Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-15 Thread steven mcphelan
the size of the total deployment, it was nothing. - Original Message - From: Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:20, Kevin

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Thies, Karl Mr LND
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Richardson Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 10:11 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == David; The failure of CHCS II was not just one failure but a series

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Chris Richardson
a failure? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Richardson Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 10:11 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == David; The failure of CHCS II

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Joseph . Gillon
to a vendor. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sommers Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 5:09 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == I think we agreed on most of it. It's hard

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
This is the second time this morning that I find myself profoundly not in agreement with what you are saying. There is an implication in your posting that freebies, as in open source free software, is unsupported. As the vendor of a product that is open source free software, but for which we

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Joseph . Gillon
] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == This is the second time this morning that I find myself profoundly not in agreement with what you are saying. There is an implication in your posting that freebies, as in open source free software, is unsupported. As the vendor of a product that is open source free

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
their money? - Original Message - From: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 7:30 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == I was initially surprised to learn that MUMPS was being used for financial

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Greg Woodhouse
I know that one reason I have tended to shy away from Linux is that I have been unable to find a vendor that sells and/or supports Linux on a notebook. It's not that I don't have the technical competence to install Linux, or even that I am averse to downloading and installing new drivers, etc.

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
It's always nice to have a member join the group with a sense of humor. Welcome! -- Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I've been wrong before, back in 1956 I think it was. Could even happen again. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:59, Greg Woodhouse wrote: I know that one reason I have tended to shy away from Linux is that I have been unable to find a vendor that sells and/or supports Linux on a notebook. You mean besides Emperor Linux, HP, IBM and Dell? For what it is worth, the correct term

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
13, 2005 10:37 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == This is the second time this morning that I find myself profoundly not in agreement with what you are saying. There is an implication in your posting that freebies

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Thies, Karl Mr LND
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Richardson Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:37 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Karl, haven't heard from you in a long time. This is news to me that CHCS II is still

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Greg Woodhouse
I've never heard of emperor Linux. I called Dell (and HP, and IBM). Dell, for example, told me that they support Linux, but not on a notebook. --- Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:59, Greg Woodhouse wrote: I know that one reason I have tended to shy away from

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
If you want certified and supported hardware with Linux, see http://h10018.www1.hp.com/wwsolutions/linux/products/clients/clientscert-suse.html for HP notebooks certified on Linux. If you want a laptop with Linux pre-loaded, you will probably need to order off the web or by phone. Walmart

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
I buy everything preinstalled, including recently from Dell and HPP, although my favorite laptop is the Sony Picture Book I brought from Emperor Linux. Those guys are miracle workers. Ruben On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:41, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: If you want certified and supported hardware with

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Greg Woodhouse
So, basically SUSE is it...but that's sure an improvement over what I found last time I looked -- which was nothing. I don't know a think about SUSE, the only distribution I've worked with is Red Hat. But I appreciate this link. I'll look into it. --- K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 11:16, Greg Woodhouse wrote: I've never heard of emperor Linux. I called Dell (and HP, and IBM). Dell, for example, told me that they support Linux, but not on a notebook. Talk to a different sales rep. It's not in their main line. Also, if you have a cooperate

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread A. Forrey
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Richard G. DAVIS wrote: I understand the dichotomy Gregory mentions, and I agree with the views he has expressed. I quite agree with the basic thread of what Richrd has said in this exchange. In fact we have put that exzct situation to both a website on the EHR here at

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
Why do you need support? I have Windows XP on my notebook. I never expect anything from Windows (except for the occasional updates that consistently remove functionality from my OS). Kevin --- Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've never heard of emperor Linux. I called Dell (and HP,

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
Yes, but if your or the the vendor are paying an M$tax for software that you don't use (which can happen if your vendor buys from another vendor with XP pre-installed and then installs Linux over it), that is more dollars that can be used to generate spread FUD innuendo. -- Bhaskar Ruben

