user_pref(capability.policy.default.windowinternal.open, noAccess);
I have a hazy recollection that the name of the pref may have changed.
Search n.p.m.security.
Gerv
(sorry, bugzilla baffles me)
You'd be better off explaining how - bug reports here go unheeded 99% of
the time :-)
Gerv
Wrong group! This is a group for Mozilla Open source
development, which has absolutely nothing to do with
Communicator 4.7.
For that you need:
http:/ufaq.org
or
snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
He whose lust
You can even go to ftp.netscape.com, browse to the appropriate directory
and click on spellchk.xpi to install it into Mozilla. Works on Linux too. :)
-Pratik.
Colin Thefleau wrote:
Mozilla is becoming really good now, but still badly lacks a spell
checker. Maybe there will be an open
I down loaded it and it works. Someone fixed the .xpi install in the
recent nightly. My thanks, I can appear literate again.
Howie
Pratik Solanki wrote:
You can even go to ftp.netscape.com, browse to the appropriate directory
and click on spellchk.xpi to install it into Mozilla. Works on
Then it should be implemented on windows at least. Mozilla's purpose is
to serve the users' needs right? :)
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On 21 Jun 2001 07:04:19 -0700, Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse
lal_truckee wrote:
Are filters operative? I can't seem to set newsgroup filters on a win nt
box (Moz seems to only want to set filters on mail, but I don't use Moz
for mail, so I'm not sure if they work.)
On Linux (RH 7.1) I can't seem to set ANY filters.
A cursory search of buzilla
Alexander Sperduti wrote:
Do you know if the InternetShortcut object could be added to Win95 by upgrading
system dll's or adding registry keys? If I'm lucky, the whole thing may reside in a
single dll supplied in the IE installation.
Why not install IE3? It doesn't integrate itself that much
It's being worked on :)
see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775
Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse butoon and then you can
navigate up, down, right, left, etc. I am not talking about
Sol, would you be talking about this, per chance?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775 ;)
Sol Hell wrote:
Then it should be implemented on windows at least. Mozilla's purpose is
to serve the users' needs right? :)
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On 21 Jun 2001 07:04:19
Darnit! You beat me to it ;)
Ben Ruppel wrote:
It's being worked on :)
see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775
Sol Hell wrote:
Why does mozilla insist on not including middle (roll) button
navigation. I mean if you click the middle mouse butoon and then you
can
Gervase Markham wrote:
I have a hazy recollection that the name of the pref may have changed.
Search n.p.m.security.
Thanks for the tip. I've found a brand-new document on this here:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/components/configPolicy.html
HP
--
Visit http://www.hei-news.de/
David Nickel wrote:
Guten Tag!!
In the builds newsgroup and I see also on the checkins page, they
talk about static builds. Does anybody know what this is and what it does?
Thank you for your help!
David Nickel
Static build refers to a build in which some of the DLLs (or shared
Thanks.
You wrote:
Sol, would you be talking about this, per chance?
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775 ;)
Sol Hell wrote:
Then it should be implemented on windows at least. Mozilla's purpose
is to serve the users' needs right? :)
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On
nospam@nospam wrote:
two queries:
[snip]
Sorry, I can only help you with this one:
also, when I visit pages hosted by tripod, geocities,etc,
little rectangular windows pop
up with adverts in them. Is there any way to disable these
pop up windows?
Is there ever! And it works with any
When attempting to explore the threads eminating from my original
posting subject of: 'Major Featur sic Status?' posted about 10:50 am
20 June 2001 (where it shows 3 articles are present) using Moz0.9.1, I
get an 'error' message reading:
'Your search - - did not match any documents.
RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
RV wrote:
[snip]
They have equated Open Source as being insecure. I have several
people
approach me already at the college where i teach and ask me why I
am
using an Open Source web browser. They are afraid someone can
insert
code (back door) that
JTK wrote:
Static build refers to a build in which some of the DLLs (or shared
objects if you're on one of those 'alternative' OSs) are built as static
libraries and are statically linked into the program. What this does is
effectively make the library an intergral part of the program,
On 21 Jun 2001 15:14:25 -0500, JTK wrote:
Someone is going to breach confidential information and send it to
someplace else by believing MS FUD?
ENOUGH already! Geez, those that are going to get the point have already
gotten it. Those that aren't haven't. This thread no longer has
anything
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
jesus X wrote:
No, Netscape released 6.0 because they NEEDED to get a new version
out before the year ended. Their choice was rushed by their
marketing department, and had nothing to do with Mozilla.
Right there: Netscape has
JTK wrote:
RV wrote:
JTK wrote:
RV wrote:
[snip]
They have equated Open Source as being insecure. I have several
people
approach me already at the college where i teach and ask me why I
am
using an Open Source web browser. They are afraid someone can
insert
code (back door) that will
JTK wrote:
*COUGH*somethingIsuggestedmonthsago*COUGH* in the main trunk.
I think you are over selling yourself but even if you are not, I am glad
they listened to you .. even after your constant ranting about Mozilla
people, AOL politburo, the communist conspiracy of a MAJOR capitalist
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
I've noticed a new optionb on the cached prefrences panel, that seems
to be the default. Compare the page in the cache to the page on the
network Automatically. How exactly does this algorithm work?
Thanks in advance.
--
Matthew Cline| Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose that
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
I got
I have a question. I run slackware 7.1 and i have
the following problem.
