likely to stay with openRC, because the switch is
non-trivial and have no faith in the xinetd-style socket arbitrator.
but would eselect be able to script the following:
.. new kernel coptions
.. new grub2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/04/2014 12:11 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
while updateing I got this blocker:
In short, sys-power/upower has changed to no longer support the unmaintained
sys-power/pm-tools and instead depend on systemd.
To remain using upower with pm
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:21:51 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than
build it to work independently of the init system),
Reusing existing, proven code is not laziness, it is efficiency. Yes,
they could code their own version, but all the time
On 04/06/14 16:47, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:21:51 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than
build it to work independently of the init system),
Reusing existing, proven code is not laziness, it is efficiency. Yes
On 18/09/2014 10:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:19:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is systemd starting to encompass too much? I think so, but who cares?
If we want an init manager that reads systemd-like files but doesn't
do anything else (hostnamectl, logging, udev, etc.), I
to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that
SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and
that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers.
I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came to
gentoo-user
Hello
PyTimeChart is another wonderful tool that complements
Ftrace/trace-cmd/KernelShark. [1] The systemd supporters would be keenly
wise if they added pytimechart to Gentoo, so those (systemd) reticent to
change, can actually see just how wonderful systemd is Here in
slide (26) we see intel
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 09:34:18AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:04:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Since you have it, but don't run it, does USE=-systemd fix the issue?
Worth a try. If it does fix
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:03 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
I think the fundamental flaw with systemd is the fact that the duality
of support for systemd and other init solutions is so quickly abondoned.
If they were allowed (encouraged) to run side by side for a few years,
let
Am Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:20:45 -0400
schrieb Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/17/2015 06:56 AM, Bob Wya wrote:
I've not seen any that are OpenRC specific... But this one is pretty
decent for SysVInit vs. systemd
Trying to emerge systemd-cron results in the following error
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for sys-process/systemd-cron
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy systemd-cron has unmet requirements.
- sys-process/systemd-cron-1.5.3::gentoo USE=-cron-boot -etc-crontab-systemd
-minutely
On Sun, Aug 02 2015, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:03 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been running systemd for a long time without needing to enable
the dhcpcd service at boot time. Starting with systemd-224 that is no
longer true. Today I had to enable
Jc García jyo.garcia at gmail.com writes:
I'm not saying push one over the other, but explain and delineate
that choice
*early* in the handbook. WE owe the larger linux community that wisdom::
that gentoo has made peace with systemd and openrc:: imho.
OpenRC is there on the stage3
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:13:19 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Did you read this part?
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Full/Installation#Optional:_Using_systemd
Yes I did and had the systemd wiki page on a chromium tab while
installing.
It's been some months since I
On 06/05/2016 03:23 AM, J. García wrote:
> I run systemd , but I have not tested your script, as of now I'm not
> using spamassassin, but I will at some time in near future; but looking
> at the script, I see some problems, you run the OpenRC restart commands
> even if systemd
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:57:19AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Honestly, as somebody who monitors all the systemd bugs on Gentoo it
> isn't actually that much work, and I suspect that it wouldn't be that
> much work maintaining openrc scripts on Arch. I doubt they rename the
> apac
, not
to mention extra wear and tear on the drives. I had a workaround to this
but it stopped working so I went to systemd, which helped that problem,
but systemd gave me new problems... like the inability to wait for a
network to be up before mounting remote nfs drives. openrc handles this
just
..]
> > I don't know/understand why meson needs the above, but is there a reason
> > google DNS and NTP servers take precedence over my system settings?
>
> You are misinterpreting this output. Nothing is "taking precedence"
> over your local settings.
>
> systemd-u
ecompiling the kernel
(5.2.0),
systemd and all packages depending on systemd - using the new
gcc-9.2.0
Furthermore I had to add the use flags
cgroup-hybrid -sysv-utils
for systemd. This hasn't been necessary before - very strange.
For me, systemd is a monster which I haven't understood.