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Greg Woodhouse
Now, that's whst I call a web site! --- A. Forrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Richard G. DAVIS wrote: I understand the dichotomy Gregory mentions, and I agree with the views he has expressed. I quite agree with the basic thread of what Richrd has said in this

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Gillon, Joseph
Toppenberg Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:20 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Why do you need support? I have Windows XP on my notebook. I never expect anything from Windows (except for the occasional updates

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Toppenberg Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:20 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Why do you need support? I have Windows XP on my notebook. I

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Toppenberg Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 12:20 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Why do you need support? I have Windows XP

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:56, Kevin Toppenberg wrote: LOL. My kids are 5 and 7. Already I am teaching them that the reason their computers (windows based) don't work the way they want them to is Because Bill Gates is Evil. LOL I never teach my kids to hate ;)

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Lloyd Milligan
13, 2005 12:20 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Why do you need support? I have Windows XP on my notebook. I never expect anything from Windows (except for the occasional updates that consistently remove functionality from

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Joseph . Gillon
You have to be told? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lloyd Milligan Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:11 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == What does this discussion have

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Richard G. DAVIS
, 13 Jun 2005 13:11:18 -0400 To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == What does this discussion have to do with VistA or with the specific subject of this post VistaWeb Missing Apps? Lloyd

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Jim Self
Joseph.Gillon wrote: Getting more and more interesting. So what's the state of the art these days in hierarchical/M databases? Is anyone trying to fix the problems like them being difficult to query? I am working to develop general web based query capabilities for MUMPS that can take advantage

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread David Sommers
. /David. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Woodhouse Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:56 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == The way things are going, I'm beginning to wish

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
Of Greg Woodhouse Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:56 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == The way things are going, I'm beginning to wish every message containint the word Microsoft (or any of its variations) was sent

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == The way things are going, I'm beginning to wish every message containint the word Microsoft (or any of its variations) was sent on to the moderator for approval. I know Microsoft isn't terribly popular around here, but do we

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread James Gray
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:48:43PM -0400, David Sommers wrote: People that express strong anti-Microsoft or anti-Bill always strike a nerve with me. I can understand that, as a user, a product may not work as advertised or as you intended

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread K.S. Bhaskar
I realize that individuals among us have strong feelings for and against different software vendors, products, business models and philosphies. But one of the things this community has avoided in the past is a flame war. I hope I speak for many who would like to keep it that way. Let us feel

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == The way things are going, I'm beginning to wish every message containint the word Microsoft (or any of its variations) was sent on to the moderator for approval. I know Microsoft isn't terribly popular around here, but do we need

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Ruben Safir
. That eliminates a lot of software, not just MS's. Ruben Jim - Original Message - From: Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 4:09 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Chris Richardson
for taking the time. Chris - Original Message - From: Thies, Karl Mr LND [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:10 AM Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Chris - I cannot really comment on the history of CHCS II

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Chris Richardson
] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == So, basically SUSE is it...but that's sure an improvement over what I found last time I looked -- which was nothing. I don't know a think about SUSE, the only distribution I've worked with is Red Hat. But I appreciate this link. I'll look into it. --- K.S

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == The way things are going, I'm beginning to wish every message containint the word Microsoft (or any of its variations) was sent on to the moderator for approval. I know Microsoft isn't terribly popular around

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-13 Thread GARY MONGER
already solved it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruben Safir Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 7:26 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:15:38PM -0400

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread David Sommers
Comments about failed projects based on differing technologies. Comments on speed of that vs speed of this. Comments saying this thing bites and this other thing is... Whoa - slow down... I don't hold a PHD in database design but I do know: 1) A project fails for many more reasons than

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Chris Richardson
Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 11:07 PM Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Comments about failed projects based on differing technologies. Comments on speed of that vs speed of this. Comments saying

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Gillon, Joseph
@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 5:22 PM Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yes, it will be interesting to see what can be done with Cache. We're looking into the patient screening issue I mentioned previously, for example. It's interesting, I never