Has anyone gotten RealPlayer 8
to work with the latest Mozilla release?
I have Mozilla installed under /usr/local/Mozilla
and RealPlayer 8 installed under /usr/local/Realplayer8.
I have entered the mimetypes correctly as
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
Er, IE6 is just like 5 with some tweaks. Looks like they're standing
still to me ;-)
--Blake
JTK wrote:
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Ryan Cassin wrote:
[snip]
I couldn't find a single difference between OE5 and OE6 when I last used
OE6.
I'm guessing just under the hood work has gone into OE6.
That's depressing. As far as I can tell, it doesn't need any
under-the-hood work, but could use a little body work.
--
In a posting on the Sourceforge.net site, Douglas E. Warner said he
received a letter from an attorney representing AOL, who asked him to
stop using the letters AIM to describe his phpAIM project.:
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5093108,00.html
I'd sure like to be a fly on the
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
First answer me this: Are you one of the QA geniuses that put their
stamp of approval on Netscape 6.0?
Nope. I am one of the Netscape QA people who screamed and screamed
that 6.0 was not ready to be shipped. I am not actually aware of any
members of Netscape QA
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Blake Ross wrote:
Er, IE6 is just like 5 with some tweaks. Looks like they're standing
still to me ;-)
Well, they did add various features that Mozilla had first, like, say, the
sidebar. And some more CSS1 support.
--
Ian Hickson )\
Blake Ross wrote:
Yeah, pretty much: You work on the stuff we don't want to, we'll take
it and bundle it with a bunch of stuff that's proprietary, and you get
nada. So long, sucker!
Dude, you don't know what you're talking about.
I know all too well of what I speak.
Netscape is
This doesn't completely make sense. If jsp's are completely implemented
on the server, then how do mouse over events occur. The main problem
with http://www.nikonusa.com is that the pop-up menus don't appear.
There is some java script in the web page, and maybe that is the part
that is
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:24:08 -0400, Chris Inacio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
This doesn't completely make sense. If jsp's are completely implemented
on the server, then how do mouse over events occur.
Java and Javascript are two totally separate entities. They have
it must be some configuration problem.
I use mozilla 0.9.1 Gecko/20010621 on WinME
Recently I deleted Iexplorer with IEradicate to enhance performance.
Maybe a clue?
I tried everything, changing MIME types, upgrading to new version,...
I even reinstalled IE 5.5, but no changes.
any help?
tnx
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:40:06 -0400, Chris Inacio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
I have a problem using sites that generate mouse over menus with Java
server pages. For example, http://www.nikonusa.com is not really
naviagable with mozilla on my machine.
The page does
JTK wrote:
That's not true at all; you're making broad statements without providing
any support. Contributors to Mozilla can work on whatever they want.
Perhaps an AIM-compatible IM client? Yeah, didn't think so.
http://jabberzilla.mozdev.org/ - an AIM (and ICQ, and Yahoo, and IRC,
JTK wrote:
Marc Leger wrote:
JTK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
controls inside the lines.
Get it where?
JTK wrote:
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of content YOU define with ease.
--
jesus X [
Stuart Ballard wrote:
[snip] DLLs (or SOs on unix; don't know
the Mac equivalent)
Seeds? :)
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism. ]
email [ jesusx @ who.net ]
web [ http://burntelectrons.com ] [ Updated April 29, 2001 ]
tag [ The Universe:
JTK wrote:
And by reduction, Netscape's choices have nothing to do with Mozilla.
A known-false statement.
but it's not false. Your choice to not believe it does not make it false. It
merely makes you wrong. If Netscape decided to start adding blink at the
beginning of every page so the whole
I had a similar problem when I installed NS6 and, before that, NS4.76. I
fixed this by
following Netscape Help document #19990112-3, Netscape will not pull up
my dialer or any web pages.
I can e-mail you a copy if you want me to.
Alexander Sperduti wrote:
Help!
How can I configure
JTK wrote:
David Nickel wrote:
Guten Tag!!
In the builds newsgroup and I see also on the checkins page, they
talk about static builds. Does anybody know what this is and what it does?
Thank you for your help!
David Nickel
Static build refers to a build in which some of the DLLs (or
Stuart Ballard wrote:
JTK wrote:
Static build refers to a build in which some of the DLLs (or shared
objects if you're on one of those 'alternative' OSs) are built as static
libraries and are statically linked into the program. What this does is
effectively make the library an intergral part
On 22 Jun 2001, Carlfish wrote:
On 21 Jun 2001 23:42:47 GMT, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somehow managed to type:
Individual choices may or may not have any relation to Mozilla. For
example, Netscape's choice to provide its employees with Indian food
on Wednesdays is totally
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Blake Ross wrote:
Er, IE6 is just like 5 with some tweaks. Looks like they're standing
still to me ;-)
Well, they did add various features that Mozilla had first, like, say, the
sidebar.
Huh? You mean
Huh? You mean where your Favorites are on the left side of the
screen? That's been in IE forever.
Yeah, but the Mozilla Sidebar is MUCH more than just a bookmarks pane. It is
like a secondary mini-browser, displaying a set of content YOU define with ease.
Well, it is same in IE, and I
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
JTK wrote:
snip
This better? I have to apologize, I am not nearly nerdly enough to
have known
that you needed a space after the two minuses. And I'm using a web-based
newsgroup reader, which Maozilla won't interface to to do such
wonderful
things for me.
50 matches
Mail list logo