I try
On 8/16/19 12:44 PM, Jack wrote:
> ps auxf | grep systemd
This is new turf for me. Upon issuing this command string I get::
# ps auxf | grep systemd
root 24947 0.0 0.0 13964 996 pts/6S+ 15:43 0:00
| | | \_ grep --colour=auto systemd
I have no c
On Sun, 6 Dec 2020 at 13:37, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Despite the claims that systemd is
> monolithic, it is not. It is an ecosystem comprised of many parts, some
> of which can be used without any other systemd components, like
> systemd-tmpfiles and systemd-boot, not to mention ud
ou use opentmp):
>
> Which breaks a lot of STANDARDS-COMPLIANT software.
Actually, /var/tmp needs not be cleaned at boot to be on the safe side:
grep /var/tmp /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/*
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/portage-ccache.conf:x /var/tmp/ccache
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/systemd-tmp.conf:x /var/tmp/systemd-p
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 2:46 AM Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> After upgrading my gentoo box i see a new behavior, that my machine
> after boot doen't configure my network. My network is configured through
> systemd-network,
>
> Only if I manually after login execut
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 2:46 PM Tamer Higazi wrote:
[...]
> /etc/systemd/network/20-wirded.network:
[...]
That looks fine to me.
for enp7s0 there is no other network file.
>
That is as it should be.
I think with THIS systemd version, the whole problem is, that the
> conf
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 6:51 PM John Covici wrote:
> [...]
> Thanks. I am not usingsystemd-network or anything like that.I
> created a service called network and use the %i and links in
> /etc/systemd/system/multi-user-target.wants to start my two cards.
> Maybe this is
Am 22.08.2011 19:03, schrieb Joost Roeleveld:
I do hope you can figure this one out as I do like the idea of systemd. But I
need RAID and LVM to work correctly for my system to boot.
Got it.
Compared this one:
https://github.com/falconindy/initscripts-systemd/blob/master/lvm.service
w
the script /usr/local/sbin/cgroup_start which is started by
openrc, but not by systemd. In there the perms would be set up for my
user ...
So the solution will be to teach systemd to start that script as well.
Am 2012-07-20 14:43, schrieb Peter Alfredsen:
(I am assuming that you are using systemd-186 -- all earlier releases
I checked have bugs I ran into)
thanks for all the information ... added those pam.d-lines, no success
Unmasking systemd-186 brought up dependencies like udev .. I hesitate to
go
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Peter Alfredsen
peter.alfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Does anyone use systemd on gentoo, with gnome3?
Would
Am 25.09.2012 10:09, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
So if I don't use systemd right now, it would be better to keep
consolekit? I give it a try now ... compiling stuff without that flag
for a test.
Did not work. Rather easy to understand, if neither systemd or
consolekit is there, how should
of stuff that break if you mix up consolekit
and systemd (logind, actually). Maybe the situation has improved, but
in my case the simplest solution was to purge consolekit from my
systems (except in my media center, XBMC still uses its d-bus
interfaces). ConsoleKit is unmantained anyway.
I removed
Am 2013-02-10 20:32, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
systemd and acpid and Gnome all try to handle suspending my thinkpad to
RAM ... it seems.
So I get the behavior that it suspends fine when I close the lid but
when I open it again I get an immediate suspend *again* ... I then tried
Am 04.03.2013 20:42, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Next systemd-issue (yes, I know ... openrc is there as well ...):
I get warnings like superblock date is in the future --- REPAIRED for
filesystems at boot-time.
Canek, (how) do you handle time and hwclock with systemd?
I *had
On 22/07/13 10:03, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
How did you resolve this conflict?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
As a maintainer of sys-auth/consolekit, and xfce-base/xfce4-meta I can
assure you sys-auth/consolekit is not about to be removed and the
support for systemd-logind
130722 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.8.4 requires systemd
sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.6cannot coexist with systemd
but many packages depend on sys-auth/consolekit :
How did you resolve this conflict?
Don't use Gnome. I've been using Fluxbox for years
On 22/07/13 18:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
It's how you look at it. I call it mature
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
Thanks, just purged consolekit from my
On Monday 29 July 2013 14:04:38 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 28/07/13 11:22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Basically, systemd is now a first class citizen in Gentoo (on par with
OpenRC)
This is great. Thanks to everyone involved!
Does someone know whether a KDE system can work reliably
/etc/mtab and /proc/self/mounts
If you switch to systemd, you will need to make /etc/mtab a symlink to
/proc/self/mounts.
Done.