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Gillon, Joseph
Safir Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:23 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yes, Oracle is expensive, perhaps prohibitively so. Is that the only game in town, I wonder? Surely there's something between SQL Server and Oracle

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Joseph Dal Molin
: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yes, Oracle is expensive, perhaps prohibitively so. Is that the only game in town, I wonder? Surely there's something between SQL Server and Oracle? You mean aside from Postgres, Mysql and others? Ruben

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Joseph . Gillon
: Sunday, June 12, 2005 4:11 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == David; The failure of CHCS II was not just one failure but a series of nearly 10 successive failures where the only criterion was that the solution could not be MUMPS

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Chris Richardson
of the money thrown at other solutions could be spent of new MUMPS development, imagine what could be done. - Original Message - From: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Gillon, Joseph
10:56 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Greg; What I was saying is that the type of study you are talking about can probably never be done because; 1) The study you are asking for costs money, (the money has to come from

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Kevin Toppenberg
. - Original Message - From: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == I agree. Most vendors don't pay much attention to the existence of MUMPS

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
It would be interesting to see a well designed study of the performance characteristics of GTM (say) and MySQL (but let's be sure it isn't an exercise in comparing apples and oranges). I would expect GTM to fare quite well in such a study. I would also expect to see some surprises. Oh,

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread James Gray
] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == However, I believe the fundamental issue is less a technical matter and more an natural 'tension' between concerns for operational effectiveness--delivery of quality health care, and the interest in administrative IT that arises from management. These two groups in most

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Ruben Safir
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 12:50:31PM -0600, James Gray wrote: Perhaps I should wait and read all of the responses before responding, but Ruben, I am sure you have missed the point that Richard Davis was making. The conflict he refers to is not between IT professionals and the end users, but a

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == 1998 Oracle vs M

2005-06-12 Thread JohnLeo Zimmer
Chris Richardson wrote: ... The Koreans did publish the results of one benchmark they did in one of the Last MUG Quarterlies. The results were astounding. Same hardware, same load, same task took the relationals 6 hours or more to complete. MUMPS took something less than one hour to

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread David Sommers
] On Behalf Of Ruben Safir Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:23 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yes, Oracle is expensive, perhaps prohibitively so. Is that the only game in town, I wonder? Surely there's something between SQL Server

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread David Sommers
:11 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == David; The failure of CHCS II was not just one failure but a series of nearly 10 successive failures where the only criterion was that the solution could not be MUMPS. I lived it. I

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread David Sommers
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == It would be interesting to see a well designed study of the performance characteristics of GTM (say) and MySQL (but let's be sure it isn't an exercise in comparing apples and oranges). I would expect GTM to fare quite well

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Ruben Safir
Well, I tend to shy away from freebies because of the support issues. This has no place in a serious discussion of issues. Support? From Microsoft? When Seimans know they have have you by the gonads and you've signed an exclusive contract with them for a healthcare system, when do you expect

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Ruben Safir
Do you compare the designed function or pure benchmarking? What's important, filling a Global/Table with 100,000 bits of data and sorting it? Or pulling up a 200 page catalog of products for 1,000 users? One seems more practical than the other. David Hello :) this is a mistake. They

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread GARY MONGER
: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Getting more and more interesting. So what's the state of the art these days in hierarchical/M databases? Is anyone trying to fix the problems like them being difficult to query? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Ruben Safir
Here's a fine example: Interoperability between VistA/M and other systems. There is never any reason to have an interoperability problem other than when a company decides it is in their best interests to obscure something. The most basic principle of Computer Sciences, as proven by the

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Ruben Safir
SQL may shine for a simple query, but you let the relationships get a little more sophisticated and the SQL statement will need to be as well. A lot of real world problems result in complex solutions, with complex data representations, relational or otherwise. It sometimes takes a skilled,