After that comes the big one
emerge systemd
USE=... systemd ...
emerge --newuse ... [ a change from previous msg ]
/etc/init.d/udev restart
Can the system
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com writes:
The wiki is wrong. The script /etc/init.d/udev is part of sys-fs/udev,
which you need to uninstall before installing systemd. Perhaps it's
CONFIG_PROTECT'd, but anyway sys-fs/udev and sys-apps/systemd install
the udev binary in different
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does is letting their OCD show
in ways they really should be keeping private.
Hmmmn, it's a bit freaking weird - if I'm
available after gnome 3.8
stabilization.
Am I correct in believing that gnome-3.8 (whether in testing as now, or
stable later) requires init=systemd? I am converting an old ~amd64
machine to systemd for practice so that I can convert my main laptop
(also ~amd64) to systemd. The purpose
.
It is solving the problem of *when* (not if - if the words I have read
from the systemd maintainers can be taken at face value) the systemd
maintainers decide to pull the plug on the ability to have a
systemd-less udev...
(on my specific server) ?
And rsyncd:
https://github.com/vonSchlotzkow/systemd-gentoo-units/blob/master/sys-apps/systemd-units/files/services-server/rsyncd.service
S
Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at writes:
Just found this note from Pacho on planet.gentoo.org:
http://my.opera.com/pacho/blog/2013/08/27/how-to-write-proper-systemd-unit-files
I will have to review some of my files then ;-)
What I did not understand from reading that is why he (or gentoo
On 2013-09-23 10:37 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd
like the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post
On 23/09/13 17:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd
like the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post.
Please disable
Am 08.10.2013 02:03, schrieb walt:
On 09/29/2013 04:58 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
As much as I hate systemd
My Alzheimer's prevents me from remembering your reasons for hating systemd.
Would you *very* briefly refresh my memory, please?
simple: one tool to do one job. text output
https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/733595-all-about-the-linux-kernel-cgroups-redesign
Not sure if I read that just right... but since nobody is doing cgroup
management besides systemd, in practice the cgroups implementation in
Linux wasn't very consistent. So since systemd
...
Is making the use of systemd or not based on a selected Profile, as
opposed to manually trying to do it via USE flags etc, a practical
request, or not?
How is this different from the status quo? There are several systemd
profiles available that make use of the files
in /usr/portage/profiles/targets
On 24/02/14 09:31, eroen wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:02:01 +0100, Fox halfsocial...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
after reading the thread about systemd somebody mentioned
sys-fs/eudev. I decided used because I had systemd only to used udev
and unmerge systemd.
Now I can't use Banshee which I
On Monday 24 Feb 2014 21:48:39 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
At least KDE has not hardcoded a requirement for systemd as Gnome now
has.
GNOME has no hardcoded requirement for systemd; do your homework.
I beg your pardon, I got this wrong - I extrapolated from the Gentoo state of
affairs (I
On 2014-02-24 4:48 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
In Gentoo you need systemd, but that's a decision from the Gentoo
maintainers. They do the job, they make the choices.
Interesting. Now I have to spin off a new thread as to why this decision
was made if it isn't forced
Am 21.02.2014 23:43, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
And now with 209 there is a new systemd-networkd deamon that is started
by default even if not configured or used.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTYxMTI
$ ./configure --help | grep networkd
--disable-networkd
Am 08.04.2014 07:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I just looked up what systemd-networkd and virt-manager do.
No tap-devices here when I run a local VM ... so I might review the
openrc-script for reference.
edited and tested the bridge.service:
http://www.oops.co.at/en/publications
happening, as more and more
infrastructure migrates towards systemd. Perhaps a news item everytime
it happens is unrealistic?
Weren't you the one saying that those of us who were voicing
concerns that
systemd proponents were ultimately wanting to FORCE systemd on
everyone were
just scare-mongering
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
First question: is there a decent guide to installing a gentoo system from
scratch using systemd as the init system?
I've done this a few times on VMs. Just follow the handbook, but skip
steps about configuring
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
I set my nameservers all manually in this file and they do
not every change. I do not run systemd. I'm not sure
of your issue(s) but, historically, resolv.conf should not
be displaying this behavior.
FWIW, systemd
401 - 500 of 6173 matches
Mail list logo