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread GARY MONGER
: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == SQL may shine for a simple query, but you let the relationships get a little more sophisticated and the SQL statement will need to be as well. A lot of real world problems result in complex solutions, with complex data representations, relational

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Ruben Safir
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:15:38PM -0400, GARY MONGER wrote: Your friends on Wall Street employ quite a few programmers, which they keep very busy, some even with M. SQL does not mean you get your data any easier or faster, That is not the purpsoe of a database. A database needs to

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Chris Richardson
to extract that meaning. Best wishes; Chris - Original Message - From: Ruben Safir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 4:26 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:15:38PM -0400

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
I was initially surprised to learn that MUMPS was being used for financial/banking applications, but when you think about it, it makes sense. The patterns of use and data organization have a lot in common with health information systems. === Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] And the end

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-12 Thread Chris Richardson
Greg; How do you think Fidelity (Sanchez and GT.m) makes their money? - Original Message - From: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 7:30 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == I

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Gillon, Joseph
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard G. DAVIS Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 12:18 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == I understand the dichotomy Gregory mentions, and I agree with the views he has expressed

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Nancy Anthracite
: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == I understand the dichotomy Gregory mentions, and I agree with the views he has expressed. However, I believe the fundamental issue is less a technical matter and more an natural 'tension' between concerns for operational effectiveness--delivery

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
Actually, I think VistA's growing pains (or death throes, depending on your point of view), really has much less to do with the underlying language and DBMS than many suppose. The trouble is that it is such an obvious difference between VistA and some other systems that we tend to focus on

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
I'm just on my way out the door right now, but while I think the relational model sometimes gets a raw deal around here, I also agree that it is not the be and end all of database technology. If you try and sit down and work through the mathematics, you'll quickly find that object models have

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Joseph . Gillon
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy Anthracite Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 3:00 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == It seem to me that you do want is an M database that is reengineered for VistA because of its speed, easier

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Chris Richardson
, June 11, 2005 5:22 PM Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yes, it will be interesting to see what can be done with Cache. We're looking into the patient screening issue I mentioned previously, for example. It's interesting, I never heard of this M/VistA being faster

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
it will take a good long time to traverse that data as a relational database. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 5:22 PM Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yes

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
, cause it will take a good long time to traverse that data as a relational database. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 5:22 PM Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yes

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Ruben Safir
Relational databases are slower and that has long been recognized, and they require a lot more work to maintain and design. Oracle is probably the gorilla in that field and is very expensive and slow. Yea, maybe you get some pretty reports from it, but not likely in real time. Not

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Ruben Safir
Yes, Oracle is expensive, perhaps prohibitively so. Is that the only game in town, I wonder? Surely there's something between SQL Server and Oracle? You mean aside from Postgres, Mysql and others? Ruben --- This SF.Net email is

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Nancy Anthracite
Actually I think the VA has plans to be able to use any number of SQL databases when they are done with this rehosting, but I doubt that any SQL database will beat the speed of M. After all, it was specifically designed for use in this setting. Relational databases are going to be better for

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-11 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
I use MySQL and am pretty happy with it. === Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers. -- Benjamin Disraeli On Jun 11, 2005, at 9:23 PM, Ruben Safir wrote: Yes, Oracle is expensive, perhaps prohibitively so. Is that the

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-10 Thread Sowinski, Richard J.
: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:45 PMTo: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Actually, the standardization work is being done VistA M-side. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-10 Thread Gregory Woodhouse
This is why I've never been very enamored of the original name of VistA, Decentralized Hospital Computer System (DHCP). It wasn't decentralized at all, but rather each DHCP system was one of a number of independent, facility level systems. An ant colony is an example of a decentralized system:

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-10 Thread Joseph Dal Molin
The significant opportunity we have outside of the VA is to avoid repeating the data problem. How can that best be done? I think Greg's option is on targetnot sure if this would be called a federated model... Joseph There is, of course, another option, one that has been explored in a

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-10 Thread Richard G. DAVIS
and play with our cool software and hardware. :-) Regards, Richard. From: Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:36:54 -0400 To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing

Re: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-10 Thread Ruben Safir
However, I believe the fundamental issue is less a technical matter and more an natural 'tension' between concerns for operational effectiveness--delivery of quality health care, and the interest in administrative IT that arises from management. These two groups in most any enterprise you

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Richard . Sowinski
] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Richard Sowinski wrote: The reason I have asked people on this list if they have VistaWeb up and running, is because I suspect they underestimate the infrastructure required under the hood, to make it, or RDV run. I also suspect, some have misconstrued what VistaWeb is. I think

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Nohlgren
. - Rich -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Self Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:55 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Richard Sowinski wrote: The reason I have asked

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Sowinski, Richard J.
on, JosephSent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:06 PMTo: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == First, I should mention that if you are a VA employee be careful what you say to this guy. He's a biased, sensationalist

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Gillon, Joseph
: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Joe, It's good to see you on Hardhats. What took you so long ? Sorry about hunt and peck analogy it's just the most apt description of what I see users doing when they use these products. It's just my bias, I think

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Cameron Schlehuber
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gillon, Joseph Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:06 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Thats an interesting problem you pose. Did you

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Cameron Schlehuber
and easy use. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gillon, Joseph Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 1:06 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Thats an interesting problem you

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Gillon, Joseph
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Regarding the nonstandard note titles and the difficulties that poses ... there have actually been some significant peer-reviewed journal articles by some VA folks on that very issue. In fact, standardization of note

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread Gordon Moreshead
:24 PM To: 'hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Yep. One of the many, very valid reasons the VA is replacing VistA, and one not mentioned, I believe, in the St. Pete Times article. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-09 Thread David Sommers
Moreshead Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 8:50 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Oh!? That is a data/terminology standardization issue and not particularly relevant to replacing Vista. This can be an issue in any system

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-08 Thread Gillon, Joseph
Re MPI, Subscription Control file, etc.: VistAWeb makes exactly the same use of the MPI as RDV. So if you have RDV working you should have not problem with VW, and conversely. I have no idea what the Subscription Contol file is, and I wrote VW, from which I conclude you dont need it.

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-08 Thread Alberto Odor Morales
Thanks for the clarification Joe. I have VistA (Cache) installed in a server and I'm accessing it from my network. I would like to prove VistaWeb in this setting, just to be able to show diferent GUIs to people who could decide to addopt Vista for the Ministry of Health in Mexico. Is this

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-08 Thread Joseph . Gillon
] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Thanks for the clarification Joe. I have VistA (Cache) installed in a server and I'm accessing it from my network. I would like to prove VistaWeb in this setting, just to be able to show diferent GUIs to people who could decide to addopt Vista for the Ministry

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-08 Thread Joseph . Gillon
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sowinski, Richard J. Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:11 PM To: 'hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == The subscription control file contains the list of sites the patient has been treated at. I suspect you

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-08 Thread Richard . Sowinski
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:06 PMTo: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == So the subscription control file is the file that is updated by the MPI? Is it the file I read

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-08 Thread Jim Self
Richard Sowinski wrote: The reason I have asked people on this list if they have VistaWeb up and running, is because I suspect they underestimate the infrastructure required under the hood, to make it, or RDV run. I also suspect, some have misconstrued what VistaWeb is. I think some of them think

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-02 Thread Sowinski, Richard J.
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alberto Odor Morales Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 6:35 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == The installation manual for VistaWeb says

RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps ==

2005-06-02 Thread Cameron Schlehuber
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sowinski, Richard J. Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 7:35 AM To: 'hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] == VistaWeb Missing Apps == Has anyone gotten VistaWeb to function outside of VA ? I haven't looked really closely

  1   2   >